Friday, March 5, 2021
Home Opinions Busting a few myths around Healthcare scheme launched in Budget 2018!

Busting a few myths around Healthcare scheme launched in Budget 2018!

On 1st of February 2018, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley announced a flagship Health Insurance cover, under the Ayushman Bharat initiative. Immediately following this announcement, the rumour mills started, and the misinformation brigade started churning out false narratives, stories to spread confusion around this scheme.

This article, here is a small attempt to dispel some of that confusion. I have a decade-plus experience in the hospitality and the Banking, Financial services and Insurance services industry. My last job was with a tech-healthcare startup, hence I feel I can throw some light on the common misconceptions and myths.

Myth 1:

The opposition, some media houses, vested interest groups and many confused individuals have likened this scheme to their INDIVIDUAL POLICY. They contend that similar individual premium amounts to upwards of INR 10,000/- and therefore the amount allocated in the budget is minuscule to meet the costs.

Clarification:

This could not be further from the truth. In the world of Insurance, to begin with there are two types of policy cover: those that cover the Individual and those that cover the group!

Remember the insurance scheme that made you fill the extensive application form, asking myriad questions about your smoking/drinking habits, lifestyle, medical history? This was an Individual policy. They took all that information provided by you and built a picture of your health, which they then used to determine how likely where you to claim a large sum over a given year. They then packaged this cost and charged you the individual premium.

Compare this to the Health Insurance cover provided by your employer to you!

Your employer took his entire employee count and solicited a Group Insurance cover for the company as a whole. The insurer took the age, broad socio-economic details of the entire group and did a premium calculation. The employer then negotiated on the terms and premium and paid the lump sum which incidentally was way cheaper than what all the employee would have to pay for an individual policy. Why you ask? Simply because the Individual policy did not give the breather of risk diversification to the Insurance company whereas the Group Policy did. As a thumb rule the larger the group, the more diversified the risk and the lesser the premium (closer to population mean).

Further, the Government is not expected to reach the entire target population in the first year itself. Thus the outlay in the first year would be considerably lower than a regular year.

Myth 2:

Rs 5 Lakhs per family will be a huge burden on the exchequer. Compared to this the budget allocation of Rs 10,000 crore is way inadequate.

Clarification:

The Rs 5 Lakh amount is the pooled Health Insurance cover available to a family. Under this cover, a family can use a maximum of Rs 5 lakhs for hospitalization and related expenditure without spending a penny. They can use it to treat one member or multiple members over a one-year period, depending on their needs. What it eventually means is that a poor family has a Rs 5-lakh worth safety net available in case of any serious/terminal illness. In most cases, however, a much smaller amount will be used for multiple family members, for managing smaller expenditures such as tuberculosis, malaria, dengue-related hospitalization. Eventually, it might even end up being used for pregnancy-related complications, more than anything else, if the treatment is covered by the scheme.

Myth 3:

This is a robin-hood policy. The government is taking from the rich and giving it to the poor. It’s misplaced socialism!

Clarification:

To begin with, the workings of group underwriting makes the policy premium quite substantially lower. Why would the government need to inconvenience the middle class when it clearly can manage it from the given revenues?

In an article published in October 2014, The World Bank President argued that a Universal Health Coverage protects the poor, the near poor from catastrophic economic costs related to health expenditure, which impoverish over 100 million people a year!

The most vulnerable sections of society rarely have a fund available to them for medical emergencies. They are often forced to take out impromptu extreme steps like loans at exorbitant interests or even begging on the street & committing suicide! Over a period of time, such imbalances only foster discontent, resentment, high crime rates and even bigger backlash!

In our context for the first time since our independence, we have a unique situation when our tax money will be sincerely used to emancipate and improve the lives of a large section of our fellow countrymen. Are we going to be churlish about it?

Myth 4:

The next obvious question raised by sceptics is why to spend so much on healthcare and not hospitals.

Clarification:

Through the multiple post-budget interviews, the finance minister has clarified that there will be at least 24 new medical-college-hospitals built across the country. If one were to take the classic top-down approach then this healthcare scheme will eventually drive healthcare industry and lead to way more hospitals being built.

The simple fact is: Running a health insurance scheme and developing medical care in a country, are not mutually exclusive activities.

Myth 5:

Won’t private hospitals fleece the poor?

Clarification:

On the contrary, the introduction of a health insurance company is a deterrent to over-charging. Hospitals receive their payments from Health Insurance companies. The bills are thoroughly checked against overcharging. To begin with, Insurance companies, have teams who whet and em-panel credible hospitals. This empanelled hospital list is circulated to all customers. Chronic over-chargers are frequently blacklisted and rarely make the cut.

Myth 6:

The Insurance scheme will collapse after every family claims Rs 5 lakhs in the first year!

Clarification:

It’s not a reimbursement program. Money is paid by Insurance companies against bills raised on actual admittance to a hospital. There is no upfront payment for a life insurance scheme. So, unless the suggestion is that the poor love being admitted to hospitals, one doesn’t see much incentive to the family for falling sick.

In addition, over time, the expected claim and actual claims will converge and provide more accurate and possibly even lower premiums.

Myth 7:

Insurance companies will make money!

Clarification:

And Thank God for that. Let’s hope they make money and even some profit, which they will use to open more branches, employ more people. Let’s hope that this, in turn, leads to opening up of the healthcare sector, of a revolution in it. Let’s hope it adds to the government tax revenues, some of which will end up being used to increase the healthcare and build more hospitals, roads etc!

Let’s hope eventually that it will become a self-sustaining cycle of ever-better healthcare!

By

The Angry Indian (Swati)

Disclaimer: The article is based on author’s work experience, listing out the possibilities and processes. It does not claim that the government mandated scheme will be exactly similar to the points mentioned above.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

theangryindian
A jack of all trades, I love art, writing, food, travel, finance, animals. Have a canvas or two, a manuscript or two and a website on the anvil at all times. Besides this I have  around 12 years of work experience in Corp Sales across, Hospitality, BFSI & Tech. My last job was with a start-up. Currently I am in between jobs, adjusting to a new continent  with my husband and my cat Gangu in tow!

Related Articles

Trending now

‘Freedom House’ downgrades India from ‘free’ to ‘partly free’: Read how it is wholly funded by the US govt and has ties to George...

Freedom House downgraded India based on facts they did not find convenient and a fallacious narrative woven by left and Islamists

Crores of undisclosed income, unexplained cash receipts and more: IT Dept discovery so far in raids against Anurag Kashyap, Taapsee Pannu

Income Tax department (IT dept) conducted raid on properties linked to filmmaker Anurag Kashyap, actress Taapsee Pannu and others

China has the ability to seriously challenge the stable and open international system: The US Secretary of State

Tony Blinken said that in order to win the global economy, the US needed to push back unfair trade practices of China

‘I am 25 and never had sex’: LGBT activist, accused of raping another woman, had said on stage that she is incapable of having...

Earlier this week, a yoga trainer took to Instagram to accuse Dureja of raping her under pretext of performing Shamanic rituals.

Jharkhand: Five members of a family, including a five-year-old child axed to death by villagers over ‘black magic’ suspicions

Five members of a family killed by villagers after a priest said that their witchcraft is responsible for deaths and diseases in the villages

Trolls use fake, photoshopped images to attack Kangana Ranaut for pictures of a fruit smoothie

Kangana Ranaut faced troll attack after sharing a photo of a smoothie she had made. Trolls claimed that she had copied food image from the internet.

Recently Popular

PM Modi and his mother abused live on air by a caller on a BBC radio show on Sikhs in the UK

BBC edited the program and the host offered apology after caller abused PM Modi and his mother during a live radio show

“Are you so creatively bankrupt”? Director of ‘Yeh Ballet’ slams Deepika Padukone starrer new Levi’s ad for plagiarising design ideas

Sooni Taraporevala said that the 'copycat culture' in India needs to be called out and cancelled after the set used in new Deepika Padukone starrer Levi's ad was plagiarised by the makers.

Her husband used to talk vulgar to girlfriend in front of her: Here is what the lawyer of Ayesha, who jumped into Sabarmati river,...

Ayesha, who committed suicide by jumping into the Sabarmati River in Gujarat on March 1, had a disquiet marital life

Crores of undisclosed income, unexplained cash receipts and more: IT Dept discovery so far in raids against Anurag Kashyap, Taapsee Pannu

Income Tax department (IT dept) conducted raid on properties linked to filmmaker Anurag Kashyap, actress Taapsee Pannu and others

‘Inserted her hand claiming she was planting a tree’: LGBT activist Divya Dureja accused of sexual assault under pretext of shamanic ritual

A popular LGBT activist Divya Dureja has been accused of sexual assault by Elodie Gendron under pretext of a Shamanic ritual.

Icchadhari protestor Yogendra Yadav finally admits that farmers’ protest is political and is about defeating PM Modi: Read how

Four months after the farmers protest began, Yogendra Yadav has finally admitted that the protests are indeed political
- Advertisement -

 

Connect with us

253,205FansLike
522,035FollowersFollow
23,800SubscribersSubscribe