Friday, August 7, 2020
Home Editor's picks Rahul Gandhi finally declares in his affidavit the Unitech properties OpIndia reported about, but...

Rahul Gandhi finally declares in his affidavit the Unitech properties OpIndia reported about, but why was it missing in his last one?

The same properties, B007 and B008 which were purchased by Rahul Gandhi in October 2010, have re-appeared in the 2019 election affidavit that Rahul Gandhi has filed now, in Wayanad.

Congress President Rahul Gandhi on Thursday filed his nomination from Wayanad, Kerala while his sister looked on and urged Wayanad to ‘take care of her brother’. Rahul had chosen to contest from Wayanad in addition to Amethi as a ‘safe option’ considering Amethi, the Gandhi bastion, might just fall to the fiesty BJP candidate and Union Minister Smriti Irani who has been working in the constituency tirelessly despite her loss in 2014.

However, this ‘safe seat’ might throw up some new questions for Rahul Gandhi that would probably be difficult to answer. His election affidavit, which was filed by Rahul Gandhi to seal his candidature has thrown up serious questions about properties that OpIndia reported about earlier.

In his 2019 election affidavit, Rahul Gandhi lists purchase of two properties in Signature Towers II which is owned by Unitech. According to the election affidavit, Rahul Gandhi has declared that he purchased two properties in Signature Tower II, office spaces B-007 and B-008. The Affidavit says that that office space B007 was purchased for Rs. 1.65 crores and B008 was purchased for Rs. 6.27 crores.

Interestingly, the affidavit says that the properties were purchased on 1st December 2014.

Rahul Gandhi’s election affidavit 2019

Earlier, OpIndia had reported how Rahul Gandhi had purchased the same two properties in 2010. In October 2010, after the Supreme Court asked the Congress to reply to a notice regarding 2G and just weeks before the CAG report on 2G was tabled in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi had signed a deal with Unitech to buy two office units in this Unitech’s ‘Signature Tower 2’ in Gurgaon. Rahul Gandhi had paid Rs 1.44 crore and Rs 5.36 crore for B-007 & B-008 in this plush tower. The balance payment was meant to be paid upon possession of the properties.

Read also: Rahul Gandhi’s lucrative and seemingly clandestine means of income and his links to scam accused FTIL, Unitech

After whistleblowers spoke to OpIndia, Republic TV had also released the documents where Rahul Gandhi had signed the purchase papers.

Source: Republic TV

The same properties, B007 and B008 which were purchased by Rahul Gandhi in October 2010, have re-appeared in the 2019 election affidavit that Rahul Gandhi has filed now, in Wayanad.

Interestingly, as we reported earlier, in Rahul Gandhi’s 2014 election affidavit, these two properties were not listed by Rahul Gandhi.

In 2014, after the properties were purchased in October 2010, Rahul Gandhi in his election affidavit had only listed the farmhouse he owns jointly with his sister Priyanka Gandhi Vadra.

Rahul Gandhi’s 2014 Lok Sabha election affidavit

Unitech is infamous for its involvement in the 2G scam. In early 2008, Unitech Wireless, a subsidiary of Unitech, was granted a pan-India telecom license by the government for Rs. 1,658 crore under the infamous first-come, first-serve policy. Subsequently, it sold 67% of its shares to Telenor of Norway for Rs 6,120 crore. This placed the value of the company at Rs. 9,100 crores. The stake sale happened when the company had no other asset, therefore, it was only fair to assume that it was the value of the license it held.

Then, the CAG report blew the lid off the scam. It said that the inexpensive spectrum sale caused a loss of Rs. 1.76 lakh crore to the government exchequer while benefiting private entities like Unitech. It was further alleged that rules and guidelines were violated in the process which suggested a collusion between those who got the licenses and those who received it.

In our previous expose, we had written:

The timeline of the entire series of events is also interesting. In October 2009, the CBI registered a case into the alleged irregularities in the allocation of 2G spectrum. On October 8, 2010, the Supreme Court sought the then UPA government’s response to the Comptroller and Auditor General’s or CAG report on the alleged scam. In October, the same year, Rahul Gandhi purchased two commercial properties at Gurugram’s Signatures Towers-II owned by Unitech. Needless to say, this property doesn’t find a mention in his 2014 affidavit. Intriguingly, several of such deals struck with dubious, scam-ridden individuals is strategically struck to avoid the hint of it appearing in his election affidavits which is for public consumption.

Our assumption at that time was that perhaps the properties did not appear in the 2014 election affidavit because between 2010 and 2014, the properties may have been sold by Rahul Gandhi.

However, with the emergence of these properties in Rahul Gandhi’s 2019 affidavit, there are some pertinent questions that Rahul Gandhi must answer the most important one being, why the properties did not find a mention in his 2014 affidavit.

There are only two possible scenarios that would explain the inexplicable absence of these properties in his 2014 election affidavit.

Scenario 1:

The first scenario that would explain the absence of the Signature Tower properties being absent from his 2014 election affidavit is if Rahul Gandhi, after purchasing these properties in 2010 October had subsequently sold these two properties before filing his 2014 election affidavit and then repurchased it on 1st December 2014 as his 2019 affidavit now claims.

This is, of course, a far more unlikely scenario because selling a property just to purchase it later at an inflated price would make little to no business sense. In 2010, Rahul Gandhi had paid Rs 1.44 crore and Rs 5.36 crore for B-007 and B-008 in this plush tower. In his 2019 election affidavit, Rahul Gandhi says that that in 2014 office space B007 was purchased for Rs. 1.65 crores and B008 was purchased for Rs. 7.93 crores.

The price in 2010 for which there are signed agreements and the price listen in his 2019 affidavit have a substantial difference. The cost of the property in which Rahul Gandhi claims he purchased the property in 2014 is much higher than the cost that he signed up for in 2010.

Thus, it would make no sense to assert that Rahul Gandhi purchased these properties from Unitech in October 2010, then sold his properties before filing his 2014 election affidavit, and then proceeded to repurchase the same properties in December 2014 at a much-inflated price that now appears in his 2019 election affidavit.

It is also possible that the payment made for these properties were reflected as ‘advance for purchase of property’. In the 2014 affidavit, there is a Rs. 6.89 crore advance that has been divulged by Rahul Gandhi. But if the payment was made for the properties, it begs the question why Rahul Gandhi added it as an advance and not an asset where he mentions specific properties as he does for his farmhouse that he co-owns with his sister Priyanka Gandhi. Was there an effort to hide the asset considering in 2019, it is declared that the purchase was made in December 2014?

Scenario 2

The second and more likely scenario is that Rahul Gandhi did not disclose all assets in the 2014 election affidavit.

If the property was purchased in 2010, regardless of whether the entire amount was paid at the time or not, the properties should have been listed in his 2014 affidavit. That it was not, and it wouldn’t make sense for him to sell his property and months later, purchase his properties in December 2014, raises suspicion that Rahul Gandhi was not being truthful in his 2014 affidavit. Also, for it to be listed as an advance for purchase of property raises suspicion that Rahul Gandhi wanted to hide the fact that he has indeed purchased the property from 2G scam accused Unitech.

The reason of lying, if he did, would perhaps be that he was well aware that the properties were being purchased from Unitech, who were accused in the 2G scam which was perpetrated and was being investigated by his own Congress government and wanted to hide this misadventure from the public eye.

If he lied then, he is lying now too

If we assume that scenario 2 is more likely and that Rahul Gandhi perhaps lied in his 2014 election affidavit, it stands to reason that Rahul Gandhi is lying in his 2019 affidavit as well.

If we accept that Rahul Gandhi lied in his 2014 election affidavit and he did indeed purchase the 2 Unitech properties in October 2010 and failed to add it in his 2014 affidavit, then, his declaration in his 2019 election affidavit that these properties were purchased in December 2014 is also not true.

Lying or misrepresenting facts in an election affidavit is a serious offence that can get the candidate disqualified.

With these damning facts coming to the fore, one can only hope that a full and thorough inquiry is launched by the Election Commission of India into the discrepancies in the 2019 and 2014 election affidavits of Rahul Gandhi.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Nupur J Sharma
Editor, OpIndia.com since October 2017

Related Articles

Trending now

Muslims chose to stay back in India: An analysis of the mythical, unsubstantiated trope that is used to make Hindus feel guilty

Muslims who stayed back in India after the partition, did not primarily do so out of their innate love for mother India

Soil from ancient Sharda Peeth in PoK was also used in Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan: Read how VHP and some dedicated devotees managed that

This Sharada Peeth is significantly important for Hindus because it is said to be one among the 18 Maha Shakti Peethas.

Assam: Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan celebration by Bajrang Dal attacked by Muslim locals, curfew imposed

The Muslim locals allegedly objected to the Bajrang Dal members chanting slogans and playing music. The arguments soon led to a violent clash.

Ram Janmabhoomi movement: Three sacrifices that can never be forgotten

Five hundred years of struggle went into Ram Janmabhoomi moment. There would be so many heroes that it is impossible to remember them all.

From being bigoted, kids are ‘hope of secularism’. The Wire’s Rohini Singh explains how

The Wire journalist Rohini Singh on Wednesday took to Twitter to share an image wherein she claimed that her child drew a mosque and a temple side by side and wrote an essay on tolerance.

Hindu cricketer Danish Kaneria deletes tweet about Ram Mandir billboard in NYC after Pakistani Islamists flood his TL. Here is what happened

The former Pakistani cricketer had shared an image featuring Ram Mandir's digital image in a giant billboard at New York's Times Square before deleting it.

Recently Popular

Twitter user arrested by Maharashtra police for criticising the Uddhav Thackeray govt on social media

Mumbai Police arrested Twitter user Sunaina Holey for posting against Maharashtra CM and his son, to be presented in court today

Here is why #BabyPenguin is trending on Twitter, and why Aaditya Thackeray is called so by some

Yuva Sena registered complaint against twitter user for calling Aaditya Thackeray "Baby Penguin" and Uddhav Thackeray "Aurangzeb"

While most Bollywood actors and cricketers chose not to welcome Ram Mandir, here are the ones who did not shy away

Only a few actors and sportspersons celebrated Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan and shared wishes on social media.

TV actor Sameer Sharma found hanging from the kitchen ceiling, case of accidental death registered

After body of Sameer Sharma was recovered from his house, a case of accidental death has been registered by the Malad police

Muslims chose to stay back in India: An analysis of the mythical, unsubstantiated trope that is used to make Hindus feel guilty

Muslims who stayed back in India after the partition, did not primarily do so out of their innate love for mother India

Maulana from All India Imam Association threatens that ‘believers of justice’ will demolish Ram Mandir and rebuild disputed structure

Maulana Rashidi stated that the Ram Mandir will one day be demolished and a disputed structure will be rebuilt.

Pakistan borrows $1 Billion from its all-weather ally China to repay $1 Billion Saudi Arabia loan to avoid default on international debt obligations

China tightens its grip over Pakistan, gives $1 billion loan to repay Saudi Arabia's $1 billion loan, grants 90% of $6.8 billion railway project

CBI registers case against Rhea Chakraborty, her family and aides in Sushant Singh Rajput death case

CBI files case against Rhea Chakraborty, her father, mother, brother and 2 others in Sushant Singh Rajput's death case

‘As a CM I have no problem with any religion, but as a yogi, I will not go for a Mosque’s ground-breaking ceremony’: Yogi...

When asked whether he will attend ground-breaking ceremony for the mosque at Ayodhya, Yogi Adityanath said that he will not be invited

Complaint filed against Maulana Sajid Rashid for inciting Muslims to demolish Ram Mandir at Ayodhya

President of the All India Imam Association Sajid Rashidi had said that a mosque will be rebuilt after demolishing the Ram Mandir

15th EU-India Summit: Promising an opportunity for India in the post-COVID world

The 15th EU-India Summit was held in the virtual space, which can be called the Covid-19 era normal. Before the pandemic made its presence felt, this Summit was planned to be held in March in Brussels.

Dalit organisation lodges a complaint with MHA seeking an FIR against AIMPLB for intimidating and hurting the faith of Hindu Dalits

AIMPLB had issued a menacing threat yesterday hinting at converting the Ram temple back into a mosque

CBI starts the process of registering a case in Sushant Singh Rajput’s death case, forms SIT for the probe

CBI to probe Sushant Singh Rajput's death after the center issued the letter to CBI on Bihar Police’s request on 5th August

Is being a Hindu acceptable but having faith in Hindutva ‘dangerous’? Quite the contrary

Is being a Hindu acceptable while faith in Hindutva is not? Is it even dangerous? Many Hindus seem wary to be associated with Hindutva

Mumbai faces massive flooding and destruction due to heavy rain, rainfall in one day exceeds the season’s average

Mumbai received 2,319.7 mm rain on Wednesday, which is more than the seasonal average of 2,206.4 mm, causes heavy flooding

Muslims chose to stay back in India: An analysis of the mythical, unsubstantiated trope that is used to make Hindus feel guilty

Muslims who stayed back in India after the partition, did not primarily do so out of their innate love for mother India

Connect with us

239,250FansLike
423,294FollowersFollow
291,000SubscribersSubscribe