HomeNews ReportsMundra Port drug seizure: Drug smugglers' modus operandi revealed, Pakistani smugglers' involvement suspected

Mundra Port drug seizure: Drug smugglers’ modus operandi revealed, Pakistani smugglers’ involvement suspected

The smugglers would put the drugs in fishermen's net and throw in the sea to hoodwink the authorities, investigation reveals

Revelations in the the 3,000 kg drug seizure from Mundra Port in Gujarat suggest that Pakistani nationals may be involved in the smuggling racket.

As reported by New18 Gujarati, the Pakistani drug smugglers would send the drugs to Iran where the further transactions are carried out at the Konarak port in Iran. Of the seven Iranian nationals arrested in the drug seizure, one of the accused has earlier been arrested by at least 3-4 countries in drug smuggling. Satellite phones and other communication devices are recovered which the authorities are currently investigating.

Report further suggests that they would come up with unique ways to smuggle drugs. The smugglers would put the drugs in fishermen’s net and throw in the sea to save hoodwink the authorities. As per R K Rajput, PI, ATS, the drug smugglers would also hide the drugs inside the cavities of the boat when Indian Coast Guard would come for verification and would pretend to be fishermen.

As per reports, further investigations have revealed that the Andhra firm that has been registered as official recipient of the drugs, had earlier imported similar consignment from Afghanistan in June this year. That consignment too was sent by M/S Hasan Husain Ltd and declared as containing ‘semi-processed talc stones’. The invoice was in the name of one Kuldip Singh, from Alipur, Delhi.

The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) has taken custody of Chennai-based Machavaram Sudhakar and his wife Govindaraju Durga Purna Vaisali. The latter is the proprietor of the firm M/s Aashi Trading Company which is registered in Andhra Pradesh’s Vijaywada. The DRI is also conducting investigations in New Delhi, Chennai, Coimbatore, Ahmedabad, Mandvi, Gandhidham and Vijayawada.

Indian Express report states that the DRI told a Bhuj court that the consignment was of Afghan origin and that the accused were in touch with “Afghan and Irani nationals” and there was need to probe “probable threat perception involved”.

Sudhakar informed DRI that the firm was started in August last year and the consignment was received from Hasan Husain Ltd in Afghanistan through their local representative ‘Amit’. For this consignment, Sudhakar reportedly received two sets of documents and when he inquired from his Iranian contact ‘Javed’, he was informed that the consignment weighed 300 kgs extra than what the liner recorded. Hence, there were two sets of documents.

Reports suggests that two more such consignments that were on their way here have since been diverted. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has also filed a money laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Madhya Pradesh HC rules that Bhojshala is a Saraswati Temple: Read about the archaeological, historical, scientific and administrative reasons cited in the landmark verdict

The High Court declared the disputed area a Bhojshala with Saraswati Temple, quashed the restrictive portions of the 2003 ASI order, and mandated the creation of a trust for temple administration and Sanskrit education

Arvind Kejriwal and his lackeys are lying, again: Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma didn’t ‘recuse’ herself, she transferred the case because she initiated contempt proceedings....

This episode focuses on a pattern, the weaponisation of public pressure against state institutions, particularly the judiciary. When people with large social media followings launch coordinated campaigns to delegitimise sitting judges, manufacture or manipulate evidence, and publicly refuse to participate in the judicial process, they are not practising Satyagraha. They are systematically undermining public trust in institutions that safeguard ordinary people far more than politicians.
- Advertisement -