HomeMedia‘Anti-terrorism measure, no signboard': Read why police went knocking on The Wire's door ahead...

‘Anti-terrorism measure, no signboard’: Read why police went knocking on The Wire’s door ahead of 15th August

According to Siddharth Varadarajan, the policeman said that he had come for regular inquiries ahead of the 15th of August, the Independence Day. Earlier, The Wire had been served with a show-cause notice by Kashmir Police over fake news.

Siddharth Varadarajan, the founding editor of The Wire, revealed on Twitter that the office of the left-wing propaganda portal was visited by a policeman on Friday with specific inquiries. According to him, the police asked questions regarding actress Swara Bhasker and fellow propagandists Vinod Dua and Arfa Khanum Sherwani.

Source: Twitter

According to Siddharth Varadarajan, the policeman said that he had come for regular inquiries ahead of the 15th of August, the Independence Day. Earlier, The Wire had been served with a show-cause notice by Kashmir Police over fake news.

The Kashmir Police accused The Wire of indulging in “misrepresentation of facts, sensationalism, concocted mixing of facts with opinion of some unknown experts”. The portal was also accused of engaging in a media trial.

Vinod Dua, known peddler of fake news, had been helped by a Union Minister recently when he was suffering from Covid-19. Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri had arranged medicines for him during distress. An FIR was registered against Dua in 2020 for peddling fake news and creating public nuisance.

Arfa Khanum Sherwani is a propagandist who often serves as an apologist for Radical Islam. She had once insinuated that the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas by the Taliban was inspired by the demolition of Babri Masjid.

Sherwani was also one of the liberal propagandists who had helped peddle the mythical narrative of a hate crime when a Muslim man was thrashed by other Muslim men over a personal matter. She had falsely claimed that the man was thrashed for refusing to chant Jai Shri Ram.

Police visited the Wire office because it has no signboard

After the tweet by Varadarajan, the official Twitter account of DCP New Delhi informed that the Wire office was checked as part of routine precaution ahead of Independence Day. The DCP also said that there is no signboard outside the building informing the building that it houses The Wire, and therefore they went to check what is inside the office. They also posted a photograph of the entrance of the office which says ‘Office for Rent’, and there is no mention of The Wire.

Delhi police said that ahead of Independence Day, security and anti-terrorist measures such as tenant verification, checking of guest houses etc are being taken throughout Delhi. As part of this exercise, a local beat officer had gone to verify an office that does not have any signboard at the entrance.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

West Bengal CM Suvedu Adhikari restores general consent for CBI after 8 years: What it means and why Mamata Banerjee withdrew it in 2018

The restoration of general sanction would enable the CBI investigations into offences by central government employees, central public sector undertakings (CPSUs), as well as private persons across West Bengal, without prior case-by-case approval.

When the Allahabad High Court told the Supreme Court that its own judgments don’t bind in cases of habeas corpus

The Allahabad bench ruled that the recent cluster of Supreme Court decisions on illegal arrest and habeas corpus, the second set, did not appear to have taken into account the older, more detailed line of precedents that had sketched out the entire criminal procedure. Because of this, the bench ruled that those newer rulings are not binding precedents and hit by the principles of stare decisis, that is, they cannot overturn the more established, well reasoned position.
- Advertisement -