Anti Hindu bias

The Washington-based CSOH's study claims to track hate speech but relies on activist networks, ignores police records and court proceedings, and applies scrutiny only to Hindu groups while excluding Islamist and missionary activities from comparable examination.

After advocate Rakesh Kishor hurled a shoe at CJI Gavai, he was pardoned and charges were not pressed against him - read why

Audrey Truschke further dismisses Hinduphobia as ‘non-existent’ and to do so, she relies on references from ‘scholars’ and ‘progressive’ Hindu Americans. Now, Truschke’s ‘progressive Hindu Americans’ are none other than “Hindus for Human Rights” (HfHR), a George Soros-funded anti-Hindu and anti-India outfit run by Sunita Vishwanath.

While the judiciary is assigned the role of the protector of the constitutional right of freedom of religion, it has increasingly been demonstrating a subtle yet pervasive anti-Hindu bias. In the recent years, this percolation of anti-Hindu bias in the judicial system has become evident.

Khadija asked Muslim parents to raise their children in Islamic culture and prevent them from participating in festivals of other religions.

The Muslim man had claimed," I am a Muslim. I have imaan. He is a mere stone-worshiper. How can he be trusted over me?” His insulting remarks about the Hindu religion outraged the customers present there, who countered him, and a scuffle broke out.

CJI DY Chandrachud went from being a liberal hero to a villain - all because he didn't submit to absolute anti-Hindu sentiments

The Japan Times has published arguable the dumbest article peddling the usual Muslim victimhood and demonising Hindus

“We keep hearing that it is difficult for Muslims in India, but I never faced such hatred there,” Sajida emphasised.

Amid Bangladesh floods, a video has gone viral from Noakhali, where a Mualvi is seen cutting off a sacred thread from a child's neck in exchange for some relief material