Thursday, April 9, 2020
Home Editor's picks Prashant Bhushan may have pushed his luck too far this time

Prashant Bhushan may have pushed his luck too far this time

This is the same Prashant Bhushan who had filed a petition on Rafale last year and which Supreme Court had dismissed, saying “there is no reason to “doubt the decision-making process.”

Also Read

Ashish Shuklahttp://ashishshukla.net/
Author of "How United States Shot Humanity", Senior Journalist, TV Presenter

Civil Riots…err…Rights Lawyer Prashant Bhushan gets away with murder. But this time he might have pushed his luck too far.

Even as Advocate General K.K. Venugopal was willing to withdraw his contempt and punishment petition against the mischief-making lawyer, the bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Navin Sinha said on Thursday: “You (Venugopal) may or may not withdraw the petition but you have raised a question and we will decide it.” This shows intent on the part of Supreme Court to come down hard on Bhushan.

Prashant Bhushan waded further into the muddle when he wanted Justice Arun Mishra to recuse himself from hearing the petition. Bhushan’s counsel Dushyant Dave initially insisted that there was apprehension in his client Bhushan’s mind that Justice Mishra might be “subconsciously biased” against him. Dave later offered an unconditional apology but Bhushan didn’t.

- article continues after ad - - article resumes -

Venugopal’s contempt petition was on a Bhushan tweet, claiming that “he confirmed personally from Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge” that the January 10 meeting of the panel, also comprising Prime Minister Narendra Modi and CJI’s nominee Justice AK Sikri, had neither discussed nor decided on the appointment of M. Nageswara Rao as interim CBI director. (Typically English mainstream media, barring Times of India, has hidden the offensive tweet-in-question from its readers—remember, these are the same newspapers who were drumming drones on our sight and mind, giving screaming headlines on CBI matter).

Meanwhile, SC would hear a contempt notice against Bhushan after Holi break (March 18-23). The court is annoyed that litigants and advocates air their views on media/social media instead of returning to court. “This is troubling all of us as an institution. This is happening in all cases of importance. Motives are attributed to judges,” observed Judge Arun Mishra. (Typically, N. Ram, Arun Shourie, Arundhati Roy, Aruna Roy and former chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah have filed intervention application against a possible gag order).

Almost a year ago, Bhushan had just about escaped any punishment through the lashing of a verbal kind had been delivered by Justice DY Chandrachud on a clutch of Public Interest Litigations (PILs) seeking probe into the death of a special CBI court judge BH Loya in 2014.

Dismissing the PILs, the SC had slammed Prashant Bhushan and his NGO, Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL), “to mislead the court by manufacturing evidence.” Justice Chandrachud said in his judgment: “Prashant Bhushan adopted a dual mantle and went to the length of personally collecting evidence to bolster the case.”

Among many sharp observations, the apex court had said: “The petition is a veiled attempt to launch a frontal attack on the independence of the judiciary and to dilute the credibility of judicial institutions.” Such PILs, observed the court, “are found to promote a personal, business or political agenda.”

“This has the propensity of endangering the credibility of other institutions and undermining public faith in democracy and the rule of law,” added the court.

On Thursday, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said: “the recent application was part of a pattern.” He recalled how the SC had severely criticized Mr Bhushan for asking justices DY Chandrachud and AM Khanwilkar to recuse from the Loya death case because they hailed from the Bombay High Court.  (same Bhushan has now done with Justice Arun Mishra).

What is this pattern and why it has put the institution of the judiciary in this country under risk?

Connecting the dots, it emerges the pattern is to first spread lies, then go the Court with a petition, discredit the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, PM Narendra Modi in particular, and swirl a malicious campaign in the newspapers. That most such fake petitions fall flat on its face, doesn’t seem to embarrass or shame this lobby.

Offhand, I could recall two similar mischiefs. In 2017, Prashant Bhushan had pleaded in Supreme Court about an alleged pay-off by Birla-Sahara Group to Modi when the latter was Gujarat chief minister. The apex court dismissed Bhushan’s plea seeking a CBI probe into the matter.  Last year, Bhushan had tweeted: “Scamster (Mehul) Choksi became Antiguan citizen…after Modi met Antiguan president in April…” OpIndialater pointed out that Choksi had become an Antiguan citizen a good six month ago!!!

Then there was the medical college case in which the then Chief Justice of India, Dipak Mishra had observed:  “Mr Bhushan you are now liable for contempt. But you are not worthy to even of contempt.” (It’s another matter that the likes of Shourie, Yashwant Sinha and Arundhati Roy proudly put themselves in frame with Bhushan).

This is the same Prashant Bhushan who had filed a petition on Rafale last year and which Supreme Court had dismissed, saying “there is no reason to “doubt the decision-making process.” Bhushan has now raked up another plea on Rafale for Supreme Court to reconsider its judgment, the hearing of which began on Thursday.

(When Bhushan’s first petition on Rafale was thrown out by Supreme Court, the former had said: “new disclosures are expected soon.” This was on December 18, 2018. Just a few weeks later, The Hindu began its series of stories on Rafale. How did Bhushan know about the “new disclosures”? It raises the suspicion of a lobby working in unison.)

Now to the biggest irony which has concerned me for long. Prashant Bhushan who files petitions and PILs as Virat Kohli scores his centuries, a monotonous regularity, hasn’t touched Arvind Kejriwal all these years. Both run/have run NGOs, both worked together on Anna Hazare’s manch, both lent shoulders in forming Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), both were part of AAP’s Political Affairs Committee (PAC) before Kejriwal threw out Bhushan from the party with impunity. Why has Bhushan taken such a humiliation lying down? Does Kejriwal know something about Bhushan which the world doesn’t know?  My guess is as good as yours.

- Support OpIndia -
Support OpIndia by making a monetary contribution

Trending now

Ashish Shuklahttp://ashishshukla.net/
Author of "How United States Shot Humanity", Senior Journalist, TV Presenter

Latest News

Locals in Kashmir defy coronavirus lockdown to attend funeral of slain Jaish-e-Mohammad terrorist, FIR registered

The police said that the legal heirs of the slain terrorist had given in writing that they will adhere to social distancing when the body was handed over to them after completing medico-legal formalities.

Tablighis were comfortable to perform toilet functions in public view – book by Malaysian author reveals

Excerpts of the book reveal living and hygiene habits of the Tablighi Jamaatis while in the markaz.

US President Trump thanks India, Indians and PM Modi for allowing the export of hydroxychloroquine, says the help will not be forgotten

The easing of exports of Hydroxychloroquine to the United States comes after US President Donald Trump on Saturday had requested Prime Minister Narendra Modi to supply hydroxychloroquine tablets that can be used to treat the Chinese coronavirus patients.

Latest updates and important links about COVID-19 coronavirus

Live statistics and tracking of news related to COVID-19 coronavirus with focus on India.

Jammu and Kashmir: Jaish-e-Mohammad commander killed in encounter with CRPF

Sajad Nawab Dar, a Commander of Jaish-e-Mohammad, killed in encounter with CRPF in Sopore in Baramulla district of Jammu and Kashmir

Radio Mirchi RJ Sayema defends malevolent Tablighi Jamaat members; claims all TV news about them fake

RJ Sayema brazenly defends the malafide actions of Tablighi Jamaat members claiming that incriminating news about them on TV is all fake

Recently Popular

After PM CARES collects Rs 6,500 crores in just a week, Sonia Gandhi wants it transferred to PMNRF: Here is the real reason

Sonia Gandhi, the current President of the Congress party has asked the Prime Minister to transfer all the funds received under PM CARES, that was set up to fight the Coronavirus pandemic, to the Prime Ministers National Relief Fund (PMNRF)

Did you know that the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund had the President of Congress party in its managing committee

After PM Modi launched PM CARES Fund, a lot has been discussed about similarities and differences between PM CARES Fund and PMNRF

Indian Army to take over Narela quarantine facility after Tablighi Jamaat attendees defecate in the corridor

Earlier today, two Tablighi Jamaat returnees created a ruckus and defecated in the corridor of the Narela quarantine facility

Islamists attack Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal after he asks them to stay at home on Shab-e-Baraat

AAP Supremo took to social media to request Muslims to stay at home for Shab-e-Baraat, which is being celebrated on the intervening night of 8th and 9th April.

Bihar: Elderly woman killed by neighbours after fight over switching off lights on 5 April, Sulaiman, Khalil and others absconding

The families had fought when Surendra Mandal, the deceased woman's son had asked his neighbours to switch off the lights for PM Modi's 9baje9minutes call.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Each morning, get an email to keep updated with all the news, opinions and analysis published by OpIndia.

Connect with us

218,104FansLike
276,919FollowersFollow
214,000SubscribersSubscribe
Advertisements