Home Blog Page 5840

Did Manish Tewari rightly call out Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh for not acting against Pakistan post 26/11?

11 years ago, on 26th November 2008, Pakistani terrorists crossed the border and unleashed nights of carnage and terror on the financial capital of India – Mumbai. In a series of terror attacks on 26/11, 10 terrorists from Pakistan based Lashkar-e-Taiba carried out 12 coordinated shootings and bombings that held the city captive for 4 days.

The attacks occurred at Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, Mumbai Chabad House, The Oberoi Trident, The Taj Palace & Tower, Leopold Cafe, Cama Hospital, The Nariman House, the Metro Cinema, and in a lane behind the Times of India building and St. Xavier’s College. There was also an explosion at Mazagaon, in Mumbai’s port area, and in a taxi at Vile Parle.

Between 26th November and 29th November 2008, at least 174 people were killed (the numbers are suspected to be far more) and 300 people were injured.

Read: Media has no right to pontificate about 26/11 after SC’s observations on their irresponsible coverage

While the terror attacks drew widespread condemnation from all across the globe, Congress, who was in power back then, had a lacklustre response to the heinous nights of terror that Pakistan had unleashed on India.

Today, on the attacks 11th anniversary, Congress leader Manish Tewari tweeted wondering what would have become of Pakistan had the 26/11 attacks taken place in the USA.


What Manish Tewari was essentially saying that is that had an attack like 26/11 taken place in the USA, USA would have reacted much differently than India did. One can judge the USA’s response to terror on its soil by its reaction after the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers. Following the 9/11 attacks, the USA launched a hot war against terror. In the aftermath, 762 suspects were arrested and laws like the Patriot Act and Homeland Security Act were passed. Eventually, Osama Bin Laden was hunted and neutralised dealing a massive blow to terror organisation Al-Qaeda.

In his tweet, while Manish Tewari rightly wonders how would the USA react, the corollary of that argument is how India did react. It would seem that Manish Tewari is rightly holding Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh responsible for not acting adequately against Pakistan post 26/11.

Read: Tales of betrayal and Congress’ insensitivity as the 26/11 terror attack left 166 dead

After the gruesome 26/11 terror attacks, it is worthy to note that the Indian Air Force was ready to take action against Pakistan, however, the Congress government decided against it. After the Balakot airstrikes, retired IAF personnel said, “After the Mumbai 26/11 attacks, we had planned a similar airstrike on Muzaffarabad. I was leading the Sukhoi squadron. Our plan was kept under wraps and I had to lie to my boys that we were going somewhere else”. “We were deployed and waited for nearly a month. But government approval never came… Today, I am glad the strike happened”. This revelation was made by then Wing Commander Mohonto Panging who was all set to lead a squadron of Mirage 2000s and Su-30s in a precision airstrike on Muzaffarabad in PoK but did not get Congress government’s nod.

Read: ‘The party chose to pander to Muslim fears’: Wikileaks cable on Congress’ dangerous politics over 26/11 terror attack

Not only did the Congress government not let the Indian Air Force act against Pakistan, but rather shamelessly undermined India’s interests as well.

A leaked WikiLeaks document reveals how the Congress party played politics over the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. It did not escape the notice of even the then U.S. ambassador to India, David Mulford.

Antulay, the UPA minority affairs minister had said,  “Superficially speaking, they (terrorists) had no reason to kill Karkare. Whether he (Karkare) was a victim of terrorism or terrorism plus something I do not know.” “Karkare found that there are non-Muslims involved in acts of terrorism in some cases. Any person going to the roots of terrorism has always been the target,” Antulay had said, adding: “There is more than what meets the eye.”

“The Congress party, after first distancing itself from the comments (of Antulay, the then Minority Affairs Minister), two days later issued a contradictory statement which implicitly endorsed the conspiracy. During this time, Mr Antulay’s completely unsubstantiated claims gained support in the conspiracy-minded Indian—Muslim community,” Mulford wrote in his secret cable to the State Department on December 23, 2008. “Hoping to foster that support for upcoming national elections, the Congress Party cynically pulled back from its original dismissal and lent credence to the conspiracy,” he added.

Mulford also said that Congress party chose to pander to Muslims post 26/11.

This is not all, Congress leader Digvijay Singh had tried to exonerate Pakistan and somehow, put the blame on the Hindus of India. He had released a book called 26/11 – RSS Ki Saazish.

Read: Indians and our short memory: Why we remember Hemant Karkare, not Tukaram Omble and how it puts our lives at risk

One has to wonder what would have happened had Kasab not been captured alive. It is interesting to note here that Ajmal Kasab, who was captured alive by martyred Tukaram Omble was wearing a Kalawa (sacred red thread worn around the wrist by Hindus). Essentially, Pakistan had ensured that when Kasab is killed, seeing the Kalawa, the theory that Hindus carried out the terror attack would be furthered in India. Though Kasab was captured alive, Congress still peddled that theory regardless of overwhelming evidence against Pakistan.

Contrasting this to how the Modi government reacted after the Pulwama attack and the Uri attack, one can certainly conclude that Congress pussyfooted after the ghastly 26/11 terror attacks and tried their best to exonerate Pakistan.

Sabarimala: One of the women who entered temple last year wants to go again, attacked with chilli spray

Bindu Ammini, one of the two women who were sneaked into Sabarimala last year by the communist government, wants to enter into the shrine this year too. As per reports, she was attacked with chilli spray by an unidentified person while she waited near a police station.

As per reports, Bindu Ammini was near the Ernakulam police commissioner’s office on Tuesday morning when an unidentified person sprayed chilli powder on her. Bindu had gone there to seek police protection as she wants to enter the Sabarimala shrine again this year.

The portals of the hill-top shrine were opened for the two-month-long pilgrimage season on November 16.


Bindu later told to media persons that the police were very irresponsible and they did not try to arrest the miscreant who had attacked her. Bindu added that even after she requested the police to arrest the man, the police did not proceed immediately.

Bindu and another woman named Kanakadurga were sneaked into the Sabarimala shrine last year by the communist government to forcibly break the traditions of the temple. Both of them were reportedly CPM workers and they were accompanied by policemen dressed in plain clothes inside the shrine.

The devotees at Sabarimala had later alleged that the women were sneaked in via the VIP entrance early in the morning on January 2 last year.

Read: Four policemen dressed in plain clothes accompanied two women to Sabarimala on Jan 2: Police to Court

The HC appointed monitoring committee had slammed the Kerala police and Patthanamittha administration for taking unauthorised steps to facilitate the entry of the two CPIM female activists Bindu and Kanakadurga causing huge embarrassment for the Pinarayi Vijayan led Kerala government.

The Pinarayi Vijayan-led Kerala government had faced severe protests and outrage by Hindus for its use of force to blatantly disregard the traditions and sentiments of a community and go out of its way to escort activists and atheists inside the temple.

The Kerala government’s excesses were slammed by the High Court. The Sabarimala excesses had also made the CPM face a massive electoral rout in the 2019 general elections.

Read: Sabarimala opens today for annual ‘Mandala Pooja’, no police protection for women activists entering the shrine

This year, the Kerala government has been on a cautionary mode. They have made it clear that the SC’s decision to take on the review petitions for the September 2018 order and its statements on the regard have de facto stayed the earlier order and they will not provide state protection to women within the restricted age-group who are seeking entry into the shrine.

In another development, activist Trupti Desai has also arrived at Kochi and has declared that she will go to Sabarimala whether Kerala government provides her protection or not.

Last year, Trupti had to go back from Cochin airport after a complete non-cooperation from the locals. Even the taxi drivers had refused to take her and her entourage of activists from the airport.

The efforts of non-Hindus, activists and atheists to forcibly enter a Hindu religious shrine under the garb of democratic rights and disregarding the faith and traditions of the devotees have been criticised widely by Hindus around the world.

It is notable here that the Sabarimala temple is the seat of Lord Ayyappa who is worshipped there in his ‘Naishtika Brahmachari’ form. Hence, only the devotees who had observed a rigorous 41-day penance and are carrying the ‘Irumudi’ are traditionally allowed into the shrine. Women of menstruating age are barred.

We share the unhappiness but keeping ‘dispute’ alive will harm the community: ‘Prominent’ Muslims oppose review petition in Ayodhya case

Islamic scholars, social activists, lawyers and even Bollywood celebrities like Naseeruddin Shah and Shabana Azmi and other prominent Muslims have issued a statement opposing review petition in Ram Janmabhoomi case that while they share the unhappiness of the Indian Muslim community, keeping the ‘dispute’ alive will only harm the community.

The statement also lamented over the ‘unhappiness’ of ‘constitutional experts’ and ‘secular organisations’ that the Supreme Court put ‘faith over law’ in favouring the Hindus. “While agreeing that the court order is judicially flawed, we strongly believe that keeping the Ayodhya dispute alive will harm, and not help, Indian Muslims,” the statement read.

Read: Once a mosque is always a mosque: Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind President Maulana Arshad Madni on Ram Janmabhoomi verdict

The statement does not give any suggestion on whether the Muslim party should construct a hospital or school at the 5 acre plot the Supreme Court has given to them to construct a mosque if they so wish.

The Sunni Waqf Board is reportedly scheduled to hold an important meeting at 11 AM on Tuesday to discuss the further course of action following the Ram Janmabhoomi verdict.

Read: Jamiat-e-Ulama-e-Hind Chief says SC should have given alternate land to Hindus for Ram Mandir, lies in the process

The Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind (JuH), a key Muslim litigant in the Ayodhya title suit which has been indulging in constant rabblerousing since Supreme Court’s historic verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi case, recently took a U-turn and said that it will not file a review petition against the Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict. Prior to that, both AIMPLB and Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani had announced that that they will file a review petition against the Supreme Court verdict as it was not based on the ‘evidence and logic’.

Ram Mandir trust should be headed by RSS chief: Ayodhya Mahant Paramhans Das

0

Paramhans Das Maharaj, the mahant of Tapaswiji ki Chhawani in Ayodhya, has said that RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat should head the trust to be set up for the construction of Ram Mandir.

“The RSS chief should be made the ex-offico head of the trust so that he automatically takes that post. Sangh Parivar should be given the responsibility of Ram temple’s construction,” the mahant told reporters at Sita Samahit Sthal in Bhadohi on Monday.

In a historic judgement on November 9, the Supreme Court of India had handed over the Ram Janmabhoomi site in Ayodhya to Hindu parties, allowing the construction of a Ram Mandir at the place believed to be the birthplace of Lord Ram. In its order, the apex court had ordered the central government to form a trust to construct and maintain the Ram Mandir at Ayodhya.

Paramhansji Maharaj has been a vocal critic of Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas chief Nritya Gopal Das and its member Ram Vilas Vedanti, alleging that both have a very narrow mindset. “Be it the issue of rashtra nirman or temple construction, what the RSS has done from village level to the cities, no one else can do,” he said. He also added that the prime minister, the home minister and the defence minister, all have their origins in the Sangh.

Also Read: Struggle for Ram Mandir at Ayodhya will remain a high point for Hindu civilization

“When the Supreme Court asked for setting up a trust for temple construction, mahant of Ram Mandir Nyas, Nritya Gopal Das said that his Nyas would construct it and this showed his lure for the post. Similarly, Ram Vilas Vedanti opposed Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath saying that ‘Nath Sampraday’ cannot construct the temple,” he said criticising the Nyas office bearers.

Ever since the Supreme Court order, a cold war has been brewing among prominent Hindu seers over leading the trust to be set up as per court direction.

An audio clip had emerged a few days ago containing alleged conversation between Ram Vilas Vedanti and Paramhans Das, where Vedanti was heard urging Paramhans Das to propose his name for the chairman of the trust. He was also heard opposing Yogi Adityanath’s name for post because he belonged to a different sect of saints, saying that a person from Gorakhnath sect can’t become chairman of a temple of Ramanandi sect. In the audio clip, both Vedanti and Paramhans Das were heard making objectionable comments about Mahant Nritya Gopal Das, head of the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas.

On the other hand, Nritya Gopal Das has said that there no need for a separate trust for the Ram Mandir as the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas already exists. “The trust (Ram Janambhoomi Nyas) already exists. We can give a shape to it and new members can be added as per need,” he had said after the Supreme Court order. Adityanath is the head priest of the Gorakhnath Temple of the Gorakhnath Mutt in Gorakhpur and belongs to the Nath sect of the saints. The Nyas is an organisation run up by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad.

Several other Hindu saints have opposed the views of Das, saying the Supreme Court order clearly talks about setting up a new trust. Chief of Digambar Akhara Mahant Suresh Das said that it is the responsibility of the central government to set up the trust and not of the Ram Janambhoomi Nyas. But Nyas representatives should be included in the trust. Nirmohi Akhara chief Mahant Dinendra Das said the trust must be formed as per the directions of the court but expressed reservations over Akhara members joining it. “Nirmohi Akhara is also a trust so the members will decide on whether or not to join the government trust,” he said.

VHP’s Triloki Nath Pandey, who represented the deity in the court, said, that the trust must be formed by the government and must have the members from the government.  He also demanded that Mahant Nritya Gopal Das should be appointed as the president of the trust. Pandey also said that the temple should be built according to the model prepared by VHP and the stones prepared by the organisation should be used in its construction.

Maharashtra: Shiv Sena, NCP and Congress MLAs made to swear pledge of loyalty for Sonia Gandhi, Sharad Pawar and Uddhav Thackeray

The MLAs from Shiv Sena, NCP and Congress were made to swear an oath on national television affirming their allegiance towards the supremos of the parties. They were made to swear that they will not get lured by any inducements nor would they do anything that will benefit the BJP.


The Shiv Sena, NCP and Congress MLAs took the oath pledging loyalty to the leadership of Sharad Pawar, Uddhav Thackeray and Sonia Gandhi.

The spectacle reminds one of the morning assemblies in school where every student is made to pledge that “India is my country and all Indians are my Brothers and Sisters.” However, it is common knowledge that the pledge gets particularly difficult to adhere to and the hollowness of it becomes evident during adolescence when students start developing romantic feelings towards their friends in schools.

One wonders whether the MLAs were having similar sentiments while swearing their loyalty towards their party supremos. The demonstration also appears to be more monarchical in nature than democratic and gives one the distinct feeling of noblemen swearing oaths of fealty towards their respective King or Queen.

Also Read: Here are the 5 things that Ajit Pawar told NCP leaders about why he chose to ally with BJP in Maharashtra

The alliance of the three parties claimed that there were 162 MLAs present at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in Mumbai where the senior leaders of the parties claimed to have demonstrated their majority. However, there’s no way to check the veracity of their claims as the crowd was just too huge.

The BJP, in its reply, maintained that there weren’t even 145 MLAs present while Sharad Pawar claimed that even more could join the alliance in the coming days. Ashish Shelar of the BJP claimed that it was an insult to the MLAs as identification parade was carried as if they were accused of some crime.


Ashish Sehlar said, “Such a parade is done for criminals, not for legislators.” He also said Shiv Sena’s Hindutva was a massive fraud. He stated, “We saw Aaditya Thackeray take oath in the name of Sonia Gandhi. Today we have seen how fraud is Shiv Sena’s Hindutva.” He added, ”We have full confidence in our numbers and will likely win the trust vote with a thumping majority under the leadership of Devendra Fadnavis and Ajit Pawar.”

After the parade was over, the MLAs were transported back to their respective hotels in buses under strict supervision. One wonders how could the citizens of Maharashtra trust these elected representatives when they are not trusted even by the political parties which nominated them.

Petition in Bombay HC wants ‘perpetual injunction’ against BJP and Shiv Sena from forming govt with any other party

A petition has been filed in the Bombay High Court by a resident of Thane, Priya Chavan, requesting that a direction be issued to Shiv Sena and the BJP to form a government as per public mandate. The petition was filed through Advocate Nitin Satpute and will come up for hearing before the bench headed by Justice SC Dharmadhikari.

The petition seeks direction from the Court to prevent the Union of India and the State of Maharashtra, which have been named as respondents in the matter, from appointing a Chief Minister from the “emerging post-poll alliance, between the Shiv Sena, Congress and NCP Or/And BJP-NCP (Ajit Pawar Group) Alliance.”

“Both the BJP and Shiv Sena have betrayed the trust of voters. They have not complied with their promises and post elections changed their alliances,” the plea alleged. Furthermore, the plea also spoke out against the actions of the governor. “The governor has acted in a partisan manner and made a mockery of the high office of the governor,” it said.

Read: Remembering Balasaheb Thackeray: A legacy shunned by Shiv Sena within seven years of his death

“The governor’s actions on the intervening night of November 22 and November 23, culminating into the swearing-in (of Devendra Fadnavis as chief minister) are a textbook example of the governor acting at the behest of a political party in power at the Centre,” the plea claimed. The governor allowed himself to become a “pawn in BJP’s illegal usurpation of power”, it said.

The petition also demands that the current potential alliances be declared as ‘fraud’ and FIRs be registered against the BJP and Shiv Sena for “cheating and breach of Trust of the Voters.” It also demands a “perpetual injunction” against the BJP and Shiv Sena from forming governments with any other political parties. The plea will come up for hearing in due course.

West Bengal government to regularise refugee colonies, give the refugees land rights: Mamata Banerjee

0

West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee has announced that the state government will regularise all refugee colonies in the state where Bangladeshi refugees are staying. The CM said that attempts will be made to regularise refugee colonies on lands belonging to central government and private parties up to 3 acres. She also announced that the displaced people will be given land rights by the state government.

The West Bengal government has already regularised 94 refugee colonies which were on state government lands, the WB CM said after a cabinet meeting today. She said that there are several refugee colonies on central government and private lands, and the state government asking them to regularise those colonies and grant then possession of the land. But the landowners have been sending eviction notices to the refugees.

Mamata Banerjee said that the refugees are living in India for a long time, since March 1971, and they are living in refugee colonies without home or land. Therefore, it is time to grant them land rights and regularise the colonies.

The announcement by the West Bengal CM came in the backdrop of central government’s announcement that the National Registrar of Citizens will be implemented all over the country. Mamata Banerjee has been a strong critic of the NRC which seeks to identify the genuine citizens of the nation.

Around 10 million refugees, both Hindus and Muslims, had entered India from East Pakistan after the military government based in West Pakistan had launched a brutal crackdown on Bengalis in East Pakistan. Most refugees had settled in West Bengal and Assam, and the government of India had clarified that India would not accept the refugees permanently. Most of the refugees were sent back to their home after the India-Pakistan war, when East Pakistan had become Bangladesh. But a substantial number of refugees remained in India even after that.

Maharashtra: BJP outsmarting and outplaying opponents who wanted to betray public mandate is not ‘immoral politics’

No one anticipated this kind of drama that unfolded in Maharashtra. However, what is happening in Maharashtra is not new to Indian politics.

Countless BJP supporters questioned the party’s opportunistic step of forming the government in Maharashtra with the tainted Ajit Pawar faction of the NCP. Their concern is not only “opportunism,” but also “immorality.” How did they ally with a person they accused so vehemently? They feel that it shatters BJP’s assiduously cultivated narrative of being a party ‘with a difference.’ That is understandable.

What baffles me is the fact that those who were excited at the possibility of an outright immoral alliance of Sena, NCP, and Congress, are also questioning the government formation in Maharashtra on ‘moral’ grounds. The very same people who celebrated every such move of Congress when it murdered democracy at the drop of a hat.

Read: Faction of Congress might abstain during the floor test, fights erupt in Congress and Shiv Sena: Read exclusive details on Maharashtra

Let me take you down the memory lane and revisit two such incidences out of countless occasions when the decision of the Governor to invite and install a new government has been challenged.

Gujarat: In 1995, the BJP for the first time won a majority in Gujarat, winning 121 out of 182, and Keshubhai Patel became the Chief Minister. Patel resigned following the revolt of his colleague Shankarsinh Vaghela, and Suresh Mehta was sworn in as the CM in October. Congress, which had won 45 seats only, pushing itself into irrelevance in Gujarat, sprung into action. They conspired with BJP rebellion Vaghela, who flew more than 45 MLAs to Khajuraho in Madhya Pradesh and hosted by CM Digvijay Singh. That is when the resort politics was introduced in India.

However, the BJP Govt had proved its numbers in the house after Vaghela was expelled from the party. Minutes after hell broke loose in the house. Congress MLAs flung microphones at the treasury benches, and blood flowed in the house. A delegation of journalists presented a memorandum to the Governor Krishna Pal Singh, who cited the breakdown of the constitutional machinery. Despite Suresh Mehta parading his MLAs in Delhi, Gujarat had been placed under President’s rule. A trap set by the Congress party in collusion with the Deve Gowda Government.

Vaghela became CM with Congress’s support for a short period. In the next election, they were voted out by Gujrat Janata.

Jharkhand: In the 2005 Assembly election, BJP was the single largest party, winning 30 seats, and its pre-poll alliance partner JD(U) had won 6 taking the NDA tally to 36 in the 81 member Assembly. The UPA was far behind with 27 seats – with JMM winning 17, Congress 9, and NCP 1. Soon after the results, BJP received the support of 5 other MLAs taking the NDA tally to 41, a simple and clear majority.

The BJP staked claim to form the government physically parading 41 MLAs including the 5 other MLAs before the Governor Syed Sibtey Razi. But what Governor did, shocked the entire state of Jharkhand. He invited Shibu Soren of JMM to form the government. Stephen Marandi, a JMM rebel who had just defeated Shibu Soren’s son Hemant from Dumka, was also sworn as Deputy CM.

The NDA cried foul. The only option left was to parade 41 MLAs before President Kalam. What happened after that is much exciting than an Abbas-Mastan thriller.

The Deputy CM Stephen Marandi and his men stopped the chartered plane on the runway at Ranchi Airport as it was about to take off! The aircraft was raided to capture the independent MLAs on board. Alas! The 5 MLAs weren’t on board. Realized that the MLAs were escaping, the Congress government sealed every state border they thought BJP would take the MLAs through. Convinced that BJP would never choose a Left Front ruled state, Congress deployed minimum resources in Bengal. BJP took the 5 MLAs by road from Bengal to Bhubaneshwar and then to Delhi by flight and paraded before the President of India.

Governor Sibtey Razi had to dismiss Shibu Soren Govt and invited Arjun Munda to form the government in the state.

Now when I hear Congress Party leader and CM of Rajasthan Ashok Gehlot say: “Governor must resign on moral grounds. He has no right to remain in office,” while questioning the morality of revocation of President’s rule in Maharashtra, it reminds me of Akabar Ilahabadi’s words:

वोक़त्लभीकरतेहैंतोचर्चानहींहोता…

हमआहभीभरतेहैंतोहोजातेहैंबदनाम!

Now let us examine the “situation” in Maharashtra. Shiv-Sena 124 contested the election on 124 seats as BJP’s (154 seats) junior partner “against” Congress+NCP alliance. The Mahayuti was in power, and Fadnavis was the incumbent chief minister.

To everyone’s surprise, Shiv Sena opted to lead the alliance with half the number of seats of its partners. It was an illogical, immoral, utterly foolish demand that betrayed the people of Maharashtra. People gave the Mahayuti led by Fadnavis, overwhelming support to form the government and continue the excellent work.

Read: BJP has shown ruthlessness in the game of power politics, and it is good for ideology too

Shiv Sena claimed that there was a private, closed-door agreement on the 50-50 without a shred of evidence to back it. Even if such an agreement existed and was not spoken during election rallies, it was deliberate cheating.

If people knew such an agreement existed, they might have voted accordingly. BJP voters who voted for Sena would understand that they are voting for a Shiv Sena CM for half the term and vice-versa. Contrary to that, BJP President Amit Shah clearly stated during the election that there is no question of anyone other than Fadnavis becoming the CM. He rejected any such proposal being made from Sena. Why didn’t Sena object or broke the alliance then? Were they of the opinion that they may lose some seats/public support?

Once people voted for the Fadnavis-led coalition, without knowing any such agreement exists, the mandate supersedes any closed-door arrangement. It was immoral on Shiv Sena’s part to claim the CM post even for a week.

The tamasha did not end there. Congress and NCP that came third and fourth in the election started conspiring to somehow keep the BJP out of power. Now, if Sena openly dumped its ideological partner stimulated by the blind ambition of a father, to join hands with his arc ideological rivals, the burden of immortality, lies primarily with the Sena. NCP and Congress also displayed ugly politics, who found this opportunity, convenient to bargain the power share.

Morality, in a nutshell, is a combination of two factors: fundamental norms of behaviour of being ‘in good taste’ and external sanctions of the society. Those moral values are superficial that do not aim for the greater good of the society and strives for sacrifice, robbing people of all motivation. Morality in politics is even more absurd a concept.

Even the communist party and entire left intelligentsia are crying foul siding with Congress-Sena alliance. The same Congress that created Shiv Sena with a singular motive to destroy communists in Mumbai. But these leftist rogues never fluster from their focus. They hate BJP because they despise anything even remotely pro-Hindutva.

The people’s verdict was unequivocally for a BJP government led by Devendra Fadnavis but ditched by Sena in a conspiracy to keep BJP out of power. In such an atypical situation, it is not only impractical to expect BJP to let go of opportunities to be in power because it won’t be “in good taste.” But, it would have been stupid to get perturbed by the narrative of their vile, immoral, and cunning rivals.

What did BJP do? It outsmarted and outplayed the opponents in their own game. It is utterly hypocritical to blame the BJP for “not playing fair” when the game itself is rigged. The BJP is well within its moral, political, and legal rights to form the government if it can prove the numbers on the floor of the assembly.

Dear LGBT Community, Azadi slogans are clearly not working, it’s time to chant Jai Shri Ram

LGBT Pride Parades have become just another occasion for the overt display of hatred against Hindutva and a mockery of the religious faith of the billion Hindus who call India their motherland. It is the same story over and over again where the participants at such rallies appear more concerned with Hindutva than they are about the welfare of their own people.

As I watched the images and videos from the Delhi Pride Parade, one thing that struck me as most obvious was how stupid it was for them to paint themselves as the enemies of Hindutva. Making this a political battle was the most stupid decision any homosexual could ever make and yet, here we are.

LGBT Community needs a reality-check

There are good reasons why I say making LGBT rights a political battle is monumentally stupid. For one, homosexuality was decriminalized during Narendra Modi’s reign as Prime Minister. It is pertinent to remember here that the government raised no objection against the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Courts and it was said that they would accept the verdict, whatever it was.

Furthermore, the secular parties haven’t really done any justice to the LGBT community in any manner whatsoever. They only paid lip service to their concerns and it was necessary for them to do so because their core vote-banks, the minority communities, are resolutely against homosexuality and consider it a grave sin. Even then, it’s only one community that’s continuously targeted in these pride parades and it’s the one that has the most favourable attitudes toward homosexuality.

A section of the LGBT community, in its infinite wisdom, has chosen to paint themselves into a corner where they have portrayed themselves to be enemies of Hindutva. In the process, they have allied themselves with Kashmiri separatists, a state where homosexuality was still illegal until the abrogation of Article 370, which again was vehemently opposed by secular parties and was implemented by the people they consider as enemies.

In no position to fight a Political Battle

I am afraid there’s an urgent need for a reality-check here. Firstly, the LGBT community is in no position at all to fight a political battle. And this is because there is no real constituency for their concerns in India. Our country is not the West, Indians do not want to emulate Western Culture. Therefore, people from LGBT communities should stop expecting India to suddenly turn into the West one fine day. It will never happen.

Hindutva is not an Enemy of the LGBT Community

Secondly, Hindutvavadis have enough concerns of their own. Article 370 has been abrogated, the Supreme Court has paved the way for a Bhavya Ram Mandir at Ayodhya, the Citizenship Amendment Bill is around the corner, the NRC remains a topmost priority. Therefore, although some political demands have been met, there’s a long way to go. Under such circumstances, if a particular group of individuals paints itself as an enemy of Hindutva, it will receive a political response. And it’s natural for it to be that way.

Therefore, given the fact that Hindutva is overwhelmingly the dominant ideology in the country at the moment, the LGBT community will never gain anything by making Hindutva an enemy. And it ought to be remembered here that Hindutva hasn’t really treated the LGBT community as an enemy. It hasn’t all been lovey-dovey, of course, but the hatred that the LGBT community reserves for Hindutva and people of certain minority communities reserve for the LGBT community, that is conspicuously missing among Hindus.

Read: Dear fellow LGBTQ members, this was a hate parade, not a pride march

There’s a great magnitude of difference between plain ‘dislike’ and ‘hatred’. For instance, Subramanian Swamy, who has the most extreme view on the matter, says that homosexuality is a genetic disorder but even he won’t throw homosexuals off rooftops neither would he advocate for the stoning of homosexuals or issue a Fatwa. There’s a lot of difference here. Thus, the differences between Hindutvavadis and the LGBT community can be worked out through dialogue. It won’t do the LGBT community any good if it makes an enemy out of Hindutva at a time when it is the overwhelmingly dominant political ideology in the country.

Ridiculous Fantasies do not benefit anyone

Thirdly, the LGBT community has enough concerns of its own. It should stop dealing in ridiculous fantasies. For instance, slogans such as ‘Hum lad ke lenge Azadi’ and ‘Tum Police bula lo’ may sound good and feel good but these are not practical. They can’t really go through with ‘lad ke lengey Azadi’. Even the Jihadists in Kashmir lived under that delusion and what did they get? The abrogation of Article 370 and they could do nothing about it.

Read: Leftist Pride Marches with their anti-Hindu rhetoric do not represent the entire LGBT community

Similarly, placards such as ‘Bharat Mata wants a girlfriend’ and ‘M*di is the only dick I can’t handle’ might make you feel good for a day but it doesn’t help you in any manner. In fact, the hatred displayed is so toxic, that by censoring the Prime Minister’s name and not the word ‘dick’, the ones holding the poster insinuate that the Prime Minister is a ‘bad word’ compared to ‘dick’ which is why the former needs censoring, not the later.

LGBT Pride March

The only thing you achieve is you turn people away who would otherwise have been sympathetic towards your concerns. Narendra Modi, like it or not, is the most powerful Indian politician since Indira Gandhi at the moment. And by the time he is done, he will in all probability achieve an even higher stature than Jawaharlal Nehru in the history of India.

Read: Delhi Pride Parade: ‘Kashmir maangey azadi’, ‘Bharat Mata wants girlfriend’ slogans raised at the queer parade

Thus, the LGBT community cannot defeat him, people with much greater resources have tried and failed. And crass remarks against Bharat Mata is the worst mistake they could make. It just doesn’t help their cause in any manner whatsoever. The LGBT community, in the aftermath of the Delhi Pride Parade, should honestly reconsider their strategy because there’s very limited scope for success with their current one.

An Alternative Strategy for the LGBT community

The LGBT Community needs a better strategy if it wishes to have greater acceptance in society. First of all, however, it needs to make peace with the fact that India will never turn into the West. On the brighter side, India will never turn into Pakistan either if Hindutva continues to dominate the country. If they do want greater acceptance within society, they have to work within these limits to maximize their interests.

Right now, they are in no position to negotiate and they are only worsening their prospects with their nonsensical demonstration of hatred towards Hindutva and Narendra Modi. To gain a place at the negotiation table, they should first abandon some of their current political positions and adopt a few new ones. For starters, they should drop slogans in favour of Azadi for Kashmir and Bastar, the insulting placards against Narendra Modi and Bharat Mata.

Next, the LGBT community would do well to abandon their weird sense of fashion that nobody apart from their coterie is fond of. A hairy man dressed in a bra in public view does not inspire great confidence. If you are just like anyone else, then your behaviour should speak for yourself. Therefore, during pride parades, it is not too much to expect that the participants should adhere to conventional norms of decency.

Read: Post 377 era: LGBT community needs to realise what is their biggest challenge and hurdle

After all that, the LGBT Community should consider adopting a few new slogans. ‘Jai Shri Ram’ and ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ would go a long way in building a sense of trust between the most dominant political ideology of our times and the LGBT community. They could do well by making the abolition of sectarian schemes and laws in favour of the minority communities a central focus of their pride parades. Homosexuals stand to gain a lot more by aligning themselves in favour of Hindutva than against.

The leaders of the community, no doubt, would abhor such ideas. But consider this, Azadi for Kashmir has always been a central theme of pride parades and yet, Jammu and Kashmir did not even decriminalize homosexuality when it was done in the rest of the country. What did the LGBT community get in return for their unconditional support for Kashmiri separatism? Absolutely zilch.

Therefore, it’s not too much to assert that all of this is the least the LGBT community could do to gain a place at the negotiation table. Consider Laxmi Narayan Tripathi for example. She is a prominent transgender rights activist who performed a Puja at Kumbh praying for the early construction of a Bhavya Ram Mandir at Ayodhya. Transgenders created history in Kumbh by participating in a religious procession at the sacred Hindu festival.

How did the LGBT community respond? They condemned her and disowned her. Worse, they focused on her caste and gave it a casteist spin. But honestly, who is in a better position to negotiate on behalf of the LGBT community right now, those who attended the Delhi Pride Parade or Laxmi Narayan Tripathi?

Need for Common Sense

The LGBT Community stands to gain nothing from adopting Leftist political stances. They will only succeed in alienating people who otherwise would have been sympathetic to their interests. There’s a need for them to reevaluate their strategy if they wish to find greater acceptance in society.

Furthermore, the LGBT Community is not on very solid ground either. They might succeed in winning favourable laws in courts as the Judiciary is not an honest reflection of Indian society and there’s a nexus of foreign-funded NGOs that works to use the Judiciary to push subversive laws. But they will not find acceptance in society if they carry on with their current trajectory.

There’s a need for dialogue between the two factions and there are genuine concerns of the LGBT community that could be addressed after a sense of trust has been built. However, making enemies out of people who are apathetic is never a good idea.

Only 9 out of 3000 plus cases in irrigation scam closed, Maharashtra ACB confirms that Ajit Pawar has not got a clean chit

0

Just two days after NCP leader Ajit Pawar took oath as Deputy Chief Minister of Maharashtra in the Devendra Fadnavis led government, today several media houses reported that the anti-corruption bureau has dropped the irrigation corruption case against him. The scam valued at around Rs 70,000 crore relates to alleged corruption and irregularities in approval and execution of various irrigation projects in Maharashtra during the Congress-NCOP rule before BJP came to power in 2014.


Media reports said that the anti-corruption bureau has given clean chit to Ajit Pawar in the irrigation scam case.

Immediately after the media reports, opposition leaders started slamming the BJP government alleging quid pro quo. Shiv Sena leader Priyanka Charturvedi tweeted, “Cases closed, corruption charges dropped, shamelessness to be in power exposed”, posting a copy of the notification apparently closing the cases against Ajit Pawar.


Congress party also launched an attack on the government for the same. Abhishek Singhvi said that the move to issue the notification is the most brazen, shameful act of conspiracy and corrupt practice of quid pro quo.


Alleging ‘quid pro quo’, Maharashtra Congress tweeted that the sermons by BJP and Devendra Fadnavis on corruption were nothing but a ‘Jumla’.

After the news evoked strong reactions, the Maharashtra government issued a clarification saying that in the list of cases being circulated on social media, none of them belongs to the irrigation scam case against Ajit Pawar.


Talking to media, the ACB said that in 9 out of more than 3000 tenders probed by the ACB, it was found that Ajit Pawar played no role, and the cases in only those 9 cases were closed. This was done ahead of the 28th November deadline given by the Bombay High Court to file a status report.


The ACB also informed that the 9 cases have been closed on a conditional basis, and the can be reopened if more information about them becomes available later.

Maharashtra ACB’s Director-General Param Bir Singh said that ACB had recommended the closure of 9 cases against Ajit Pawar almost 3 months ago, as there was no role of Pawar in these cases. But the ACB is still investigating more the 3000 cases in the irrigation scam, and Ajit Pawar has not got any clean chit in those ongoing cases. They said that the closed cases were routine cases, and the ongoing cases will continue as they were earlier, despite Ajit Pawar becoming the deputy CM of the state.

Update: A press note issued by the Maharashtra ACB said that they are investigating a total of 2654 tenders of 45 projects of Vidarbh Irrigation Development Corporation, and so far open enquiry has been completed in 212 tenders. From these, FIRs have been registered in 24 cases and charge sheet filed in 5 cases. On the other hand, open enquiry into 45 cases has been closed as no offence was found during the probe. the ACB said that the order dated 25 November 2019 closing the 9 cases belong to those 45 cases, and the recommendation to close them were received 2-5 months ago from respecting ACB units.

They said that no criminal offence was found in those 9 cases. The ACB note also specifically mentioned that none of these 9 cases is linked to Ajit Pawar.