Home Blog Page 5861

Ashok Singhal, Class of 92: Remembering the Chief Architect of the Ram Janmabhoomi Movement

Four years ago, on this day, one of the greatest stalwarts of the Ram Janmabhoomi Movement, Ashok Singhal, passed away at the ripe old age of 89 after suffering from poor health for a while. From an affluent family and a graduate in Metallurgical Engineering from the Banaras Hindu University, Ashok Singhal dedicated his life to the resurgence of the Hindu religion.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah remembered him today on the occasion of his death anniversary. He hailed the stalwart’s contribution in the Ram Janmabhoomi movement and said that he sacrificed a comfortable life to dedicate himself to the country and Dharma.


Ashok Singhal’s ‘tryst with destiny’ began in 1984, three years after he became the National Joint General Secretary of the VHP. It was the year when the VHP organized its first ‘Dharma Sansad’ to discuss the Ram Janmabhoomi issue. Sants and Sadhus contributed participated in the event in significant numbers and the late Hindutva stalwart played a critical role in making the event a grand success.

Then on, Ashok Singhal became the working president of the VHP. He chalked out strategies and made the Hindutva ideology popular among the masses. More than that, he was the valuable link between the BJP and the community of Sants and Sadhus. Singhal is also credited with convincing the party to include the issue of Ram Janmabhoomi in its 1989 election manifesto.

Read: A Hindu perennially ashamed and guilty: How narrative after Ayodhya verdict is trying to achieve it

From 1984, through the stormy days of the opening of the locks to allow Hindus to worship at the sacred site, the Shilanyas in 1989, the organization of the Kar Seva and ultimately, the demolition of the disputed structure at Ram Janmabhoomi, Ashok Singhal remained at the helm of affairs. In many ways, he was the chief architect of the movement. Subsequently, an FIR was registered against him for his involvement in the demolition.

Ashok Singhal was one of those individuals who lived by his convictions. After the BJP stormed into power on the back of the Ram Janmabhoomi Movement, his personal relationship with the party soured. He felt that Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s government was not doing enough for the cause of Ram Mandir. It is said that he felt cheated. And thus, he was compelled to go on a hunger strike against the government accusing it of taking a callous approach towards the campaign for Ram Mandir.

Read: As liberals claim South Indians don’t care about Ram, read about the history of Ramayana in South Indian states

At that point of time, Ashok Singhal was not even on talking terms with Atal Bihari Vajpayee and at times directed his wrath against Lal Krishna Advani who was the Home Minister and Deputy Prime Minister at the time. He demanded publicly that Advani stop saying that the 6th of December, 1992 was the “saddest day of my life”. According to Singhal, the say ought to be celebrated as Shaurya Divas.

However, whatever angst he had against the earlier BJP government, Ashok Singhal’s opposition to it appears to have been dissolved by the time Narendra Modi was elected the Prime Minister of the country in 2014. He heralded the Narendra Modi’s victory as the beginning of a revolution.

“I was at the Sai Baba Ashram where Sai Baba told me by 2020 the entire country will be Hindu and 2030 the entire world will be Hindu. I feel that revolution has started,” Ashok Singhal said at an event in New Delhi. “This is not a modest revolution. It will not remain confined to India but present a new ideology before the world,” he said. According to Ashok Singhal, Narendra Modi’s victory at the polls was the end of 800 years of slavery.

Ashok Singhal played a monumental role in the rise of Hindutva from a fringe ideology to the dominant power in the country. However, there are other facets to the leader that is not very well known. For instance, he was a trained classical vocalist, his guru was the legendary Pandit Omkar Nath Thakur. It is said that he had a melodious voice.

In an interview with DNA, Singhal spoke at length about the work that he had done during his lifetime. He said, “In 1981 after the mass conversion of Scheduled Caste people to Islam in Meeankshipuram in Tamil Nadu, I became part of the VHP. We went there and talked to the leaders of the SC community in the villages. Their main complaint was that they were not allowed into the temples. We built 200 temples for the scheduled castes. The conversions stopped.”

Read: The comprehensive legal History of Ram Janmabhoomi case: A case that will have its relevance for generations to come

Ashok Singhal also appeared to have much favourable opinion of Narendra Modi in comparison to Atal Bihari Vajpayee. When asked about BJP’s prospects in the 2014 Lok Sabha Elections, he said that times were changing and he believed in destiny. He said, “Things are changing. They have brought Modi to the forefront. I believe in destiny. God guides the temple movement. It is not dependent on political parties. The battle has been going on since the Babri Masjid was built in 1528. There have been 76 battles over the last four hundred years and three lakh people have died.”

The stalwart’s opinion on ‘interfaith dialogue’ was also consistent with the conviction with which he had conducted himself throughout his life. He said, “There is no need for a dialogue. People are coming to us (Hinduism) without a dialogue. Patanjali Yoga is becoming popular all over the world. We did not go out. People are coming. We do not need conversions.”

As early as February 2013, Ashok Singhal had compared Narendra Modi’s popularity to that of Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister. “There was demand from the masses in the first general elections to make Nehru prime minister… I see a similar demand for Modi now,” he had told reporters.

Like many great men before him, Ashok Singhal passed away without witnessing the conclusion of a dispute centuries old. He passed away at Medanta Hospital in Gurgaon following a multi-organ dysfunction and sepsis. He had been diagnosed with right lower lobe pneumonia, carbon-dioxide retention, sepsis and drowsiness.

Ashok Singhal’s lived his life staying true to his conviction. He graduated as a Metallurgical Engineer but engineered the greatest mass movement of Independent India. He had one demand from the party but felt betrayed when the party decided that time hadn’t come yet for the construction of the Ram Temple. Towards the end of his life, however, he could foresee that the cause for which he had sacrificed his whole life would soon come to fruition.

Although Ashok Singhal did not live long enough to witness the resolution of the Ram Janmabhoomi dispute, he died with the knowledge that it will be resolved soon enough. It took five years for the matter to come to its logical conclusion but the matter has come to rest. The Supreme Court verdict has honoured his legacy and the cause he dedicated his life to. And when all of this is said and done, Ashok Singhal will be remembered as one of the pioneers of the Ram Janmabhoomi Movement.

Judge S Abdul Nazeer who was a part of Ayodhya and Triple Talaq verdict gets Z plus security after threats from Islamist PFI

0

The Central government has taken the decision to assign Z plus security to Judge S Abdul Nazeer who was a part of the bench that delivered the historic verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi, Ayodhya case. Incidentally, Judge S Abdul Nazeer was also a part of the bench was decided to criminalise Triple Talaq other than Ayodhya verdict. The Z Plus security is being given after reports that he and his family are under threat from Islamist organisation Popular Front of India (PFI).

Read: Supreme Court hands over Ram Janmabhoomi site to Hindus to build Ram Mandir, Sunni Waqf Board to be given alternate site for mosque

Recently, the agencies have warned that Judge S Abdul Nazeer and his family members face threat from Islamist organisation PFI. As reported by ANI, the Home Ministry instructed CRPF and local police to provide security to Nazeer.

Reportedly, Judge Nazeer faces threats not only from PFI but also ‘other quarters’.

Read: Ramalingam murder case: NIA arrests Myden Ahmed Shali, head of the ‘Dawah’ team linked to PFI

According to an official communication accessed by ANI, security forces and local police will “immediately” provide ‘Z’ category security to Justice Nazeer and his family members in Karnataka and other parts of the country “in view of the threat from PFI and other
quarters, as reported by the security agencies”.

The letter acquired by ANI, the Z Plus security will come out of the Karnataka quota when he travels to the state and similar security will be provided to his family members.

Read: Jharkhand bans violent Islamist outfit PFI while Kerala and Karnataka refuse to do so

Justice Nazeer, 61, was reportedly first enrolled as an advocate in 1983 in the Karnataka High Court. He was later appointed an additional judge in the High Court in 2003. Justice Nazeer was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court on February 17, 2017.

It was recently reported that retired Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi will also be provided with Z Plus security in Assam, where he is likely to settle now that he has retired.

Gautam Gambhir says Dhoni’s advice cost him a century in 2011 Cricket World Cup final

It seems like Gautam Gambhir has got the uncanny knack of keeping himself in news most of the time these days. His pics of eating Jalebi in Indore went viral as he missed a parliamentary meeting on Pollution in Delhi due to his commentary commitments with Star Sports and now he has blamed Dhoni for not able to score a World Cup Hundred which has irked Dhoni fans.

On Saturday in an interview with an online portal, Gambhir stated that he missed scoring a hundred in the World Cup final in 2011 due to the advice of his captain MS Dhoni. “I have been asked this question many times, on what happened when I was on 97. I tell every youngster and every person that before getting to 97, I never thought about my own individual score but looked at the target set by Sri Lanka. I remember that when an over was completed, I and Dhoni were at the crease. He told me that ‘these three runs are remaining, get these three runs and your hundred would be completed’. Suddenly, when your mind turns to your individual performance, individual score, then, somewhere, you have a rush of blood. Before this moment, my target was only to chase Sri Lanka’s target. If only that target remained in my mind, maybe, I would have easily scored my hundred,” Gambhir said.

“That’s why, till I was on 97, I was in the present, but as soon as I thought, I am three runs away from getting a hundred, then that rush of blood caused by the desire to get to a hundred (took over). That’s why it’s so important to remain in the present… when I was walking back to the dressing room after being dismissed, I said to myself that these three runs would trouble me for the rest of my life and that is true. Even to this day, people ask me why I couldn’t get those three runs,” Gambhir added.

While Gambhir got out on 97, Dhoni remained not out on 91 and hit a six to win the match. Dhoni also won the Man of the Match. Gambhir’s contribution was pushed in the back, while Dhoni took away the credit with India’s first World Cup win in 28 years.

Gambhir has been quite often in criticizing Dhoni in the past for his captaincy. In 2012 Dhoni applied the rotational policy in ODIs for the openers (Sachin, Sehwag, and Gambhir) for the triangular series in Australia, to which Gambhir said “I believe that one should follow the captain’s decision but it was complete crap. You started with the rotation policy but played all the three in the must-win games. If you make a decision, back your decision, stick to it.”

AAP refuses to accept BIS report that said Delhi tap water unsafe, Minister Ram Vilas Paswan exposes Delhi govt apathy

A day after it was revealed that water quality in Delhi is the worst, failing in all the 19 parameters set by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), Delhi Government refuted the report claiming ‘bias’ in sample testing. BIS is the national standardisation body of India established by the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986. 11 samples collected in Delhi failed in all 19 parameters set by the BIS for water quality. Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal is the chairman of Delhi Jal Board (DJB) since September 2017.

The samples were taken from 11 localities, including Paswan’s official residence at 12 Janpath and Krishi Bhawan in Lutyens’ Delhi, and areas such as Nandnagari, Sonia Vihar, Pitampura, Ashok Nagar and Burari.

However, Delhi government has ‘challenged‘ that the water quality be compared to other BJP-governed states in ‘fair’ manner and send it to a ‘neutral’ agency for checking. It may be noted that tap water quality in Mumbai was found to be complying with standards set in 10 out of 10 samples. Mumbai is capital of Maharashtra, which till last month was a BJP-ruled state. Following a logjam in government formation, it is currently under President’s rule.

Read: RTI reply reveals AAP government in Delhi has not spent almost 80% of the Green Tax collected in last four years

Casting aspersions on the BIS, DJB vice-chairman and AAP leader Dinesh Mohaniya said he would like to know which parameters were used to check water if capital cities like Kolkata, Chennai and Jaipur failed to meet them. Responding to the allegations, Union Minister for Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution, Ram Vilas Paswan said that BIS is an independent body and they have checked the water sample in an unbiased manner.


Training his guns on AAP government’s apathy towards drinking water toxicity, Paswan said if Delhi Jal Board is so confident of water quality, they should not hesitate in getting mandatory testing under BIS or WHO (World Health Organisation) standards. Paswan said that on 3rd October, a meeting was held with DJB CEO (Arvind Kejriwal), DG of Bureau of Indian Standards and officers of the NDMC (New Delhi Municipal Corporation) where it was suggested that a team be constituted to test water samples in any laboratory.
He added that previously the Delhi Government had agreed to getting it tested but later showed no interest in following it through.


Paswan even suggested that the DJB and team up with BIS and get water samples tested in any other laboratory if they so wish.

SQR Ilyas, who announced AIMPLB’s decision to file review petition in Ayodhya case, used to be a member of terror org SIMI

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has decided to file a review petition against the Ayodhya verdict. The unanimous judgment of the Supreme Court had paved the way for a Bhavya Ram Mandir at Ram Janmabhoomi while awarding the Muslim community an alternate piece of land for a Masjid. Interestingly, Umar Khalid’s father was present during the press briefing where the decision was announced.

Read: Islamist terror organisation SIMI banned for five more years by the Union Home Ministry

Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas was the one who announced the decision on behalf of the AIMPLB.


Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas is a former member of the Islamic Terrorist organization, SIMI. He had left it in 1985, well before Umar Khalid was born. Ostensibly enough, there doesn’t appear to be a legal case against the organization when the left-wing Muslim communist’s father left the organization. SQR Ilyas recently contested the Lok Sabha Elections from West Bengal on a ticket from the Welfare Party of India (WPI) from the Jangipur constituency, a Muslim-dominated seat in the Murshidabad district.

The former SIMI member is now a member of Central Advisory Council of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind and served as convener of Babri Masjid Coordination Committee. He is now a member of AIMPLB.

Read: Hubli railway station blast: Police arrest one suspect with links with banned SIMI

Umar Khalid, meanwhile, has always maintained that he is an atheist and the mainstream media had worked hard to build up his image as a ‘hardcore Communist atheist’. However, recently, in the aftermath of Kamlesh Tiwari’s brutal murder by Jihadis, Khalid had bowed meekly before the prophet of Islam in his bid to deflect attention from the pervasive intolerance within significant sections of the Muslim community.

Read: Dara Hua ‘Murtad’? Two days after Kamlesh Tiwari’s death, ‘communist atheist’ Umar Khalid prostrates as a ‘believer’

Some suspect that Umar Khalid is playing the ‘Taqqiya‘ card. The practice of ‘Taqiyya’ is a religiously sanctioned lying or deceiving non-Muslims in order to present oneself as not a true believer in Islam.

Amit Shah said not to worry, BJP and Shiv Sena will form the government, claims Union Minister Ramdas Athawale

The suspense in Maharashtra appeared to have been coming to a close with Shiv Sena getting increasingly close to forming the government with Congress and NCP. However, Union Minister Ramdas Athawale has renewed speculations saying that he was assured by Home Minister Amit Shah himself that the BJP and Shiv Sena will be forming the government.


Ramdas Athawale, as reported by ANI, said that he told Union Minister and BJP President Amit Shah that if he mediated between the two parties, a solution could be reached. He was then assured by Amit Shah that ‘everything will be fine’ and BJP and Shiv Sena will come together to form the government.

Read: Point of no return: Shiv Sena to sit in opposition in upcoming winter session in Parliament

Earlier, it was announced that Shiv Sena will not attend the NDA meeting ahead of winter session of the Parliament which begins from Monday. On Saturday, the meeting between the joint body of the new alliance – Shiv Sena, Congress and NCP with the Governor of Maharashtra, Bhagat Singh Koshyari, was postponed due to the unavailability of the leaders.

Presidential Rule was imposed on the state after Shiv Sena split off with its traditional alliance partner the BJP after a pre-poll alliance was agreed upon by the two. Following the declaration of results, Shiv Sena decided to pull away from the alliance over its demand of sharing the Chief Minister’s chair.

The ‘lynched’ man for whom Harsh Mander’s ‘Karwan e Mohabbat’ did a spontaneous ‘fund collection’ comes back alive

0

A bizarre story has emerged from Bihar. Krishna Manjhi, previously believed to be murdered in a case of mob lynching, has returned from the dead. The Police say that his dead body was identified by his wife and father. Investigations are currently underway to discover the accurate identity of the murdered individual.


Twenty-three people were even arrested for the murder of Krishna Manjhi. The wife claims that she was told by the Police that it was her husband and the Police had identified the person based on the clothes worn by the corpse. Meanwhile, Manjhi himself says that he had gone out of town to work but he wasn’t aware that he had been murdered in the meantime.

Meanwhile, Harsh Mander’s ‘Karwan e Mohabbat’ had used the ‘lynching’ to peddle the narrative of rising hate crimes in the country. The wife of the deceased, Rudhi Devi, is a poor woman and a mother of six. Mander wrote, “Everyone in the Karwan e Mohabbat delegation was badly shaken and moved by our encounter with Rudhi Devi, her children and her husband’s father. People who had joined the Karwan quietly made a spontaneous fund-collection of money we carried in our pockets, which they silently pressed this into Rudhi Devi’s hands. She did not resist. But we knew that this would only help the family survive through a few more weeks. What would happen after that?”

Read: Harsh Mander’s article shows how ‘seculars’ are the real bigots and believers of the 2-nation theory

He continued, “Two senior volunteers in the Karwan e Mohabbat – Anwar ul Haque who heads our work with homeless people, and Ibrahami, a retired IAS officer from Bihar – decided that they would do nothing until they were able to extract some promise from the state administration for action to sustain the survival with dignity of Rudhi Devi, her children and her father-in-law.”

Mander concluded with the following words, “But the whole day, I could not forget the faces of Rudhi Devi and her children, the faces which Gandhiji had advised us to recall in times of uncertainty and confusion. I thought also of the talisman which the Mahatma had given us in his last months among us before he fell to the forces of hate. It is evident that we, his people, have lost his talisman somewhere in the blinding glitter of our wealth and the heady intoxication of our hate. How many generations will pass, I wondered, before we find his talisman again?”

The only good thing that has emerged from the entire fracas, it appears, is that the poor family received some monetary assistance from Harsh Mander, hopefully.

Muslim parties to file review petition against Ram Janmabhoomi judgement, AIMPLB decide to reject 5-acre alternate land

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), on November 17, said that it has decided to file a review petition in the Supreme Court of India against the Ram Janmabhoomi case verdict.

According to the reports, the AIMPLB after holding a crucial meeting on Sunday decided to challenge the Supreme Court order by filing a review petition on the Ram Janmabhoomi judgement that was delivered by the top court on November 9.


“We have decided to file a review petition in the SC. Since the SC, in its judgement, said that the mosque was not built by demolishing a temple, still the mosque was not given to us. So, we will file a review petition and ask for what is rightfully ours,” said Arshad Madani of the Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind. He also said that though they are sure the review petition will be thrown out, one must be filed.

Reportedly, the AIMPLB has also decided to reject the 5-acre land which was promised by the Supreme Court as compensation. The AIMPLB contended that once a Mosque was built at a spot, it remains there and Shariat does not allow for anything to be accepted in lieu of the same.

Read: A Hindu perennially ashamed and guilty: How narrative after Ayodhya verdict is trying to achieve it

The decision was taken after the Jamiat’s highest decision-making body, the working committee, gave permission to file a review petition following extensive deliberations involving lawyers and experts.

On November 9, in a historic judgement, the Supreme Court had ordered handing over of the disputed Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri masjid land to the Hindu parties, making way for Hindu devotees to have a grand Ram Mandir at the birthplace of Lord Ram.

The court had ordered for the construction of a Ram temple by a government trust at the disputed site in Ayodhya and ruled that an alternative five-acre plot must be found for a mosque in the Hindu holy town.

Earlier on Saturday, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) held a brainstorming session with different Muslim parties over the Supreme Court verdict in the Ayodhya case in Lucknow.

The decision to file a review petition comes a week after the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board had welcomed the Supreme Court verdict on the Ram Janmabhoomi case. The Sunni Waqf Board had made it clear that it will not file any review or curative petition against the same.

On Friday, the Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind (JuH), a key Muslim litigant in the Ayodhya title suit, had taken a similar position, stating that they will not be accepting the 5-acre alternative land for building a mosque as mandated by the Supreme Court.

The working committee of Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind had met in Delhi on Thursday, declared that nothing would be acceptable as an “alternative” to a mosque, be it money or land. Jamiat had not ruled out the possibility of going for a review of the Supreme Court verdict.

39 bills to be introduced in the Winter session of Parliament including Citizen Amendment Bill: Read what these bills are

‘She is a BJP agent,’ minister in Kamal Nath’s cabinet in Madhya Pradesh loses his cool on Congress worker

Harsh Yadav, a minister in Madhya Pradesh government lost his cool at a recent function organised in Sagar district and lashed out on a female colleague of his and called her a ‘BJP agent’.

As per reports, in a function where Madhya Pradesh Home Minister Bala Bachchan was present, a lot of Congress leaders came up to meet him. When a photo-session was underway, Congress leader Anita Mishra also came up for a photo. Along with Bachchan, Kamal Nath government’s cabinet minister Harsh Yadav was also present. Yadav suddenly lost his cool on seeing Mishra and lashed out on her. “Don’t listen to her, she is a BJP agent. She had worked for BJP during elections,” Yadav told Bachchan about Mishra.

Read: Madhya Pradesh: Civic body officials beaten up by Kamal Nath cabinet minister’s supporters for removing birthday greeting hoardings

To that, Mishra responded by saying she has been with Congress since past 35 years. After that, she asked another Congress karyakarta to click her picture with Bachchan. Oblivious to this, Bachchan continued meeting and greeting other Congress workers present there.