bias

Jimmy Wales called the proposed indefinite ban “ludicrous”, but editors overruled him after accusing Larry Sanger of canvassing supporters, challenging source rules and backing greater accountability for Wikipedia’s powerful anonymous administrators during the online dispute.

Court called tweets prima facie derogatory and issued interim restraint without hearing defendants. Plaintiffs cited threats. OpIndia says order is not final and raises concerns about broad restrictions affecting independent reporting and public interest journalism.

Talk page debates show multiple editors objecting to selective sourcing, misrepresentation of The Independent, and violation of neutrality norms, arguing that the “propaganda” label lacks consensus and reflects contested editorial push, not established fact.

While opposing government censorship, Jimmy Wales endorses Wikipedia’s internal blacklisting of Right-leaning media, proving that the platform’s bias is institutional. The OpIndia dossier shows how Wikimedia-funded editors helped entrench this ideological control.

Justice Vikram Nath remarked that the stray dogs case earned him worldwide recognition, beyond his legal work. He highlighted support from dog lovers and noted how their appreciation, alongside human blessings, now shapes his public identity.

OpIndia research on Wikipedia focuses on its left bias and how it pays editors and funds dubious anti-India orgs

Editors of the Wikipedia page on Godhra train burning gives more importance to ‘opinions of scholars’ over court verdicts

Aakar Patel posted in support of Umar Khalid, declaring that “locking up a man indefinitely without conviction is not democracy it’s tyranny.” 

The concept of a university, as we know it today, has to be decolonized

On Friday, my phone buzzed to an incoming email from The Guardian, the subject of which was 'Guardian reporter Aina J Khan'.