Anti India Propaganda

The picture of a woman caught the sight of many protestors. Unlike the brown-skinned protestors, this variant had blonde hair and white skin. Soon her identity became evident. She was Hannah Ellis-Petersen, a known anti-India propagandist who works for The Guardian.

In her book, Gunisha Kaur had described terrorist Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale as "a charismatic and influential leader of the Sikhs in the 1970s and early 1980s." She also referred to him as a 'religious leader', who was supposedly framed as an extremist and secessionist by the Indian government.

This pro-China transnational network helmed by Neville Roy Singham comprises non-profits, activist groups, think tanks, and media outlets, operating as the propaganda machinery of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Several Roy Singham-funded organisations are consistently pushing anti-India and pro-China narratives in India.

Bangladesh authorities stated, "We have not received any reliable information indicating that he has crossed the border."

COLLECTIVE is not a mere student organisation but a Marxist platform using on-campus activism and social media propaganda to stir unrest in India and undermine the country security and communal harmony. In the name of dismantling capitalism, patriarchy, caste structures, electoral politics and whatnot, this group of urban naxals is essentially targeting Hindus and the Indian state.

While it was evident that CNN published the article to berate the Republicans and champion the cause of 'anti-racism', the American news channel ironcially roped in individuals known for anti-India and anti-Hindu rhetoric.

A poster of the contentious workshop was shared on X (formerly Twitter) by columnist Harshil Mehta, which depicted a so-called 'pyramid of capitalist India.' One section of the pyramid, which read 'We fool you', had caricatures of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.

Pakistani accounts are amplifying the fake narrative that Sonam Wangchuk is somehow being victimised by the Indian government. They are deliberately misleading about the internal matter of India and characterising the decision by the Ladakh administration as a 'political move to silence voices demanding statehood.'

With renewed promises of systemic reforms, putting Awami League leaders on trial for alleged 'crimes' and conducting a nationwide free and fair election, Muhammad Yunus has been able to buy himself some additional time.

Given that the Indian government has been a vocal opponent of Khalistani activities abroad, aimed at secession of Indian State of Punjab from the Union, it could be labelled as a foreign government (under the proposed California State law) of employing 'transanational repression.'