Home Blog Page 7352

CJI recommends removal of Allahabad HC judge for his impropriety in Medical admission scam case

0

The Lucknow medical scam might go down in history as one of darker periods in India judiciary.

The saga began in August, 2017 when it was reported that a few medical colleges were giving admission to students, even though they were barred by the supreme court from doing so, for a lack of regulatory compliance.

In order to contest the ban, a medical college knocked on the doors of a Supreme Court bench which also included the Chief Justice Dipak Misra. The court consented, but ruled that the college can’t seek permission from any court in the land, to admit students for the 2017-18 year.

In an almost jaw dropping next scene, the college then approached the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court, and incredibly a judge in contravention of the Supreme Court order gave permission to the college to admit students in the said year.

Now the Chief Justice has decided to take action regarding the matter and has recommended the removal of the Allahabad High Court Judge for passing the aforementioned ruling. This decision has been taken based on an adverse report regarding the Justice named Narayan Shukla, filed by an in-house panel.

This panel which was constituted in November, consisted of Madras high court’s Chief Justice Indira Banerjee, Sikkim high court’s Chief Justice SK Agnihotri and PK Jaiswal a Madhya Pradesh High Court judge. The file which recommends the dismissal of the Judge is still with the Chief Justice, but is expected to be forwarded to PM Modi and President Kovind in the near future.

As per procedure, after this recommendation, an impeachment motion might be moved against the Judge in the Parliament, which will trigger an investigation. If the investigation confirms the judge’s guilt, the impeachment motion would be put to vote in the parliament.

Incidentally the judge could have got off the hook by avoiding this infamy, had he taken CJI’s initial recommendation to either resign or take voluntary retirement. Justice Shukla though refused to do both, which resulted in this impeachment recommendation.

Justice Shukla who had joined the Allahabad High Court in 2005, was scheduled to retire on July 17, 2020.

Mumbai pakodewala donates a day’s earnings for the Armed Forces

0

Mangesh Ahiwale, a Mumbai based street vendor who sells vada pav for a living has set a remarkable example for the society. On January 30th, the death anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi, Mr Ahiwale had declared that he would donate the entire day’s earnings to Defense Minister Smt Nirmala Sitharaman for the welfare of Indian soldiers.


Not only did Mr Ahiwale pledge to donate the entire day’s earnings, he also sold the snacks at Rs 5 instead of Rs 14 so even the poor can afford it and more and more people can contribute to the noble cause. He was joined by many to help him achieve his goal. People too participated enthusiastically and his stall saw a great many customers on the day.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJgGHUXxshk]

As per a report, this was not even the first time Mr Ahiwale has displayed his dedication to the society. He has done it earlier too. In 2015, Mr Ahiwale donated Rs 20,000 to the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund for drought-hit farmers in Vidarbha and Marathwada regions. Last year after the Elphinstone railway bridge tragedy, he had done the same gesture of donating a day’s earnings to the victims’ families. Mr Mangesh Ahiwale had said that like every Indian, he respects the Armed Forces and he thinks that we all our remembrance of their sacrifices should not be limited to January 26 and August 15.

Mr Mangesh Ahiwale’s noble gesture was praised by many. Some on social media also hailed the gesture and criticised how ex-finance minister and Congress leader P. Chidambaram had recently compared street vendors to beggars.


Mr Chidambaram in a recent statement had stated that if pakoda selling can be called a job even begging can be called a job. His statement was severely criticised for being insulting to the hard working, enterprising street vendors.

Comedy of errors: Indian ‘comedians’ and delusion of grandeur

0

Rather curious trend has emerged on social media recently. More and more of so called comedians in India have taken an ugly turn towards ‘activism’ designating themselves as the last stand between democratic principles and the perceived assault on these principles by Modi-Shah duo in cahoots with RSS and probably sponsored by Illuminati or some such.

These ‘comic-activists’ (no pun intended) have joined the shrill chorus of Doomsday Prophets that already included most of the media personalities, the award-returning ‘intellectuals’ and the ever reliable wannabe Che-Gueveras of Communist Republic of JNU and for them, battle for the soul of Indian Democracy has been lost. Modi-Shah duo have used the Constitution for pakora-wrapping and a reign of terror dwarfing that of Jacobin or Stalin’s purges has been unleashed on dissent claiming at least 3-4 Million ‘woke’ citizens. Notably, these claims are often made without any discernible hint of irony.

Comedy is a serious business, as someone has astutely observed. Satire in particular is a manifestation of frustration resulting from the contradictions within a political or social system and this is why the most successful satirists in history were products of troubled times. Charles Dickens, Miguel De Cervantes (Don Quixote fame), Mark Twain and Jon Stewart are some of the brilliant examples of this lineage.

Even in India the best satire writers emerged during and after Emergency. The satires of Harishankar Parsai, Ravindranath Tyagi and Narendra Kohli are not only funny but are scathing indictments of erstwhile state of affairs. Their writings are not persona centric abusive rants but a hopeless idealists’ frustration on the failure of system.

One of the most unsung Indian satirists, Jafar Zatalli (whose pen name literally translates to ‘nonsense’) flourished during the chaotic period of decline of Mughal Empire. As one of the pioneer writers of newly emerging Rekhta language, he spared no one in his satires (one chapter of his anthology is named ‘Ga**u naama) and ultimately paid the price when he was executed by Mughal Emperor Farrukhsiyar due to his outspoken political views.

On the contrary, in the name of satire the current so called ‘comedians’ rely on clichéd narratives of oppression, imaginary threats to their freedom (while they preach to the choir in air-conditioned auditoriums to an audience that pay on an average 1000 INR) and recycled jokes on cows, Aadhaar, Sanghis and other buzz words in leftist-circles. You can almost predict with fair amount of accuracy their punch line of the jokes.

One trope that this breed has perfected similar to their ilk in the Left is playing the victim card. Not so long ago, a Facebook satire page (popular in left circles) called ‘Humans of Hindutva’ deactivated his page citing imminent threat to his life and then within days was back on. Similarly, abusive troll Kunal Kamra recently posted a sob story of how he was being evicted from his apartment for his political views. The list goes on of such ‘comic-activists’ who have publicly stated that their voices are being crushed.

What these ‘comic-activists’ need to do is introspect, come out of their cocoon, eschew the herd mentality and look beyond the persona centric rants. I would have recommended reading too but I know that’s a hard sell.

From torn kurta to designer jacket, Rahul Gandhi’s journey as a fashionista

0

Usually donning a kurta and jeans or pyjama, sometimes torn, to break his elitist and privileged background, Gandhi has been known to take digs at Prime Minister Modi’s clothes. Very cleverly Gandhi termed the BJP as ‘suit-boot ki sarkar’ after Prime Minister Modi wore a designer jacket and scarf. Except, in most cases, Prime Minister Modi has auctioned off his clothes and donated the money raised for various causes, especially for education of girl child.

Congress President Rahul Gandhi reached Meghalaya yesterday to kick off the election campaign in the poll-bound state. That is where his ‘suit-boot’ jibe came back to haunt him.

He turned up wearing a jacket which social media users found to be very similar to a designer jacket from Burberry. Soon twitterati claimed to have found the product online, on the Bloomingdale website, where the jacket was listed at a cost of $995. Twitter users were quick to mock Rahul for the same.


People even pointed out the elitist mindset Congress has when it comes to Prime Minister Modi.


Of course, Rahul Gandhi’s fangirls immediately came to defend his fashion choices.


But as this user pointed out, achhe din for Rahul Gandhi, the fashionista seem to have arrived.

Arvind Kejriwal’s ‘is it true’ tweets are mostly untrue, and that’s not ‘shocking’

0

Arvind Kejriwal has been spreading lies and making wild allegations by using a question like format ‘is it true’ or an equivalent of the same for a long time. Today he asked if the BJP was destroying retail business to pave way for FDI in retail.


Here is a list of instances on which his ‘is it true’ tweets were plain lies.

FD interest rates drastically reduced after demonetisation

Reports of reduction of FD rates to 4.25% after demonetisation was shared by his party man Satyender Jain. Kejriwal claimed that middle class would be affected adversely because of this move.


However, the truth was, only deposits of 1 crore or above were to be affected by this change in interest rates. Which middle class person will have 1 crore rupees ?


Amit Shah owns 13000 crores declared by a businessman

When a Gujarat businessman Mahesh Shah declared 13,000 crore assets, Hardik Patel claimed that all the money belonged to Amit Shah. Kejriwal picked on this baseless allegation and asked ‘Is this true?’


The truth is, Amit Shah’s assets are worth 19 crore as per his declaration in 2017. Media went hullabaloo over this figure by comparing his previous declared assets.

ANI has been boycotting AAP events on Modi’s orders 

Dipak Bajpai, an AAP member had tweeted that ANI had been boycotting AAP events based on Modi’s orders. Kejriwal spread this allegation by saying, ‘if this is true, it is shocking’


However the lie was busted by a report carried in the news portal , ‘Janta Ka Reporter’. The report carried a denial by Smita Prakash, editor of ANI.

Amit Shah and Owaisi had a secret deal during Bihar polls

AAP mouthpiece Janta Ka Reporter shared this article claiming Amit Shah and Owaisi had a deal.


Kejriwal spread this story in his typical style :


However, Owaisi categorically denied this allegation when Rajdeep asked this question. He jokingly said that the deal happened Rajdeep’s house over a lunch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfmgIPrTFVU

Nita Ambani runs Modi’s Twitter account?

One has to be supremely clueless to say that Nita Ambani runs Modi’s Twitter account. But Kejriwal shared it with a comment ‘absolutely shocking if it is true’. This is an absurd remark which deserves nothing but a smirk.


After these lies, and others not covered in this article, one can perhaps only say that it seems Arvind Kejriwal has absolutely no credibility left, and that indeed would be shocking if untrue.

Book Review : ‘The Fisher Queen’s Dynasty’ by Kavita Kané

0

Human life is filled with contradiction. Whether one should live a simple life by sticking to morals or should one rise in the social ladder through deceit and manipulation? This classic question has been a matter of debate not only in public life but also inside the minds of individuals. The book ‘The Fisher Queen’s Dynasty‘ by Kavita Kané captures this dilemma through the character of Satyavati, the fisher-girl who went on to become a queen.

51BI-531tmL._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_

The book starts with the scene of Bhishm lying on his bed of arrows, contemplating about his life and mistakes. He wonders whether he could have avoided the mistakes he had done in the past. The rest of the story is presented as a flashback of Bhishm’ s life till Satyavati chooses to leave Hastinapur.

The story of Satyavati, Devvrat/Bhishm and Shantanu is well known. It is usually presented as a brief prelude to the great Indian epic Mahabharata to explain the birth of Pandu and Dhritarashtra. But the key role of Satyavati in the shaping the future of Hastinapur is not well known. Kavita Kané explores this story in depth.

The author’s characterization of Satyavati is commendable. She is able to capture her beauty, ambition, vulnerability and sorrow in the course of the book. I must credit the author for exposing the raw ambition of Satyavati through this dialogue :

“It is better I use my ambitions wisely. I would rather make use of a powerful man and get some benefits, as I have done with Rishi Parashar. If it is looks and lust which can seduce a man, weaken him, then I shall employ them as my means; I shall use my charms to get what I want. I cannot afford to have morals like the rich and the royal. The righteous would argue that it is unscrupulous, but I would rather be branded that, than be forgotten as a casualty, as my mother was. If men can use women, why can’t women get something out of men? Beauty and lust is just that- a means to an end”

The author has also explored the subject of sensuality in her book. The progress of Shantanu and Satyavati’s relationship, the high drama of their relationship is brought out well in her book. It appears that the concept of beauty in those times was not tied to the color of skin. The description of her body by the author brings her alive in front of the reader’s eyes :

She was very tall and sculpted, with the strength to manoeuvre the wooden boat in the choppy waters. She was dusky and ravishing with broad shoulders, a provocative bust, a small waist, voluptuous hips and long legs which were taut and tense swaying with the movement of the boat as the fabric of her short cloth rode up her smooth thighs. Her thick dark hair rested loosely on her bare shoulders.

Domestic squabbles prior to the marriage of Shantanu and Satyavati, the reluctance of the palace and people to accept her as a queen and her ability to endure it all have been dealt in great detail. The story doesn’t move as fast as it does in the first half of the book in the second half. But it delves deeper into the complexities of royal life and inner contradictions of Satyavati and Bhishm.

The trajectory of the story moves in line with the rise and fall of Satyavati’s fortunes and Bhishm’s sense of idealism. It also explores the tension between Satyavati and her progeny. This tension is similar to the one experienced by Bhishm and his version of idealism. It evokes the reader to appreciate these tensions though there may not be any standard answers to solve them.

The book is a beautiful exploration of human contradictions. The fallout of these contradictions leads to disaster for the royal family of Hastinapur. A replication of the same may not be rare in modern day as well. And therefore, it is a book worth the time of any keen reader.

Shahrukh Khan’s palatial Alibaug farmhouse attached by the Income Tax department

0

Bollywood actor Shahrukh Khan’s 19,960 sq metres sprawling Alibaug farmhouse has run afoul of the Income Tax department which has proceeded to provisionally attach it. As per a Business Standard report, the attachment order for Shahrukh’s Deja Vu Farms Pvt Ltd was issued in December under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act (PBPT).

Under the provisional attachment, this property can be attached for a period of 90 days, from the day the notice was issued. This luxury property contains amenities like a helipad and has access to the beach of the coastal Maharashtra town.

The main allegation is that Shahrukh Khan had sought to purchase agricultural land for farming purposes but instead ended up constructing a luxury farmhouse. As per an Income Tax report, quoted by the Business Standard report, the Deja Vu Farms had acted as a “benamidar” for the ultimate benefit of Shahrukh Khan, which falls under the Section 2 (9) of the PBPT Act.

Under Maharashtra’s Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, it is illegal to transfer agriculture land to non-agriculture users, without taking the permission of either the district collector or the state government. It was also alleged that this Deja Vu Farms Pvt Ltd was incorporated in order to purchase these agricultural lands as Sharukh Khan reportedly could not have been able to do so in a personal capacity.

Historically this Deja Vu Farms was incorporated in 2004 by two shareholders namely Srinivas Parthasarathy and Somasekhar Sundaresan, after which the shares transfer certificates were signed by the shareholders in Shahrukh and Gauri Khan’s name in December of that year. It has also been claimed that Shahrukh Khan gave an unsecured loan of Rs 84.5 million to this company.

It has as a result been claimed in the Business Standard report that, the unsecured loans provided by Shahrukh were used to purchase lands by Deja Vu farms which till date hasn’t shown any income via farming activity.

This issue had come to the forefront in November 2017, when it was reported that this farmhouse was one of the 87 properties against whom action could be taken for alleged Coastal Regulatory Zone (CRZ) violations. A legal opinion regarding the same was sought by Raigad collector Dr Vijay Suryavanshi.

Coming to Shahrukh Khan’s property, it was then stated that first a legal link had to be established between the actor and the property, as the farmhouse was technically owned by Deja Vu Farms, in a certain Moreshwar Asgaonkar’s name.

One of the initial signs of trouble for this property came in 2015, when one of its boundaries was demolished for allegedly violating Coastal Regulatory Zone (CRZ) violations.

This property is incidentally well favoured by Shahrukh Khan, with him hosting his 52nd birthday party there, which was attended by various Bollywood A listers.

Do not fall for fake degrees from these fake university websites

0

Delhi police busted a pan – India fake degree racket which consisted of three men including a Delhi university graduate. The accused are identified as Pankaj Arora (35), Pawiter Singh alias Sonuv (40), and Gopal Krishna alias Pali (40). The racket admitted that they had sold more than 50,000 fake degrees and mark-sheets using a highly organised modus operandi. The racket gave advertisements in newspapers promising to sell degrees of these institutes. They had set up convincing university websites to demonstrate their reliability. The degrees were printed at their press and sent via post. This racket has been running since 2001 according to police.

Delhi Police West (@DCPwestDelhi ) tweeted the list of sites.


Fake websites terminated by Delhi Police include school boards and well known universities

The list of websites include all major universities including Sikkim University, Allahabad University, Karnataka State Open University, Tamil Nadu MGR Medical University. School boards of Andhra Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi and Punjab state open school were also caught. These websites used URLs similar to those of original ones to convince potential fake degree customers. The websites in the list of universities have been taken down.

Fake degree caught at a passport centre leads to the racket

When Vijay Kumar visited a passport centre in Sikar, Rajasthan, the certificates he produced were found to be fake. A case was registered after this discovery. Vijay Kumar had asked for 10th marks card from SRKM Education and Welfare Society, but he had been delivered marks cards of Andhra state board for himself and six of his friends. Arora had assured him that they were genuine. He had obtained them for a price of 1.30 lakh from one of the accused, Arora.

The Delhi police tracked down Arora and his compatriots after receiving this complaint. Cash deposits of 20 lakh were found in various bank accounts. These bank accounts have been frozen. The complaint had led to the discovery of fake websites, undelivered marks and forged blank sheets as well. The fake websites have been taken down.

The websites are :

Report claims an article in The Wire led to a violent agitation in Assam district bordering Nagaland

0

A report in Indian Express claims that an article published in The Wire on 19th January 2018 led to violent protests in Assam, bordering Nagaland. As per the report, following the publishing of that article in The Wire, which quoted one Jagdamba Mall, as an RSS veteran, widespread violence broke out.

The report referred to Mall as an RSS leader and quoted him suggesting a ‘separate development authorities’ for 10 Naga-inhabited districts of Manipur, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. The report states that a one-time grant of Rs. 500 crore would be given. The report further claims that one of the groups interpreted ‘development authority’ as a step toward forward inclusion of the district with “Greater Nagalim” in the future. This led to widespread violent protests.

However, as per the report in Indian Express, it is revealed that Mall is not associated with the RSS and Chief Minister Sarbananda Sonowal issued a statement assuring Assam’s geographical integrity would not be compromised. However, by then, many protestors had also tried to set the RSS office on fire. The firing that killed two persons took place in Maibang, 50 km from Haflong, after a mob set the railway station there on fire and also removed railway tracks on the Lumding-Silchar hill section Thursday. As per Indian Express report, Sankar Das, a senior spokesperson of the RSS, also denied Mall being associated with the RSS.

In the follow up article which The Wire published on 27th January, 2018, The Wire published a rejoinder from Mall, where they again referred to him as RSS veteran pracharak. The Indian Express report states that Mall confirmed sharing his idea and views on Naga peace accord to a journalist, who ‘totally misinterpreted’ it which ‘led to such serious problems including death of two innocent persons’.

This is not the first time left leaning digital portals have misreported or misinterpreted news which led to deaths. Earlier, Quint journalist Poonam Agarwal had carried out a ‘sting’ operation at Deolali cantonment in Nashik, Maharashtra. Following publishing of the video, the jawan Lance Naik Roy Mathew, who was stung, committed suicide.

Writers Siddharth-Garima pen a scathing response to Swara Bhaskar’s open letter criticising Padmaavat

0

Bollywood actress Swara Bhaskar stirred up a controversy a couple of days back when she wrote an ‘open letter’ to Padmaavat movie director Sanjay Leela Bhansali. She stated that the movie made her feel ‘reduced to a vagina’. We had published a rebuttal to her letter.

Siddharth and Garima, the writer duo behind Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s film Goliyon Ki Raasleela-Ramleela, have penned another scathing reply to Ms Bhaskar’s letter. Though the writer duo has not referred to Swara Bhaskar directly, they have titled their letter as ‘An Open Letter to All Vaginas’.


 

Here is the letter by Siddharth-Garima:

Feminism: The advocacy of woman’s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.

Now that’s the dictionary definition of the word. But how can anyone advocate about ‘equality of the sexes’? A woman has a vagina, the door to life. It has the power to procure ‘life’, which no man, however hard he tries, can ever do. The question of equality is settled there, once and for all.

There are some film-makers, artists, actors who feel they are the torch-bearers of ‘feminism’ in the new-age cinema.

So here is what the ‘true’ & ‘real’ depiction of feminism in recent films – A woman, betrayed by the lover/groom picks up a bottle of alcohol and walks the streets while an old ‘hindi’ song plays in the background…she managed to something that men have been doing when betrayed. So that’s equality. Men – 10 women – 1 (the films have just begun to become progressive so please don’t mind the score). Just forgot to mention, in the same movie a dialogue goes – “Jab aadmi aurat se pareshaan hota hai ye daaru hi usey sahara deti hai. Isi liye shadi ke baad har mard peeta hai, biwi chillaati rehti hai par aadmi ka gham kaun samjhe” (This is the gist of the dialogue, not the exact dialogue)

In a recent short film, a woman, tired of doing the daily chores in the kitchen, pulls a chair and begins to sip on juice (a la her husband and other ‘men’). Equality achieved. Men-10… women – 2

In another film a daughter smokes and shares a cigarette with her father (which only a boy could do till now) is lauded and celebrated as feminism. Equality again. Men -10 Women – 3

Now coming to the people who found Padmaavat regressive and found their feminism challenged by it.

Did they feel like a ‘vagina’ when Rani Padmavati almost orders her husband, who obliges, to throw out the lecherous priest? She takes a decision, as a vagina.

Did they feel like a ‘vagina’ when Rani Padmavati decides to show her face to Khilji in a mirror? Though it was her decision, as a vagina.

Did they feel like a ‘vagina’ when Rani Padmavati goes to ‘rescue’ her husband who had been abducted? Again, a decision against the system, as a vagina.

They must have felt like a ‘vagina’ when she chose ‘fire’ over ‘rape’? It was her ‘call’, her ‘decision’ as a vagina. Right, wrong, strong, weak is up to you to interpret as a ‘penis’ or as a ‘vagina’.

The word feminism is so misused and so misinterpreted off late that it feels like an abuse. To women, to the ‘vagina’… to the great feminine power. To the only gender that has the power to procure life.

Films, ads, opinions that portray women doing things that men do are lauded and celebrated as ‘feminist’. Feminism is reduced to women smoking, drinking, gambling etc on screen. Abey aadmi toh hamesha se ‘f****d-up’ rahe. Ab auratein equality ke chakkar mein ‘f****d-up’ ho gayi. Ho gaya feminism. Men – 10. Women -10. Lo daal lo equality jahan daalni hai.

Yes, women were repressed and India was patriarchal, it still is. But feminism is not about women doing things that men do.

Feminism is about taking a stand. Taking a decision and standing by it. About having the freedom to choose. It’s a thought that gives you freedom to just be. Not become equals or equally c********c (wait that’s ‘vaginal’) as another gender.

When you took your whole family and cook for the film, didn’t you know it is going to end with a jauhar? Why act so surprised? Oh because you wanted him to include a comment on the practice? Ok then… as if the number of disclaimers were not enough. It’s the story of womens’ valour and their brave, harsh, radical decision. Their choice. That my dear is feminism. The power to be able to choose.

What perhaps was a victory for the filmmaker was the blinding of khilji as he entered the fort precincts, by burning embers thrown at him by the women. Such was the power of their fire within that they didn’t let the enemy lay their hands upon themselves. Why make them small and guilty of an act that they chose to protect themselves in the face of lynching and a life of slavery? Why judge that day from 700 years ago with ‘what would I do today’? It’s a film based in the 13th century when women preferred and chose death to rape.

Then don’t watch historicals, here or abroad. A ‘gladiator’ would perhaps shake your sensibilities of a slave in today’s context! Or a Troy might again make you feel like some other body part… A squishy liver perhaps. Since we cant appreciate art, lets violate it. With karni sena on one side and the vaginas on the other. Lets demand jauhar from the makers and feel victorious with sensationalising it with our judgements and parameters.

It was Padmavati’s choice and free will to not give herself up to Khilji. The question about life after rape does not arise. She, out of her free will, chose to embrace the fire rather than the tyrannical Alauddin. How is that any less empowering? It was a matter of choice and not forced upon them by their husbands! So, Padmavati was not a ‘rape victim’ who was so shamed that she didn’t have a right to live, as you make it out to be in your letter. Amazing what you all make it into. Was your open letter about Padmaavat or the regressive ‘Bhoomi’?

And factually speaking – ‘Sati’ was a practice (forced tradition) where women self-immolate themselves (mostly by force, sometimes by will) after the husbands’ death. Similar tradition called ‘Saka’ was observed by men who face a certain death in the battlefield. ‘Jauhar’ is only and only out of free will. As a woman. And as a ‘vagina’.

So people who feel like a ‘vagina’ after watching Padmaavati, should continue to feel like a ‘vagina’ for they would never understand the power it has. The power to create and run the world. Such people are the biggest road-blocks for ‘feminism’.

The letter was originally shared on the writer duo’s blog.