Yogendra yadav

Yogendra Yadav's call for a "politics of resistance" and his assertion that democracy should run "from the streets, not Parliament" raise fundamental questions about whether permanent street mobilisation is being elevated above India's constitutional framework of representative democracy.

Although Cockroach Janta Party protestors are now issuing “Nepal bana denge” threats, indicating Bangladesh- and Nepal-like violent regime changes in the last two years, CJP’s origins go back to a meeting attended by ‘andolanjeevi’ Yogendra Yadav a decade ago. 

Assam’s story cannot be understood through borrowed metaphors or distant ideological templates. It demands engagement with its history, its agreements, and its anxieties. Only then can the debate over delimitation move from rhetorical labeling to meaningful democratic dialogue.

Election Commission data from Tamil Nadu and Gujarat contradicts Yogendra Yadav’s claims, showing deletions were driven by deaths, migration, and duplicate registrations, while correction mechanisms remain available to eligible voters.

The real question is not “Why no SIR in Assam?” But, “Why does the opposition oppose or support the same process depending on its vote-bank math?”

Yogendra Yadav dismissed going to courts or submitting affidavits and claimed that public perception favored Rahul Gandhi.

Yogendra Yadav claimed that while ECI argues that an SIR in Bihar will help weed out illegal Bangladeshi and Rohingya infiltrators from the voter list, it will also remove over 2.5 crore Indian citizens from the electoral roll.

Yogendra Yadav tried to frame Rohith Vemula's suicide as the result of caste oppression against a SC which he was not.

Aandolanjeevi Yogendra Yadav, supporting Maha Vikas Agaadi, was manhandled by Prakash Ambedkar's supporters in Maharashtra.

Election Commission rejected claims by Congress leaders of alleged tampering of EVMs in some Haryana seats claiming that BJP won seats with more battery charge levels