Watch: Is the Indian state really secular? No, according to this Supreme Court advocate

Mr Agarwal also remarks on the manner on which only Hindu Temples are in direct control of the government and the alleged 'secular' state while the minorities are at liberty to manage and administer their own constitution with completely as guaranteed by Article 26 of the Indian Constitution.

UpWord, a not-for-profit knowledge platform co-founded by Ashish Dhar and Ajaey Sharma, produces well-researched content in the form of short videos. It published a new video on YouTube today, featuring Supreme Court advocate Kanu Agarwal elucidating the manner in which certain articles of the Constitution discriminate against the majority faith in the country.

In the video, Mr Agarwal asks the question, “Is the Indian state really secular?” and the proceeds to answer why it is not really the case. The video concerns the problematic aspects of Articles 26-30 and the manner in which they favour minority faiths over the Hindu religion.

Regarding Article 29 and 30, Mr Agarwal says, “It protects the interests of a section of citizens with a distinctly religious, cultural or linguistic identity by granting them the right to protect their language, their script and their culture. The article intends to preserve and protect the innate pluralism that makes India the fabled land of diversity. In conjunction with it, Article 30 empowers the minorities with the right to establish and administer their own educational institutions. However, there is a catch. While the protection against discrimination under Article 30 is extended to institutions of the minority, it does not say anything about institutions of the majority.”

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

Mr Agarwal then talks about the disproportionate influence wielded by minority interest groups during the constituent assembly debates and the eagerness of the members to pacify the misplaced insecurities of these groups motivated them to adopt the said provisions. He also ponders upon the inherent problems with declaring certain faiths as ‘minority’ in India due to the immense cultural diversity of our country with thousands of sects and communities which technically makes every single one of them a minority in their own right.

Article 28 of the Indian Constitution that prohibits religious instruction in public institutions is also detrimental towards ensuring the continuity of the Indian Civilization, that is, the Hindu Civilization. As Mr Agarwal says, “By categorizing all the ancient civilizational knowledge of India, whether it is of Mathematics, Psychology, History or Medicine, as religious the modern state has effectively severed the umbilical cord of its citizens with their own priceless heritage. Far from being the custodian of the Indian Civilization, the Indian state has turned into its principal enemy.”

Then there’s Article 27 which forbids the state from levying taxes on its citizens for the promotion of any particular religion or religious denomination. Despite that, every government initiates numerous schemes which are directed towards benefiting only people from the minority. Thus, our taxes are indeed being diverted, albeit indirectly, towards religious purposes.

Mr Agarwal also remarks on the manner on which only Hindu Temples are in direct control of the government and the alleged ‘secular’ state while the minorities are at liberty to manage and administer their own constitution with completely as guaranteed by Article 26 of the Indian Constitution.

Finally, as the learned advocate states, “Articles 26 to 30 of the constitution were meant to give religious freedom to the people of this country but the same articles have been misused to deny that freedom to a vast majority of the Indian population.”

There has been much talk about these various articles of the Indian Constitution actively discriminating against Hindus. Especially regarding the affairs of Hindu Temples and the 93rd amendment that selectively applies to Hindu run educational institutions alone, there has been a rising awareness about the discriminatory nature of certain constitutional provisions.


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

Pakistan quotes The Quint, Karan Thapar and Praveen Swami to brand Kulbhushan Jadhav as a ‘RAW spy’ at ICJ

Pakistan quoted several articles published in Indian to present its case during Kulbhushan Jadhav hearing at the International Court of Justice
How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans after Pulwama attack

How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans

Ravish Kumar of NDTV is a man known for many lows. But this may well be his lowest point.
Image Source: The Week

Mandya: Actor-turned-politician Prakash Raj attends funeral of Pulwama martyr, villagers expose his hypocrisy towards Armed Forces

Prakash Raj, a left wing ideologue, who is often known for joining hands with the left-liberals to express their hate towards Hindus and the BJP, has plans to contest in the upcoming elections from Bengaluru Central Lok Sabha constituency.

The Hindu not only cropped the Rafale dissent note, but also had digitally manipulated it

Comparison of Hindu document with ANI document shows that Hindu had doctored the Rafale dissent note

Kavita Krishnan uses 4 year old photograph to claim PM Narendra Modi was laughing after Pulwama attack

Using a old photo, Kavita Krishna claimed the Modi was having fun at election rallies after Pulwama attack

Imran Khan’s deranged statement on Pulwama terror attack tailor-made to appeal to Indian ‘liberal’ sensibilities

In his statement on the Pulwama terror attack, Imran Khan claimed that his country had nothing to gain from attacking India. Apart from that, he threatened India with retaliation should the Indian Army decide to attack Pakistan.

Pakistan minister says ‘bells won’t toll in temples’, he forgets, India is the land of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj

Sheikh Rashid Ahmad, Federal Minister for Pakistani Railways, commented that should anyone look at Pakistan in a negative manner, then "the eyes will be ripped out, the grass will not grow, the birds will not chirp and the bells won't toll in Temples."
Image Source: Swarajya

Ten things India must do to stop being a soft state

India is overly defensive. Despite its massive economic and military power, it does not respond to grave provocations (26/11, for example). It does not retaliate when attacked. It tolerates countless attacks on its citizens and affronts to its prestige.
Article 370

Article 370 must go: BJP can’t pussyfoot any longer

So what is this Article 370 which allows J&K to function much against the national (or for that matter, it’s own) interests?
Amar Singh donates property worth Rs 15 crore to RSS-affiliated Seva Bharti.

Amar Singh donates ancestral properties worth 15 crores to RSS-affiliated organisation Seva Bharti

Amar Singh donated Rs 15 crore property to Seva Bharti, an RSS affiliated social service organisation.

Latest articles

Connect with us

137,866FansLike
110,751FollowersFollow
23,260SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these