Sunday, July 13, 2025
HomeNews ReportsSupreme Court Bench set to hear PIL demanding abolition of Article 35A

Supreme Court Bench set to hear PIL demanding abolition of Article 35A

The Supreme Court will rehear the Public Interest Litigation regarding the 35A clause which empowers the state of Jammu & Kashmir state legislature to define “Permanent Residence” of the state and grants them special rights, on August 16. This has been a topic of debate for quite some time in India with a section stating such provisions alienates the state from the rest of India and others stating it’s in line with the instrument of Accession.

There were four petitions demanding a scrap of 35A in Jammu & Kashmir listed before the bench. The main petition was filed by a Delhi based NGO, ‘We The Citizens’ in 2014. Later three more were filed but they were clubbed together with the main one.

The bench comprises of three judges. The bench is headed by The Chief Justice of India (CJI).

35A of the constitution deals with the rights enjoyed by a resident of the Jammu & Kashmir state, it empowers the state legislature to decide who can or cannot be a permanent resident of the state. People who are not a Permanent resident of the state are eligible for –

  • No person who is not a Permanent Resident of Jammu and Kashmir can own property in Jammu and Kashmir.
  • No person who is not a Permanent Resident of Jammu and Kashmir can obtain a job within Jammu and Kashmir Government.
  • No person who is not a Permanent Resident of Jammu and Kashmir can join any professional college run by the government of Jammu and Kashmir or get any form of government aid out of government funds.

A controversy was first triggered when Charu Wali Khanna, a lawyer and former member of the National Commission for women field a plea challenging the 35A of the constitution and Section 6 of the Jammu & Kashmir constitution which deals with “permanent residence” of the state.

The issue is a very hot topic of Debate both within the state and outside the state. The main regional parties like People’s Democratic Party, National Conference are of the opinion that any change in the status quo regarding 35A would bring serious repercussions. On the other hand, The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which leads the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) in the centre has always opposed any special provisions regarding Jammu & Kashmir.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Related Articles

Trending now

ULFA-I says funeral of its top commander killed in earlier drone strike in Myanmar hit by Indian missile, two leaders killed and many injured,...

After saying that its camps in Myanmar were attacked by Indian forces earlier today, ULFA-I (United Liberation Front of Asom- Independent) later said that the funeral of its commander killed in the attack was also hit by missiles shot by Indian planes

Who is Ujjwal Nikam, the new Rajya Sabha MP who secured conviction of 26/11 terrorist Ajmal Kasab as special public prosecutor

On Sunday, 13th July, President Droupadi Murmu nominated Ujjwal Nikam, the the renowned special public prosecutor in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks case, to the Rajya Sabha. Nikam, joins the Upper House alongside former Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla, historian Dr. Meenakshi Jain, and Kerala social worker C. Sadanandan Master, filling vacancies created by retiring members.
- Advertisement -