HomeLawCentral Govt opposes same sex marriages in Delhi HC, 'We have to look at...

Central Govt opposes same sex marriages in Delhi HC, ‘We have to look at the petition with an open mind’ Court says

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said that he opposed the petition. He argued that same sex marriages are not recognised by our laws and culture.

A petition was filed in the Delhi High Court seeking recognition for same-sex marriages under the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioners argued that the Act does not bar same-sex marriages claiming that it does not specify that marriage ought to be between a man and a woman. The matter was taken up by the Court on Monday.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the central government, said that he opposed the petition. He argued that homosexual marriages are not recognised by our laws and culture. He said that the Hindu Marriage Act itself does not recognise same-sex marriages. As per law, marriage is only between a husband and a wife’, he argued.

It was argued that there are several issues that need to be considered, for example, the Solicitor general Tushar Mehta told Chief Justice D N Patel led bench that moral values of Indian society and culture are codified in various laws. Who will decide who is the husband and wife in a same-sex marriage for the purpose of prohibitory degrees of matrimony, he asked.

He also asked under the domestic violence Act, who will be the husband and who the wife in a same-sex marriage? Further, he said under 498A IPC punishing the husband and in-laws for cruelty to the wife would also pose serious implementation issues in same-sex marriage. He said if a woman dies within 7 yrs of marriage, cruelty is presumed and the case is probed. How will it work in same-sex marriage?

The Court responded saying that it has to look at the matter at hand with an open mind and not the position as stated by a law saying that changes are happening across the world. SG Tushar Mehta, however, maintained that the petition does not even deserve the filing of an affidavit. The matter concluded with the Court directing the petitioners to place on record all those people who have been affected by the non-registration of such marriages at the next hearing.

The petition has been filed by Abhijit Iyer Mitra, Gopi Shankar M, Giti Thadani and G Oorvasi and it is argued that denial of the Right to Marry is in violation of the Right to Equality and Right to Life as guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Searched termsdelhi high court
OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Explained: Why India is set to join the elite club of countries with $1 trillion in exports and why it matters 

In May 2026, Union Minister of Commerce and Industry, Piyush Goyal, announced that India has set a target of achieving exports worth $1 trillion in 2026 and $2 trillion over the next five years. Numbers indicate that India is heading on a credible path toward s $1 trillion worth of exports in FY 2026-27 with sustained momentum.

Farooq Abdullah says ‘Pakistan keeping Kashmir issue alive is saving us’: Beyond the NC leader’s political self-goal, why Pakistan’s ‘jugular vein’ rhetoric is hypocritical and futile 

Farooq Abdullah, the former Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, and National Conference supremo, Farooq Abdullah laid bare his traitorous intentions when claimed that it is Pakistan, which is keeping the supposed Kashmir issue alive, or else New Delhi's plans are not good. Abdullah resorted to blatant fear-mongering and instigation, saying that Kashmiris should fight or be ready to perish into oblivion. 
- Advertisement -