Are Caravan’s claims that Firstpost is shielding 3 top BJP leaders true?

In a recent post, the online portal Caravan raised a serious question on the editorial freedom in Firstpost, a Network 18 owned online portal. The Network 18 group, in turn, is owned by Reliance Industries, and thus by Mukesh Ambani, who is claimed to be close to PM Modi by opposition parties.

The point which triggered this story is the mysterious disappearance of an opinion piece written by R Jagannathan, the editor-in-chief of Firstpost. The piece was titled “GST, Land Bill on Hold: Modi May Have to Rethink Jaitley as Finance Minister” and was initially published on 21st July 2015, but was taken down within 3- days without any explanations being given. It can still be accessed at R Jagannathan’s personal blog.

Now comes the interesting part. Caravan talked to the former executive editor of Firspost Lakshmi Chaudhry (who had resigned a few days after the opinion piece was taken down). According to Caravan, “Three or four days after the article first went live, Jagannathan had a meeting with some of the board members of Network18.” Further, according to Lakshmi Chaudhry “a diktat was issued in that meeting that from now on there will be no criticism of certain political leaders. The decision to pull the piece on Jaitley was a part of the same conversation.”

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

Caravan also quotes an unnamed source who told them that a “directive stated that the website could not carry any criticism of “the big three” in the BJP”. The story further says that when Chaudhry resigned, she told her staff that she was leaving because of “editorial pushback.

So in short, it would appear that at least from July 21 odd, the owners of Firstpost have laid down an unwritten rule that “3 top leaders” from BJP are exempted from critical posts. Caravan does not name them, but it is pretty clear these leaders would be PM Modi, his trusted aide Amit Shah and of course Arun Jaitley.

So does this allegation of interference and censorship hold ground? Not in totality. Lets first look at some anti-Modi stories posted on Firstpost:

21 August 2015: Sacking of Sanjiv Bhatt part of Gujarat Vendetta Politics

19 August 2015: Modi ignored the real problems of Indian labourers in UAE

19 August 2015: Why PM Modi should stop chasing UN Security Council mirage

16 August 2015: Some things which Modi got wrong in his I-Day speech

16 August 2015: The speech Narendra Modi should have made this Independence Day – by R Jagannathan 

14 August 2015: Modi govt should walk the talk

6 anti-Modi opinion pieces in last 7 days. Almost 1 every day. And these are beside the regular posts which directly report anti-Modi statements by various opposition leaders. So if indeed there is a “don’t criticize Modi” policy, it seems to be hardly effective.

If we analyze posts on Amit Shah, there are just 3 posts tagged with”Amit Shah” in the past 7 days, 2 of which could be said to be anti-Amit Shah (although 1 is not an opinion piece). It must be noted that by and large, media doesn’t carry too many regular posts on Amit Shah because he is finally only the Party President, and not part of the Government so he is not actively involved in its functioning.

As for Arun Jaitley, there are 25 posts tagged with his name in the last 7 days. But most of them do not talk about him, he is only tagged by virtue of being the Finance Minister and gets a passing mention in many of the posts. However, we could not find any “anti-Jaitley” post per se.

So does this point out to any trend? It would not be unreasonable to say that:

1. Posts critical of Modi do appear frequently on Firstpost

2. There is insufficient data to arrive at any conclusion on Amit Shah

3. Arun Jaitley seems to get lesser brickbats

In fact, from our past experience with Firstpost, we can say not only is it critical of Modi on many occasions, sometimes it has relied on pure lies to defame Modi. In this post from April 2015, Firstpost decided to use an NGO’s proposal to rename Delhi, to slander Modi by calling what they claimed was “his actions”, reminiscent of “Stalinist-era revisionism“. So not only has Firstpost been open about skewering Modi, it has done this without being truthful too.

So is the directive issued by Firstpost board only Arun Jaitley specific? And is this “don’t criticize Arun Jaitley policy” only Firstpost specific? What separates Jaitley from Shah and Modi is while Shah and Modi are rank outsiders to the Lutyens world and have been the Media’s favourite punching bags for a decade now, Jaitley is considered to be one of Lutyens’ own. Social Media has been filled with rumours and displeasure about Jaitley’s alleged closeness to many media outlets and personalities, who have been known to be anti-BJP or anti-Modi. So is a no-attack-on-Jaitley policy being old as something else?


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

Pakistan quotes The Quint, Karan Thapar and Praveen Swami to brand Kulbhushan Jadhav as a ‘RAW spy’ at ICJ

Pakistan quoted several articles published in Indian to present its case during Kulbhushan Jadhav hearing at the International Court of Justice
How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans after Pulwama attack

How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans

Ravish Kumar of NDTV is a man known for many lows. But this may well be his lowest point.

The Hindu not only cropped the Rafale dissent note, but also had digitally manipulated it

Comparison of Hindu document with ANI document shows that Hindu had doctored the Rafale dissent note

Kavita Krishnan uses 4 year old photograph to claim PM Narendra Modi was laughing after Pulwama attack

Using a old photo, Kavita Krishna claimed the Modi was having fun at election rallies after Pulwama attack

Imran Khan’s deranged statement on Pulwama terror attack tailor-made to appeal to Indian ‘liberal’ sensibilities

In his statement on the Pulwama terror attack, Imran Khan claimed that his country had nothing to gain from attacking India. Apart from that, he threatened India with retaliation should the Indian Army decide to attack Pakistan.
Image Source: Swarajya

Ten things India must do to stop being a soft state

India is overly defensive. Despite its massive economic and military power, it does not respond to grave provocations (26/11, for example). It does not retaliate when attacked. It tolerates countless attacks on its citizens and affronts to its prestige.

Pakistan minister says ‘bells won’t toll in temples’, he forgets, India is the land of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj

Sheikh Rashid Ahmad, Federal Minister for Pakistani Railways, commented that should anyone look at Pakistan in a negative manner, then "the eyes will be ripped out, the grass will not grow, the birds will not chirp and the bells won't toll in Temples."
Major Vibhuti Dhoundiyal was martyred with 3 other soldiers in Pulwama during an encounter

A teary adieu to Major Vibhuti Dhoundiyal: Married only last year, he made the ultimate sacrifice so we can live

Major Dhoundiyal along with three soldiers was killed in an encounter with terrorists in Pulwama district.

Meet the people whose main concern is if Modi may ‘benefit’ due to terror strike, not tears of martyrs’ families

While the Country held its breath and read gut-wrenching stories of the Jawans martyred in the Pulwama attack, the 'liberals' were more concerned about politics than the tears of the martyr's families.
New Delhi had reservations over his coming to India from Pakistan.

Saudi Crown Prince returns to Riyadh before his visit to India as India objects to direct visit from Pakistan

India has been identified as one of the eight strategic partners with whom Saudi Arabia intends to deepen its partnership

Latest articles

Connect with us

137,550FansLike
110,569FollowersFollow
23,177SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these