Ram Janmabhoomi

The hearing in the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case has entered its 30th day today.

KN Govindacharya has requested the court that if live video streaming was not possible, at least an audio recording of the hearing should be available for the public.

Why can't Ram’s birthplace have rights like a juristic person, SC asks Muslim parties in Ayodhya case

CJI Ranjan Gogoi asked senior Advocate Dhavan on whether he accepts that if the Hindus carried out prayers in the outer courtyard in the 'chabutra', it would mean there would be a deity.

Advocate MC Dhingra stated before the bench that the disputed Mosque site was a Shia property and the Shia board is ready to give their share of the land to Hindus.

The typical 'modern' Indian mind still seeks validation on benchmarks set by the erstwhile colonial master, which it has internalized so deep within its consciousness that it has come to accept them as not just the normal but also the ideal.

The CJI clarifies that the counsels can take as much time as they want to put forth their submissions

The case was considered for a day to day hearing after the efforts to arrive at an amicable settlement through mediation failed.

Ravi Shankar Prasad has once again batted for expediting the Ram Janmabhoomi case.

It would be ignorant and offensive to deny that the dispute revolves around faith and dignity of faith for all the parties involved matter equally.