Home Opinions Anantkumar Hegde's comments on constitutional amendments - a media manufactured controversy

Anantkumar Hegde’s comments on constitutional amendments – a media manufactured controversy

The debate on the inclusion of the word ‘secular’ in the preamble has been raging in recent times due to the controversy surrounding the BJP MP Anantkumar Hegde. The minister said that “we (BJP) are here to change the constitution.” He did not say what exactly the change is going to be. The media and anti-BJP elements ganged up to twist his words on the topic of secularism and created huge brouhaha. To end the ruckus in the parliament, he tendered an apology in the house.

This episode raises an important logical question. Did the people and the governments which have amended the constitution in the past, have no allegiance to the constitution? Were they traitors? The first government to amend the constitution was led by Jawaharlal Nehru himself. Per the same logic, was he against the constitution? The 42nd amendment, which made sweeping changes to the constitution was passed under Indira Gandhi’s tenure. Was she then also a traitor?

In The Hindu, an article on this episode appeared on 2nd January, expressing deep concern over ‘threat to the secular character of the constitution’. The author, an advocate in the Madras High court wrote :

There was a point of time, perhaps, when we might have taken the idea of a secular, pluralistic India, tolerant of all sects and religions, as a position set in stone. But, incidents, especially since the early 1990s, have radically altered both reality and our imagination. That certain groups, including many within the political party presently in power at the Center and in many States, actively believe in a different kind of India is today intensely palpable.

- Advertisement - - article resumes -

Of course, some fundamental values of the constitution have to be preserved. Democracy, multi party democracy, federalism, secularism (in its true sense) and free speech must not be threatened by any government. But that doesn’t mean the favorite parts of the pseudo secular liberal elite class should never be touched. It doesn’t mean that a political party disliked by the same class, should be banned from amending the constitution as per what they think fit and in accordance with the mandate they have received.

There are many loopholes in the current constitution. Its vagueness on appointment of judges has given disproportionate power to judiciary. Lack of definition of the word ‘minority‘ has led to misuse of article 29 and article 30 of the constitution. Hindus who are in minority in 8 states are unable to get the benefits meant for minorities. Rampant conversion of gullible poor is also a matter of great concern.

Lokanath Mishra in his speech in the constituent assembly on (6 December 1948) argued against the freedom of propagation of religion and questioned the brand of secularism that was being written in the constitution. He said :

Sir, it has been repeated to our ears that ours is a secular State. I accepted this secularism in the sense that our State shall remain unconcerned with religion, and I thought that the secular State of partitioned India was the maximum of generosity of a Hindu dominated territory for its non-Hindu population [..]

Do we really believe that religion can be divorced from life, or is it our belief that in the midst of many religions we cannot decide which one to accept? If religion is beyond the ken of our State, let us clearly say so and delete all reference to rights relating to religion. If we find it necessary, let us be brave enough and say what it should be. [..]

But this unjust generosity of tabooing religion and yet making propagation of religion a fundamental right is some what uncanny and dangerous. Justice demands that the ancient faith and culture of the land should be given a fair deal, if not restored to its legitimate place after a thousand years of suppression.

As far as the freedom of future generations to amend the constitution is concerned, Jawaharalal Nehru himself has conceded that the constitution can be changed by the country from time to time in his address to the constituent assembly. Pt Jawaharlal Nehru in his constituent assembly speech on 8th November 1948 :

I should like this House when it considers the various controversies – there are bound to be controversies and there should be controversies because we are a living and vital nation, and it is right that people should think differently and it is also right that, thinking differently when they come to decisions, they should act unitedly in furtherance of those decisions.  […]

Vast number of minds and eyes look in this direction. We have to remember them. Hundreds of millions of our own people look to us and hundreds of millions of others also look to us; and remember this, that while we want this Constitution to be as solid and as permanent a structure as we can make it, nevertheless there is no permanence in Constitutions.  […]

It is right that House elected so – under this Constitution of course it will have the right to do any thing – should have an easy opportunity to make such changes as it wants to. But in any event, we should not make a Constitution such as some other great countries have, which are so rigid that they do not and cannot be adapted easily to changing conditions. Today especially, when the world is in turmoil and we are passing through a very swift period of transition, what we may do today may not be wholly applicable tomorrow. Therefore, while we make a Constitution which is sound and as basic as we can, it should also be flexible and for a period we should be in a position to change it with relative facility.

The basic structure and boundaries of power to amend of the Parliament is well defined by the Supreme court in various cases over the years. If any amendment is found to be against the spirit of the Constitution or principles of justice, the courts have the authority to strike them down as they did under the tyrannical rule of Indira Gandhi.

So what is this fuss all about? No constitution is perfect. And the document can be corrected and updated as per needs of the time and the mandate that the government of the has received. The Modi Government got a thumping majority for a reason. For the promises they made and in tune with the aspirations of a young nation. Why then is it to inconceivable that they should attempt to change the Constitution in accordance with those aspirations. For the Constitution is meant to reflect the will of the people, not the other way around.

[Transcripts of Constituent Assembly debates can be accessed on the Parliament website here]

Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Advertisement

Big Story

The reportage of Aaj Tak journalist Anjana Om Kashyap and TV Bharatvarsh journalist Ajit Anjum raised concerns of how bullish and high-handed the media was being with unsuspecting doctors who were only doing their job.

2019 World Cup Is Here!

Catch the latest on Cricket World Cup as it unfolds, special coverage by Opindia

Uttar Pradesh: Rampur Police shoots Nazil, accused of abducting, raping and killing a 6-year-old girl

Disturbingly, such incidents of sexual abuse against children have become rampant in India

Tausif Imran Khan repeatedly raped class X girl in Vadodara, took her to religious places to brainwash and convert her

19-year-old Tausif Imran Khan, a class XII student who lived in Manjalpur, has been booked under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for sexually exploiting a minor.
Evangelists going jobless

Evangelists left jobless after Modi government’s crackdown on foreign funds, Pentecostals in Kerala severely affected

Pastors are unable to repay their loans as they stopped receiving their monthly salary for their gospel work

Assam: Sidul Islam sends intimate photos with wife to in-laws, threatens to release on social media if dowry not given

Muslim man in Assam blackmails in-laws for dowry threating to release intimate photos with his own wife

TMC MP Nusrat Jahan takes oath in name of ‘Ishwar’, ends with ‘Vande Mataram’

Samajwadi Party leader, Shafiqur Rahman Barq, had stirred controversy by saying in Parliament that Vande Mataram is against Islam

In a massive self goal Congress leader in Lok Sabha questions PM Modi for not sending Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi to jail

"You came to power by calling them thieves, then how are they sitting in the parliament?" Congress leader in Lok Sabha questions PM Modi on Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi still being Members of Parliament

Devotees throng a Khodiyar Mata temple in Gujarat after a crocodile, worshipped as Goddess’ vehicle, strays inside the temple

Khodiyar Maa, a family deity of the Patidar community, is often depicted as riding a crocodile.

Blast in military hospital in Rawalpindi and its blackout by Pakistani media sparks speculation

The military hospital in Rawalpindi in Pakistan was rocked by a huge blast on Sunday evening.
Park Street rape case had brought the ugly face of TMC government out

TMC’s candidate Nusrat Jahan, Mamata Banerjee and their connection with the infamous Park Street rape case

Actress Nusrat Jahan was in a relationship with one of the main accused of the Park Street rape case. Her role in shielding and helping the accused, Kader Khan, was questioned by many.
Subscribe to Day's Top Stories
- Advertisment -

Latest articles

Connect with us

171,861FansLike
151,142FollowersFollow
70,244SubscribersSubscribe
Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post