Home Law SC's judgement rejecting petition against movie 'Aiyaary' exposes the hypocrisy of FoE crusaders

SC’s judgement rejecting petition against movie ‘Aiyaary’ exposes the hypocrisy of FoE crusaders

Freedom of Expression has become the favourite champagne phrase for the self-proclaimed Liberal cabal. But their undying support for one’s freedom of expression is, of course, limited to the freedom to express what suits them. Everyone remembers the initial uproar when Rajputs objected to the movie Padmaavat. The uproar, however, fell silent when they realised that the Karni Sena had extended support to Congress, a party that most suits their liberal ethos, considering it also shamelessly indulged in censorship when it suited them, and pretended to fight for freedom of expression when it suited their politics. Heck, it was the same party that imposed the Emergency, but those sins have been forgotten since the “liberal” crusade needs a political hero.

A similar incident came to light recently when Adarsh Housing Society, represented by the Congress supporting lawyer Sanjay Hegde went to court to thwart the release of the movie ‘Aiyaary’. The movie is said to be a military cum intelligence thriller that is a work of fiction but is based on real events. The catch, however, is that It also has a case related to Adarsh scam of 2010 – where a big building was built on a piece of plot earmarked for building houses for widows and families of the Kargil war. A movie still from Aiyaary is doing the rounds in army social media groups. While the High Court denied prosecution of Ashok Chavan based on technicalities, it can’t be forgotten that he was made to step down during the Congress regime and this scam, had haunted the Congress party.

Adarsh Housing Society approached the Supreme Court petitioning the court to not allow the release of the movie Aiyaary and to direct the deletion of any scene that made any direct or indirect reference to the housing society. They contended that the mention of the society breached their fundamental right to life under Article 14 and 21 of the constitution.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

On Twitter, Mr Hegde contested that if things were to be banned for ‘bad taste’, movies, art and politics would be banned. He basically defends even offensive speech here.

While he postures and defends offensive speech, in Court Hegde stands against “projection in an unacceptable manner”. Sanjay Hegde who appeared for the Adarsh Housing Society contended that the film projected the society in an unacceptable manner. That the movie and the dialogues in it made insinuations that would not only affect the ongoing litigation but also make people believe the “reel image” of the residents and not the “real image”. He contended that the society and its residents had created their reputation with a lot of difficulties and that should be protected.

It is worthy to note here that the counsel for the petitioner, Sanjay Hegde conceded that the CBFC had given the requisite certificate after consultation with “competent authorities of the army” as a measure of caution.

Mr Hegde contended that this movie could affect the course of justice and thus, the release of this movie should be stayed.

The court, however, dismissed this petition. The court cited that a film is a creation of art and an artist has his own freedom to express himself in a manner which is not prohibited by law. The court observed that the prohibition shouldn’t crucify the rights of expressive minds.

The entire hypocrisy of Sanjay Hegde is staggering. While here Hegde’s argument is that since the Courts have imposed restrictions earlier, they should do it again, Hegde has earlier argued even against reasonable restriction.

In the court of course, Hegde had a very different view. While in his tweet, he negates the point that an entire town or community cannot be “bastardized”, here, he fights for a Housing Society akin to a town in his argument.

The court proceeded to make some scathing observations regarding the submissions made by Sanjay Hegde. The main point made by Sanjay Hegde was the Adarsh Housing Society is under litigation and the matter is sub judice and that the movie may prejudice the course of law. The Court observed that the doctrine of ‘sub-judice’ cannot be elevated to such an extent that any kind of allusion to a member of a society would warrant striking down of a person’s freedom of expression.

The Court made another interesting statement that is often negated by the self-proclaimed liberals as and when they deem fit. That Freedom of Expression is not unlimited, but restrictions need to be narrow and within reasonable parameters. Which would also mean that Adarsh Housing Society’s case didn’t fall under that reasonable parameter.

The Court also observed that Sanjay Hegde’s demand that the movie adds a disclaimer so as to not affect the society and its members adversely, was not permissible as it is the job of the censor board to grant certificates and judge whether a disclaimer is necessary or not.

The writ petition, therefore, was dismissed sans merit (without merit).

This judgement is frankly a testament to the unbound hypocrisy of the ones who publicly pretend to espouse the cause of absolute freedom of expression. It is evident, that they would move the court for the suppression of freedom of expression if it doesn’t suit them, their clients, their politics, their purpose or their narrative. This unbridled hypocrisy was also pointed out by Director Vivek Agnihotri.

While this is what Mr Hegde said in court, he has publicly made his opinions on bans on works of art fairly clear.

While lawyers do as their clients require them to do, knowing the law, one is at least expected to keep the public posturing and derision of others who make similar legally sound points to a minimum. Though, I’m certainly not holding my breath.

The images have been taken from the LiveLaw website where the judgement was uploaded 


Sharing is caring - Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

‘Teri maa ka bh*s**,’ Uber driver Aftab gets angry on seeing Shivaji Mandir, gets abusive with passenger

Two days back, a lady passenger was subjected to rude and obnoxious behaviour of an Uber driver, Usman, who was perhaps triggered by a picture of Modi on her phone cover
Soni Razdan pontificates to Indian how they should vote while she herself carries a British passport

Wife of Mahesh Bhatt, who lied about Junaid to pontificate to Indians how they should vote, holds a British passport

Soni Razdan and her daughter Alia Bhatt both hold British Passports and hence cannot vote in India

They lied and concocted ‘Hindu terror’, they jailed and tortured her, now they rain hate on her for contesting 2019 elections

Sadhvi Pragya has been pitted against Congress' Digvijay Singh. Digvijay Singh is the very politician who proudly launched the book '26/11 - RSS ki Saazish' and has often furthered the 'Hindu Terror' narrative that has been summarily debunked many times.

How did Adil Shahryar go from being insolvent to getting out of jail and starting a company worth $250 million in 5 years flat?

Adil Shahryar’s name has been buried and seldom uttered. Not by the political class and certainly not by the media who is more than willing to let the indiscretions of the first family slide under the rug.
'What Azaadi do you want? You need to give answers': Kanhaiya Kumar gheraod and questioned by Begusarai locals

‘Deshdrohi Murdabad’: Begusarai locals protest against Kanhaiya Kumar by stopping his roadshow, ask him what ‘Azaadi’ does he want

Kanhaiya Kumar was gheraod by Begusarai locals and questioned about the 'Bharat tere tukde honge' slogans that were raised by him and his opposition to reservation for the economically backward sections of the society.

Congress dare not say a word on Sadhvi Pragya and here’s why

Sadhvi Pragya suffered unspeakable torture under police custody for eight years, to the extent that it left her paralysed, during the Congress regime

109 eminent Tamil intellectuals appeal to Tamil Nadu voters to reelect Narendra Modi

Tamil scholars, writers, jurists, scientists appeal to Tamil Nadu voters to reelect Prime Minister Modi

Former civil servants write letter to express concern on how EC is being forced by anti-Modi lobby to conform to a ‘particular line of behaviour’

A group of 81 former civil servants that compromise of defence personnel, judges, academicians and professionals, led by former Delhi Police Commissioner R S Gupta raised concerns about this lobby trying to influence the Election Commission in taking anti-Modi steps to 'conform to a particular line of thought and behaviour'
Priyanka Chaturvedi expresses her disapproval on being unfairly treated by the Congress party

Congress national spokesperson Priyanka Chaturvedi slams party for reinstating goons who had misbehaved with her

Congress spokesperson Priyanka Chaturvedi had to endure unruly behaviour from her own party members in Mathura.

Latest articles

Connect with us

155,548FansLike
128,279FollowersFollow
53,513SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these


Sharing is caring - Share This Post and Support: