Media speculation about CVC report on CBI Director Alok Verma turn out to be wrong

Supreme observed that some charges against Alok Verma in the CVC are 'not at all complimentary'

The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) submitted its report on the alleged wrongdoing by CBI chief Alok Verma at the Supreme Court today. This was a confidential report given in a sealed cover. But, ahead of this, some media houses and journalists had claimed to have access to the confidential report, and had claimed that the CVC found no evidence of corruption by Verma.

The CEO of NDTV had tweeted this, quoting her colleague:

NDTV even ran a story based on source, saying CVC found no proof that Alok Verma took a bribe. NDTV had concluded that Verma has been cleared of the ‘main allegation’ bribe-taking, but found proof of ‘administrative lapses’ by him.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

Another journalist from Hindu had claimed that CVC would file a report which would keep Verma under doubt, but retired SC judge Ashok Patnaik didn’t allow that. Patnaik was appointed as a supervisor for the CVC probe by the apex court.

But what actually happened in the court is totally contrary to those advance predictions. After seeing the report, Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said that “the report can be categorised in four points- on some charges, it is very complimentary, on some, not so complimentary, on some, it is not at all complimentary, and on others, further investigation is required”.

In other words, on some allegations, Verma has been given clean chit by CVC. But there are other allegations which are not clear but there are doubts, some go totally against Verma, and some needs more probe. This means that CVC has found conclusive evidence on some of the alleged wrongdoings by Verma, which are not all complimentary.

Even if CVC has found nothing against Verma in some allegations, if there is even one serious allegation that is found to be true by CVC and accepted by the Supreme Court, that would a setback for him and his supporters in media and political parties.

Moreover, the allegations of Verma taking bribe was made by Rakesh Asthana, CVC had never said that is the main allegation against Verma as NDTV claims. CVC had found that Verma had taken action against Asthana without obtaining prior sanction from competent authorities as per law. Moreover, the case against Asthana was filed under section 13 (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which was removed in July through an amendment to the act. CVC also said that despite sending repeated reminders for over 10 months, Verma did not submit any evidence to prove his allegations against Asthana. These things may be mere ‘administrative lapses’ for NDTV, but Supreme Court may think otherwise.

The court also reprimanded Dushyant Dave, advocate for NGO Common Cause which is also a petitioner in the case. In the last hearing, Dave had submitted that acting CBI chief Nageshwar Rao was making certain decisions which violate Supreme Court’s order. In its October 26 order, the apex court had said that the acting chief can’t take any major policy decision. But the petitioners failed to submit any detail of policy decision taken by Rao.

When the chief justice asked whether the court should presume that no such decisions were taken at all by Rao, Dave said that such decisions are not available to him. Instead of providing proof of violation of SC order by Rao, Dave requested the court to issue an order to place the decisions taken by CBI acting chief to the court.

The chief justice refused to entertain this request, saying if there is no evidence of any wrongdoing, there is no need to ask for further information from CBI.

The court handed over a copy of the report to Alok Verma in sealed cover, and asked him to file a response to the report by November 19. The CJI said that after the response is received from Verma, the court will take a decision on the matter.

The court said it is not calling for any response from the government of India or any other party, only Alok Verma is required to file his response. Court will take the matter next on 20 November 2018.

Share and Support:
Support OpIndia by paying for content

Most read articles recently

Here is why BJP lost elections, and of course, it was deliberate

What BJP supporters need to realise is this - no political party ever wants to lose and least of all, a party led by the two most politically aggressive politicians the country has ever seen.
Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Telangana, Mizoram assembly election results

Latest updates and breaking news on counting day: EC declares 3 wins in Madhya Pradesh, all 3 go to BJP

Latest news and updates from 2018 assembly election results of Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Telangana, and Mizoram.

Prashant Bhushan and left-liberal cabal was actively helping Vijay Mallya in UK court by attacking CBI special director Rakesh Asthana

Vijay Mallya's defence team was using Indian left-liberals' allegations agaist Rakesh Asthana in London court

Can the BJP satisfy its online supporters? If only it were Congress

BJP supporters online, also known as the ‘right wing’, are first to attack the party and write it off after electoral setbacks.

Has PM Modi sounded the start of slog overs with the new RBI Governor’s appointment

Shaktikanta Das, who is currently a member of The Finance Commission and Former Finance Secretary (the one who presided over Demonetisation), has been appointed as the new RBI Governor by the Modi government

Supreme Court says mosque located in the Allahabad Court complex not to be removed now, orders to maintain status quo

The Allahabad High Court has been facing a crunch of space so much so that twelve judges have been sharing six chambers.

The early trends might change, but both Congress and BJP have something to go back to the drawing board with

5 states deliver their verdict today, on 11th December 2018. A hard fought battle in Chattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Mizoram and Telangana culminates with early trends showing Congress inching forward to the majority mark.

Fact check: Did BJP President Amit Shah and PM Modi call Baniyas cheaters and accuse them of profiteering?

Earlier, Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani had also been accused of making a casteist remark, which turned out to be a Photoshopped image

After stopping BJP’s rath yatra, West Bengal government allows Hindu-hater Bangladeshi Maulana to address meetings in the state

BJP's rath yatra banned, Bangladeshi Islamic preacher welcomed in West Bengal

Latest articles

Connect with us

125,526FansLike
97,353FollowersFollow
6,057SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these