Tuesday, October 20, 2020
Home Specials OpIndia Explains 5 questions about the new Industrial Relations Code and the Occupational Safety, Health and...

5 questions about the new Industrial Relations Code and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Condition Code answered

There have been several questions raised in connection with the three bills passed by the parliament and in this article, we aim to answer 5 such questions that have been raised.

In the current parliament session, three bills – Code on Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions, Industrial Relations Code and Social Security Code were passed to reform Labour laws.

The central government had said that there are over 100 state and 40 central laws regulating various aspects of labour such as the resolution of industrial disputes, working conditions, social security and wages. The Second National Commission on Labour (2002) found existing legislation to be complex, with outdated provisions and inconsistent definition, hence, to improve ease of compliance, the Commission recommended the consolidation of central labour laws into broader groups.

In 2019, the Ministry of Labour and Employment introduced four Bills to consolidate 29 central laws. While the Code on Wages, 2019 was passed by Parliament, Bills on other areas were referred to the Standing Committee on Labour. The Standing Committee submitted its report on the three Bills, and then, the Modi government replaced these Bills with new ones on September 19, 2020. To that end, the three bills – Code on Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions, Industrial Relations Code and Social Security Code were passed.

There have been several questions raised in connection with the three bills passed by the parliament and in this article, we aim to answer 5 such questions that have been raised.

The Industrial Relations Code 2020

The Industrial Relations Code seeks to replace three specific labour laws:

  1. The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
  2. The Trade Unions Act, 1926.
  3. The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

Question 1: Unites up to 300 can hire and fire without seeking government permission, and thus, it might lead to increased hiring and firing

The threshold that has been increased from 100 to 300 was recommended by The Parliamentary Standing Committee. The Parliamentary Standing Committee has recommended that the threshold of one hundred workers may be increased to three hundred workers for seeking prior permission for lay-off, retrenchment and closure. In the previous provisions, the rule of prior government permission for hire and fire only pertained to factories, mines and plantations.

The criticism in this case is that this change in the law would compromise the workers’ rights and promote firing practises. However, the only change in this aspect is that units with up to 300 workers will not have to take prior permission of the appropriate Government before hiring and firing. The workers’ rights workers such as notice before retrenchment, compensation at the rate of 15 days wages per completed year of service and pay in lieu of notice period has not been compromised. 

It is to be kept in mind that there is no evidence that a change of this rule to extend it to units with up to 300 workers would promote hire and fire practises. What is also being pushed under the rug is that the Industrial Relations Code envisages an additional monetary benefit equivalent to 15 days of wages under newly created Reskilling Fund.

The Economic Survey, 2019 had analysed that due to the threshold of 100 workers, there were several businesses that were incentivised to remain a small unit. The State of Rajasthan in 2014 had increased the threshold from 100 to 300 workers and done away with the requirement of prior permission before retrenchment etc., in case of firms having less than 300 workers. The impact of increase in threshold in the state of Rajasthan, showed that average number of factories in Rajasthan having more than 100 increased significantly as compared to the rest of India.  The total output in those factories also increased.  

Following the footsteps of Rajasthan, 15 more States have enhanced threshold to 300 workers even before the Industrial Relations Code 2020 was passed. These States include, AP, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, HP, Jharkhand, Karnataka, MP,  Meghalaya, Odisha, Punjab, Rajasthan and UP.

Question 2: Won’t Fixed Term Employment introduce hire and fire

By several people, the introduction of ‘Fixed Term Employment’ is being touted as a new rule that has been introduced by the government. However, Fixed Term Employment has already been notified by Central Government and 14 other States. These States include Assam, Bihar, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand (apparel and made up) Karnataka, MP, Odisha, Punjab, Rajasthan, UP (textile and EOU), and Uttarakhand.

Earlier, an employer could only hire either permanent employees or contractual employees. There were several issues with this limitation. The employer often had to hire unskilled labourers with no commitment and long term relationship with the company, in case of contractual employees. There have also been allegations that the contractors charges full amount in terms of minimum wage and other entitled benefits like EPF, ESIC but do not pass the same to the contract labour.   

However, now with the introduction of Fixed Term Employment, the employer can directly get into a fixed term contract with the employee without the middleman. A fixed term employee has been made statutorily entitled for all benefits and service conditions equivalent to that of a regular employee. In fact the code on Industrial Relations also extends benefit of gratuity even for a Fixed Term Employee contract of one year which is five years in case of regular employee.

Hence, the introduction of the Fixed Term Employee option is actually a pro-labour reform that the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 has introduced.

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Condition Code, 2020

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Condition Code, 2020 consolidates 13 acts regulating health, safety and working conditions. These include Factories Act 1948, The Mines Act 1952, and the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

Question 1: The definition of Inter-State Migrant worker is different in Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act, 1979 Act and new Code – will it create confusion?

The Inter-state Migrant Worker Act, 1979 has been subsumed in OSH Code.  The various provisions of the erstwhile Act have been further strengthened in the OSH Code. The definition of Inter-State Migrant worker is same in the Social Security Code and the OSH Code. 

The definition of the inter-state migrant worker was very restrictive in the Inter-state Migrant Worker Act, 1979. It provided that a person who is recruited through a contractor in one state for employment in another state, to be an ‘Inter-state Migrant Worker’. The OSH Code expands the definition of the migrant worker to include those workers who would be directly employed by the employer besides by contractor.  Further, it has also been made possible that a migrant, who comes on his own, in the destination State, can declare himself a migrant worker by registering on an electronic portal on the basis of self-declaration seeded with Aaadhar. The registration on the portal has been made simple and there is no requirement of any other document except Aaadhar.  

The Ministry in this regard has also taken steps to develop a national database to enrol unorganised workers including migrants, which will inter-alia help migrant workers get jobs, map their skills and provide other social security benefits.  It will also help in better policy formulation for unorganised sector workers, in general. 

A statutory provision for helpline for migrant workers has also been made.

The migrant workers will also be able to enjoy the benefits of portability in respect of ration and avail benefits from building and other construction cess. They will also get all other benefits of ESIC, EPFO and annual medical check-up etc.

Question 2: Won’t night shifts for women compromise their safety?

Gender equality in the workplace and in hiring practices has been a long-time demand. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Condition code ensures that gender equality is maintained in workplaces and women, should they want, be entitled to get the same working opportunity, including the night shift.

However, safety of women is always a paramount concern and to that end, sufficient safeguards for employing women at night have been provided. The consent of women for employing them at night has been made mandatory. Further, it is said that the appropriate government shall prescribe conditions for safety, holidays and working hours or other conditions before permitting women to work at night.

Question 3: Have Welfare provisions been diluted in the new Codes?

It is being alleged that in the new code, several welfare benefits have been diluted and that would affect the rights and well-being of the workers. However, that allegation is far from the truth since several new provisions for the welfare of the workers have been introduced through these bills.

Following are some of the welfare provisions:

  1. There is generally a threshold of workers employees, beyond which, the government notifies certain health and safety measures. Through these codes, for establishment carrying on hazardous and life-threatening occupations, the Government can notify coverage even on establishment having workers less than the threshold.
  2. ESIC has been extended to plantation workers.
  3. Appointment letter has been made mandatory. Earlier, hiring workers without an appointment letter could be a means to exploit workers by employers. If there was no appointment letter and no record of the hire, the establishment could arbitrarily fire workers and even deny them there basic rights like ESIC, Provident Fund etc.
  4. Free annual health checkup has been introduced.
  5. The bipartite safety committee has been introduced for establishments in factory, mines and plantation in place of hazardous factories. The involvement of two separate parties in the committee ensures that the steps taken are fair to the workers.
  6. Activities of the plantation worker dealing with elements like insecticides, pesticides have been included as hazardous processes. Earlier, though the health effects of these jobs were severe, they were not considered a hazardous process and thus, these workers were not given certain benefits extended to workers in the hazardous process category.
  7. There are certain other facilities that factories and establishments have to provide, for which, the number of workers threshold has been reduced. For example, the number of workers beyond which an establishment will have to provide canteen services has been reduced to 100. Earlier, in certain acts, the threshold was higher – for example, in Factories Act and Mines Act it was 250. An establishment has to provide Crèche facilities if it employees more than 50 women, and a Welfare Officer has to be employed beyond 250 workers for factory, mine, plantation. Earlier, a Welfare Officer only had to be employed beyond 500 workers for Factories and Mines and 300 workers in Plantations.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Rajdeep Sardesai and India Today secure a gag order against social media user who had said they took 8 crores for Rhea interview

Issuing an order on India Today petition, the Delhi HC has ordered Twitter to suspend the man named Anurag Srivastava, and Google to remove the content from search results.

Jinnah’s ideology: Prof Brij Narain, a strong supporter of Pakistan’s creation, was hacked to death by an Islamist mob in Lahore in 1947

Prof Brij Narain, an enthusiastic exponent of Pakistan, was hacked to death in broad daylight by a Muslim mob even as he kept pleading them to stop ransacking his house in Lahore in the wake of partition .

India-China standoff: Indian army captures PLA soldier, probing espionage angle

The army stated that the PLA personnel will be handed over to the Chinese officials at Chushul-Moldo meeting point, following the completion of formalities.

If Congress comes back to power, it will be impossible to utter a word against them

This time, they will have a third and most potent weapon: technology and dominance in the digital space.

‘Uddhav Thackeray has formed a special team to bring down Republic TV, Arnab has to be locked up’: Explosive sting reveals MVA govt plot

"The strategy is to lock him (Arnab Goswami) behind bars. Nobody can save his channel from being banned," the Congress leader said.

Recently Popular

After Chinese phones blocking weather data for Arunachal and Ladakh, now Twitter shows Leh as part of China

Security analyst Nitin A Gokhale found that Twitter has labelled Leh in Ladakh as part of People's Republic of China (PRC)

In 2012 ‘out of town’ Salman Khan partied with Parambir Singh in Mumbai on day Bandra cops could not serve him Court summons for...

As reported by Mid-Day in 2012, Salman Khan and Parambir Singh were both found attending a Christmas party hosted by Sunny Dewan and his wife Anu Dewan in Mumbai. This when the Bandra cops claimed Khan was not in town.

During 26/11 Mumbai attack, Param Bir Singh refused to be on ground and take on terrorists, then Mumbai CP Hasan Gafoor had said

Hasan Gafoor, who was the Mumbai Commissioner of Police during the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, had accused senior police officials, including Param Bir Singh of not taking on the terrorists.

Pro-congress journalists and trolls target Amitabh Bachchan’s son-in-law Nikhil Nanda when another Nikhil Nanda criticised Rahul Gandhi

Nikhil Nanda, the MD of JHS Svendgaard Laboratories Limited, had exposed Rahul Gandhi for criticising India's handling of COVID-19 crisis

Shashi Tharoor wears Mani Shankar Aiyar’s hat, denigrates India and praises Pakistan at Lahore Literature Festival, claims Modi govt targeting Muslims

Shashi Tharoor denigrated India and praised Pakistan during a discussion at the Lahore Literature Festival.

Odisha lawyer Mehendi Reza gives rape threats to Kangana Ranaut on Navratri post, claims Facebook ID was ‘hacked’

Actress Kangana Ranaut receives rape threat on her post wishing people for Navratri.
- Advertisement -

Days after an Islamist brutally beheaded a teacher, France Govt prepares to expel 231 religious extremists from the country

France is planning to come down hard on religious extremists after an Islamic youth beheaded a teacher recently

Congress, media target Varun Gandhi for unwillingness to speak to a stranger late at night: Here is who the man was and why he...

The Congress party has decided to go after BJP MP Varun Gandhi after a leaked version of his conversation found its way to the media.

India formally invites Australia to join the 2020 Malabar trilateral naval exercise, Australia confirms full participation: Read details

It will be the first time all members of the regional grouping known as the Quad will participate in the Malabar naval exercise

Rajasthan: Two minor girls gang-raped, police shift victims to the hospital in an auto-rickshaw instead of ambulance

Two minors gang-raped by six in Rajasthan. Police conducting raids at various locations in search of accused.

Dance moves by Dr Arup in Silchar, Assam wins Internet, inspires Hrithik Roshan

The Assam doctor's dance video has gone viral on social media, gaining thousands of likes and comments.

Family of girl murdered in terror attack condemns BBC for providing platform to terrorist Ahlam Tamimi, painting her as a victim: Read details

Ahlam Tamimi was convicted and sentenced for 16 years her role in a pizza parlour bombing in Jerusalem in 2001 before her imprisonment was cut short in a prisoner-exchange deal with Hamas

Republic TV’s Arnab Goswami to sue Param Bir Singh for Rs 200 crore after Maha Govt’s admission in Mumbai High court

Maha Govt and Mumbai police distances itself from the allegations meted out at Republic TV by PC Param Bir Singh

Frustrated with “rants” of Shashi Tharoor, MP Nishikant Dubey requests Lok Sabha speaker to put him in a committee where there is no Tharoor

Congress leader Shashi Tharoor yesterday ranted against Republic TV and Times Now, issuing 'moral sermons' to the corporates who financed the aforementioned news channels

Rajdeep Sardesai and India Today secure a gag order against social media user who had said they took 8 crores for Rhea interview

Issuing an order on India Today petition, the Delhi HC has ordered Twitter to suspend the man named Anurag Srivastava, and Google to remove the content from search results.

Connect with us

245,563FansLike
464,943FollowersFollow
18,700SubscribersSubscribe