On 4th September, journalist-turned-TMC MP Sagarika Ghose targeted the then-Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led government in 1999, accusing it of being a “soft” state for releasing three terrorists as part of the negotiations with the hijackers of the IC814 Indian Airlines plane. Notably, the hijacking is in the news after a series based on it was released on Netflix, with many accusing it of being soft towards the terrorists.
Sagarika Ghose wrote on X (Twitter), “In 1999, the #AtalBihariVajpayee government, a coalition led by BJP, released THREE of India’s most wanted terrorists during the #IC814 hijacking. Among them was Masood Azhar, who had been arrested by the Congress’s PV Narasimha Rao govt in 1994. In 1999, the IC 814 hijacking caught the Vajpayee government napping. In 1971, Indira Gandhi had invaded East Pakistan. Who runs the so-called ‘soft’ state, BJP or Congress? In my biography of Atal Bihari Vajpayee.”
In 1999 the #AtalBihariVajpayee government , a coalition led by @BJP4India, released THREE of India’s most wanted terrorists during the #IC814 hijacking. Among them was Masood Azhar who had been arrested by the @INCIndia’s PV Narasimha Rao govt in 1994. In 1999 the IC 814… pic.twitter.com/bGoFfkKmPj
Sagarika Ghosh used the current controversy over the hijacking to promote her book on Atal Bihari Vajpayee, and she posted several tweets attacking the then NDA government for releasing three terrorists to secure the release of the passengers held hostage in Afghanistan’s Kandahar. “A shamefaced India gave in meekly to the terrorists demands and released 3 wanted terrorists. It was a crushing failure of the BJP‘s first prime minister,” she wrote.
The journalist-turned-politician completely ignored the fact that her own party was a part of the save coalition government, and her leader Mamata Banerjee was a cabinet minister in the Vajpayee government.
However, her half-baked knowledge about the coalition government ran dry pretty quickly as Kanchan Gupta, Senior Advisor to the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Government of India, reminded her that Trinamool Congress (TMC) was part of the coalition at that time, and Mamata Banerjee was Union Minister for Railways. He added that during a crucial Cabinet meeting, Banerjee not only endorsed freeing the terrorists but aggressively pushed for it.
This #TMC MP @sagarikaghose is being deceitful. Her boss Mamata Banerjee was Union Minister for Railways in 1999. At crucial Cabinet meeting @MamataOfficial not only endorsed freeing 3 terrorists to secure freedom of passengers and crew of #IC814, she aggressively pushed for it. pic.twitter.com/kOzv5ru7yZ
He wrote, “This TMC MP Sagarika Ghose is being deceitful. Her boss Mamata Banerjee was Union Minister for Railways in 1999. At a crucial Cabinet meeting, Mamata Banerjee not only endorsed freeing 3 terrorists to secure the freedom of passengers and crew of IC814, she aggressively pushed for it.” Kanchan Gupta was OSD in the PMO to then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and a member of the National Security Advisory Board when the hijacking took place.
By the time this report was published, Ghose had not replied to Kanchan Gupta. However, earlier, Ghose had threatened journalist Tushar Gupta with defamation when he called out her half-baked post. In a post on X, Tushar wrote, “TMC Rajya Sabha MP does not know that TMC was a part of the coalition led by the BJP in 1999. It happens when you do not earn your ticket but buy it.”
TMC Rajya Sabha MP does not know that TMC was a part of the coalition led by the BJP in 1999. It happens when you do not earn your ticket but buy it. pic.twitter.com/SqTXg50cDz
Though Tushar never specified which ticket, Ghose assumed he was referring to her Rajya Sabha ticket. She threatened him with defamation, saying, “‘Buy’ a Rajya Sabha ticket? Please prove it here with evidence. Else Tushar Gupta, you are liable for defamation immediately.” She tagged TMC leader Derek O’Brien in the post.
Source: X
Replying to her, Tushar clarified he never said Rajya Sabha ticket. He subtly questioned the missing “Freedom of Speech and Expression” when it comes to TMC leaders. He said, “So much for Freedom of Speech and Expression. I wrote about buying a ‘ticket’. She assumed I said ‘Rajya Sabha ticket’. Laughable.”
So much for Freedom of Speech and Expression. I wrote about buying a 'ticket'. She assumed I said 'Rajya Sabha ticket'. Laughable. pic.twitter.com/yIpXi1GSUe
Ghose then threatened him to see him in court and wrote, “Keep laughing Mr Tushar Gupta and save your explanations for court.”
Source: X
Netflix’s web series “IC814: The Kandhar Hijack” has stirred controversy as it has been alleged that the makers of the series did not disclose the real names of the terrorists and used pseudo names that the terrorists had used. Following the controversy, the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting summoned Netflix India’s content head who promised not only to update the disclaimer but also to moderate content in the future.
Leftist filmmaker Anubhav Sinha has attracted significant backlash over his propaganda Netflix series IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack. This series starring Naseeruddin Shah, Vijay Verma, Pankaj Kapoor and Dia Mirza lead roles is facing criticism for whitewashing the crimes of Harkat-ul-Mujahideen terrorists who hijacked the Indian Airlines plane IC 814 in 1999. This six-episode series deliberately did not reveal the real names of the Pakistani terrorists rather only used their codenames Bhola, Shankar, Chief, Burger and Doctor to hide their Muslim identity. This leaves the audience with the impression that the plane was hijacked by Hindus rather than Islamic terrorists. This Anubhav Sinha directorial also gives ISI a clean chit, which was directly involved in the ploy. An OpIndia review of the series can be read here.
Amidst the outrage, Anubhav Sinha and the cast of the IC 814 are promoting the series. During a media interaction, actor Naseeruddin Shah who plays the role of Cabinet Secretary Vinay Kaul invoked Islamophobia to whitewash crimes committed by his co-religionists. He said that when the hijacking happened in 1999, he feared that a fresh “wave of Islamophobia” would prevail.
“I was about 50 when this happened, end of the previous century. I remember being extremely disturbed because I feared that it would provoke another wave of Islamophobia. Luckily, at that time, it didn’t. I remember feeling concerned about the situation and what it would lead to. I was left with a feeling of unease. I could not pinpoint why I felt this but I did feel that the passenger and pilot went through a horrific time. No closure. I remember feeling this,” Naseeruddin Shah said.
Naseeruddin Shah says when IC 814 Hijack happened, he was worried about 'Islamophobia'.
"I feared that it would lead to Islamophobia"
Is this why the Web Series whitewashed the Terrorists and showed them good human beings?
It is ironic that the veteran actor was more concerned about how the hijacking of the IC 814 plane would trigger Islamophobia than how Pakistani Islamic terrorists brutally killed two innocent people, held 191 passengers and 15 crew members hostage and got three Islamic terrorists released from Indian jails. He was more concerned about how the incident would lead to the spread of Islamophobia than what the terrorists freed would do in future. It is pertinent to note that Masood Azhar, Omar Sheikh, and Mushtaq Zargar were the three terrorists released in exchange for passengers held hostage.
‘Maulana’ Masood Azhar went on to form the Islamic terrorist group Jaish-e-Muhammad which carried out the 2001 Parliament Attack, and the 2019 Pulwama Attack among others. Omar Sheikh kidnapped and beheaded journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002. While Mushtaq Zargar founded Al–Umar–Mujahideen a banned terror outfit. He was trained in Pakistan and said to be linked to the Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front as well.
While it is alarming that Naseeruddin Shah is more concerned about how terror crimes of Jihadis would trigger ‘Islamophobia’, it warrants understanding why some ‘artists’ feel the compulsion to whitewash Islamic terrorism. What are the reasons that the need to defend those killing non-Muslims in the name of Islam is more important than denouncing them?
One of the reasons is the delusional belief in conspiracy theories popular in the Islamic world – where everything is an ‘inside job’ by the other side rather than willing to admit that there are terrible Muslims. Since they don’t believe that any crime was done by Muslims in the first place, it becomes their duty to whitewash. This could simply be the result of brainwashing or being fed with targeted literature/propaganda or maybe just an unhealthy love for conspiracy theories (which make for good fiction). This very belief that there are only ‘good Muslims’ and the rest are just bad people, drives those, especially in the film industry, who have weird limerence for Islamist terrorists [both armed and intellectual] to create characters, write scripts that would present Muslims either as victims or terrorists who turned to violence to fight the oppressive system. Here the Muslim religiosity is not depicted as the motivation behind turning violent but rather it is shown that the Muslim was targeted due to his religious identity by ‘bigoted’ Hindu ‘extremists’ and thus he was compelled to ‘fight’ against them. Remember? there are no bad Muslims!
Bollywood’s Islamist cheerleaders go to any extent to whitewash the crimes of Islamic terrorists, Pakistan and its barbaric army. A classic case of this was seen in Meghna Gulzar’s directorial “Raazi” which showed the Pakistan army as “humane”. The very Pakistan Army that burnt Captain Saurabh Kalia with cigarettes, gouged out his eyes, broke his bones and teeth, clipped his nails, and assaulted his face before shooting him dead was shown in a sympathetic manner.
While Pakistan, as in the words of former Prime minister of Pakistan, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto in 1990, wants to wage a “1000 years war against India”, its cheerleaders in Bollywood want Indians, particularly, the Hindu majority to not see its hostile neighbour has an enemy.
Naseeruddin Shah is not the only one who fears that if Islamic terrorists carry out terror attacks in the name of Islam against Kafirs, a ‘wave of Islamophobia’ will spread. What is Islamophobia, besides being the oxymoron it is, Islamophobia is the favourite weapon of Islamists and their sympathisers to silence those criticising Islamic terrorists even as they kill Kafirs in the name of Allah. The pro-Islamist ‘artists’ consider it imperative that the non-Muslims do not form stereotypes against Muslims because as per their brainwashed thinking, ‘true’ Muslims can never commit a crime and thus, those who kill, convert or rape non-Muslims are either angry over the ‘system’ or are simply ‘bhatke huye naujawan’. A perfect example of this was seen in the Amazon Prime series “The Family Man” wherein a shameless attempt was made to arouse sympathy for terrorists by contextualising why Muslims pick up arms against others
In their warped understanding of crime and justice, a criminal can happen to be a Muslim, but a Muslim is never a criminal. This mindset is reflected in the movies and web shows of leftist filmmakers.
Another reason behind ‘artists’ whitewashing Islamic terrorism is Wokeism—the cultural Marxism— which reduces the world into conflicts between oppressors and oppressed; here Muslim strategists and Islam apologists have been hugely successful in painting themselves as victims in almost every scenario. So much so that even if they are throwing gays off roofs, satrangis would rather stand by Hamas.
In the last few months, people from the LGBTQ+ community across the globe have been protesting screaming “Free Palestine” slogans and siding with Hamas oblivious to the fact that the religion Hamas terrorists follow shows no respect towards LGBTQ+ people but rather hates them. Despite this, the people of this community have largely been supportive of the Islamist terror group Hamas. Why? Because they have been brainwashed into believing that Palestine has been oppressed and Israel is its oppressor. This oppression has compelled them into waging Jihad against Israel, ignoring the massacre of Israelis on 7th October 2023. The oppressor and oppressed conflict come into play. This makes the ‘artists’ and extension Islam apologists in all walks of life whitewash all crimes by Islamists because Muslims must be protected from their oppressors; this is also one of the reasons why they worry about ‘Islamophobia’ more than anything.
When anti-Hindu violence was at its peak in 1947, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi had advised Hindus saying that “Hindus should not harbour anger in their hearts against Muslims even if the latter wanted to destroy them. Even if the Muslims want to kill us all we should face death bravely. If they established their rule after killing Hindus, we would be ushering ina new world by sacrificing our lives”.
This, thought that Hindus must not retaliate even if the Muslims want to kill them has deeply impacted the psyche of left-liberal not just in the field of arts but beyond that. The Islam apologists in India have been brainwashed into believing that they should not dislike Muslims even if it’s a large number of its members hate non-Muslims simply because of their religious identity. They are convinced that ‘terrorism has no religion’, and ‘crime has no religion’, these principles, however, are only applicable in the context of Muslims. In the case of Hindus, a tilak sporting Hindu is an oppressor, those who do Devi pooja commit crimes like, the more religious you are the bigger villain you are contrary to Muslims, who is shown as the more religious the nicer person. For an inherently tolerant community like Hindus, tolerance has been presented as an act of bravery, while for Muslims violence against imaginary oppressors stemming from the perfectly carved narrative of perpetual victimhood, is deemed an act of bravery.
Thus, much like the communal violence bill, which if passed would have made sure that only minorities and SCs/STs could be “victims” and the perpetrators of communal violence would always be Hindu, tolerant Hindus are oppressors no matter what and Muslims are oppressed even if they do your Sar tan se juda in the name of their religious figures or over perceived ‘blasphemy’.
The third major reason that drives the artists, particularly, in Bollywood to whitewash Islamic terrorism is Hinduphobia. It is real, people hate Hinduism for having survived proselyting/colonising Abrahamic religions and it appears like an eyesore. Even non-Abrahamised worlds, say China and the Far East, have largely become ‘Western’ but Hindus continue to be largely neither. Thus a default feeling of putting guilt on Hindus because they are still not ‘civilised’ rather than blaming the real oppressors.
Hindu Dharma being the oldest and most authentic religion in the world, has survived numerous attacks, be it the early Islamic invaders, the Mumluk dynasty, the Mughals or the British Raj, despite their best efforts and significant success in killing and converting Hindus to their respective religions, these forces could not completely uproot Hinduism. This doesn’t sit well with the Hindu-hating lot. An average liberal who has watched movies like Mughal-e-Azam or Jodha Akbar 100 times believes that “Mughals brought culture to India”, the British brown sepoys believe that Britishers civilised a Hindu majority India. They, thus, see Hindu beliefs as the root cause of India still not being ‘civilised’.
Back in 2019, Kareen Kapoor boasted how she named her son Taimur after 14th-century Turkp-Mongol invader Timur who is estimated to have wiped out 5% world population in his lifetime. She hailed him as a “conqueror”, and “warrior”. In an industry where ‘artists’ consider Akbar who killed 30,000 Hindus to be “Mahaan” [great], where Timur is celebrated, where invaders are presented as culture enrichers and Hindu warriors are side-lined in a Hindu majority country, the disdain for Hindus is evident. In fact, Bollywood has been the biggest contributor in furthering Hinduphobia, especially, hatred against the so-called “upper caste” Hindus.
3) My problem is with Kareen Kapoor Khan's support to a barbarian, Tamerlane aka Taimur, after whom she has named her 1st son..Watch this video ?, she is fawning while mentioning his name..'Warrior' 'Conqueror'..What sadistic behaviour she is displaying!
Other than the reasons discussed above, Islamophilia – a latent/inherent belief that Islam is a better, rather the best religion, so Muslims are better people thus they can’t do any wrong. Different from wokeism where Muslims can’t do any wrong because they are ‘weak and oppressed’, here Muslims can’t do any wrong because they are inherently good because they follow a good faith. So, they must be given the benefit of the doubt and their crimes be whitewashed.
The Islamophilic artists, moviemakers, song and scriptwriters have presented Islamic beliefs as true and beyond the scope of questioning or criticism. Remember the movie “Meri Jung” where Anil Kapoor plays a lawyer and in the court, he says “Ye koi aasmaan se utari hui kitab nahi hai jisse koi galti nhi ho sakti?” that’s how Islamic beliefs have been given legitimacy by ‘atheist’ writers like Javed Akhtar. Bollywood has so much love and admiration for anything associated with Muslims that even brothels are glorified.
In conclusion, Islamophilia coupled with Hinduphobia, and wokeism among other factors drive some ‘artists’ to whitewash the crimes of Islamic terrorists. They, however, are doing a great disservice to their craft and the people of India, particularly, the Hindus. They are trying to humanise those who do not consider this life important but the “Akhirah” [afterlife], they are trying to secularise the Islamic terrorists in their films and shows who hate non-Muslims for simply existing and not believing in their god.
A video of Zakir Nayak has surfaced from Malaysia in which he is saying that no matter how many people like Ravish Kumar, Sagarika Ghosh, Rajdeep Sardesai, Swara Bhaskar speak in our favor, Allah will send them to hell because they would not have accepted Islam at the time of… pic.twitter.com/FygIzTRCYV
As once Islamic hate preacher Zakir Naik said even those non-Muslims like Ravish Kumar, Barkha Dutt, and Sagarika Ghose who side with Muslims would go to hell [Jahannum] after death, the Islamophilic artists mean nothing to Islamists and as per Islamic belief, would burn in hellfire.
The Central government and State government of Tripura on Wednesday signed a Memorandum of Settlement with the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT) and All Tripura Tiger Force (ATTF) in the national capital.
The memorandum of settlement was signed in presence of Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Tripura Chief Minister Manik Saha among others.
After signing the Memorandum of Settlement, Amit Shah said that ever since Prime Minister, Narendra Modi assumed power of office he had through peace and dialogue, developed the northeast region.
“…This is a matter of joy for all of us that after the struggle that was ongoing for 35 years, you (armed groups) have given up weapons and joined the mainstream and expressed your commitment towards the development of entire Tripura. Ever since Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister of the country, through peace and dialogue, he developed the Northeast,” Shah said.
The Union Minister also said that PM Modi had bridged the gap between the people of Delhi and Northeast through infrastructure development.
“There was a great distance between the people of Northeast and Delhi. He (PM Modi) not only removed this distance through road, rail and air connectivity but also removed the distance between hearts of people,” he said.
Shah said that with the signing of the peace pact, more than 300 armed cadres are set to join the mainstream.
“This agreement is the 12th for the northeast and the third related to Tripura. So far around 10,000 insurgents have surrendered, given up weapons and joined the mainstream…Today, with the surrender of and agreement with NLFT and ATTF, more than around 328 armed cadres will join the mainstream…” the Union Minister said.
Chief Minister Saha lauded Amit Shah for creating an atmosphere of peace and prosperity in the entire northeast region and spoke about the peace agreements signed in the last ten years under the leadership of PM Modi.
“…I would like to express my gratitude to HM Amit Shah for being instrumental in creating an atmosphere of peace, prosperity and goodwill in the entire northeast region. Under the leadership of PM Modi and the proactive initiative of Amit Shah, a dozen of peace agreements have been signed in the northeast in the last 10 years to resolve many of the complex issues. Out of which for Tripura alone, there are three agreements so far,” Saha added.
Lauding the efforts of PM Modi, the Tripura chief minister said, “It is a matter of great satisfaction that the members of NLFT and ATTF have decided to join the mainstream for participation in the journey of development spearheaded by our PM…The future of all the people of Tripura is bright under the leadership of PM and guidance of our HM Amit Shah…”
(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)
On Tuesday (3rd September), the Congress party objected to the Adani Group’s proposal to upgrade an airport in Kenya as the Indian conglomerate could pip Chinese firms who have also been eyeing the same project. While expressing concerns about the developments in Kenya, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh claimed that the ongoing protest against the Adani Group could “easily convert into anger against India and the Indian Government”.
The senior leader responsible for disseminating the official line of the Congress party also linked and blamed the global expansion of the Adani group for the violent outcome and social unrest in India’s neighbourhood, citing the alleged collusion between the Indian Businessman and PM Modi.
The Adani Group’s proposed takeover of the airport in Nairobi, Kenya, has led to widespread protests in the country, with the Kenya Aviation Workers Union calling for a strike to demonstrate its opposition. This is a matter of grave concern for India, because the non-biological…
However, several netizens slammed the Congress leader for targeting and besmirching an Indian firm that could secure India a strategic airport in Africa giving the country an added advantage over China whose firms had been aggressively gunning for the same project. Previously, OpIndia had in detail pointed out how the Adani Group has been aspiring to challenge China’s maritime dominance, however, the Congress party has targeted the Indian company after signing an MoU with the CCP.
While lambasting Jairam Ramesh, several users also cited the grand old party’s ‘secretive’ Memorandum of Undertaking (MoU) with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and accused him of being a pro-Chinese leader and harming India’s interest in petty politics.
Dear Sadde Aam,
Here’s the complete version with the requested lines at the end:
—
You never worked on foreign policies; you were a minister by accident, not by merit.
Someone from India is trying to secure strategic locations—airports and seaports—to ensure India's… pic.twitter.com/ilPmD0dtKS
Non-biological, the chief doormat of Pappu, Jairam, has a problem with an Indian industrialist taking over an infrastructure project in Africa, which usually goes to Chinese companies. Now tell me the Congress party does not work with the CCP of Chona.
Adani could pip Chinese firms to secure development project in Kenya’s largest airport; stirs protest among locals
The entire row pertains to Kenya’s largest airport – Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) which was built in 1978. It is Kenya’s strategic national asset. According to the Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) officials, its ageing infrastructure is a threat to its regional competitiveness and therefore it has been undertaking upgradation and developing new infrastructure from time to time.
Initially, several Chinese firms secured tenders for developing and upgrading JKIA infrastructure, however, as per reports, the Indian conglomerate is now ahead in securing a project to develop a second terminal at KAA after Beijing’s botched tenders caused heavy losses to the African nation. Strikingly, despite causing heavy losses to Kenya, China on its part has been engaged in doing PR for its work on the JKIA airport.
(China has been in the game in Nairobi’s JKIA airport for decades, Adani pipping Chinese firm would be a natural choice for Kenya as it incurred losses at the hands of Chinese firms.)
In July this year, Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) confirmed that it had received an investment proposal under the public-private partnership (PPP) from the Adani Group for the upgradation of the JKIA airport in Nairobi.
Consequently, last month, the government of Kenya said in a statement on the Adani Group’s proposal that JKIA was stretched beyond its capacity of 7.5 million passengers a year and is in urgent need of improvements. They cited incidents like leaking roofs which it said had caused “international embarrassment”.
The statement added that modernising JKIA could cost $2 billion, which the government was “constrained to fund due to the current tight fiscal situation”. Afterwards, it noted that Adani’s offer was “currently being reviewed” adding that if a deal is agreed, there would be safeguards to ensure Kenya’s national interests are protected.
Meanwhile, the Gautam Adani-owned Indian firm has proposed to upgrade the airport, including the construction of a second runway and a new passenger terminal under a 30-year build-operate-transfer (BOT) contract. It is a Sh246 billion deal.
The Adani Group subsidiary will also be expected to carry out renovations and refurbishments to the airport as well as oversee the development and operation of JKIA, Kenya’s largest aviation facility, and East Africa’s busiest airport.
However, the government’s assertion that Adani’s proposal was being reviewed triggered protests in Kenya. The Kenya Aviation Workers Union (KAWU) and Shippers Council of Eastern Africa (SCEA) demanded that all stakeholders involved in the deal should temporarily stop it so that they can get time to read the documents presented by the government, alluding that they are not themselves convinced about any wrongdoing in the proposed deal.
They have urged the KAA officials to come clean on the ongoing negotiations with Adani Holdings on the JKIA takeover saying could impact freight businesses. They have expressed apprehensions that the deal could lead to job losses and bring in non-Kenyan workers as well as failure in honouring previous contracts and agreements.
The KUWA called on the government to scrap what it referred to as the “unlawful intended sale of JKIA to Adani Airport Holdings of India” and gave a seven-day strike notice which was issued last month in August.
Reacting to the protests, Kenya’s government has assured the protesting union that the interest of the country, its workers, and its citizens will be protected and ensured. It also noted that the airport is “not for sale” and that no decision had been made on whether to proceed with the proposed PPP to upgrade the hub.
While issuing the strike notice, KAWU Secretary General Moss Ndiema had said, “We shall reconsider our intention to engage in industrial action … only if the Adani Airport Holdings Limited’s deal is abandoned in its entirety.” He also reiterated a call for the entire KAA to resign.
Incidentally, on 3rd September, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh shared a three-week-old article to allege that massive protests are going on against Adani Group’s proposed takeover of JKIA airport. He argued that this could end up fueling anti-India sentiments in the African country and wane India’s global soft power.
Congress’ Communication’s in-charge, Jairam Ramesh wrote, “The Adani Group’s proposed takeover of the airport in Nairobi, Kenya, has led to widespread protests in the country, with the Kenya Aviation Workers Union calling for a strike to demonstrate its opposition. This is a matter of grave concern for India, because the non-biological PM’s friendship with Mr. Adani is now globally well known. The protests can therefore easily convert into anger against India and the Indian Government.”
He then went on to level the blame of social unrest and violent coups in India’s neighbourhood – Sri Lanka and Bangladesh – squarely on the Adani group and his alleged closeness with the Indian Prime Minister.
Jairam Ramesh targeted the Indian conglomerate saying, “In recent years, similar controversies around Adani projects in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh have undermined our national interest and contributed to bad outcomes for India. The Bangladesh Government’s contract to purchase power from Adani’s coal plant in Jharkhand, for instance, became a flashpoint in the protests that led to PM Sheikha Hasina’s resignation last month. Adani’s renewable energy projects in Mannar district in Sri Lanka were also embroiled in controversy and were a part of the widespread protests against the Sri Lankan Government in 2022.”
He concluded by alleging that PM Modi’s so-called collusion with the Adani group could diminish India’s global soft power.
The Adani Group’s proposed takeover of the airport in Nairobi, Kenya, has led to widespread protests in the country, with the Kenya Aviation Workers Union calling for a strike to demonstrate its opposition. This is a matter of grave concern for India, because the non-biological…
While the Congress leader alleged that “widespread protests” are ongoing in Kenya against the Adani group’s proposed takeover of JKIA, ironically, the main body, KUWA, fueling the protest against the Adani Group has called off strikes multiple times. They have repeatedly stated that they want to read more about the deal to adjudge whether there is any irregularity in the proposed agreement.
However, while targeting the Indian conglomerate, the Congress leader failed to appreciate that the Indian firm had seemingly pipped China which has been in the game in Nairobi’s JKIA airport for decades.
For a long time, Chinese firms have been involved in JKIA’s development projects and have been eyeing every new project even after Beijing’s botched tenders causing major losses to the African nation.
Incidentally, Nation.Africa reported in June 2022, How Chinese firm pocketed Sh4.3bn for doing zero work at JKIA.
(Nation.Africa news clipping)
The report stated, “A Chinese contractor reportedly pocketed Sh4.3 billion of taxpayers’ money for doing zero work in a mega project at the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport that has infuriated MPs. The firm had won an Sh64 billion tender for the construction of Greenfield Terminal, which was cancelled in March 2016. There were claims that its cost had been inflated by up to Sh9 billion. President Kenyatta presided over the project’s ground-breaking ceremony, which cost the taxpayer Sh75 million on May 23, 2014.”
Additionally, according to an August 2024 Business Daily report, the Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) suffered a Sh4.2 billion net loss for the year to June 2023 as it was hit by a Sh5.4 billion payment to a joint venture of Chinese contractors. The payment was part of an out-of-court settlement over the cancellation of a tender to build a second terminal at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) nine years ago.
Naturally, after suffering heavy losses at the hands of Chinese firms and in the wake-drop of well-established knowledge of China’s debt trap strategy, Kenya’s government has seemingly looked the other way resulting in a possibility of the Indian conglomerate, Adani Group, pipping Chinese firms and getting India a strategic win over China in the fiercely fought battleground in the African continent.
Furthermore, it is pertinent to note that globalisation and FDI are bound to face protests, especially in countries that have faced economic and employment crises. Hence, protests against a foreign country’s firm over apprehensions of job losses, and the possibility arising of a compromise in the nation’s interest, among others, are a part and parcel trait of any democratic society, and upholding a nation’s sovereignty which can and should be resolved through transparency and amicable solutions through dialogue and discussion between stakeholders. However, ulterior motives and pro-Chinese entities fueling the ongoing protest in Kenya can’t be ruled out and the country should ensure that it meets its strategic goals despite all the hindrances.
As per reports, a large delegation of officials from Kenya has arrived in India to iron out the issues while the Adani Group has moved ahead and opened its Kenyan subsidiary for the proposed JKIA deal.
Nonetheless, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh is now receiving flakes for targeting the Indian conglomerate that has virtually defeated India’s major adversary, China which has been engaged in a territorial dispute and aggression for the better part of a century.
The Congress party has been struggling to muster a response to the dichotomy of Adani Group’s investment in BJP-ruled states vis-a-vis non-BJP-ruled states. It has been facing severe criticism for trying to attract investment from the Gautam Adani-owned firm while constantly deriding its investment in BJP-ruled states and other countries, alluding that the deal wreaks corruption. It has been accused of not backing the Indian firm in its quest to pip expansionist China in securing more strategic ports, and airports.
Linda Sun, a former high-ranking aide to two New York governors, has been charged with spying for the Government of China, raising serious concerns about the influence of foreign entities at the highest levels of state administration. Sun held prominent roles, including Deputy Chief of Staff to Governor Kathy Hochul and Deputy Diversity Officer for former Governor Andrew Cuomo. She was arrested alongside her husband, Chris Hu, from their $4 million Long Island home.
According to reports, prosecutors allege that Sun used her position in government to subtly promote the Chinese agenda, including barring Taiwanese representatives from accessing the office of New York’s governor. Furthermore, it has been alleged that New York’s official messaging was aligned with the interests of the Chinese government. In return, Sun and her husband received substantial financial benefits. Hu’s business dealings in China were reportedly assisted by the Chinese government, enabling the couple to acquire luxurious properties and vehicles.
The indictment further details how Sun allegedly made efforts to omit references to China’s human rights abuses against Uyghurs from official communications, such as in a Lunar New Year video requested by Chinese officials in 2021. The Sun-Hu couple has pleaded not guilty and is currently out on bail.
Sun, originally from China, currently holds US citizenship. Following the accusations of misconduct, she was dismissed from Hochul’s administration. Reportedly, Cuomo’s spokesperson attempted to downplay her influence in the office.
India needs to be careful of Chinese influence
While the case highlights a broader need for a federal crackdown on suspected Chinese espionage in the US, it is also a wake-up call for countries like India to scrutinise potential Chinese influence on their government, economy, and administration. The case of Newsclick, where Chinese funds were used to push Beijing’s anti-India agenda, is already a notable example.
The NewsClick Chinese funding case
In August 2023, a New York Times investigation exposed links between American businessman Neville Roy Singham and the Chinese government, revealing that Singham has been funding global media outlets, including India’s NewsClick, to propagate Chinese government narratives. Singham’s network reportedly disguised Chinese propaganda as progressive advocacy across nations like India, Brazil, South Africa, and the US.
Further revelations in the case from the Delhi Police chargesheet indicated that NewsClick employees were paid to incite violence during anti-CAA protests. Witnesses testified that funds from China were used to distribute cash to protesters, purchase firearms, and fuel unrest in Kashmir. The chargesheet also named activist Teesta Setalvad as a recipient of Singham’s funds, allegedly used to revive her portal ‘Sabrang India.’
The chargesheet described an “interoperable triumvirate” involving Singham, Setalvad, and Prabir Purkayastha, NewsClick’s founder, and suggested a coordinated effort to propagate a left-wing extremist agenda. Police raids in 2023 at multiple locations linked to the accused individuals resulted in the arrest of Purkayastha and NewsClick’s HR head under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. Purkayastha was, however, later released on bail over a technicality. The investigation into the matter is underway.
OpIndia’s complete coverage of the NewsClick controversy can be checked here.
Chinese funding to Rajiv Gandhi foundation
In October 2022, Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (RGF), a non-governmental organisation linked with the Gandhi family, had its Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) licence revoked by the Centre for alleged violation of the foreign funding law. Licence of Rajiv Gandhi Charitable Trust (RGCT) was also cancelled barring both organisations from receiving foreign funding.
According to reports, the decision was made based on investigations conducted by an inter-ministerial committee constituted by the ministry of home affairs (MHA) in July 2020. A notice regarding the termination of licence has been sent to the office-bearers of the foundation.
In July 2020, the MHA formed an inter-ministerial committee led by an Enforcement Directorate (ED) officer to investigate three foundations linked to the Gandhi family, Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (RGF), Rajiv Gandhi Charitable Trust (RGCT), and Indira Gandhi Memorial Trust, for alleged violations of the Money Laundering Act, Income Tax Act, and FCRA.
In 2020, several shocking details about the financial dealings of the RGF were reported. Back then, OpIndia had extensively reported on how the Chinese government donated funds to RGF in 2006 and subsequent years. It is worth noting that Sonia Gandhi is the Chairperson of the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, and the trustees have been Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra since 2005.
During UPA1 in 2008, the Congress party and the Communist Party of China (CPC) had signed a deal in Beijing for exchanging high-level information and co-operation between them. The memorandum of understanding (MoU) also provided the two parties with the “opportunity to consult each other on important bilateral, regional and international developments”.
Before the signing of the MoU, the then Congress president Sonia Gandhi and her son Rahul Gandhi had held a long meeting with Xi and other senior leaders of the Communist Party of China to discuss issues of mutual interest.
In 2008, Sonia Gandhi had visited Beijing along with Rahul, daughter Priyanka, son-in-law Robert Vadra and their two children to attend the opening of the Olympic Games. A year before, Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi had also led a delegation of the Congress party to China.
The 2008 MoU between CCP and Congress came at a time when the Left parties in India had expressed lack of trust in UPA-1 government led by Congress. The India Today report suggests that even as China was aware of the political landscape in India, Xi Jinping went ahead and signed the pact with Congress as CCP wanted deeper ties with Congress, especially the Gandhi.
Indian journalist arrested for spying for China
An Indian journalist, namely Rajeev Sharma was arrested by a special cell of Delhi police on September 14 under the Official Secrets Act for spying for China. His Twitter account was restricted following his arrest. Sharma had reportedly worked with The Tribune, Free Press Journal, Sakaal, etc. and for left-wing publications like The Quint, DailyO, etc. He also ran a YouTube channel. Sharma was also reported to have written for the Global Times which is the mouthpiece of the Communist Party of China for many years.
Sharma was accused of passing sensitive information to Chinese intelligence. One Chinese woman and her Nepalese associate also arrested for paying him large amounts of money routed through shell companies. Chinese intelligence tasked the journalist for conveying sensitive information in lieu of large amounts of money. A large number of mobile phones, laptops, and other incriminating/sensitive material were also recovered.
Sitaram Yechury, CPIM and love for Xi Jinping & China
Notably, CPI(M) leader Sitaram Yechury has never shied away from praising the Chinese government and its authoritarian Premier Xi Jinping. “As far as the world is concerned, we think the (Chinese Communist Party) Congress’ decisions will be important for strengthening multilateralism in international relations as opposed to unilateralism and imperialism,” he said in 2017. The Indian Communist leader further added, “I think in the future, challenges such as economic development, social harmony and the fight against negative features will be met more effectively in China.”
Yechury had also defended Xi Jinping’s disastrous handling of the Coronavirus pandemic. “The exemplary manner in which the PRC (People’s Republic of China) tackled and contained the Covid pandemic, reopened its society and economy with the requisite precautions and put back the economy on a growth trajectory, is a lesson for the world establishing the superiority of socialism as a system over capitalism,” he had claimed. “The efforts to eliminate inequalities and corruption, raising the quality of life have put PRC on the path for achieving the centennial goal of building a ‘modern socialist country that is prosperous, strong, democratic, culturally advanced and harmonious’ by 2049,” Yechury praised Xi’s authoritarianism. As such, it comes as no wonder that the Chinese Communist Party values its ties with the Indian leftist parties.
The recurring cases of Chinese influence in political, media, and civil spheres across various countries, including India, raise a pressing global concern. The cases of Linda Sun in the US and Neville Roy Singham in India illustrate how Chinese entities have infiltrated and manipulated foreign systems under the guise of financial assistance and progressive advocacy.
From high-ranking government officials to influential media platforms, these entities have influenced or attempted to influence every possible sector. For India, the implications are particularly stark. As evidenced by the NewsClick and Rajiv Gandhi Foundation controversies, there is a need for vigilance and scrutiny at every step to safeguard national sovereignty.
On Tuesday, Prayagraj police discovered a book comparing the RSS to a terrorist organisation during a search of a madrasa in connection with a fake currency case. They suspect the cleric may have been using the book to “instill anti-RSS sentiments” and brainwash students against the nationalist organisation.
A senior police official stated that during an August 28 raid at Jamia Habibia Masjide Azam Madrasa in the Atarsuiya area, along with counterfeit currency, they found the book. After translating it from Urdu to Hindi, the book was identified as SM Musharraf’s “RSS: The Biggest Terrorist Organization in the Country.”
The police suspect that Mohammad Tafseerul Arifeen, the cleric of the madrasa, was using the book to “instill anti-RSS sentiments in the minds of children.”
In connection with the case, Local Intelligence Unit (LIU) and Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) teams questioned the madrasa staff on Tuesday.
An officer from the LIU stated, “On Tuesday, ATS and LIU teams visited Jamia Habibia Masjide Azam Madrasa to interrogate the staff and students. However, no significant information was obtained from the questioning.”
The officer also mentioned that the police plan to file a petition in court soon, requesting the remand of the arrested suspects for further questioning in the fake currency case.
The madrasa staff and students have denied any involvement in the counterfeit currency operation, according to an officer.
On August 28, Prayagraj police dismantled a counterfeit currency gang, arresting four suspects and seizing 1,300 fake 100-rupee notes, 234 uncut printed pages, a laptop, a color printer, and bundles of paper, officials reported.
Deputy Commissioner of Police (City), Deepak Bhuker, stated that the gang leader, Jahir Khan from Bhadrak, Odisha, along with Mohammad Afzal from Kareli, Prayagraj, was printing fake currency in a room at Jamia Habibia Masjide Azam Madrasa.
Bhuker added that madrasa cleric Arifeen had provided a separate room for producing the counterfeit currency, with Mohammad Shahid assisting in the operation.
According to Bhuker, the gang had been running the counterfeit currency business for the last three to four months, exchanging fake notes worth Rs 45,000 for genuine notes of Rs 15,000.
The police have charged the arrested suspects under sections 178 (counterfeiting coin, government stamps, currency notes, or bank notes), 179 (using forged or counterfeit coin, government stamp, currency notes, or bank notes as genuine), and 180 (possession of forged or counterfeit coin, government stamp, currency notes, or bank notes) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
Additionally, they have been charged under sections 181 (making or possessing instruments or materials for forging or counterfeiting coin, government stamps, currency notes, or bank notes) and 182(1) (making or using documents resembling currency notes or bank notes) of the BNS.
A case of sexual exploitation of a Dalit woman has come to light in the Gonda district of Uttar Pradesh where her clothes were torn and she was molested by four men and had to face casteist slurs when she objected. She was also physically assaulted. The matter happened on 18th August. The accused have been identified as Islam, Nizamuddin, Qayam Khan and Muzzim. On 3rd September the authorities informed that investigation is underway and other necessary legal action is being taken in the case.
प्रभारी निरीक्षक कौड़िया को जांच कर आवश्यक कार्यवाही हेतु निर्देशित किया गया है।
Attorney Ram Vachan Verma filed a complaint about this issue by tagging the UP Police from his X (earlier Twitter) handle. According to the complaint, the incident occurred in the Kauriya police station area of the Gonda district. The victim who lives in a village belongs to the SC (Scheduled Caste) community. She already wrote a letter to the Superintendent of Police of Gonda district on 23rd August.
She stated that her house had been built on government land. Her husband had gone out on the day of the instance when the perpetrators entered her place at around 9 pm and started harassing and molesting her. She tried to stop them but was brutally beaten and her clothes were ripped in retaliation. Casteist insults and filthy abuses were also thrown at her as she attempted to resist.
The accused barked, “Cha***in ki aulad tum mera kuch nahi bigaad paogi (Daughter of a cha***in, you will not be able to do anything to me),” according to the complaint. The neighbours got scared as they witnessed the heinous act. Some local children reportedly screamed for help and people started gathering due to which the offenders fled from there. “You have been brutally thrashed. If you file an FIR, you will be killed,” they threatened while leaving.
The woman has demanded strict action in her complaint. Gonda police took cognizance of the case and directed the Station House Officer of Kaudiya police station to probe the issue and follow the necessary legal steps.
Hearing a long-standing dispute between 2 Christian factions, the Kerala High Court on 30th August ordered that six churches currently held by the Jacobite faction must be given to the state government. The District Collectors of Ernakulam and Palakkad have been ordered to seize the churches that are at the centre of a protracted conflict between the Jacobite and Orthodox groups of Malankara Christians. Two vicars (petitioners) from the Orthodox group filed a contempt petition and the court issued an order in response.
Due to interference by Jacobite parishioners, Justice VG Arun chastised the flagrant disobedience of the Court’s 2022 directives to allow members of the Malankara Orthodox Church (Orthodox faction) to enter and calmly perform worship services at the churches. The judge stated that he had no choice but to demand that the District Collectors assume control of these churches. “The recalcitrant attitude of the official respondents and disregard of the directions by the party respondents (Jacobite faction members) leaves this court with no option but to issue directions for preventing the contemptuous acts,” the bench chastised.
St. Mary’s Orthodox Church in Odakkali, St. John’s Besphage Orthodox Syrian Church in Pulinthanam and St. Thomas Orthodox Syrian Church in Mazhuvannoor under the Angamaly diocese are directed to be turned over to the District Collector of Ernakulam by the court. St. Mary’s Orthodox Church at Mangalam Dam, St. Mary’s Orthodox Syrian Church at Erickinchira and St. Thomas Orthodox Syrian Church at Cherukunnam were ordered to be taken over by the district collector of Palakkad. The churches are under the Thrissur diocese. The state government was previously directed by the Supreme Court to assume management of these churches, but it did not comply.
Justice V J Arun issued the temporary injunction and gave the police instructions to provide the necessary protection. The court ruled that “the district collectors have to keep the keys of the churches.” Furthermore, the court ordered the district police chiefs to assign adequate police force to assist the district collectors in carrying out the directives as soon as possible. The next hearing date for the case is 30th September and both Collectors have been instructed to submit compliance reports by then.
On 8th July, the police were ordered by the court to formulate a clear plan of action and execute it. Regretfully, the court stated, that approach has been ignored. The opposing parties in the case claimed that the judge believed the court had ordered the handover of the church’s possession to the Orthodox faction in the 2017 order. The very provision of police protection to allow the petitioners to access the churches is based on incorrect premises, and that ruling makes no mention of such a directive.
According to the state authorities, a large number of elderly men, women and children who were Jacobite parishioners were blocking the church’s entrance. It further claimed that despite its best attempts to follow out the court’s orders, it was compelled to back down because of intense protests by Jacobites. The court was informed that additional state intervention could result in fatalities. The Jacobite group’s representatives in court argued that the 2022 decree was issued incorrectly and that the church could not be turned over to the Orthodox faction. However, their arguments were dismissed.
The government cannot be found in contempt, according to Additional Advocate General Ashok M. Cherian, because serious steps were taken to execute the ruling and the police were compelled to leave the area after widespread unrest on the church grounds. According to the court, they are unable to pretend not to know the instructions after impeding the police’s pitiful attempts at enforcement. The court also suo motu impleaded the district collectors in the case as respondents.
The court highlighted, “Disobedience of court orders strikes at the root of the rule of law on which the judicial system rests. If conduct which tends to bring the authority of the court and the administration of law to disrepute is allowed to be perpetuated that will result in the entire system being maligned. It is the bounden duty of every court to uphold the majesty of law and maintain the purity of the system. The law is equally applicable to the mighty and the meek, the powerful and the powerless and has to be applied without fear or favour, prejudice or predilection.”
Background of the controversy
The Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church and the Jacobite Syrian Christian Church have been at odds for a long time over the management of church property and leadership roles. This conflict is known as the Orthodox-Jacobite church dispute in Kerala and began in the early 20th century. It has grown more intense over time, resulting in court cases and physical altercations.
The Orthodox and Jacobite groups once belonged to a single church, but they eventually drifted apart amid disagreements about to whom the church should be loyal. The Jacobite faction regarded the Patriarch of Antioch as its spiritual authority, whereas the Orthodox faction swore allegiance to a Bishop in Kerala (Malankara Metropolitan). Conflicts then erupted on who in Kerala had the right to run certain churches. The Supreme Court was eventually involved in this controversy.
In 2017, the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Orthodox church on several disputes by citing the 1934 Constitution. The highest court further held that a 2002 statement drafted by the Jacobite group could not have established a parallel system of governance for the churches. Since then, nevertheless, the Orthodox group has always protested that the Supreme Court’s 2017 ruling has not been executed. Based on one of these arguments, a single judge of the High Court in 2022 ordered the police to give the petitioners, the Orthodox faction, the support they need to enter and hold religious services in the contested churches in a peaceful manner.
The Orthodox petitioners filed the current contempt petition with the High Court to seek redress once more since the competing Jacobite parishioners were still preventing them from entering the churches. A single judge of the high court granted a request on one of these instances in 2022, ordering the police to give the petitioners—the Orthodox faction—the support they need to enter and hold services in some disputed churches in a peaceful manner. Justice Arun dismissed the Jacobite respondents’ objections to their request for a stay of further court action, challenging if the court should remain silent when its orders were being ignored. The judge declared, “Such disrespectful acts would malign the entire judicial system.”
A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking direction to the Centre to cancel any existing licences and halt the grant of new licences/permissions to various companies in India for the export of arms and other military equipment to Israel during the Israel-Palestine conflict.
These companies include a public sector enterprise under the Ministry of Defence, M/s Munitions India Limited and other private companies such as M/s Premier Explosive, Adani Defence and Aerospace Ltd., and others alleged the petition filed by 11 people, including Ashok Kumar Sharma, a retired civil servant and social activist.
“At least 3 companies in India dealing with the manufacture and export of arms and munitions have been granted licenses for the export of arms and munitions to Israel, even during this period of the ongoing war in Gaza. These licences have been obtained from either the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) or the Department of Defence Production (DDP) that authorise the export of arms and munitions for dual use and specifically for military purposes,” the plea stated.
The plea filed through advocate Prashant Bhushan said that granting a license for the export of arms and other military equipment to Israel is in violation of India’s obligations under international law coupled with Articles 14 and 21 read with 51(C) of the Constitution of India.
India must immediately make every effort to ensure that weapons already delivered to Israel are not used to commit genocide, contribute to acts of genocide or are used in such a way as to violate international humanitarian law, added the petition.
“That in light of this constitutional mandate, any supply of arms and munitions to the State of Israel by India is morally unconscionable and legally and constitutionally unsustainable,” it stated further.
“India should immediately suspend its aid to Israel, in particular its military assistance, including military equipment, in so far as this aid may be used in the violation of the Genocide Convention, international humanitarian law or other peremptory norms of general international law,” stated the petition.
(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)
Namibia is facing a severe drought that has caused significant hardships, leaving around 1.4 million people struggling with food shortages. To address this crisis, the Namibian government is considering a drastic and controversial measure: culling over 700 wild animals, including elephants and zebras. Specifically, the plan involves the killing of 723 wild animals, 83 of which are elephants, to alleviate the hunger crisis.
The government has defended this action as necessary to fulfil its constitutional duty to use natural resources for the welfare of its citizens. This strategy, outlined by the Ministry of Environment, Forestry, and Tourism, was reported by the New York Times. Rose Mwebaza, Director of the United Nations Environment Programme’s Africa Office, remarked that the well-managed and sustainable harvesting of healthy wild animal populations can provide valuable food resources for communities.
Wild animals to be culled in Namibia amidst raging hunger crisis
This viewpoint underscores the broader idea that responsible wildlife management can help meet human needs during crises. Southern Africa, including Namibia, is currently dealing with a severe drought that is impacting over 30 million people, according to a June report by the U.N. World Food Program.
Although droughts are common in this region, this year’s situation is particularly severe due to the effects of El Niño, which brings warmer and drier conditions. Benjamin Suarato from the U.S. Agency for International Development highlighted that the current drought is especially dire, with some areas receiving less than half their usual rainfall, marking record lows.
The extreme water shortage has devastated Namibia’s staple crops and livestock, forcing the country to turn to wild animals as a food source. The culling plan includes not only elephants but also 300 zebras, 30 hippos, 50 impalas, 60 buffaloes, 100 blue wildebeests, and 100 elands.
Zebras, Elephants among animals to be culled by Namibia
Along with addressing food shortages, this measure seeks to minimize the risk of dangerous encounters between humans and wildlife, which are expected to rise as both compete for scarce resources.
This extreme approach highlights the wider effects of climate change and environmental pressures on both human and wildlife populations, showcasing the complex challenges of managing natural resources during crises.
