In his defence of Aurangzeb, the journalist said the Mughal ruler's generosity is evident from the fact that even though Aurangzeb imposed Jizya (a religious tax) on Hindus he exempted Brahmins, women and old people from it. He added that Aurangzeb did destroy some Hindu temples but he also built some temples.
Politicians are not concerned that a little girl lost her life, but they just want to further a narrative that paints a 'Hindu priest' in bad light probably because 'Salims' are already bad, eh?