Home News Reports Our apologists made a romantic hero out of a cold-blooded terrorist, yet again

Our apologists made a romantic hero out of a cold-blooded terrorist, yet again

Masood Azhar is back in news — this time because of confusions over his “protective custody” by the Pakistan police counter-terrorism department after the Pathankot attack. After the Pathankot attack, Pakistan, being exposed to continuous pressure from India as well as from the US and other nations, assured substantial actions on terrorism. But while the Indian Government, with the help of NIA and other investigative agencies, is pushing Pakistan to take firm actions, the apologist brigade — including many from media houses who were kept away from Pathankot investigations (for some obvious and some not so obvious reasons) have started sabotaging the ongoing mission by creating narratives to hold India responsible for the attack.

Recently, an article by Harinder Baweja on Hindustan Times titled, “Making of a terrorist: Babri demolition triggered Masood Azhar’s jihad” infuriated many Indians, but at the same time, it gathered support from many hardliners like Rana Ayyub and alleged liberals like Ramachandra Guha.

Masood Azhar

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

Surprisingly, this article, which has already been declared brilliant and insightful by our many people is nothing but a small paragraph of crippled argument mentioning, “Azhar may never have turned his attention to India or Kashmir were it not for the demolition of the Babri Masjid. He was content playing the role of a ‘journalist’ through a militant journal called Sada-i-Mujahid (Knock of the Mujahid)“, incoherently placed between emotional stories narrated by Masood Azhar. The more disturbing part of this childish article is that it glorifies Masood Azhar as a freedom fighter who is chivalrous, emotional, religious and respectful to women. I was so overwhelmed with frustration after reading this eulogy of a terrorist, involved in killings of many innocents, that I had to close my laptop for a break.

Even if we assume that the author has a soft corner for Masood Azhar (the tortured “donation seeking journalist”, as described by Harinder Baweja) because he treated her with respect, I fail to understand how and why intellectuals like Ramachandra Guha, who write pages on how to deal structure, substructure and superstructure of terrorism or who preach people not to complicate terrorism my mixing religious angles, jumped to affirm the theory with justifications like “Babri demolition was Bad, Masood Azhar is bad, so I will not oppose the argument” 

The blatant hypocrisy of this kind of liberals is not a new thing. They have built their career and credentials by emphasizing secularism to such an extent that it becomes impossible for them to decouple crime and religion before analyzing it. Rightly pointed out by many, if Babri demolition is responsible for the rise of worst terrorists, the perennial destruction of thousands of temples should have turned many Hindus into cannibals. Few days back, most of these apologists were singing rhymes of intolerance, but for Masood Azhar, they have reasons and sympathy for him to become a murderer. It is because of this palpable hypocrisy that “whataboutery” finds a space to grow. It is because of this hypocrisy that when Kiku Sharda is attacked for hurting religious sentiments of some people, other people find justifications from Malda.

Dear apologists, at least stand by your philosophies; at least stand by your arguments; at least don’t make those stupid logical fallacies which you mock others for; and if, you can’t criticize murderous terrorists like you criticize Hindu fundamentalists, at least don’t glamorize them as a freedom hero.

Share This Post With Your Friends & Fans:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.

Election 2019 Final Tally

Check the final seat tally and other post election coverage

Smriti Irani’s aide in Amethi shot dead, his son says some Congress workers were not happy with BJP’s ‘Vijay Yatra’

Smriti Irani had defeated Rahul Gandhi on his home turf of Amethi in Uttar Pradesh by a margin of 55,120 votes

Meerut: Communal tension after a video showing Muslim men beating up shopkeepers goes viral

A viral video where Muslim men are beating up a shopkeeper has triggered communal tensions in Meerut

Rajdeep Sardesai thinks Narendra Modi should thank Masood Azhar, among others, for BJP’s victory

As a long term Congress loyalist media person, Rajdeep Sardesai is yet to come to terms that Modi won a second term with thumping majority

Left has failed, but the ‘Right’ does not understand Modi as well

With the left looking irrelevant, the right needs to get its act together.

A tribute to OpIndia’s fallen star

On 13th May 2019, Devandhu Rajput succumbed to cancer.
NYT peddles Modi 2.0 as victory of India's most divisive leader

Dear New York Times, India has chosen Modi 2.0, deal with it

When India gives a thumping, unprecedented, overwhelming victory to a man who has made every single Indian feel proud of their nation and heritage, the NYT's heartburn is expected. 

Rahul Gandhi upset that senior Congress leaders didn’t shout ‘Chowkidar Chor Hai’ enough, lashes out on them for party’s defeat

Amusingly, though Rahul Gandhi had indeed offered to resign, the CWC, that is chaired by himself, had unanimously rejected the resignation and asked him to reconstruct the party

Journalist wants to ‘crowdfund’ a parallel parliament so that Atishi Marlena can become an MP

The 'neutral media' meltdown seems to have reached its peak after AAP's Atishi Marlena came in third in East Delhi Lok Sabha seat

The Left has lost its deposit. It is time for the Right to fight Modi

Modi 2.0 heralds a new beginning for India and her people. It must not be allowed to cultivate the habits of Modi 1.0.
Subscribe to Day's Top Stories

Latest articles

Connect with us

Share This Post With Your Friends & Fans: