The Karnataka High Court on Thursday, 9th April, dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) that challenged the Centre’s advisory on singing Vande Mataram in...
The NPF described the decision as incompatible with the special constitutional protections granted to the state under Article 371A, which aims to protect the religious and customary practices of the Naga people.
On Friday (20th February), the Hindu organisation 'Sanatan Sanstha' rubbished lies peddled by the Congress party about Union Ministry of Culture funding the "Sanatan...
The order dated 6th February 2026 marks a major shift from the Jawaharlal Nehru government’s adoption of the truncated version of Vande Mataram to the original 6-stanza version written by Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, which glorifies Maa Durga.
Current opposition to Vande Mataram reflects long-standing communal objections that once shaped Congress decisions, revealing how religious sensitivities still determine cultural boundaries and revive ideological tensions that historically empowered separatist politics and weakened India’s civilisational cohesion.
As Home Minister Amit Shah mentioned several incidents of disrespect to Vande Mataram, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh sought credible information be placed on the table of the House.
Union Home Minister Amit Shah addressed the Rajya Sabha, emphasizing the importance of the full Vande Mataram song. He said splitting the song began appeasement politics that weakened India’s unity and contributed to its division. Shah criticized Congress’s historic stance and called for renewed national pride by upholding symbols that unite the country.