Ram even did not even spare the judges of the Supreme Court. He stated that there are factual mistakes in the order of justices Bhanumathi and Bopanna.
The woman's advocate has stated that the 16-year-old girl's father is interfering with her right to live with her life partner whom she had chosen after attaining puberty and married through a valid 'Nikahnama'.
Noting that losses on this count will run up to Rs 1,500 crore per annum, the Supreme Court bench said that as a result, DMRC may not remain a profitable venture.
CJI Ranjan Gogoi asked senior Advocate Dhavan on whether he accepts that if the Hindus carried out prayers in the outer courtyard in the 'chabutra', it would mean there would be a deity.