The Ministry of Defence has strongly rebutted misleading reports published in certain sections of the media that have sought to twist Defence Minister Rajnath Singh’s statement in Parliament on July 28, 2025, and create a false controversy over the timing of disclosure of names of martyrs from Operation Sindoor.
Reports in outlets such as fake news peddler The Wire and Congress mouthpiece National Herald have claimed that the government “quietly” inscribed the names of six military personnel at the National War Memorial only recently, a year after the operation, and have alleged that this contradicts the Raksha Mantri’s parliamentary remarks in which he stated that no Indian soldiers were harmed. These reports claimed that this means the defence minister lied in the parliament when he said that there was zero deaths on Indian side during Operation Sindoor.
Context of Rajnath Singh’s parliamentary statement
The Ministry has clarified that these claims are completely baseless, and that the minister was misquoted. The Defence Minister’s statement in Parliament, in which he affirmed that no Indian soldiers were harmed, was made in a specific context. It was a direct and categorical response to the persistent fake narrative being pushed by Pakistani propaganda machinery and amplified by certain Opposition voices, including from the Congress, that Pakistan had shot down several Indian Air Force jets and several pilots killed during the operation.
Certain posts circulating on social media platforms have sought to misrepresent the Raksha Mantri’s address delivered on the floor of Parliament on July 28, 2025. These posts have selectively quoted an isolated portion of the speech to falsely imply that the Raksha Mantri claimed…
— Ministry of Defence, Government of India (@SpokespersonMoD) June 27, 2026
This claim of Indian pilots being lost was entirely false and had been repeatedly denied by India. Rajnath Singh’s remarks were therefore a targeted rebuttal to this particular disinformation campaign regarding aerial losses, and not a blanket denial of any casualties across the entire spectrum of Operation Sindoor.
The statement says, “Those who have sought to construct a controversy out of Raksha Mantri’s Parliamentary address have done so by deliberately ignoring the full context of his remarks. It must be recalled that at the time of the Raksha Mantri’s address, a particularly persistent and dominant narrative had taken hold, both in certain sections of the media and on social media, which claimed that Indian pilots had been lost during Operation Sindoor. This narrative was entirely false, yet it was being amplified aggressively with the clear intent of diminishing the success of the operation and demoralising public sentiment. It was in direct reference to this specific and mischievous narrative that the Raksha Mantri made the statement in question. His remarks were, therefore, a targeted and contextually specific response to a falsehood that was gaining dangerous traction at that moment.”
The defence ministry statement added, “His statement in Parliament was, in its entirety, a proud and accurate account of the remarkable success of Operation Sindoor, an operation in which the Indian Defence Forces demonstrated unmatched precision, resolve, and military professionalism. During the operation, more than 100 terrorists and Pakistani soldiers were neutralised, as also Pakistani Air Bases and deployment along Line of Control suffered extensive and significant infrastructure damage. The address was a fitting tribute to the courage and capability of the Indian Defence Forces, and a clear message to those who wish India harm.”
The six martyrs in question were Army personnel and one IAF aviation technician who laid down their lives in the Jammu and Kashmir theatre during ground and related actions. Sgt Surendra Kumar of the IAF was killed in Pakistan’s air attack in Udhampur, while the army soldiers were killed in cross-border shelling and other such actions. They were not pilots involved in the precision strikes against terror basses in Pakistan. Their families received all due honours, support, and recognition from the government and the Armed Forces from the very beginning.
Claims in the reports are factually incorrect
As reported earlier, the claim that the government had kept the death of six soldiers hidden for a year is also completely false and baseless. The supreme sacrifices of the six bravehearts, Sgt Surendra Kumar, Subedar Major Pawan Kumar, Havildar Sunil Kumar Singh, Rifleman Sunil Kumar, AgniVeer Mood Muralinaik and L/Nk Dinesh Kumar, were publicly acknowledged and honoured by the Armed Forces through official channels much earlier, in May and August 2025 itself.
Official handles of the Indian Army’s White Knight Corps and the Indian Air Force’s Media Coordination Centre had issued statements and tributes naming the martyrs and saluting their valour shortly after Operation Sindoor concluded. High-level visits, including by the Air Chief Marshal to the family of one of the martyrs, were also publicly reported. There was no secrecy or delay in disclosure.
In addition to individual tweets from the battalions, the Indian Armed Forces held a press conference on 11th May 2025 to honour the supreme sacrifice of 5 soldiers. Given that Havildar Sunil Kumar Singh was undergoing treatment at that time, only 5 casualties were acknowledged during the press briefing.
The recent formal inscription of names at the National War Memorial is a routine administrative process for updating the roll of honour and does not represent any new or “quiet” revelation. The names and the details of their supreme sacrifice were already in the public domain for nearly a year.
The Ministry has reiterated that the Government of India and the Armed Forces hold the supreme sacrifice of every martyr in the highest esteem. Names of all those who have laid down their lives in defence of the nation are duly inscribed at the National War Memorial as per established procedure. Families of the bravehearts are entitled to all benefits, including educational and medical concessions.

