It is often said that the ‘Hate Modi’ brigade has morphed into a mangled, distorted version of ‘Hate India’ brigade. While the quest to undermine (and perhaps) replace the Prime Minister is an agenda they pursue feverishly, to meet that goal, they are willing to concoct fault lines that undermines the entire country. They display scant regard for all that the country holds sacred. All that holds the various threads of the society together. From dividing the society on the basis of religion and caste, to undermining the Judiciary of the country, no trick is off-limits, no length untraveled, no depths too low and no path too dirty to tread.
While the entire cabal functions on a ‘one lie a day keeps the Modi away’ mantra, three nefarious lies have been busted in the recent past, that provide us a window of understanding into the troubled soul of an average ‘liberal’.
1. The Judge Loya death
Judge Loya, the judge who was presiding over the Sohrabuddin murder trial where BJP President Amit Shah was the main accused, passed away in December 2014.
But three years after the death, in November last year, a magazine named Caravan came out with a sensational story, which insinuated possible foul play behind the death, which was deemed as a natural death. Caravan’s story was later debunked to a large extent by an Indian Express article and an inconsistency, which the IE failed to address, was explored and debunked by us.
But the wild allegations didn’t stop. Insinuations that Amit Shah had something to do with the murder were kept afloat in a remarkable coordination between the Media, Lawyers, Congress and AAP.
In the case, Senior Counsel Dushyant Dave, Indira Jaising and V. Giri had appeared on behalf of the Bombay Lawyers’ Association, Former chief of the navy Admiral L. Ramdas, an intervenor, and Tehseen Poonawalla respectively. Senior Advocate Pallav Shishodia had represented Maharashtra based journalist Bandhuraj Sambhaji Lone, while Senior Counsel P. V. Surendranath had appeared for the All India Lawyers’ Union, another intervenor. Advocate Prashant Bhushan had advanced submissions on an intervention application on behalf of the CPIL.
To give a better perspective, Indira Jaising is a known Congress loyalist. She represented Navy Admiral L. Ramdas. Ramdas was the ‘internal lokpal of AAP’. He was also a part of the group that had filed a PIL in Supreme Court against the appointment of Lt. Gen. Bikram Singh as COAS. Interestingly, his daughter Kavita Ramdas is a former member of the Global Development Program Advisory Panel to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. She was also appointed as a representative to New Delhi by the Ford Foundation.
Tehseen Poonawalla is Nehruvian Congressman apart from being related to Robert Vadra. Bombay Lawyers’ Association is a repeat offender as far as intervening in such cases is concerned. They had also intervened in the Sohrabuddin encounter case. Prashant Bhushan is the former AAP member and life long “activist” who had sought clemency for Yakub Memon.
This incestuous bunch tried to undermine the judiciary by casting aspersions on its judgement and trying to prove that the death of Judge Loya was a ‘murder’ and not natural. Despite Loya’s sister, whose statements were used as a basis to cry foul denying everything. She said she was manipulated and that this entire episode was a media hit job. Congress used shady “whistleblowers” with questionable pasts to create this monster of a controversy. Loya’s son pleaded to be left alone, but the ‘cabaal’ lied that the press conference was organised by Amit Shah and the son was being coerced.
After this entire drama, the Supreme Court has finally set the record straight and perhaps showed these propagandists their true place. Today, the SC dismissed a petition that sought probe into the death of Judge Loya. The parts of the judgement that have been published in the public forum are scathing.
Justice Chandrachud, while pronouncing the judgment said,
“An aura of good faith was sought to be created by the petitioners, but as submissions progressed, it fell apart.”
The court said :
There is no reason to disbelieve the sequence of events leading to the death as narrated by the four judicial officers namely Shrikant Kulkarni, Shriram Modak, R. Rathi and Vijay Kumar Barde and the assertions of Bombay High Court Justices Bhushan Gawai and Sunil Shukre.
The Bench also came down on heavily on the petitioners for casting aspersions on the Administrative Committee of the Bombay High Court.
“Even judges of this court were not spared”, it said, referring to the request made by Prashant Bhushan for recusal of judges.
The court said that this PIL was a “full frontal attack on the Judiciary” and that there exists a case for initiating contempt proceedings against the petitioners and the lawyers.
3. The Court says while there is exists a case for initiating contempt proceedings against the Petitioner and the lawyers representing the Petition, it is refraining from doing so! #JudgeLoya
— Sai Deepak J (@jsaideepak) April 19, 2018
The Supreme Court specifically named the Indira Jaising, Prashant Bhushan coterie and expressed anguish on their conduct during the trial.
Judge Loya ‘murder conspiracy theory’ has fallen flat on its face. The holes were punctured by many, but the bludgeoning blow has come from the Supreme Court itself. The tiring, dirty nexus exposed. The lies laid bare. The truth pronounced. Yet, there is no point wondering if the players in this nefarious game would apologise. They are too shameless to bother. The sanctity of the Judiciary doesn’t matter as long as their political motives are served and that is evident now with the loud shrieks of the usual suspects doubting the judgement, calling it a ‘black day for Judiciary’ and sticking to their dirt filled gun of lies.
2. Junaid Lynched because he was suspected of carrying beef
In 2017, an unfortunate crime took place. A young man called Junaid was murdered in a moving train. The unfortunate murder was given an interesting turn by the usual suspects. Many media houses reported how Junaid was killed because of the suspicion that he was ‘carrying beef’. The country’s “liberal” elite had taken to social media and the streets to claim “not in my name” when the beef theory peaked.
The High Court put this drama to rest in its recent judgement during the bail hearing of one of the accused. In no ambiguous terms, the Judge stated that the fight started over seat dispute and there was no religious motivation to the crime. The crime wasn’t preplanned and there was no intention of creating disharmony. The word “beef” appears nowhere. Not in the FIR and not in judgement of the High Court or the sessions court.
The entire intolerance debate and ‘not in my name’ coordinated drama that maligned India on an international stage was aimed at one thing and one thing only. To project the Prime Minister as a man who has turned India into “lynchistan” with his supposed Muslim hate. That the minorities aren’t safe. The usual atrocity literature was created, but this week, the truth prevailed. One wondered, however, was the damage already done?
Hindu festivals are generally considered to be devious by the self-proclaimed liberals. Diwali creates pollution. Karva Chaut is regressive, and the list goes on. Usually, Holi is the festival where they talk about water conservation. This time, however, they took things a little further. Some girls alleged that semen filled balloons were thrown at them. This asinine allegation was picked up by the usual suspects and an entire narrative of how “dirty hindu men use Holi to molest women” was crafted.
This ridiculous lie was busted recently when the forensic reports confirmed that the balloons were not filled with semen but perhaps only with shameless Hinduphobia. The latter is my deduction, I must confess.
4. Saffron Terror
Perhaps the greatest fear of the left and congress ecosystem is the consolidation of Hindus and their votes. Lest they start asserting themselves and demanding rights denied or equality snatched away in the name of minority appeasement. Towards that end, a carefully crafted narrative was furthered by the Congress party. That of saffron terror. That Hindus can be terrorists too. That Islamic terrorism isn’t as bad and certainly not the only thing we must worry about.
According to reports, after the blasts, the police suspected the involvement of Pakistan based terror group Harkat-ul-Jihad-e-Islami (HuJI) in the blasts. The Hyderabad police had also interrogated about 90 men and charge-sheeted 21 of them including one Billal, who was considered the mastermind and was linked with HuJI.
But the Congress had different plans. Their poster face for this treacherous argument was Swami Aseemanand who was furthered as the mastermind behind the Mecca Masjid blast of 2007.
On April 16th 2018, all accused were acquitted of all charges by a special NIA court. The saffron terror bogey was demolished.
Congress is presenting its President, Rahul Gandhi in a new avatar. The temple going, janeu dhaari Hindu. And to solidify that aura, their previous assertions of Hindu terror had to be negated. They lied that the party or Rahul Gandhi had never used the term ‘Saffron Terror’. We had recently jogged their memory and reminded them of the times they indulged in this treachery. From asserting that Hindu Terror was a greater threat as compared to Islamic radicalization, to releasing a book titled “26/11 – RSS ki Saazish”, the Congress party did it all. Their lies now in shambles sending them looking for cover.
Four supremely perfidious lies exposed in quick succession. There have been no apologies and no retractions. Perhaps their aims have already been achieved. Perhaps the narrative they wanted has already been furthered. Perhaps the perfumed elite don’t care about the sanctity of this nation and her people. However, the truth is out there and perhaps, someday, the truth will overshadow their perilous existence.
And an appeal to my fellow countrymen with overflowing milk of human kindness, especially to those who still consider themselves Hindus, next time you outrage on something, or feel ashamed of your culture, just remember these lies. These are just four in one week, and there are 52 weeks in an year, and you have lived many years on these lies. It’s time to unlearn and open your eyes.