Home Opinions BHU Dharma Vigyan students deserve an apology for being labelled as 'bigots'

BHU Dharma Vigyan students deserve an apology for being labelled as ‘bigots’

It can now be safely concluded that the BHU story should be a lesson in how not to cover news and why we should not jump to conclusions based on viral headlines.

A few weeks ago, headlines went viral about protests at BHU against a newly appointed professor of Sanskrit who happened to be Muslim. This was of course immediately sucked into the “intolerance” narrative against BJP ruled India. The global liberal media did not lag behind. After all, these days anything perceived to be wrong with India is big news, even if it is vegetable prices.

Untitled.png

And why not? After all, how can students in a learning environment possibly dictate that their professors should belong to a specific religion? What has the religion of the professor got to do with teaching a language?

- Ad - - article resumes -

So much of the left and the right weighed in on this story, most sensible people inclined to condemn the protesting students for their “bigotry.” Some celebrity journalists went a step further, putting the students on the kangaroo court of cable news though not letting them speak and hammering them on air.

Read: How the BHU students were demonised and the ones who refused to be ‘secularised’ unfairly called ‘bigots’

Slowly, but surely, a second narrative began to emerge. The students insisted that they had absolutely nothing against a Muslim teaching Sanskrit or any other language. It just so turns out that the Sanskrit Vidya Dharma Vigyan (SVDV) department to which Feroz Khan had been appointed, is a rather unique institution at BHU, which teaches Hindu Shastras and Hindu rituals.

This obviously has to do with the special history of BHU, conceived by Mahamana Madan Mohan Malviya as a centre for both secular and religious education. The appointment of a Muslim to teach Hindu Shastras in the Vedic tradition may, therefore, be seen as roughly equivalent to appointing a Muslim to work as a priest at a Hindu temple. It is not unreasonable to protest against this and doing so can hardly be considered a form of bigotry.

Read: BHU: SVDV students finally vindicated, Dr Firoze Khan resigns, will join Arts faculty to teach Sanskrit

But few wanted to listen. The initial burst of viral headlines were simply too powerful.

However, the events of the last few days leave no doubt that the students had a legitimate point, which had nothing to do with religious fundamentalism.

OpIndia headline

Feroz Khan will continue to teach Sanskrit at BHU. He will just be teaching it in the Sanskrit department at the Faculty of Arts, where Sanskrit is taught in a secular fashion like any other language.

And the reaction of the protesting students?

Untitled.png

Even the NDTV reporter gets it now.

No student ever protested against a Muslim teaching Sanskrit at BHU. All they ever demanded was that a non-Hindu should not be teaching Hindu religion.

And yet, the impression was created (deliberately?) across India and across the world that these students were bigots, opposing a professor simply because he happened to be a Muslim.

The protesting BHU students deserve credit for making their point resolutely. For being unfazed before bullies from all over the world. The media elite, sometimes taking advantage of their relatively weak English speaking skills, tried to bury their narrative. But it was not to be.

Read: BHU protests: Students seek ‘Bheeksha’ to raise awareness for their cause, RSS reverses stand, Mahants come out in support

It can now be safely concluded that the BHU story should be a lesson in how not to cover news and why we should not jump to conclusions based on viral headlines. The whole thing was an internal matter of the university, relating to the unique history of the institution. Outsiders getting involved and shooting their mouths off without knowing the full story, did not help anybody.

A liberal may ask here: what about JNU? How come I want BHU protests to be an internal matter, but I had no qualms commenting on JNU? Well, it’s quite simple: JNU protests were about hostel fees, mess charges, etc. Common concerns that we can all understand and relate to. Concerns that are universal in nature. The BHU case simply wasn’t about any such thing. Most universities don’t have the unique history and traditions of BHU. The matter was far too specific to one department at one university.

Read: BHU students organise Rudhrabhishek as part of agitation against the appointment of non-Hindu to the faculty of theology

And now the protesting BHU students and the administration have reconciled all their differences in a manner that is fair to all. Prof. Feroz Khan will continue to teach Sanskrit at BHU and absolutely nobody questions his academic expertise. The students have happily called off their protest and will continue with their Hindu religious education at their department.

Seems everyone is a winner here. Except those of us who rushed to judge without making certain of the facts first.

Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post
Support OpIndia by making a monetary contribution

Big Story

Social media was abuzz with reports of Asha Devi joining Congress to contest against Arvind Kejriwal
Nirbhaya's mother Asha Devi blamed the Delhi government and jail authorities for the delay in the hanging of the convicts.

Don't miss these

2019 World Cup Is Here!

Catch the latest on Cricket World Cup as it unfolds, special coverage by Opindia

Latest articles

Connect with us

205,546FansLike
221,158FollowersFollow
157,000SubscribersSubscribe
Advertisements
Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post