Home News Reports Read Naidu's scathing rejection of impeachment motion : Allegations not admissible, Parliamentary customs disregarded

Read Naidu’s scathing rejection of impeachment motion : Allegations not admissible, Parliamentary customs disregarded

Vice President Venkaiah Naidu today rejected the impeachment motion against CJI Deepak Mishra tabled by the 64 MPs of seven opposition parties. The VP has stated legal, moral and constitutional reasons as the ground for the rejection of the motion.

The order of rejection which runs 10 pages, lists out the background of the charges and the Vice Presidents base for rejection. At the beginning of the order, the VP acknowledges the relevant sections of the constitution and the relevant laws (The Judges Inquiry Act, 1968) that lays rules for the grounds on which an impeachment motion can be initiated against a sitting judge. He acknowledges that since 64 MPs have signed it, the motion meets the requirement of a minimum of 50 MPs signing the order. He has also added that the same Act also provides for the chairman of the council, after consulting, to either reject or accept the motion.

The VP mentions that he took guidance from a previous Supreme Court order in the case of N Krishna Swami vs Union of India (AIR 1993 SC 1407).

- Ad - - article resumes -

courtesy: Livelaw

The VP mentions that since the case is against the CJI himself he has not consulted him on the matter and has consulted with legal luminaries, constitutional experts, former secretary generals of both houses of Parliament and several jurists. He adds that after going through comments and consultations of all the above, he is of the opinion that the impeachment motion is not fit to be a case for removal of a judge.

The VP added that the article 124(4) explicitly states the ground for impeachment to be ‘proved misbehaviour or incapacity’. He added that the word ‘proved’ places an obligation that the allegations of misbehaviours must be proved before the parliamentary process of removal can be initiated, which is not the case in this motion.

courtesy: Livelaw

Venkaiah Naidu goes ahead to add that the MPs who have presented the motion are unsure of their own case since the page 1 of the motion has phrases like ‘may have been involved’ and ‘he too was likely’ etc and it shows that the MPs are merely stating their suspicion or a conjecture or assumption which cannot be called ‘proved beyond reasonable doubt’. He adds that conversations between the third parties, with dubious credentials, which have been extensively relied upon, cannot themselves constitute any material evidence against the Chief Justice of India.

The VP further adds that it is affirmed by a constitution bench of judges of Supreme Court ( Kamini Jaiswal vs Union of India , 14 Nov, 2017 ) that the CJI is master of roasters and that it is his prerogative alone to constitute benches of judges and there cannot be any direction to the CJI as to who will sit on a bench and who shall take up the matter.

courtesy; Livelaw

The order further mentions that in para 15 of the same Supreme Court order, it is mentioned that the CJI is well within his powers to construct administrative benches too.

Courtesy: Livelaw

Mr Naidu adds further that the five allegations mentioned by the MPs are neither admissable or tenable. He states that the allegations in the motion have a serious tendency of undermining the judiciary and hence it is neither legal nor proper to admit the notice of motion. He states that the provisions in the constitution are to nurture and strengthen the judiciary and there are safeguards to prevent interference in its independence by Legislature and Executive powers.

He adds further that the section 124(4) and the Judges Act both have laid down very stringent conditions necessary for initiation of such proceedings and they are aimed at protecting and safeguarding the independence of the judiciary and keep the judges safe from external pressure.

courtesy: Livelaw

The Vice President further adds that there is virtually no verifiable concrete imputation in the motion and it would be inappropriate and irresponsible to accept statements which have little empirical basis. He asserts that he has examined the relevant provisions in the constitution and also has pursued the annexures provided in the motion, consulted with experts he is certain that the motion is not admissible. He also added that the parliamentary customs and conventions have been disregarded in case of the impeachment notion.

He goes ahead to add that it is prohibited for the members to publicize any notice submitted to the Chairman till it is admitted and circulated to the said members. He condemned the MPs conducting press conferences immediately after submitting the notice and asserted that is against the propriety and decorum of the parliament and also denigrates the institution of the CJI.

Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Big Story

Sanjay Leela Bhansali set to produce an hour-long movie based on the life of PM Modi and is titled Mann Bairagi.

2019 World Cup Is Here!

Catch the latest on Cricket World Cup as it unfolds, special coverage by Opindia

To Advertise on Opindia.com Click here

‘Professional Congress’ member posts promotional tweets for 500 rupees, blames ‘social media manager’ after having defended tweet

Flipkart Big Billion Sale is here and well, 'Congress supporters' would like to earn a few quick bucks.

‘Kashmir free from shackles of Pakistan sponsored terrorism’: Pakistani org representing Pashtuns refuses to support Imran Khan’s Kashmir protest, backs India

Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement (PTM), the principal body representing Pashtuns in Pakistan, has rejected Prime Minister Imran Khan’s recent call to all people in which he urged them to come out and support Pakistan’s narrative on Kashmir. 

Prashant Kishor’s team starts reaching out to media and influencers with ‘paid content’ offers ahead of West Bengal assembly elections

Darjeeling Chronicle has exposed how Prashant Kishor led IPAC is reaching out to 'influencers' and digital portals to carry out paid campaigning for TMC and Mamata Banerjee ahead of 2021 West Bengal state elections

Suvarna news anchor wants scientist arrested for his sarcastic Tweet about ‘Mysore Pak’, claims his act was ‘seditious’

The anchor of Suvarna news, Jayaprakash Shetty has now asked for the arrest of scientist Ranganathan for claiming Mysore Pak belonged to Tamil Nadu in a sarcastic Tweet

Congress’ AIPC member blames Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for an incident of violence in Pakistan

All India Professionals' Congress member Andria D'Souza wants to hold PM Modi accountable for an incident in Pakistan

While talking about Muslims in Jammu, Karan Thapar diminishes massacre of Hindus and Sikhs in Jammu and the KP exodus

Karan Thapar in his article "We cannot be selective about the past in Jammu & Kashmir" in Hindustan Times dated 15th Sept 2019, gives a call to morality, intellectual honesty and being conscious to multiple peoples and their identities.
Stopped for traffic rules violation, Delhi girl threatens suicide

Watch: Stopped by traffic cops, Delhi girl threatens with suicide, helmet attack and then her mother

The girl was reportedly stopped for the broken license plate on her two-wheeler. When the traffic police demanded to see the scooter's documents, she stated that she had no papers.
Image Source: twitter

Malala Yousafzai spreads fake news, claims girl from Kashmir missed her exams on August 12 which was an Eid holiday

According to Malala, one of the three girls from Kashmir missed her exams on August 12. However, August 12 is a notified holiday declared across the country by Government of India on the occasion of Bakr Id or Eid ul-Adha.

Kannada media spreads fake news, accuses Nirmala Sitaraman of ‘giving’ Mysorepak to Tamil Nadu

No one had expected that a huge controversy would erupt over the issue of Mysore Pak, which originated in Mysuru during the rule of Wodeyar dynasty.
Subscribe to Day's Top Stories
[newsletter_form type="minimal"]
- Advertisment -

Latest articles

Connect with us

182,792FansLike
180,452FollowersFollow
97,491SubscribersSubscribe
Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post