Iran

Another special flight carrying 296 Indian nationals and four Nepalese nationals stranded in conflict-hit Iran landed safely in New Delhi on Wednesday, taking the total number of people evacuated under Operation Sindhu to 3,154

Despite bold claims, the US failed to destroy Iran’s nuclear capacity. With regime change no longer on the table and Iran still holding enriched uranium, Washington’s intervention appears strategically hollow and politically counterproductive.

Leaders of 32 NATO members converge at The Hague on Tuesday, June 24 for a NATO summit meticulously calibrated to navigate the return of Donald Trump to the global stage, only to witness its agenda overtaken by exploding Middle East violence and existential questions about the alliance's future.

The recent tensions flared up just hours after US President Donald Trump claimed he has facilitated a ceasefire between Iran and Israel.

International nuclear watchdog agencies are faced with a crisis following the disappearance of approximately 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium from Iran.

Trump called it the “12-day war” and claimed credit for brokering peace. Iran’s foreign minister denied an agreement but left room for de-escalation. Israel has not yet issued any official statement on the ceasefire.

US strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites mark Trump’s reluctant entry into Israel’s ‘Rising Lion’ campaign to dismantle Tehran’s atomic and clerical power structure.

Israel has warned that if Tehran continues to attack Isareli cilivilians, the strikes on Iran will only get more intense.

Interestingly, Trump's regime change comments come just days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that regime change in Iran "could certainly be the result" of Israel's operation there, since the Islamic regime is currently "very weak".

A direct attack on the US assets of bases not appear to be preferred strategy of Iran to avenge the US attacks on its soil, considering the disparities in the military strengths of the two countries.