Tuesday, May 26, 2020
Home News Reports “Muslim law permitting polygamy does not make it mandatory”: Uttarakhand HC says 2-child norm...

“Muslim law permitting polygamy does not make it mandatory”: Uttarakhand HC says 2-child norm for Panchayat elections is not anti-minoritarian

The court noted that the amendment in the Panaghayat Raj Act is applicable for all religions and it is not anti-minoritarian, and it does not also violate the fundamental rights of religious minorities under Article 25.

Also Read

OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

In a very significant judgement, the Uttarakhand High Court on Thursday ruled that barring candidates having more than two children from contesting in elections for Panchayat Raj institutions is not anti-minoritarian. The court made this observation which disposing several petitions filed against the Uttarakhand Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act, 2019. The amendment had inserted section 8(1)(r) into the act stipulating that person shall be disqualified for being appointed, and for being a Pradhan, Up-Pradhan and a member of the Gram Panchayat, if he has more than two living children. Some petitions were filed against some other provisions of the amendment also, all of which were clubbed and heard together.

Petitioners who had appealed against the two-child norm had argued that there is no uniform civil code in the country, and the provision for Panchayat elections is anti-minoritarian as it violates the fundamental rights of procreation of minorities. They stated that “law permits a Muslim male to have more than one wife, and even if he has one child through each wife he would still violate the onerous prescription of not having more than two living children; and this is also in violation of the right of a Muslim woman to have at least one child”.

The court rejected this argument by saying that just because something is permitted as per religion or law does not make it mandatory. Muslims are allowed to have four wives, but that does not mean all Muslim men have to marry four women and have children will all of them, the court contended. The court also said that the premise that only Muslims will have more than two children is also wrong. The court noted that among the 21 petitioners in the case, only one was Muslim, that too a woman. All of them have admitted to have more than two children while questioning the validity of the amendment, the court said.

- article continues after ad - - article resumes -

The court stated that “no religion in India dictates or mandates as an obligation to enter into bigamy or polygamy or to have children more than one; what is permitted or not prohibited by a religion does not become a religious practice or a positive tenet of a religion; a practice does not acquire the sanction of religion simply because it is permitted.”

The judgement says that Article 25 of the constitution, which grants freedom of religion, is itself subject to public order, morality and health. Noting that “Muslim law permits marrying four women; the personal law nowhere mandates or dictates it as a duty to perform four marriages”, the court said that even if bigamy or polygamy or having more the one child is allowed in a religion or community, this can be regulated or prohibited legislation in the interest of public order, morality and health or by any law providing for social welfare and reform. The court said that a statutory provision casting disqualification on contesting for, or holding, an elective office in Panchayat Raj institutions is not violative of Article 25 of the Constitution.

The court noted that the amendment in the Panaghayat Raj Act is applicable for all religions and it is not anti-minoritarian, and it does not also violate the fundamental rights of religious minorities under Article 25.

On the contention that the law is against those who have twins in the second pregnancy, the court said that this is an exception, the law is made for the generality of people, and not to deal with exceptions. The court ruled that the amendment can’t be struct down just for exceptions.

- article continues after ad - - article resumes -

Replying to the argument that the provision will hurt the women most, as many times husbands force their wives to have more children, the court said that such men will be disqualified according to this rule, as ruled by the Supreme Court in the case of Javed and others.

The court also talked in length about the National Population Policy 2000, and noted that the law is in line with that policy. The judgement says that the legislature can, undoubtedly, prescribe disincentives to curb exponential population growth in the country. It also said that “It is settled law that it is not the job of the court to decide whether a law is good or bad. Policy matters fall within the realm of the legislature and not of the courts.” It added that “the Court cannot sit in judgment over the wisdom of Parliament and the legislatures.”

Although the court rejected the petitions against the provision, it read down the provision of the two-child norm as it didn’t stipulate any cut-off date. While the court said that the provision can’t be said to be anti-constitutional as it does not have a cut-off date, the court ruled that the provision will apply only from the date the amendment came into effect. Now the two-child norm for contesting elections in Panchayat Raj Institutions will apply from 25 July 2019, and people have more than two children prior to this date will not be made disqualified.

Uttarakhand is not the first state to impose a two-child norm for Panchayat Raj elections, several other states have imposed this rule. Many of such laws were challenged in the court, but all those oppositions were rejected by High Courts and the Supreme Court.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Trending now

OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

25 lakh migrant workers returned to state so far amidst Coronavirus pandemic: UP CM Yogi Adityanath

The Yogi Adityanath govt has been working relentlessly to provide employment and various other facilities to the migrant workers who have returned to the state amidst the nationwide lockdown

UP: Police books over two dozen people for gathering in large groups to offer Eid namaz in a Muzaffarnagar Mosque

Defying administration's repeated appeals, a raft of Muslims congregated at the mosque in Kajian colony in Muzaffarnagar to offer prayers on the occasion of Eid-al-Fitr

Styrene gas tragedy: LG Polymers was warned over toxic styrene levels, green ministry red flags delay by Andhra govt: Report

A major chemical leak from the LG Polymers plant near Visakhapatnam impacted villages in a five-km radius

Coronavirus outbreak: Congress demands a fresh Union Budget, claims the pandemic demands increased spending by the centre

Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram in his column has argued that the present scenario has rendered the Union Budget declared in February irrelevant

England: Pakistani arrested for vandalising Guru Arjan Dev Gurdwara, note on Kashmir posted in the Gurdwara recovered

In the attack which took place on May 25 morning at Guru Arjan Dev Gurdwara in Derby, England, the unidentified man had broken the Gurudwara's windows

China to evacuate its citizens from India amidst pandemic and rising border tensions: Here are the details of the press release

A notice has been published on the Chinese embassy website which states that students, tourists and businessmen who have been stranded in India will be allowed to fly back to China on special flights

Recently Popular

Here is the truth about the fake TIME magazine cover page shared by Ravish Kumar and subsequently deleted

His legendary capacity to peddle fake news was once again exposed when Ravish Kumar shared a fake TIME magazine cover in a bid to malign PM Modi.

Pinjra Tod ‘activist’ arrested for inciting Delhi riots was a columnist with The Wire and Newslaundry

Delhi police arrested two women, Natasha Narwal, who was also a columnist with The Wire and Devangna Kalita for inciting the anti-Hindu Delhi riots

Mumbai Police issues prohibitory order, to take action against messages on social media: Here is how it curbs criticism against Uddhav Govt

For MLA Aaditya Thackeray too, the most worrying aspect of the pandemic in Maharashtra is the ‘hate on social media'

Maharashtra: After Palghar lynching, two Sadhus brutally killed inside ashram in Nanded

The bodies of the Sadhus were found in their ashram in Maharashtra's Nanded late on Saturday night

Delhi: Tanker operators say AAP MLA Prakash Jarwal collected bribes up to Rs 60 lakhs a month

The accusations of graft against AAP MLA Prakash Jarwal came to light after a water tanker owner, Dr Rajendra Singh, committed suicide alleging harassment for payment from the AAP MLA and his aide Kapil Nagar

Connect with us