Thursday, August 6, 2020
Home Political History of India The dictatorial history of the Congress party began right after Indian independence under Nehru,...

The dictatorial history of the Congress party began right after Indian independence under Nehru, Arnab Goswami is only the latest victim

“For the saddest epitaph which can be carved in the memory of a vanished liberty is that it was lost because its possessors failed to stretch forth a saving hand while yet there was a time.”

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed- if all records told the same tale- then the lie passed into history and became truth. ‘Who controls the past’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past” 1984, George Orwell

Public memory is short. The way the Left and the Congress came together in late Seventies in the aftermath of Emergency, splitting the political and the intellectual spaces between the two of them, made this possible. This allowed the lies to propagate and propaganda to continue, even after the Party lost power owing to massive corruption charges and a pronounced alienation from the people at large. Hitler hired one propagandist to carry on twisting the history. Congress hired the entire Leftist muscle of the mind to create a fake history with Nehru sitting on the top of it as a paragon of virtue, defender of democracy and a fake-God of Free-thought. The dictatorial streak of Nehru had started before independence when the Congress declared itself to be sole spokesperson of the Indian people, suppressing any other voice. The biggest cruelty of the Congress is not only the Authoritarianism it brought in to Indian democracy, rather the fact that it continued to whitewash it. This whitewashing allowed it to remain oblivious to its own wrong-doings and still pose as the great liberator of free thought in India, even with its baggage of Emergency by Indira, Press Act of Nehru, Postal Bill of Rajiv Gandhi and draconian Article 66A to control the internet under Sonia Gandhi.

The chain of dictatorial tendencies continued unabated in their small ways, wherever they came to power, on state-level, through cynically cobbled-coalitions. In MP and Maharashtra, College Principle and Professors were arrested for taking a political line which the Government did not like. There was no hesitation, never a second thought. Still riding on the Nehru’s image carefully crafted by the sycophantic brigade as a benevolent democrat, Congress continued to attack the current Narendra Modi government, without any concrete evidence to back their charges. Today when a well-known media personality, Arnab Goswami is hounded by the Police in a state ruled by the Congress under coalition, at a time when it is failing miserably in controlling COVID-19, when it is stuck in serious charges of incompetence on account of Palghar Lynching, on the charges of release of Curfew passes to supposedly untraceable Wadhawan brothers to go for a Picnic during the lockdown; it is pertinent for us to trace the steps back to where it all began.

It is always important to start from the beginning. As we all know, Nehru was selected the leader of Congress, positioned to be the President of Congress at the time when Independence of India was around the corner. This placed Nehru in the right place to be the first Prime Minister of India and the head of caretaker Government. Unfortunately, it seems that the fact Nehru was a selected leader, at least at the time of independence, not an elected one, in contrast to Sardar Patel who held the Party and the people with him, played on the mind of Nehru. It is also possible Nehru was being honest in an alleged self-portrait he is said to have written anonymously in the Modern Review before 1947, when he wrote about himself that, “he has all the makings of a dictator in him—a vast popularity, a strong will directed to a well-defined purpose, energy, pride, organizational capacity, ability, hardness, and, with all his love of the crowd, an intolerance of others and a certain contempt for the weak and the inefficient.”

The dictator Shri Jawaharlal Nehru mentions here was let loose, within three years of Independence and one year of India becoming a Republic with a democratic Constitution. The Constitution, labored over by leading luminaries from different ideologies over one year was created with the solemn ‘resolve to place before the world a model of Constitution which will ensure to everyone Freedom of action, Freedom of thought, Freedom of belief and Freedom of Worship.’ The Constitution came into effect on 26th of January, 1950. Soon after that, Pandit Nehru put on his heavy boot and started marching towards crushing the very fundamentals which he spoke of eloquently at the time the Constituent Assembly began writing the Constitution.

The first Congress Government already had around 28 Communists in prison when the Constitution came into effect, under Bombay Public Security Act. A petition was moved immediately and on 8th of February, 1950, the Bombay High Court released the 28 Communists. Nehru was shocked to be suddenly deprived of the cruel claws of the colonial British laws which became defunct under the Indian constitution. An inflamed Nehru immediately wrote that the Communists ‘constituted a danger to the existence and security of the state which cannot deal with them under the provisions of ordinary laws.’ Enthused by the release of their Comrades in Mumbai and sick of torture and eventual killing of two of the communists in Salem Prison on 11th of February, 1950, 200 Communists held in Salem Prison began protest and went on Hunger Strike. This resulted in a scuffle between the Prison Authorities and the Prisoners. What happened next is shocking. On 12th of February, 1950, 200 Communists were locked in a hall and the Police opened fire. 22 died and around 107 were grievously injured. Who thought a Jalianwalla Bagh will be brought in by the Congress Government in free India within days of implementing a democratic Constitution? Later this too would be wiped off from public memories much like the 2011 midnight attack of Delhi Police under Sonia Gandhi led Congress on protesting citizens in Ramlila Maidan.

Romesh Thapar, a Communist from well-heeled family running a Leftist magazine Crossroad took this up. He wrote- ‘One more proof that the Congress rulers are afraid of the truth. Their ways are the ways of Hitler and Mussolini.’ Crossroad was banned by the Nehru Government. Romesh Thapar approached the Bombay High Court. Around that time the Hindu Right began to question the Partition. Mahant Digvijaynath of Gorakhpur and then President of the Hindu Mahasabha demanded the annulment of Partition and reunification of India and Pakistan. The RSS mouthpiece attacked Nehru government on Nehru-Liaquat Pact and on its stance on Enemy Properties. Shri KR Malkani was the Editor of Organiser (Later first man to be arrested during Emergency brought in by Nehru’s daughter, Indira). Pre-censorship was imposed on The Organiser. On 13th March, 1950, Malkani wrote- ‘Surely the Government does not hope to extinguish a volcano by squatting more tightly on the crater.’ On 10th of April, 1950, Malkani and Brij Bhushan approached the Supreme Court. Organiser was represented by Shri NC Chatterjee, former President of Hindu Mahasabha and father of the Communist leader, Somnath Chatterjee. The left and the Right in this rare occasion came together to uphold the democratic spirit of India with Organiser and Crossroad, both landing in the Court seeking justice.

Shri PR Das, a former Judge, admonished the Congress under Nehru- ‘We have in India today a One-Party state just as Hitler’s Germany was a One-Party State and Stalin’s Russia is a One-Party State’. All this while the wheels of petty politics moved fast. In a rush to bring in an abolishment of Zamindari, the Bihar Government brought in a shoddily drafted Bihar Management of Estates and Tenures Act. Compared to the similar bill in UP under Shri GB Pant with extensive 340 plus clauses, Bihar Bill had fifty clauses, and was lopsided to favor small landlords. The smaller landlords (mostly Congress supporters) were to get twenty times their land earnings as one-time settlement, while the larger ones were to get only three times. Court was approached and Patna High Court declared the bill unconstitutional. The rush was under the pressure to make changes to meet the election deadlines set by Nehru. Initially, elections were proposed to be held on May, 1950. Dr. Shyama Prasad Mookerjee and Shri KC Neogy resigned in protest against Nehru-Liaqat Pact. While Nehru could have brushed their resignation as Right Wing unreasonableness, but at the same time, Nehru’s Finance Minister and an Independent John Mathai too resigned, protesting Nehru’s Authoritarianism. He was a non-political appointee and a brilliant Scholar. Nehru at that time was on Vacation at the Naval Ship, INS Delhi. He lamented, not at the loss of a brilliant mind, but rather at the disruption to his vacation.

Pressure from the Courts on obvious transgression on Intellectual liberties, failure to implement poll-promises, diminishing political clout, was further aggravated by Community Government Order in Tamil Nadu which reserved seats in education and employment based on communities, split between Christians, Non-Brahmins, Muslims and Brahmins. In June 1950, two petitioned were filed against the GO calling it unfair. TN Government also faced heat on closing down the People’s Education Society and claiming in the court that ‘it was prerogative of the State to declare any association unlawful and imprison their members.’ The Indian Criminal Law Amendment (Madras) Act was declared void by the high court. An active judiciary upholding the principles of Democracy was too much for Nehru to bear right after his near dictatorship found feet in Nasik Congress in August, 1950 where he swore to ‘fight resolutely against Hindu communalism’ and ‘discourage vehemently any criticism of Pakistan’. UP, Bihar, Maharashtra and Madras- all were slipping. In Bihar, Government imposed a ban on Bharti Press for its newsletter Sangram. Shail Bala Devi approached the HC and the order was quashed. Master Tara Singh was in Prison and Punjab too was up in arms. In December, the only person who could put some checks and balances on the despotic Congress chief, Sardar Patel passed away. Nehru now had free hand. His mind was made up.

Immediately after this, Nehru wrote to the CMs, on 31st of December, 1950- ‘We have to make clear that no individual in India, whoever he may be, can challenge the authority of the State or Parliament. We are not going to tolerate any defiance to the State’s authority.’ Nehru then postponed the elections and decided to make his final move towards what is called as the First Amendment of Indian Constitution. In US, the first amendment of Constitution was made to uphold the absolute right to free speech; In India, under Nehru, it was to restrict free speech. What was worse was the provision of Ninth Schedule which placed acts under the dictatorial vault of 9th Schedule outside judicial purview. Dr Rajendra Prasad tried to dissuade Nehru as he wrote with sadness that it is ‘an irony of fate that the part which stands above every other part of the constitution is first to be assailed.’ He also wrote that there was no case for amendment to the fundamental rights. He mentioned that the judicial censure in most cases is not because constitution is bad, but because the laws were drafted poorly. But Nehru will have none of it.

On 12th May, 1951, at 9:31 AM, disrupting ongoing debate on Representation of People’s Act, Nehru presented the first Amendment. Dr Shyama Prasad Mookerjee led the opposition’s attack urging people to take a stand across party line against this ‘encroachment on the liberty of the people of Free India.’ Rajendra Prasad again tried to discourage Nehru. Nehru, stubbornly and brusquely responded – ‘It would be exceedingly unfortunate if the public became aware that the President held a contrary opinion to that of the Cabinet in such a matter.’ Matter went to Standing Committee with instruction to immediately revert. On 29th May, the word ‘reasonable’ was added to restrictions to free speech. Nehru was opposed to it since this was subjective and could cause a lot of litigation. Nehru declared that if the Constitution restricted his functioning, the Constitution itself will be junked. Congress MPs cheered. One MP from TN claimed that Indians were inferior to the British and therefore should not have unfetter rights of freedom. The opposition was bludgeoned mercilessly and the bill was passed 246 to 14. UP MP KK Bhattacharya’s request for free vote was refused by Nehru and he resigned. Acharya Kriplani had already resigned on 18th of May. Nehru got his first amendment backed by a subservient Congress. The day ended amid ominous dark clouds looming over the Parliament and thunderstorms descending on Delhi. Only thing that stood hanging that day were words of caution made by Dr. Shyama Prasad Mookerjee-

“For the saddest epitaph which can be carved in the memory of a vanished liberty is that it was lost because its possessors failed to stretch forth a saving hand while yet there was a time.” Let us remember these words when a journalist is called and grilled for hours on the charge of calling Sonia Gandhi by her pre-marriage name and asking her to comment on the cold-blooded lynching of two Hindu saints in a state ruled by her party, a common citizen is allegedly kidnapped and beaten for hours by the goons of an NCP minister, a hospital is refused an FIR by her Police when attacked by a Congress leader. One doesn’t need to like Arnab or his journalism for that. This is not the matter of person. It is a matter of principles. Let us remember to stretch forth a saving hand while yet there is time.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Saket Suryesh
A technology worker, writer and poet, and a concerned Indian. Saket writes in Hindi and English. He writes on socio-political matters and routinely writes Hindi satire in print as well in leading newspaper like Jagaran. His Hindi Satire "Ganjhon Ki Goshthi" is on Amazon best-sellers. He has just finished translating the Autobiography of Legendary revolutionary Ram Prasad Bismil in English, to be soon released as "The Revolitionary".

Trending now

Ram Mandir, a symbol of cultural continuity: Northeast India and Sanatan Dharma

After a decade long historical, political and legal dispute and with a Supreme Court intervention brought to closure in the matter of construction of Ram Mandir and, finally, Lord Rama shall get its abode to live

‘Efforts were made to eradicate Lord Ram’s existence, but it is his immense power that he continued to live in our hearts’: PM Modi’s...

PM Modi who returned to Ayodhya after 29 years, performed the Ram Mandir's Bhoomi Pujan at 12.44.08 PM on 5th August

PM Narendra Modi and the journey from Ayodhya Andolan to Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan: Then and now

Now and then: Journey of PM Modi from Ayodhyan Andolan to Ram Mandir

From ‘nothing new about Shilanyas’ to ‘I will not find Ram there’, Bhoomi Pujan ceremony of the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya triggers a meltdown...

The liberal intelligentsia is having a hard time digesting the fact that the dream of millions of Hindus of a Ram Mandir in Ayodhya is finally turning into a reality

‘I, Narendra Damodardas Modi, on behalf of my country and its people’: Read what the PM’s ‘Sankalpa’ at Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan meant

PM Modi today did the Shilanyas and Bhoomi Pujan for the proposed Ram Mandir at the Ram Janmabhoomi site in Ayodhya.

Islamists, ‘liberals’ attack cricketer Mohammad Kaif for urging haters to not spew venom over Ram Mandir in Ayodhya

Mohammad Kaif was attacked by Islamists for urging people who were spewing venom over the Bhoomi Pujan to spread the message of love and dignity instead.

Recently Popular

Here is why #BabyPenguin is trending on Twitter, and why Aaditya Thackeray is called so by some

Yuva Sena registered complaint against twitter user for calling Aaditya Thackeray "Baby Penguin" and Uddhav Thackeray "Aurangzeb"

‘Situations do not last forever’: All India Muslim Personal Law Board issues a menacing threat on the eve of Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan

Comparing Babri Masjid to Turkey's newly converted mosque 'Hagia Sophia', the Muslim Personal Board said, "Babri Masjid was and will always be a Masjid".

NASDAQ billboard at NYC’s Times Square not to beam Lord Ram’s image after petitions by Muslim groups

Muslims groups in New York have objetected to the plan of displaying the images of Lord Ram on the large LED screens of Times Square on Bhoomi Pujan day.

Veer Savarkar’s prophecy ‘The day Hindus unite, Congress leaders will wear janeu over the coat’ comes true as they celebrate construction of Ram Mandir

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Kamal Nath and Manish Tewari have posted tweets, welcoming the Bhoomi pujan ceremony and extending their support for the construction of Ram Temple in Ayodhya

Islamists, ‘liberals’ attack cricketer Mohammad Kaif for urging haters to not spew venom over Ram Mandir in Ayodhya

Mohammad Kaif was attacked by Islamists for urging people who were spewing venom over the Bhoomi Pujan to spread the message of love and dignity instead.

“Will believe in coronavirus if Amit Shah dies”: Shaheen Bagh ‘activist’ Aiman Rizwi urges Muslims to pray for his death

Rizwi also strongly believes that Coronavirus is a myth and propagated to conceal failures of Modi government.

Bengal police lathi charge Hindus for organising Ram pujas during the one-day lockdown on 5th August

Police lathi charged Hindus, pull devotees out of temples for organizing Ram Pujas on Ram Mandir Bhumi Pujan in West Bengal

The Wire shares article citing discredited ‘experts’ to falsely claim older mosques existed beneath the Babri structure, not a temple

The Wire cites 'experts' who had claimed no temple was found below Babri Masjid, but they were not present during ASI digging

Digital billboard featuring Lord Ram and Ram Mandir comes up at Times Square in New York

A large curved digital screen located at the iconic Times Square displayed the images of Lord Ram and the Ram Mandir

Ram Mandir, a symbol of cultural continuity: Northeast India and Sanatan Dharma

After a decade long historical, political and legal dispute and with a Supreme Court intervention brought to closure in the matter of construction of Ram Mandir and, finally, Lord Rama shall get its abode to live

Meet K Parasaran, the 93-year-old ‘Pitamah’ of Indian laws who had said that logical end to Ram Janmabhoomi case was his last dream

K Parasaran once said that the logical end to Ram Janmabhoomi case was his last wish before he died

NDTV refers to Ram Janmabhoomi site as ‘disputed’, quietly edits posts after social media outrage

NDTV had uploaded posts on Facebook in which it had referred to Ram Janmabhoomi site as "disputed"

Kashmiris rejects Pakistan’s anti-India propaganda as hundreds come together to celebrate the first anniversary of abrogation of Article 370

Bangus Awaam Mela was organised to commemorate the first anniversary of the Abrogation of Article 370 in the valley

Kerala nun-rape case: Supreme Court dismisses discharge plea filed by rape accused Bishop Franco Mulakkal

Bishop Franco Mulakkal to face trial in the nun-rape case after Supreme Court dismissed his petition to discharge the case against him

Kashi Vishwanath and Krishna Janmasthan temples have to be liberated too: Senior BJP leader KS Eshwarappa

KS Eshwarappa also asserted that there will be temples at both Kashi and Mathura in the near future just like Ayodhya.

Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan: Illustrations, sculptures and paintings of Bhagwan Ram winning the social media

Many creative, and beautiful artworks have been made by artists for the occasion of Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan.

Related Articles

Connect with us