Opinions

Titled "The India Quandary", the evangelical NYT's op-ed on Thursday was uncommonly politically correct. Of course, the article didn't fall short of its traditional anti-Modi, anti-India, anti-Hindu bigotry.

It was quite striking that a reputed journal like Nature published an editorial to criticize India’s educational policy based on the recent rescheduling of the textbook.

Adipurush has been recording a downward trend at the box office for its crass dialogues, poor casting, and factually incorrect storyline.

One of the narratives around the South-North divide is that the South states contribute more money to the central government and are therefore much more superior than the Northern states.

In Purola, Uttarakhand, Hindus decided that they would not stand by idly while Hindu girls were being brutalised through Love Jihad

Indian regional cinema on the contrary has tens of hundreds of Ramayana, Mahabharat, and several other such productions based on spiritual Indian history. And each of these productions is full of creativity in their story-telling.

On the face of it, it is true. Of course, Hindu men commit crimes against Hindu women, just like Muslim men commit crimes against Muslim women, Sikh men against Sikh women, Christian men against Christian women and so on. These crimes are of diverse nature, some very serious.

Cinema is a great medium to break down our complex culture and carry out a message to the world. Hindus hoped Adipurush would do just that. I have not seen the movie but I see that we as Hindus face a double-edged sword.

Adipurush is poorly conceived adaptation and will go down as one of the worst readaptation of Valmiki Ji's Ramayana

You may have read about the recent case from Ghaziabad (Hindu, Jain boys lured to convert to Islam through game Fortnite (opindia.com)) where Jain and Hindu underage boys were groomed to accept Islam.