Law

Supreme Court stated that if centre's suggestions are accepted they must be disclosed to the other side in order to maintain transparency

The Supreme Court of India on the 3rd of February muzzled free speech in their order pertaining to Jan Aakrosh Rally in Mumbai

In 2018, Justice Nazeer had contested the observation made by the Supreme Court in the Ismail Faruqui case) that mosque is not essential part of Islam.

The Kerala High Court said, "No district administration or the police can insist on only 'politically neutral' coloured decorative materials being used by a temple."

Hindu Front for Justice intervened in a case in SC where a petitioner is asking action against "hate speeches" by Hindu groups

Jaya Thakur also questioned the decision of the State Bank of India (SBI) and the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) to invest in Adani shares at allegedly inflated prices.

Even though Sections 375 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) state that "any woman" cannot commit rape, the court held that a woman might be charged under Section 376-D of the IPC if she assisted the other accused individuals who actually committed the gang rape.

Baharul Islam is a must-read chapter when it comes to a discussion about ruling parties picking former judges for various constitutional posts. He has set a rare example in which a Rajya Sabha MP went on to become a judge in the Supreme Court and then come back as an MP in the upper house.

There are no restrictions that bar Justice SA Nazeer from seeking employment, joining a political party or being nominated to the Parliament.

Justice Lokur also said that the courts should step in if there is any violation of fundamental rights in the eyes of the courts, and advocated for more activism on the part of the Supreme Court in such cases.