Tuesday, March 25, 2025
HomeNews ReportsChild rapists convicted under POCSO should not have the right to file mercy petitions:...

Child rapists convicted under POCSO should not have the right to file mercy petitions: President Ram Nath Kovind

It is pertinent to note that the President made these statements when the mercy petition filed by one of the convicts in Nirbhaya 2012 is still pending with him.

As Country grapples with a spate of rape incidents, the President has taken a tough stand against rape convicts booked under POCSO Act. The Indian President Ram Nath Kovind said that there should be no provision of filing a mercy petition for child rapists.

Speaking at an event in Sirohi, Rajasthan, Kovind said, “Women safety is a serious issue. Rape convicts under POCSO act should not have the right to file mercy petition. Parliament should review mercy petitions.”


It is pertinent to note that the President made these statements when the mercy petition filed by one of the convicts in Nirbhaya 2012 is still pending with him.

Kovind’s assertions also come at a time when the encounter in Hyderabad culminated into deaths of 4 accused in the gruesome gang rape and murder of a 27-year-old veterinary doctor Preeti Reddy (name changed).

As per the media statement given by Shamshabad DCP Prakash Reddy, a police team had taken the four accused to the very spot of the crime early today morning between 3 to 6 am. The accused had snatched some weapons from policemen and tried to escape. They were killed by retaliatory fire in self-defence by the police. Two policemen have also reportedly suffered injuries in the encounter.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

In India, judges appoint themselves, investigate themselves and refuse all attempts at accountability: How reforms have been blocked over the years

The executive's attempts to introduce judicial reforms and increase accountability of judges have yielded no results. When an inquiry is commenced, it is carried out by other judges based on a framework they have set up, resulting in lingering uncertainties and a severe lack of desired impartiality and transparency. This privilege is not extended to anyone else. The judiciary requires and enforces standards of transparency and integrity from everyone except itself.

Surat POCSO court sentences Ashad Altaf to 20 years in prison for raping minor Hindu girl: Breaking down victim statement and court judgement

In the judgment, the court noted that the defence tried to discredit the statement given by the victim’s mother in front of the magistrate, stating that it was different from what she had told the police in her complaint that led to the FIR. The court invoked the principle that “an FIR is not an encyclopaedia.”
- Advertisement -