Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Home Specials Even before Waseem Rizvi petitioned for removing 26 verses from Quran, a petition to...

Even before Waseem Rizvi petitioned for removing 26 verses from Quran, a petition to ban the Quran altogether was filed 36 years ago: Read Details

The petition had argued that every copy of the Quran is 'liable to be forfeited' under CrPC Section 95 when read with IPC Sections 153A and 295A

Syed Waseem Rizvi, the ex-chairman of the UP Shia Central Waqf Board, has recently stirred the hornet’s nest by filing a petition in the Supreme Court seeking the removal of 26 verses from the Quran. In his petition, Rizvi has argued that the Quran contains “some verses that are used to promote terrorism, violence, jihad.” This had led to a series of threats, with a Muslim cleric even offering a bounty of ₹20,000 for anyone who brings Rizvi’s head.

While such a petition might seem unusual today, it was 36 years ago when advocate Chandmal Chopra and one Sital Singh moved the Calcutta High Court seeking a ban on the Quran altogether. An application was filed on March 29, 1985, under Article 226 (power of the High Court to issue some writs) of the Indian Constitution, asking the Calcutta High Court to direct the government to ‘forfeit’ every copy of the ‘Holy book’.

The petition argued that every copy of the Quran is ‘liable to be forfeited’ under Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) Section 95 (Power to declare certain publications forfeited) when read with Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 153A (Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion) and 295A (Deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage reli­gious feelings). The petition had argued that Muslims have been exploiting the laws so far to ban books critical of Islam. He added, “so far it had been the privilege of the Peoples of the Book to ban and burn the sacred literature of the Pagans.”

Calcutta High Court entertained the petition

Chandmal Chopra and Sital Singh cited direct verses from the Quran, calling for violence against the ‘infidels’. “When the sacred months are over, slay the idol-worshippers, wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them,” they quoted one verse from the ‘Holy book’. Another verse, cited by them, read, “Believers! make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Let them find harshness in you’. The matter initially came up before Justice Khastgir J of the Calcutta High Court.

Far from dismissing the application, as one would expect today, the learned Judge had entertained the application. She also issued notice to the contending parties. “Everything seems insane and absurd. No mortal on earth can challenge the holy scripture and no court in the world has any authority over it,” senior advocate had Alhaj C.F. Ali remarked. Soon, over 70 advocates passed an ‘official resolution’ urging other lawyers to boycott the court of Justice Khastgir J.

Muslim groups opposed the historic petition

Radical Islamist organisations, such as Jamait-e-Islami and Kerala Muslim Association of Calcutta set up a ‘Quran Defence Committee‘ to strengthen the movement. However, they decided to not become a respondent in the case, for ‘fear’ of law and order turmoil (at the hands of common Muslims). The CPI(M)-ruled West Bengal government took a firm stand against the petition and its admission in the Calcutta High Court. In its affidavit, it said, “the court has no jurisdiction to pronounce a judgement on the Koran, the holy scripture of the Muslims the world over, each and every word of which, according to Islamic belief, is unalterable”.

Congress and CPI(M) up in arms

The government claimed that it was filed with malafide intent and that such a petition has never been filed in Indian history. The Congress-led-Union government also sided with the Left and opposed the plea. With mounting political pressure, Justice Khastgir dropped it from her list and sent it to the Court of Justice Satish Chandra. On the advice of state Advocate-General S.K. Acharyya, the matter was transferred to the Bench of Justice Bimal Chandra Basak, who dismissed the petition on May 17, 1985.

Review petition and the arguments

Advocate Chandmal Chopra noted several ‘errors’ in the Court’s verdict and thus filed another application on June 18 of that year, seeking a review of the judgement. Justice Basak, in his earlier judgement, had noted that the Quran had divine origin and had no earthly source. He had also proclaimed that the Court cannot entertain matters related to the ‘Holy book’ and that it did not insult other religions.

Chopra, in his review petition, had argued that the observations made by the Judge are against the basic tenets of secularism and therefore unconstitutional. He had also pointed out that the verdict claimed that Quran did not insult other religions, despite the verses quoted in the writ petition (calling for violence against infidels) suggested otherwise.

In his review petition, he said, “A book, even if it be a book held sacred by any community living in India, loses the protection of Sec 295 of the Indian Penal Code if its publication amounts to offences under Section 295-A of the Indian Penal Code and should have been held accordingly.” However, Justice Bimal Chandra Basak again dismissed the petition on June 21, 1985, highlighting the time-barred nature of the petition and without going into the merits of the case.

The publication of Calcutta Quran Petition book and aftermath

Following the dismissal of the petition, historian Sita Ram Goel along with Chandraal Chopra published the book named ‘The Calcutta Quran petition’ in 1986. The book highlights the saga of Muslim appeasement and the vote-bank politics of pseudo secularism. After the book was published, Hindu Raksha Dal President Indra Sain Sharma and Secretary Rajkumar Arya were arrested. They had published 24 Ayats of the Quran under the caption, ‘Why riots take place in the country?’

They had argued, “These Ayats command the believers (Musalmans) to fight against followers of other faiths’ and that ‘so long as the Ayats are not removed from the Quran, riots in the country cannot be prevented.” However, they were soon released on the orders of the Metropolitan Magistrate of Delhi Justice Z S Lohat. While Waseem Rizvi faces threats to his life for citing ‘violent verses in the Quran’, it was the heroics of Chandmal Chopra that set the precedent.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

IIT Kanpur Professor predicts COVID-19 to peak in May, dismisses claims of Kumbh and poll rallies being responsible for spread

The IIT Kanpur professor said that since the election rallies and the Kumbh are held in open spaces, there are few chances of it spreading the COVID virus

Government of India opens COVID-19 vaccine for everyone above 18 years of age: All you need to know

On April 19, the Government of India announced the Phase 3 Strategy of Covid-19 vaccination.

Imran Khan says ‘Inshallah, there will come a time that in Western countries, people will fear insulting Prophet’, but says rioting hurting Pakistan

Pakistan PM Imran Khan addressed the recent violence by Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) which enveloped Pakistan

Allahabad HC imposes restrictions in five cities till April 26, Govt of UP refuses complete lockdown as suggested by court: Details

Allahabad HC issued a list of strict restrictions in five UP cities Prayagraj, Lucknow, Varanasi, Kanpur Nagar, and Gorakhpur till April 26

Pakistan violence: Imran Khan government fails to control riots that erupted from protests against France

TLP is getting support in Pakistan from all sections, including armed police and military personnel.

Delhi and Maharashtra governments leave migrant workers in the lurch as they return to their native places in the wake of second wave of...

Migrant labourers in Delhi are leaving the city for their native places as Arvind Kejriwal announced a strict 6-day curfew to control the spread of the coronavirus

Recently Popular

Filmmaker Hansal Mehta challenges for free flight tickets to Pakistan but goes into hiding after Twitter user provides it. Read what happened

Hansal Mehta's flight to Pakistan via Dubai is scheduled for 20th April, 2021. We shall keep you posted if Mehta goes to Pakistan or will he register his name in long list of paper tigers.

Understanding the hate factory: How Rohan Joshi and his hateful post against Hindus gives us an insight into the ‘liberal’ mind

Comedian Rohan Joshi tells Bhakts, "I have nothing but contempt for them and nit a shred of empathy" as he mocks Coronavirus deaths

Maharashtra Remdesivir ruckus: Saket Gokhale brazens his lies by filing complaint against Fadnavis, BJP returns favour. Details

A complaint has been filed against Saket Gokhale by a BJP member in which the complainant has accused the Congress supporter of lying and waging a war against the state in the midst of a pandemic

Delhi couple abuses cops over masks in viral video, husband blames wife after arrest

Police have booked and arrested a Delhi couple after the duo misbehaved with the personnel over masks. The video went viral.

250 ventilators sent by central govt lied unutilized in the state of Punjab amid the second wave of coronavirus

250 ventilators sent by the central government to Punjab for use in government hospitals were lying unused till late March.

When ‘comedians’ double up as doctors and believe ‘Bhakts’ deserve the misery as Chinese coronavirus rages

You will never see them questioning how many mosques have opened up their gates as medical facilities. Because, everyone likes to keep their heads.
- Advertisement -


Connect with us