Don’t fall for propaganda: ‘Write off’ of loans is not ‘Loan waiver’

Every few months, we witness hysteria on social media regarding loan write offs. Almost exactly a year ago, a social media rumour claimed that SBI had “waived off” Mallya’s and other wilful defaulters’ loans, to the tune of Rs 7000 crore. This was based on an article in DNA.

Now, a similar article has sparked off similar reactions. The Indian Express has carried a news article titled: “PSU banks write off Rs 55,356 crore in six months“. There may be nothing factually wrong with this, but readers and politically inclined people are either misunderstanding the term used, or are deliberately spinning it.

Yogendra Yadava and Comrade Yechury have compared these write-offs with waivers, indicating that while farm loan waivers are scorned upon, “waivers” given to corporates are fine:

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

Congress leader Arjun Modhwadia has used this news to land the “suit boot ki sarkar” jibe, indicating that these “waivers” are helping corporate India

A JNU-ite, displaying his knowledge, asks whether there is a “ghotala” (scam)

So what is this write-off? Is it really a loan waiver, a sweet deal given to errant corporates?

For this we need to understand what write-offs are. A balance sheet should reflect the real position of assets and liabilities. Hence Banks have to write off loans given to borrowers, which are “assets” to the banks, which have now shown signs of weakness. If they don’t write off loans, it is like claiming to hold a high quality asset, when actually the quality has deteriorated. Will you trust an entity that doesn’t give the true picture of its assets?

Secondly, if a loan is not written-off and is continued as a healthy asset (when it actually is an Non Performing Asset), then banks can continue to book interest income on the loan, on accrual basis of accounting. This has two impacts: Firstly, the bank is artificially increasing its income by booking interest on accrual basis, income which it may or may not receive (since the loan is actually an NPA). Secondly, the bank has to pay tax on such interest income. Both are undesirable. A write off prevents banks from doing this, since once a loan is “written-off”, income booking on the same is based on actual receipt of income, and not based on accrual. Banks do not stop earning interest on such loans, but now they can recognize it as income only when they receive it.

Hence write-offs are a purely technical, accounting entry. Loans, which may not be repaid by the borrower in normal course of business are written off. Even when these loans are written off, various recovery procedures like recovery suits filed before the DRT/ Court. and action initiated under SARFAESI Act continue. Now, the bank takes control of the assets secured against such loans and sells them off to recover the loans.

So a write off means the loan has been waived? Definitely not. Even the RBI had issued a clarification  in February 2016 (Raghuram Rajan headed the RBI then) stating exactly what we have explained above:

The RBI, now and even during Raghuram Rajan’s tenure, has been a big votary of this clean up process. The RBI has been constantly monitoring the write-offs by banks, and adding to the banks’ own write-off amounts whenever it has felt necessary. Rajan has recently stated that he felt banks were “scared” of writing-off loans, which they ideally should have written-off.

The people who have shared today’s Indian Express article, would have been better served if they had bothered to read the piece. The same report quotes an RBI explanatory  note which states that a substantial portion of the write-off is, technical in nature:

“It is primarily intended at cleansing the balance sheet and achieving taxation efficiency. In ‘Technically Written Off’ accounts, loans are written off from the books at the Head Office, without foregoing the right to recovery.”

Former chairman and MD of Indian Overseas Bank, M Narendra,’s views are also reported in the same piece:

“The write-off is just a technical book entry. Banks are not losing anything. It doesn’t mean banks are giving up those assets. They will continue with various recovery methods.”

In an ideal world, write-offs would not be needed. Loans given would be repaid back in time. But write-offs are needed right now since loans given earlier, are now showing signs of weakness, and accounting prudence, RBI guidelines, and Tax efficiency demand that such loans be “written off”. These “write-offs” are by no means a “waiver”.


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

Days after Pulwama attack, Kamal Haasan toes the Pakistan line

Kamal Haasan demands ‘referendum’ in Kashmir, terms Pakistan Occupied Kashmir as ‘Azad Kashmir’

Days after Pakistan sponsored Pulwama attack, Kamal Haasan has echoed the sentiments of terrorist state Pakistan when he sought a 'referendum' in Jammu and Kashmir

Man whose number was made public by Barkha Dutt for stalking, claims he is getting threatening calls, says didn’t abuse Barkha

In her tweet, Barkha demanded the Home Minister of the country, Rajnath Singh, himself intervene in the matter which is routinely dealt with by local Police.

JNU ‘student’ who was accused of stealing funds in Kathua case found spreading rumours about Kashmiri girls trapped in Uttarakhand

CRPF also issued a notice that certain 'miscreants' on social media are spreading rumours and hate on social media

The Hindu not only cropped the Rafale dissent note, but also had digitally manipulated it

Comparison of Hindu document with ANI document shows that Hindu had doctored the Rafale dissent note

Meet the people whose main concern is if Modi may ‘benefit’ due to terror strike, not tears of martyrs’ families

While the Country held its breath and read gut-wrenching stories of the Jawans martyred in the Pulwama attack, the 'liberals' were more concerned about politics than the tears of the martyr's families.

Pakistan funded Islamic terrorist blows up 300 kgs of IED, actor brings ‘Hindu right wing’ argument to shield Pakistan

Jaaved Jaaferi refuses to hold Pakistan accountable for the attack, instead equates Hindus with Jaish Terrorists.

Dear Barkha Dutt, please don’t trivialise sexual harassment by making it about ideology

Barkha Dutt received an unsolicited d*ck pic from a stranger after her number was made public, she cried 'nationalism' rather than sexual harassment
Image Source: Dawn

Pakistan Senator Rahman Malik says Pulwama attack was skilful job of RAW and Indian Army to defame Pakistan

Former interior minister Senator Abdul Rehman Malik has held India responsible for Pulwama attack claiming that RAW had engineered such attacks to not only divert world attention from the so-called human rights violation in Kashmir but also to sabotage Kulbushan Yadav case.

Pulwama attack: Justice doesn’t give a tiny rat’s furry posterior about the sensibility of elites who go where the money takes them

Pulwama attack victims' mortal remains weren't even cold yet. The candles lit by the nation has not even been blown out by a sorrowful sigh of the nation, that the vultures started circling the remains

Kavita Krishnan uses 4 year old photograph to claim PM Narendra Modi was laughing after Pulwama attack

Using a old photo, Kavita Krishna claimed the Modi was having fun at election rallies after Pulwama attack

Latest articles

Connect with us

137,381FansLike
110,158FollowersFollow
23,054SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these