Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma on Monday posted a tweet busting the fake assertions attributed to him in a ‘Brut India’ video. The Assam CM also hinted legal action for posting distorted video designed to disrupt communal harmony, adding that the “long arms of law will catch up with them.”
“See for yourself, as elections approach, how vested groups distort a speech with the criminal intention of spreading disinformation and communal disharmony,” Himanta Biswa Sarma tweeted along with the two videos, one fake, and the other original.
See for yourself, as elections approach, how vested groups distort a speech with the criminal intention of spreading disinformation and communal disharmony.
In the distorted video, Himanta Biswa Sarma’s remarks on Congress’ stance on Udhaynidhi Stalin’s “Sanatana Dharma must be eradicated” comment have been cunningly edited to insinuate that the Assam CM is calling for the annihilation of Islam and Christianity.
However, in reality, Sarma was questioning the duplicity of the Congress party, an alliance partner of Stalin’s DMK.
“Stalin’s aim to eradicate Sanatana Dharma is not his goal alone. The Congress party also shares the same objective as they defended his remark as “Freedom of Speech.” I want to ask the Congress party if I call to eradicate Islam or Christianity tomorrow, will the Congress party defended it as my freedom of speech.”
But Sarma’s video was maliciously edited to remove context and imply that the Assam CM had vowed to eradicate Islam and Christianity.
DMK leader Udhaynidhi Stalin had stirred a massive political row last year with his “Sanatana Dharma must be eradicated” remark. While the comment saw sharp disapproval from the BJP, several DMK leaders and their allies stood in Stalin’s defence and backed his comments on the Santana Dharma.
In a shocking incident reported from Begusarai, Bihar, a man identified as Maheshwar Kumar Rai was killed by his in-laws after he refused to put up with his wife’s obsession with creating Instagram reels based on popular songs. The victim had a five-year-old son and was married to Rani Kumari six years ago.
The incident took place in the Fafaut village in Begusarai, Bihar, on the night of 7th January. The 25-year-old, a labourer in Kolkata, recently returned home. According to the police, he and his wife got into an argument when he objected to her obsession with creating reels. The lady has over 9,500 followers on Instagram and has posted over 500 videos on the social media platform.
As per the reports, the victim was murdered by his in-laws in their home. The accused tied a rope around the victim’s neck and killed him. The father of the victim confirmed the incident and said that the victim never liked his wife making Instagram reels. “The duo used to fight a lot over the issue. His in-laws killed him after he went to their home on Sunday,” the father confirmed.
The incident, however, is said to have come to the fore after Rudal, the brother of the victim in Kolkata called him on his phone but someone else answered. Rudal then informed the victim’s family in the village who discovered that the victim had been killed by his in-laws.
The accused reportedly had absconded by the time the villagers arrived at the spot. The police were informed, who eventually took the dead body in possession and sent it for post-mortem. The wife and her sibling have been arrested by the police in the case.
The accused persons have been arrested and the police are interrogating them in the case. Further investigation in the case are underway.
An Indian-origin retail establishment worker in the Canadian state of Manitoba has filed a lawsuit against a police officer for allegedly investigating his home without a warrant and threatening to deport him.
Harjot Singh, a cashier at a Sargent Avenue convenience store, told the CBC television channel on Friday (5th January) that Winnipeg police officer Jeffrey Norman’s actions left him so shaken that he resigned from his job there. Singh was told he was being arrested for obstructing a police officer after his mobile was taken away and he was handcuffed.
According to Singh’s statement, filed late last month in the Manitoba Court of King’s Bench, Norman attempted to enter the shop while it was temporarily closed on December 2 of last year. Singh opened the door “after a very brief interval,” and Norman began searching the property without a warrant.
According to the statement of claim, Norman interrogated Singh and threatened to deport him from Canada if he did not cooperate. According to the lawsuit, the search was “warrantless and unreasonable in the manner in which it was carried out”, and left Singh so terrified that he quit his job at the store.
While none of the claims in the statement were yet proven in court, the complaint claimed that the officer’s behavior was high-handed and “discriminatory based on the national or ethnic origin”.
It also noted that Norman’s conduct “amounted to battery, false imprisonment and arbitrary detention, unjustified seizures and searches, and an infringement of Singh’s rights.”
In addition to seeking an undefined amount in general, constitutional, and punitive damages, the complaint requests that a judge compel the City of Winnipeg to develop a remedial education program for the Winnipeg Police Service.
Along with Norman, the City of Winnipeg is named as a defendant in the action. While no statements of defense have been filed, the CBC reports that Police officer Norman has been cited in at least two previous lawsuits alleging inappropriate use of force.
At 6:40 PM (IST) on 4th January, Mr Sinha shared PM Modi’s Lakshadweep video in a post on his X account. Little did he know that this post would cut the ground from under People’s National Congress’s (PNC) feet, the ruling party in Maldives.
It seems it has reached the Maldives & many Maldivians are hurt with this.
Just to clarify that we have nothing against the Maldives, we are against your new govt which is pro China & anti India..
Mr Raushan Sinha, a political commentator, took to X to share PM Modi’s appeal to people around the world to visit Lakshadweep. “What a great move! It’s a big setback to the new Chinese puppet govt of Maldives. Also, it will boost tourism in #Lakshadweep,” Mr Sinha wrote.
The post irked Mariyam Shiuna, Maldives’ Deputy Minister of Youth Empowerment, Information and Arts. The Maldivian leader responded to Mr Sinha’s post calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi a “clown” and a “puppet of Israel”.
Shiuna, along with two more ruling party leaders in Maldives, is now suspended and has deleted her post. While Indian netizens in clear words objected to the derogatory words used against their country and Prime Minister, Mr Sinha raised in a significant point in his clarification post.
On 5th January, he wrote, “It seems it has reached the Maldives & many Maldivians are hurt with this. Just to clarify that we have nothing against the Maldives, we are against your new govt which is pro China & anti India.”
Speaking to OpIndia, he pointed out that the Opposition in Maldives is pro-India whereas the ruling government led by Mohamed Muizzu is pro-China. Notably, the controversy erupted ahead of Muizzu’s visit to China on 8th January.
On a different note,unlike Pakistan not all the citizens of Maldives are anti India.
A large number of the population is pro India & their previous govt had a friendly relationship with us.
It's just the current gvt which is a Chinese puppet..
“MEA summons to Maldives envoy at a time when Maldivian President is in China is a big message to China in a way,” Mr Sinha said underlining the power of the clout Indians enjoy once they decide to unite against anti-India forces.
Mr Sinha, a Bihari businessman residing in Gujarat, takes active interest in Indian politics, geopolitics and foreign policy. He wears his Hindu identity with pride.
“There has been a significant boost of confidence among Indians since 2014,” Mr Sinha says, sharing his observation about the political changes he has seen in the country from his college days, when he actively participated in campus politics.
Mr Sinha is a Bihari living in Gujarat. His social media presence has grown strong over the years. Despite several of his old accounts suspended, his India first and pro-Hindu stand has resonated with many leading to a staggering 165.4k followers on X, formerly Twitter, which he joined in 2016.
Mr Sinha told OpIndia that he has received some death threats and abuses in his inbox ever since the controversy broke out. But he is certain that the calls by the Indian people to boycott Maldives have gathered support from the Indian government.
“A change in the government in Maldives would be good for India,” Mr Sinha said. On 7th January, he shared a post on X citing sources that Maldives Tourism is sponsoring an anti-India campaign.
“So the entire anti India campaign is being sponsored by a few business houses who are close to #Maldives President & their ministers. And President @MMuizzu is doing it purposely to please China. Sources say he’s visiting China in a few days. #BoycottMaldives,” Mr Sinha wrote sharing some images.
So the entire anti India campaign is being sponsored by a few business houses who are close to #Maldives President & their ministers.
In another anti-India post shared by a Maldivian newspaper, a call was made for an “urgent cap on Indian tourists visiting Maldives”. The post made comparisons between European tourists and Indian tourists giving reasons as to why the former is better than the latter. In the Indian tourist section, an image of Mr Sinha was used.
It is important to note the pic that they used when depicting Indian tourist ??
It’s our very own superman, who defends our border when we sleep ?
Many anti-India personalities including politicians in Maldives were irked by the post Mr Sinha shared on Lakshadweep. This led to a spate of unsavoury exchanges finally forcing the Maldives government to issue a clarification. Additionally, it became imperative on senior leaders in Maldives to reaffirm their friendship with India and reiterate their commitment.
The controversy has exposed another enemy of India overseas but has also, more importantly, unleashed the power of the everyday Indian onto the world. Now, anti-India Maldivian ministers stand suspended. As for the virtual battle, the trend as it stands now is #VisitMaldives versus #ExploreIndianIslands #BoycottMaldives #MaldivesOut #LakshadweepTourism.
The Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) started oil production from the much-delayed flagship deep-water project in the Krishna Godavari basin offshore the nation’s eastern coast. As per reports, ONGC has started production from the Cluster-2 project of the KG-DWN-98/2 block. It is expected to slowly ramp up production in this Cluster.
Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri informed about the commencement of production. Though he did not provide information of current output, the Union Minister added that production is expected to be 45,000 barrels per day of oil and over 10 million standard cubic meters per day of gas.
As India powers ahead as the fastest growing economy under leadership of PM @NarendraModi Ji, our energy production is also set to rise from the deepest frontiers of #KrishnaGodavari
For the deep sea energy project, ONGC has hired the floating platform Armada Sterling V, owned 70% by Shapoorji Palonji Oil and Gas and 30% by Malaysia’s Bumi Armada. The Floating production, storage, and offloading (FPSO) vessel was docked into the Cluster-2 area on December 27 and has been waiting to receive oil since January 2.
As per reports, ONGC’s KG-DWN-98/2, also known as the KG-D5 block, is located next to the KG-D6 block, which is owned by Reliance Industries Ltd. KG blocks are located in the Krishna Godavari Delta, in the Bay of Bengal, just off the coast of Andhra Pradesh.
ONGC’s KG-D5 block is divided into 3 clusters, Cluster-1,2 and 3. Of these, Cluster -2 was scheduled to be operational back in November 2021, but the project was delayed due to Covid.
The water depths in the KG-D5 block vary from 300 to 3200 meters. Cluster 2 is expected to produce 23.52 million metric tons of oil, and 50.70 billion cubic meters of gas in its operational lifetime.
“This 98/2 project is likely to increase ONGC’s total oil and gas production by 11 percent and 15 percent, respectively,” the ONGC said.
ONGC successfully executed Phase 1 of the project in March 2020, achieving the commencement of gas production from the U field of the KG-DWN-98/2 Block in a record time of 10 months.
With the commencement of this first oil on Sunday, ONGC is nearing completion of Phase 2, culminating in the commencement of oil production from the ‘M’ field of KG-DWN-98/2, it added.
While some of the deep water hardware has been purchased from global markets, the majority of the fabrication has been done in the Modular Fabrication Facility at Kattupalli, under the Make In India initiative, as per ONGC.
PM Modi also said that the development will boost the mission of a self-reliant India. “This is a remarkable step in India’s energy journey and boosts our mission for an Aatmanirbhar Bharat,” PM Modi said in a post on X.
The Pran Pratishtha ceremony of Ram Lalla is scheduled for 22nd January 2024. It took over 500 years for the Hindu devotees to see their dream of having Bhagwan Ram’s temple in Ayodhya. The journey to the temple’s construction saw bloodshed and a lengthy legal battle that ended on 9th November 2019 when the Supreme Court of India gave judgment in favour of Hindus. Apart from advocates, researchers, and archaeological experts, Hindu saints played a vital role in providing the foundation for the final judgment. One such saint is Jagatguru Swami Rambhadracharya Maharaj, whose testimony was crucial in the final judgment.
Swami Ji was deposed as an expert witness on religious matters at the Allahabad High Court in July 2003. Out of his 100-page affidavit and cross-examination, portions were quoted in the final judgment by the High Court. In his affidavit, Swami Ji cited numerous ancient Hindu scriptures, including Ramayana, Rāmatāpanīya Upaniṣad, Skanda Purana, Yajurveda, and Atharvaveda, to support his viewpoint that Ayodhya, a holy city for Hindus, was the birthplace of Bhagwan Ram.
Swami Ji also referred to several verses from two works composed by Tulsidas. One of these was from the Doha Sataka, which described the destruction of a temple and the construction of a mosque at the disputed site by Babur in 1528 CE. The second verse he used was from Kaitavali, which mentioned a mosque.
During the cross-examination in the High Court, Swami Ji cited details on the history of the Ramananda sect, its Mathas, the rules regarding Mahants, the formation and working of Akharas, and Tulsidas’ works. Furthermore, he also refuted the claims that the original temple was on the north side of the disputed area, which was argued by the Muslim side. He cited the Ayodhya Mahatmya section of the Skanda Purana that mentioned the temple’s exact location.
OpIndia accessed court documents from both the Supreme Court and Allahabad High Court to understand Swami Ji’s perspective and testimony.
Excerpts from testimony used in the High Court judgment
In his testimony, Swami Ji asserted that, as per his knowledge and study, the disputed site was Bhagwan Ram’s birthplace. He said, “It is known to all that Lord Sri Rama was born in Ayodhya itself, and the disputed site is, as per faith, tradition and belief, recognised by the followers of Hinduism as the birthplace of Sri Rama since the time immemorial, and the worship of that place has consistently been performed.”
To support his claims, he mentioned several Hindu scriptures in his testimony. Citing verses from Valmiki Ramayana, Atharvaveda, Yajurveda, Ramtapniyayopanishad, Skandapurana and Tulsidas’s literature, Swami Ji detailed how these scriptures mentioned the birthplace of Bhagwan Ram. He pointed out that in ‘Sri Tulsishatak’, Goswami Tulsidas clearly described how Muslims and Babur destroyed the Shri Tam Janam Mandir in Ayodhya and constructed a mosque in its place.
In his writings, Tulsidas Ji expressed his deep anguish and distress over the actions of Yavans against the Hindu society and religious practices. The term Yavans was used for Mughals or barbarians. He described how the barbarians ridiculed and disrespected Hindu hymns, scriptures such as Upanishads and other religious texts such as Brahmanas, Puranas, and Itihasas.
Tulsidas Ji recounted the forceful attempts made by Muslims to drive Hindus away from their native lands. They stripped Hindus of their religious symbols such as Shikha, which is a lock of hair on the crown of the head and ‘Yagyopaveet’, which is a sacred thread that Hindus wear. The barbarians pressured Hindus to abandon their faith.
मंत्र उपनिषद ब्राह्मनहुँ बहु पुरान इतिहास । जवन जराये रोष भरि करि तुलसी परिहास ।। सिखा सूत्र से हीन करि, बल ते हिन्दू लोग । भमरि भगाये देश ते, तुलसी कठिन कुजोग बाबर बर्बर आइके, कर लीन्हे करवाल । हने पचारि-पचारि जन, तुलसी काल कराल ।। सम्बत सर वसु बान नभ, ग्रीष्म ऋतु अनुमानि । तुलसी अवधहिं जड़ जवन, अनरथ किय अनखानि ।। राम जनम महिं मंदिरहिं, तोरि मसीत बनाय । जवहि बहु हिन्दुन हते, तुलसी कीन्ही हाय ।। दल्यो मीरबाकी अवध, मन्दिर रामसमाज । तुलसी रोवत हृदय हति, त्राहि त्राहि रघुराज ।। राम जनम मंदिर जहाँ, लसत अवध के बीच । तुलसी रची मसीत तहँ, मीरबाकी खल नीच ।। रामायन घरि घन्ट जहें, श्रुति पुरान उपखान । तुलसी जवन अजान तहँ, कियो कुरान अजान ।।
Excerpt from Sri Tulsishatak
Furthermore, Tulsidas Ji detailed how Mughal ruler Babur led a brutal campaign leading to the mass genocide of Hindus in Ayodhya around 1528 CE. He talked about the ruthless destruction of the Shri Ram Janam Bhumi temple and its conversion into a mosque by Mir Baqi, who was an associate of Babur. He described how heartbroken he was to witness the revered temple of Bhagwan Ram being replaced by a structure that symbolised the suffering and persecution of the Hindu community. The place that once resonated with Hindu religious discourse and the sounds of temple bells echoed with the Quranic recitations and Azaan, which deeply grieved Tulsidas Ji, leading him to cry out in despair to Bhagwan Ram for salvation.
In his work ‘Kavitavali’, Tulsidas Ji expressed detachment from society and his attachment and faith towards Bhagwan Ram. Further, he mentioned about the disputed site as follows:
“Dhoot Kahaun, Avadhoot Kahaun, Rajpoot Kahaun, Jolha Kahaun Kou. Kahu Ki Beti Se Beta Na Byahab, Kahu Ki Jati Bigaran Sou. Tulsi Sar Naam Gulamu Hai Ram Ko, Jako Ruche So kahe Kachhu Jou. Mangi Ke Khaibon, Maseet Me Soibo, Laive Ko Eku Na Deve Ke Dou.”
The Mosque mentioned in verse, particularly in the line “Mangi Ke Khaibon, Maseet Me Soibo,” holds the utmost importance in this context as it is believed that Tulsidas Ji was talking about the Mosque built in place of Shri Ram Janam Temple. He said in the verse that he was ready to ask for food and sleep in the Mosque, but his devotion to Bhagwan Ram would remain intact.
Swamiji further mentioned a Shlok from Sarga-18 of Balkand in the Valmiki Ramayana that talked about the birth of Bhagwan Ram. The Shlok read, “Tato Yagye Samapte Tu Ritunam Shat Samatyuyah. Tatasch Dwadashe Mase Chaitre Navamike Tithau. Nakshatre-aditi Daivatye Swochchsanstheshu Panjasu. Graheshu Karkate Lagne Vakyatavinduna Sah. Prodyamane Jagannatham Sarvalok Namaskritam. Kaushalyajanayad Ramam Divya Lakshan Samyutam.” Swami Ji said that the words “Sarvalok Namaskritam” referred to the birthplace of Bhagwan Ram, Ayodhya.
Referring to Skand Purana, printed and published in 1966 by Venkateshwar Printing Press, established by Kshemraj Shreshti, son of Shrikrishnadas, Swami Ji said that it contained a clear description of the Janmbhumi (birthplace) of Lord Sri Rama.
Excerpts from the Supreme Court’s judgment
The judgment read, “Jagadguru Ramanandacharya Swami Rambhadracharya states in his statement that disputed site is a Ram Janma Bhumi, which is being so believed from time immemorial by faith and tradition of Hindus.
In his statement, he states: “According to my studies and knowledge, the Ayodhya situated disputed site is Sri Ramjanmbhumi, which has been recognised as the birthplace of Lord Rama by followers of Hinduism from time immemorial on the basis of faith, tradition and belief, and the said place has been continuously worshipped.“
Source: Supreme Court of India
In his examination-in-chief, Jagadguru Ramanandacharya Swami Rambhadracharya has also stated that Ayodhya-Mahatmya, the birthplace of Lord Shri Ram, has been clearly described. Paragraph 25 of the examination-in-chief is as follows:
“I am familiar with the Ayodhya Mahatmya of the Vaishnav Khand of Skand Puran, published in 1966 in the press established by Shri Krishnadasatmaj Kshemraj Shresthi in which the birthplace of Lord Shri Rama has been clearly described. The photocopy of the cover page and the photocopy of Shloka Nos. 1 to 25 on page No.292 of chapter 10 of this book is enclosed with this affidavit as enclosure-1, which is the valid photocopy of the original book.“
Swami Ji’s testimony in the High Court was forwarded to the Supreme Court. Excerpts from the testimony were part of both High Court and Supreme Court judgments. Swami Ji was one of the saints who testified in court and referenced Hindu scriptures to prove the disputed site was indeed Bhagwan Ram’s birthplace.
Following Maldivian Politicians’ racial commentary on Indians, Lakshadweep MP Mohammad Faizal slammed the politicians and netizens of the archipelago for making uncalled-for and racial comments about Indians. Speaking to news agency ANI, Mohammad Faizal expressed surprise, asserting that why should Maldives say anything about what is going to happen in Lakshadweep or what PM Modi says or does for the islands.
According to the Lakshadweep MP Faizal, whatever PM Modi does for Lakshadweep or whatever is going to happen on the island, doesn’t concern Maldives and it is uncalled for Maldivians to pass comments on such things. Expressing surprise, he asked why should Maldives have a problem with what PM Modi does for his nation and its Islands.
The media asked about his response to the Maldivian Ministers’ post about PM Modi’s visit to Lakshadweep. To which, the Lakshadweep MP Mohammad Faizal said, “…Why should Maldives say something about what is going to happen in Lakshadweep and what PM Modi spoke on the future of tourism in Lakshadweep.”
(Video Courtesy – ANI)
Faizal added that PM Modi made himself an Ambassador of Lakshadweep as the Union Territory of Lakshadweep is directly governed by the Union government, and he said something which the people of Lakshadweep always wanted, to promote tourism.
Faizal added, “One thing is sure that Lakshadweep is going to be a new destination which is still to be explored. PM Modi came to Lakshadweep and stayed for a day and he said something which the people of Lakshadweep always wanted to have from a tourism perspective. I always wanted this government to have a policy for tourism because that will definitely generate employment opportunities for youngsters…Why should the Maldives have a problem with that?”
#WATCH | On Maldives MP's post on PM Modi's visit to Lakshadweep, Lakshadweep MP Mohammad Faizal says "…Why should Maldives say something about what is going to happen in Lakshadweep and what PM Modi spoke on the future of tourism in Lakshadweep. One thing is sure that… pic.twitter.com/URDLQrEpLs
This comes after some politicians of the ruling government in Maldives insulted India, Indians, and PM Modi.
The bizarre reaction from Maldives
Notably, it all started on 4th January after PM Narendra Modi shared some pictures of his recent visit to Lakshadweep. He exhorted people to explore the scenic island in what could be seen as a push to his ‘vocal for local’ slogan, and an effort to give a boost to tourism on the island.
Following his visit to Lakshadweep, a large demand erupted among Indians to explore the Indian Islands and boost our tourism sector before visiting beaches or tourism sites in other countries. However, jittery Maldivian politicians interjected and reacted by making racial commentary on Indians.
It is important to note that neither the Indian PM mentioned any country nor it was targeted toward any nation, yet some Maldivians feared a potential hit to their tourism economy.
Nonetheless, Mariyam Shiuna, Deputy Minister of Youth Empowerment, Information, and Arts, recently made insulting remarks against PM Modi, referring to him as a ‘clown’ and a ‘puppet of Israel’ after he posted pictures from his visit to Lakshadweep Islands. She later deleted the tweet and was among one of the three Ministers who were suspended by the Maldivian government for making disparaging remarks on India.
On Friday (5th January), Zahid Rameez, a Council member of the ruling Progressive Party of Maldives (PPM) also took to the microblogging site X to mock Indians.
In response to Maldivian users’ and politicians’ uncalled-for and racial commentary, trends like #BoycottMaldives, and cancellation of trips to Maldives are picking steam in India.
From prominent Cricketers to Actors, all have in unison slammed Maldives for their hateful remarks against Indians and promoted tourism in Lakshadweep and other Indian Islands snubbing Maldives. Additionally, as per reports, a large number of Indians have cancelled their trips to the Island nation in the wake of the Maldivian Minister’s disparaging, and racial and Hinduphobic comments on Indians.
On Monday (8th January), former Indian Express ‘journalist‘ Irena Akbar took to X (formerly Twitter) to express her support for tourism in Lakshwadeep because the Union territory has a 97% Muslim population.
The development came amid calls to boycott Maldives after the Ministers of the island nation made racist and derogatory remarks about Indian citizens and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Indians had vowed to support tourism in Lakshadweep instead of splurging their money on visiting Maldives.
As expected, Irena Akbar made it clear that she would not boycott Maldives (a country which has a 98.4% Muslim population). She however encouraged tourism in Lakshadweep on account of the fact that the inhabitants of the Union territory are her co-religionists.
Screengrab of the tweet by Irena Akbar
“I am not for boycotting Maldives but I am definitely for supporting tourism to Lakshadweep because it is 97% Muslim,” she informed. The former Indian Express journalist added, “I will give economic preference to Muslims of India over those outside.”
Several netizens called into question her loyalty to her country. Others inquired whether her allegiance to the nation is limited only to the Muslim population.
Following outrage on social media, Irena Akbar deactivated her X account. On searching for her username (@irenaakbar) on the microblogging platform, the following message is displayed – “The account does not exist.”
Irena Akbar deactivates her account
Past controversies of Irena Akbar
This is not the first time that the former scribe courted controversy on social media. After Hamas terrorists stripped a German woman named Shani Louk and paraded her dead body on a pickup truck, Irena Akbar came out in defence of the terrorists in October last year.
In April 2021, she stirred the hornet’s nest by thanking Allah for the Coronavirus pandemic. She claimed “If it weren’t for Covid, Indian Muslims would’ve been in detention camps. I’m NOT being grateful for the virus which killed my aunt, sent my dad to the ICU & is causing tragedies across homes. I’m stressing the fact that while fascists were making their plans, God was making His.”
Comments by Irena Akbar
“It’s between the devil & the deep blue sea for IMs. Either die/live in fear of Covid OR die/live in fear of anti-Muslim state violence. At least the former doesn’t specifically target us & the public will eventually question the state. But in latter, the public would rejoice it,” she added.
In February 2020, she asserted that Dalits should never be trusted by the Muslim community. The Islamist claimed that the Dalits were the ‘foot soldiers’ when communal riots broke out in Gujarat in 2002 after a Muslim mob engineered the Godhra train carnage.
Hateful tweets by Irena Akbar
“They did the dirty job of gang-raping and killing Muslims. I have never trusted them. They are ill-treated by their upper-caste Hindu brothers, not by Muslims. We owe them nothing,” she wrote. Irena Akbar also called for boycotts of business establishments run by Hindus.
Telugu movie industry icon Megastar Chiranjeevi has announced that for every ticket sold for the new ‘HanuMan’ movie, the makers will donate Rs 5 for the Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Mandir in Ayodhya.
Megastar Chiranjeevi announced at a pre-release event at Hyderabad for Prashanth Varma’s new movie ‘HanuMan’. HanuMan is set to release on January 12, clashing with other Tollywood Sankranthi releases that include Mahesh Babu’s Guntur Kaaram, Nagarjuna’s ‘Naa Sami Ranga’, and Venkatesh’s ‘Saindhav’.
तेलगु फिल्म इंडस्ट्री के स्टार हमेशा दिल जीत लेते हैं ❤ मेगास्टार चिरंजीवी ने अयोध्या राम मंदिर के लिए फिल्म ' हनुमान ' की प्रति टिकट 5 ₹ दान करने का वादा किया है। अत्यंत सराहनीय कार्य ? जय श्री राम ??https://t.co/yqXxSKWP69pic.twitter.com/HkG73w9UZx
‘HanuMan’ has Teja Sajja as the lead actor. It is a superhero movie themed around Hanuman’s power as an immortal God who is still watching over his devotees. Vinay Rai will play the villain role in the movie. The film also features Amritha Aiyer, Varalaxmi Sarathkumar and Raj Deepak Shetty in supporting roles.
‘HanuMan’ will be the first movie in a superhero series planned by Prashanth Varma, as per reports. The next movie is to be named as ‘Adhira’.
The Delhi High Court voiced its disapproval on 8th January and cautioned YouTuber Shyam Meera Singh that he could face contempt proceedings for comments he made against the Court. Shyam Meera Singh, in one of his latest social media posts, had mentioned that he was being pressured by the Court in the case against Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh.
The court was hearing a plea filed by Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, seeking an interim stay on a video, and the deletion of a video Shyam Meera Singh uploaded to YouTube. The YouTube video is titled “How Gurmeet Ram Rahim Fooled His Bhakts?”.
At the outset, counsel for the YouTuber requested an adjournment because Senior Advocate Salman Khurshid was not available to argue today. Senior Advocate Mohit Mathur, meanwhile, standing for the Dera Sacha Sauda Chief, informed the court that Singh has tweeted that he is under pressure.
The senior counsel quoted Shyam Meera Singh’s tweet, “Samne wale paksh ke karan hume 2 din ke liye video private mode pe krne ke liye majboor hona pada (Because of the opposite party, I have been forced to put the video on private mode for 2 days).”
“This is not fair. This is unfair. The court doesn’t force anybody. He’s saying he’s being forced. It was a concession. I could have passed an order. The court is very competent to pass an order with regard to the merits of the case. It was done voluntarily. Where is the majburi (Compulsion)? You bring him here, and we’ll ask him what he wants, then it will not be a majburi (compulsion),” the court of Justice Jasmeet Singh then said.
“Please understand…When you write about the court, you have to be a responsible citizen. You cannot say that the court is pressuring you. The court cannot pressure anybody. Your counsel had suggested putting the video in ‘Private Mode’ if any such tweet is posted in the future. I’ll issue a contempt order against you,” the court said advising the YouTuber Shyam Meera Singh.
The court deferred the hearing to January 10, 2024, citing the absence of Singh’s senior counsel. “The video will remain in private mode until January 10,” the court instructed.
Senior Advocate Salman Khurshid, who represented Singh at the last hearing, stated that both sides will get down and review the defamatory portions of the video to determine what can be done.
Last week, YouTuber Shyam Meera Singh informed the Court that he would remove the tweets he had written against Dera Sacha Sauda founder Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh. The plaintiff’s counsel stated that his client issued a legal notice to YouTube and Shyam Meera Singh, the person who uploaded the video, on December 21. He had claimed that the film was “clearly derogatory, disparaging, and denigrating.”
“He (Shyam Meera Singh) is a habitual offender… After we put him to notice, he put out a comment on Twitter (now known as X) saying, ‘I’m not going to delete these videos’. Defiant. He has also been accused by the UP administration of insulting the Chief Minister. An FIR came to be registered at the instance of a UP resident,” the counsel of the Dera chief had said.
