Home Blog Page 5852

Solicitor General cites OpIndia report in SC to debunk misleading report by IndiaSpend and The Wire on Kashmir

0

The Supreme Court is hearing cases related to the so-called communication shut-down in Kashmir after the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories – Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. During the hearing, a report by OpIndia was cited in the Supreme Court to debunk the lies of India Spend.

During the arguments, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta brought up the issue of allegations that people of Kashmir are not being able to access healthcare in the state.


Tushar Mehta said that the government has put a scheme (Ayushyaman Bharat) in place where the cashless facility for availing healthcare can be taken benefit of. A total number of cases under this scheme from Aug 5 till date 11468 cases on the transaction management system.

Further, Tushar Mehta spoke of an IndiaSpend report that had made the allegations that several people in Kashmir were not being able to access healthcare. Tushar Mehta then went on to cite the OpIndia report which debunked the lies being spread by IndiaSpend.


The OpIndia report that Solicitor General was referring to in the Supreme Court was an article which debunked the lies spread by IndiaSpend and The Wire after the abrogation of Article 370. In the article, IndiaSpend had twisted data and laced it with lies to claim that mental health issues were on the rise in Kashmir after the abrogation of Article 370.

In a section with the subheading, “Patients reluctant, unable to access healthcare”, Wire quotes fake news IndiaSpend to say that patients have not been able to access healthcare since August 5th 2019 so as to give the impression that even though Kashmiris are facing mental health issues due to the abrogation, they are not being able to get themselves treated. However, they follow it up in the same section by stating “Even in a normal situation, few people access mental healthcare, in particular”. In that case, how did The Wire and India Spend manage to tie it to the abrogation of Article 370 is a mystery yet to be solved.

Read: The Wire uses 2015 survey and laces it with lies to say mental health issues on the rise in Kashmir post abrogation of Article 370

The article went on to say that after the abrogation of Article 370 in August, 44.5% fewer patients visited IMHANS compared to July. However, they also say that this data is inconclusive as the number of patients was even lower in May. However, interestingly, the highest mental health issues reported in Kashmir was in July, a month before the abrogation of Article 370. The lowest was in May.

The entire article essentially had tried to confuse the readers to insinuate that firstly, patients are unable to access healthcare facilities and secondly, that due to that, mental health issues are on the rise post abrogation of article 370. OpIndia had shown that both these claims per that article were fallacious.

IndiaSpend is a habitual offender. It was responsible for furthering the highly dubious hate crime watch database that has now shut shop. With their bigoted agenda and dubious track record, the IndiaSpend Factchecker.in had all along attempted to push Hinduphobic propaganda by selectively reporting crimes in which accused were allegedly Hindus and referred to it as a ‘Hate crime’ while deliberately ignoring those crimes committed in which perpetrators were Muslims and the victims were Hindus.

The ‘Hate Crime Watch’ initiative of the Factchecker.in, which began as a supposed tracking tool of hate crimes across the country, soon began to manifest its true colours by not only limiting its reporting to Hinduphobic content but also whitewashing crimes committed by Muslims against the Hindus. In fact, there have been instances where IndiaSpend’s ‘factchecker’ journalist was caught trying to manipulate a minor Dalit victim from Begusarai who, along with his family, was attacked by local Muslim goons, trying to force them to sell their home to prove that there was no ‘hate crime’.

In an attempt to justify their statement of not treating a terror attack – where the terrorist himself declared that it was a religious war against infidels – as a religious hate crime, FactChecker compared the terrorist attack with alleged attacks on Kashmiris in some parts of India after the Pulwama terror attack. They claimed that they have not included such attacks either as ‘hate crime’ as it doesn’t fit into their ‘motivated by religious identity’ criteria, because such attacks appear motivated by regional identities of the victims, not religious.

Note: Full details of the proceedings are awaited and this reported will be updated if new information comes to light 

Ali Sohrab sent to 48-hour police custody, he had 8 accounts to spew venom, was not even a journalist as he claimed

‘Journalist’ Ali Sohrab, who was arrested by UP Police last week over his objectionable tweets has been sent to 2 day judicial remand over his provocative tweets on Supreme Court judgement of Ram Janmabhoomi verdict. As per reports, the police will now investigate the devices he used to post messages on the internet.


Ali Sohrab had reportedly multiple accounts through which he would post provocative messages. He informed police during his remand that he has 8 accounts. He has claimed he is not associated with any ideology. Ali Sohrab has studied sociology and runs a coaching centre in Delhi. Many of his students reportedly trended #ReleaseAliSohrab on Twitter after he was arrested on November 16. Aam Aadmi Party leaders had also joined in the campaign to get Ali Sohrab released.


Dr Kafeel Khan, accused in the 2017 Gorakhpur tragedy case, also questioned Police for arresting Ali Sohrab.


Sohrab had also made objectionable remarks following the murder of Hindu Samaj Party leader Kamlesh Tiwari by Islamists. In his tweet, Ali Sohrab went on to wish the deceased Kamlesh Tiwari on the occasion of Diwali despite knowing that he is not alive anymore.

Ali Sohrab’s tweet on Diwali following Kamlesh Tiwari’s murder

He had made quite a few disturbing posts following the Supreme Court verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi.


Sohrab had been continuously indulging in sharing fake and inciteful posts on his social media pages. In September, following the abrogation of Article 370 by the centre, Sohrab had tried to pass off an old image of two army men cleaning a pool of blood on a road as a recent one. He shared the misleading image implying that it was taken during the ongoing situation in Kashmir.

Karnataka: After attack on Congress MLA Sait, CM accuses Siddaramaiah for going easy on PFI, govt mulls ban

0

A 24-year-old man who had attacked the Karnataka MLA Tanveer Sait on Sunday at a wedding is believed to be a member of the radical Islamic organisation Popular Front of India.

On Sunday, Karnataka Congress MLA Tanveer Sait was stabbed by a 20-year-old attacker at a wedding reception in Mysuru. The whole event was captured on camera. The attacker had tried to run away after he had stabbed the Narasimharaja MLA Sait.


Initial reports had suggested that the attack may have been triggered due to personal enmity of the accused against Sait over a job. However, later reports emerged that the accused attacker named Farhan was part of the radical Islamic organization Popular Front of India (PFI).

Karnataka CM Yediyurappa has indirectly accused former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah of being responsible for the attack on Congress MLA Tanveer Sait suggesting that was his government that showed a lenient attitude towards PFI.

“When Siddaramaiah was chief minister, he withdrew all cases against Islamic outfit Popular Front of India (PFI). This was after there were riots in Shivamogga and Mysuru and also a murder. Now Tanveer Sait has been attacked,” CM Yediyurappa said.

Accusing Siddaramaiah of protecting PFI for votes, Yediyurappa said, “I want to ask Siddaramaiah, who by withdrawing cases has given protection to PFI which is involved in murder and goonda giri (hooliganism), are you not in a way indirectly responsible for the attack on Tanveer Sait?”

Siddaramaiah had earlier tweeted saying that the attack on Sait shows the complete collapse of law and order in the state.

Reacting to Yediyurappa’s comments, Siddaramaiah said, “The CM must speak responsibly. We did not withdraw cases only against PFI activists, but also those filed during the tenure of the earlier BJP government against members of the Karnataka Forum for Dignity (KFD).”

In the light of these events, the Karnataka government is now considering to ban Islamic organisation Popular Front of India (PFI) for their alleged involvement in the brutal attack against Sait.

Former home minister R Ashok also said that the Karnataka government will first discuss the issue and then recommend to the Centre to ban both PFI and the Karnataka Forum for Dignity (KFD).

The radical Islamic organisation Popular Front of India is notoriously known for instigating several communal incidents in the country. Popular Front of India, a radical Islamic organisation, has been accused of having links with the banned Islamic terror group Students’ Islamic Movement of India (SIMI).

In the past, the PFI members have been accused of chopping off the hands of a Kerala Professor for allegedly insulting Islamic Prophet Mohammed.

In Kerala, most of its leaders were members of the banned Student Islamic Movement of India. Reportedly, the PFI was allegedly involved in at least 24 political murders in Kerala.

Read: RSS worker Rudresh murder case: Supreme Court rejects accused PFI leader’s plea against framing charges

Besides this, it has been accused by the National Investigative Agency (NIA) of being involved in the controversial ‘love jihad’ cases in Kerala. Recently, activists of its political arm SDPI were arrested in connection with an ABVP worker’s brutal murder in Kerala’s Kannur.

Recently, PFI members were accused of killing 42-year-old activist Ramalingam. The activist was brutally murdered for opposing forced religious conversions.

The state of Jharkhand had banned the PFI last year.

Rose Valley Chit Fund scam: Enforcement Directorate searches five locations in Kolkata

0

The Enforcement Directorate has intensified the crackdown while probing the multi-crore Rose Valley Chit fund scam. Currently, the ED is conducting raids at five different places in Kolkata related to the case. Two locations are reportedly in the New Town area in eastern fringes of Kolkata, one in Dunlop which falls in the municipality of North 24 Parganas district and others near the southern fringes of the city.


According to reports, one of it is a residential property which belongs to one of the brokers who allegedly had a link with the prime accused Gautam Kundu.

The raids are currently underway and more details are awaited.

The ED had registered a case on the basis of an FIR filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The agency is investigating the cases against Rose Valley Group of Companies, run by the Group’s Chairman Gautam Kundu, for laundering of funds received from the public by way of Ponzi scheme.

Read: Rose Valley Scam: Shah Rukh Khan’s Kolkata Knight Rider CEO Venky Mysore questioned by ED regarding transaction between KKR and Red Chillies

According to the ED estimates, the Rose Valley scam is at least five times the Saradha ponzi scam. The group allegedly floated 27 companies to run various schemes. It allegedly collected Rs.17,520 crore from depositors in West Bengal, Assam and Bihar.

The agency had registered an FIR against its Chairman Gautam Kundu and others under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act in 2014 and arrested him on March 25, 2015. The ED also attached his assets worth Rs 2,300 crore, including hotels and resorts. Multiple charge sheets had been filed by the ED in the courts of Kolkata and Bhubaneswar.

In September 2019, ED conducted raids at multiple locations linked to Income Tax Commissioner, Neeraj Singh, in connection with a money laundering case associated with an alleged disproportionate assets case. Singh is also under the scanner of the Kolkata Police and the ED for alleged links with the prime accused of the Rs  15,000-crore Rose Valley chit fund scam Gautam Kundu.

Read: West Bengal government obstructing investigations in Saradha Chit Fund Scam: CBI

Another big name had surfaced in connection with the multi-crore Rose Valley scam, as the Enforcement Directorate summoned Shah Rukh Khan owned Kolkata Knight Rider CEO Venky Mysore to the CGO complex in Salt Lake, Kolkata, on Friday morning to question him regarding the financial transaction between Shah Rukh Khan owned Red Chillies and Rose Valley.

ED had also summoned Bengali superstar Prosenjit Chatterjee in connection with the multi-crore scam. Prosenjit Chatterjee has been regularly spotted at many Rose Valley events with the main accused Gautam Kundu.

Prior to this, Chief of Shree Venkatesh Films and Mamata Banerjee’s close aide, Srikant Mohta had been arrested in January 2019 by the CBI in connection with the Rose Valley scam. The Bengali film producer and distributor was then interrogated by the CBI at his offices. He was served a notice by the agency regarding “acceptance of money from Rose Valley”.

Apart from these, several top leaders of the Trinamool Congress are named in the chit fund scam and facing investigation.

The ED had earlier also interrogated TMC leader Madan Mitra in connection with the scandal. He was interrogated for more than four hours.

West Bengal: Parents file complaint after private missionary school forces girl students to remove leggings

0

Parents of first-grade girl students who were forced to remove leggings because ‘they didn’t match with the school uniform colours’ have filed a police complaint against the private missionary school in Bolpur. As per reports, a number of girl students in the English medium missionary school were forced to remove their leggings because they were not part of the school uniform and the colours did not conform to the uniform colours either.

The incident took place on Monday. The parents say that the girls had worn leggings underneath their uniform because the weather has started getting colder. A parent of a girl child alleged that when she returned home from school, she was not wearing her leggings. Upon inquiry, he found out that the teacher got them removed during recess. He alleged that the school teachers did that on instructions of the school principal.

Read: Christian Convent in Gujarat punishes girl student for wearing henna, later apologizes

Free Press Journal reported another father’s demand that the school principal should resign. He is quoted to have said,”I was shocked to see my child coming out of the school without her leggings. She did not have an underwear. This is outrageous. The head mistress should resign.”

As reported by Mumbai Mirror, Jaher Ali Mondal, a senior teacher said that the leggings violated the dress code but insisted that no one was forced to remove the leggings. Jaher Ali Mondal said that the students have been instructed not to wear the leggings again. School headmistress Archana Fernandes said that the parents have been warned in the past not to make their daughters wear leggings as they are not part of the uniform. Refuting the allegations of forceful removal of leggings, she said that despite having tendered apology, she could not understand why the parents were agitating.

Read: Tripura: 15-year-old student dies after he is brutally tortured by hostel warden for opposing forceful conversion to Christianity

Meanwhile, a police complaint was filed in the Shantiniketan Police Station on Monday. Ananya Chakraborty, West Bengal Commission for Protection of Child Rights said that the incident was deplorable and an inquiry will be made. State Education Minister Partho Chattopadhyay has also sought report on the matter.

Bhopal MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur nominated for Parliamentary Consultative Committee of MoD

Bharatiya Janata Party MP from Bhopal Pragya Singh Thakur has been nominated to the Parliamentary Consultative Committee of the Ministry of Defence headed by Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh.

According to the reports, the 21-member Parliamentary Consultative Committee on Defence also includes the likes of Opposition leaders Farooq Abdullah and Sharad Pawar.

Bhopal MP Pragya Thakur entered the 17th Lok Sabha by defeating former chief minister of Madhya Pradesh and Congress leader Digvijaya Singh in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur is widely believed to be one of the victims of the Congress party’s attempt to invent Hindu Terror. In 2016, the NIA had given her a clean chit in the Malegaon Blasts case.

The Bombay High Court has granted her bail on health grounds in April 2017 after the NIA dropped charges against her under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act. She is currently under trial for multiple charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

What are the Consultative Committees?

The Consultative Committees are attached to various ministries or departments of the Central Government. These committees consist of members of both the Houses of Parliament. The Minister or the Minister of State in charge of the Ministry concerned acts as the chairman of the consultative committee of that ministry.

The consultative committees provide a forum for informal discussions between the ministers and the members of Parliament on policies and programmes of the government and the manner of their implementation. These committees are constituted by the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs.

These committees are normally formed after the new Lok Sabha is constituted, after General Elections for the Lok Sabha. Thus, these committees stand dissolved upon dissolution of every Lok Sabha and are reconstituted upon the constitution of each Lok Sabha.

How are these different from the Departmental Standing Committee?

Consultative committees are different from the Parliamentary Committees (DSC) as the members of the latter are appointed by the speaker of the Lok Sabha in the lower house while RS Chairman appoints the same in the Rajya Sabha. A minister cannot be a member of the Departmental Standing Committee, unlike Consultative Committees.

The main functions of Departmental Committees are consideration of Demands for Grants at the time of the annual budget. Examination of Bills referred to by the Chairman, Rajya Sabha or the Speaker, Lok Sabha is also the duty of the DSCs. Apart from these, the Departmental Committees will also consider Annual Reports of the ministry it is attached to. Finally, it considers the national basic long term policy documents presented to the House and referred to the Committee by the Chairman of Rajya Sabha or the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.

Has Shiv Sena conceded to NCP-Congress ‘secular’ demands? Sanjay Raut invokes Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj to harp on ‘secularism’

The Maharashtra government formation has remained sticky with Shiv Sena ditching BJP and trying to form an alliance with ideologically opposed Sharad Pawar led NCP and Sonia Gandhi led Congress. Now, it seems the talks have progressed by as per the media, the word ‘secularism’ is a sticky point in the formation of the alliance.

Several media houses have reported that while Ahmed Patel from Congress and NCP supremo Sharad Pawar remained locked in the room trying to work out the kinks in the alliance armour and decide on a common minimum program, the one issue that stuck out like a sore thumb was the word ‘secular’.

Reportedly, Congress and NCP want the word ‘secular’ to appear prominently in the CMP while Shiv Sena is resisting the move. There is also news that one NCP leader took exception to the term ‘secular’ and said that the CMP should instead say that the alliance will ‘adhere to the preamble of the constitution’.

However, in an interesting turn of events, Sanjay Raut of the erstwhile Hindutva party Shiv Sena has come out swinging batting for the tenets of ‘secularism’.

Assuring that the Maharashtra alliance will be announced soon, on 21st November Sanjay Raut said that the very foundation of India and its Constitution is ‘secularism’.

“The country and its very foundation is based on the word ‘secular’. You don’t ask farmers or jobless or the hungry their castes or religion…All the stakeholders in the country are secular,” said Raut. He was responding to a question about Shiv Sena and its stance on Congress and NCP insisting that the Hindutva agenda is abandoned.

Sanjay Raut did not just stop there. He even invoked Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, the great Maratha warrior to paint him as ‘secular’ while trying to score political points.

He said that Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj always took people of all religions and castes together and late Sena founder Balasaheb Thackeray had first mooted replacing the Constitution of India with religious texts for the swearing-in before the courts.

It was earlier reported that Shiv Sena had agreed to the Congress and NCP demands of conceding to 5% reservation for Muslims and also on abandoning the Hindutva cause. While the media has reported today that the addition of the word ‘secular’ in the CMP is a point of contention and Shiv Sena refuses to accept, Sanjay Raut’s statements make amply clear that Shiv Sena is now abandoning the Saffron for secular green.

Audio clip emerges which claims #MeToo activist Mahima Kukreja’s lawyer-sister threatened standup comic Utsav Chakraborty

In an audio clip released on Wednesday night where in an alleged conversation between standup comic Utsav Chakraborty, who was accused of sexual harassment, and Mansi Kukreja, lawyer-sister of Mahima Kukreja (Twitter user @agirlofherwords) who had put up these allegations, can be heard threatening legal action if Chakraborty releases screenshots of conversations which may prove his innocence.

A YouTube channel ‘EXPOSE MAHIMA’ released an audio where the alleged conversation took place between two individuals the user claims to be Utsav and Mansi on 14th November 2018.

The woman in the conversation identifies herself as Mahima Kukreja’s advocate calling on her behalf. “I have been informed that you have been planning to release certain screenshots or something of that nature… If I may be very honest at this point, she is been in touch with the Mumbai Police as well as the National Commission for Women, who have been pressing her to file charges. Due to her mental issues she is not wanting to get further involved in this. She wants to come out of it…”

The man, who had earlier identified himself as Utsav in the clip cuts her off but the woman asks him to hear her out first. “So she has been wanting to get past this thing. Mahima has decided but if you put out something which is damaging to her without her prior permission we may file legal, criminal as well as civil remedies. We will be constrained to…”

The man in the conversation asks what the remedies would be. The woman says the criminal remedy would be loss of reputation. “Anyway the Mumbai Police has been asking and has been in touch with her. Whatever we deem fit… Are you planning anything of that sort? I mean this is just to talk to you. Anyway this has been in the pipeline for a while. Because she has been asking me to get in touch with you and discuss it all. She wanted a public apology and you seek some kind of therapy. Because let’s face it, you may have screenshots… ,” the woman says.

Read: #MeToo: JNU student alleges ‘Hero of Kathua protests’ raped her brutally

The man interjects, “You have ruined my career. I have nothing else left. And the thing is all the people who spoke up against like after her and I understand her perspective also in that, what she did, she ruined my life, completely. My friends have stopped talking to me. Close friends, who have said, ‘what about other women?’ I have actually sat down and I have collected all the other screenshots of all the other people who wrote to Mahima and then Mahima put out that information without verifying and all of them I have screenshots of them either consenting or not talking to me at all. I don’t know why these people would do such thing. But you have ruined my life. And I have nothing else to do. What do I do now?”

The woman says, “If I may just say something from a fair point of view, let us be honest here and cut the chase… it is not like you didn’t do anything…” The man says, “Didn’t Mahima mention the fact that she was naked before? In the situation?” The woman says she would not be in a situation to comment on that. “But if you are going to leak screenshots of that, then you will get in serious trouble,” the woman says. The man identifying himself as Utsav then says how he would of course not release those screenshots to the media. “I am not an idiot,” he says.

Read: Vinod Dua’s daughter says she stands by her father accused of sexual harassment, and supports #MeToo too

The woman, who had identified herself as Mahima’s lawyer and is also her sister Mansi Kukreja, lists out various sections of the IT Act under which releasing the above images of Mahima may be a criminal offence. The man says he has kept these screenshots for legal issues.

“You know what I think, you say she ruined your life and ruined your career… I think a very wise thing for both of you would be you release a statement saying that whatever happened you didn’t subscribe to everything that was said but yet you did a mistake and are willing to give a public apology…” she says.

“Why would I give a public apology? Would Mahima give a public apology regarding that?” he asks.

“No, please let me complete. Are you saying that all the screenshots and all the messages she sent…” she asks regarding the other allegations put up on Utsav by other women.

“Yes I have eight separate incidences where people have either sent me nudes and they have regretted it later on and that is why they have put it up there. Or they have not talked to me at all. And they have jumped in the fray because clearly this was the trending topic and everyone wanted to join in. I am sorry. I have proof of that. Why would I not use that proof?” he asks.

“Where will you use these proofs? There is no proceedings known where you could use these proofs. Very honestly you are saying you talked to eight different people… there were lof of messages which were posted anonymously by her. But she has far far far more than 8 messages which if she has to and she will have to disclose,” the woman-lawyer says.

The man says she could go ahead and disclose. “I am fairly certain at this point…” he says before he is interrupted by the woman who says, “No, you are not because she has like amazingly huge numbers of messages and emails and correspondence. And she is in no way accountable for that.”

“She put it out there. There were 3,500 RTs (retweets) on each. Are you telling me she did not soliticise (sic) in any way? Did she not put it out there? Did she not aggravate saying that this vile man… The kind of language is reserved for actual rapist was used for me. For confusing… And for all those people who said ‘oh he touched my belly..’ it was consensual, we were having full conversation saying ‘oh I am blushing’,” he said.

Read: Mumbai police likely to close the sexual assault case against Alok Nath due to ‘lack of evidence’

The woman reminds the man who he went on to Zoom TV and said he would want to apologise. “Yeah, I would want to apologise to everyone who feels that they have been affected. I think you should talk to my lawyer. This is not… This is the thing. Even the Zoom TV thing was done under duress. I was ready to kill myself. That was the situation you put me through. This was the situation you put me through. Don’t tell me for one second that I am like…”

At this point, the woman asks the man if he would like to talk to Mahima as well and if she could put her on a conference call. The man agrees to talk to Mahima. This is where the first part of the clip ends.

In October 2018, Mahima Kukreja in a series of tweets had accused Utsav Chakraborty, a standup-comedian, of sexually predatory behaviour. Mahima even shared various screenshots she had received from various girls who had come out and accused Utsav of sending unsolicited ‘d*ck pics’, asking for nude images of girls and even justifying them.

Later, in an interview with Zoom TV, Utsav attempted to whitewash his allegedly inappropriate behaviour by highlighting his mental health issues without offering any meaningful apology and then blamed the ‘rightwing’ for his predicament. Utsav had said, “A lot of it has been galvanised by rightwing Twitter accounts. Please check their Twitter accounts, their Twitter headers, whatever, a lot of it.”

Passport Office issues notice to ‘activist’ Medha Patkar, asks why passport should not be impounded for concealing pending cases

0

The Mumbai Regional Passport Office has issued a show-cause notice to ‘activist’ Medha Patkar seeking details on cases pending against her asking why her passport should not be seized for hiding information regarding pendency of cases against her.

According to the reports, the RPO Mumbai has issued Patkar a notice on October 18 seeking details regarding the nine criminal cases that have been registered against her – three are in Barwani, one in Alirajpur and five in Khandwa district of Madhya Pradesh, which is still pending adjudication.

Reportedly, most of the cases against Medha Patkar have been lodged for rioting and obstructing government servants from carrying out their duty. In March 2017, a passport was reissued to her which is valid till March 2027.

Read: Sardar Sarovar Dam: The significance of Prime Minister Modi celebrating his birthday at Kevadia

The notice to Patkar by RPO Mumbai came after a complaint filed by journalist Sanjeev Jha in June which accused Patkar of obtaining her passport by “concealing” material facts from the RPO

The notice states that while obtaining her passport dated March 30, 2017, she did not disclose the pendency of these cases and obtained the passport by suppressing information.

“In view of the same, it is proposed to impound your passport bearing and any other passport if issued subsequently under section 10(3)(e) of the Passports Act 1967. You are requested to state why action should not be taken under section 12(1) of the Passports Act 1967,” the notice issued by the passport office on October 18 said.

Following the notice, the passport officials have sought her explanation within 10 days from the date of this communication failing which action would be taken. Reportedly, Patkar has till date not submitted any reply despite the lapse of more than 30 days.

Read: Aatish Taseer and his cheerleaders go loco: Here is how they are lying and deceiving about him losing his OCI

According to the section 10(3) of the passport act, the passport authority may impound or revoke a passport or travel document if proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the holder of the passport or travel document are pending before a criminal court in India.

Similarly, Section 12 of the same act states whoever “knowingly furnishes any false information or suppresses any material information with a view to obtaining a passport or travel document shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years or with fine which may extend to Rs 5,000 or with both.”

Responding to the allegations, Medha Patkar said that she had sent a reply to the Regional Passport Office saying that at the time of application, there was no case pending against her. She added that she had after the RPO had sent another notice giving me 15 days to produce documentary evidence for the cases. I have the documents of some of the cases but not all, she said.

Medha Patkar added that all the cases were filed during the NBA agitation which began in 1985. “These were not cases against me alone but against a large group of people. I don’t even remember appearing in Khandwa,” said Patkar.

Jignesh Mevani and CPIM Kerala share photos of ABVP activists to express solidarity with JNU students

Many prominent personalities and political parties extended their support to the students of the Jawaharlal Nehru University(JNU) who carried out a protest-march recently in the capital of the country demanding a complete rollback of the fee hike.

Gujarat MLA Jignesh Mevani and the Communist Party of India too expressed their solidarity with the protesting students. However, in Mevani and CPIM reportedly shared photos of ABVP activists to spread their agenda. ABVP had shared a tweet identifying their members and had requested them to acknowledge the organisation’s role and not just use the photos of their activists for their agenda.


Taking a swipe at Mevani and CPIM, the ABVP Twitter handle claimed that the Mevani and CPIM have rightfully hailed the activists of ABVP for taking a stand in students’ favour. ABVP stated that photos of its activists, Shambhavi, Prakash and Sujeet were used by Jignesh Mevani and CPIM party to praise student’s protest against the fee hike. It also raised suspicions about the intentions of Mevani and CPIM in hailing the ABVP activists saying it would be fair if they had used the photos to acknowledge ABVP’s contribution to the student community and not for pushing their leftist agenda.

CPI(M) shares a photo of ABVP activist Shambhavi Jha

 

Jignesh Mevani on his Instagram profile had shared a photo from yesterday’s protests featuring an ABVP activist. Similarly, CPIM Kerala had also shared a photo of an ABVP activist Shambhavi Jha’s photo while asserting that they stand with the JNU students in their demand against the fee hike and the newly imposed restrictions.

The perpetual protest dawdlers of the Jawaharlal Nehru University had launched a protest-march on November 18 from JNU varsity premises towards the Indian parliament in opposition to JNU administration’s proposed fee hike and other proposals.

Read: Other premier and second-tier institutions charge students upto 20 times more than proposed JNU fees now: Report

Thousands of students had hit the streets demanding a complete rollback of the fee hike amid massive police deployment. Several students faced action from the police force for breaking the law and hitting the streets despite having no permission to organise the protest march. The police had allegedly lathi-charged some students near the Safdarjung tomb square.