Sunni Waqf Board claims Shah Jahan gave them Taj Mahal, SC demands transfer deed with his signature

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Sunni Waqf Board to submit papers signed by Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan in which they were given the rights to the Taj Mahal. The Sunni Waqf Board is pursuing a legal battle against the Archeological Survey of India (ASI) for the ownership of the iconic monument.

The SC has given a week’s time to the Sunni Waqf Board to submit the papers signed by the Emperor. Shah Jahan died in 1666, 18 years after the Taj Mahal was built.

According to reports, the Sunni Waqf Board, which is the current regulatory body of the property for religious, educational and charitable purposes had passed an order in July 2005 which decreed that the monument should be registered as their property. There is a stay in that order currently. The ASI had filed a petition in the SC challenging the order.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

An SC bench headed by CJI Deepak Mishra stated, “who in India will believe the Taj belongs to the Waqf Board? These kinds of issues should not waste the time of the Supreme Court.”

The Sunni Waqf Board had claimed in court that the sole owner of the Taj Mahal was with Emperor Shah Jahan, who, in a ‘waqfnama’, passed the property on to them. Senior Advocate VV Giri, who represented the board, claimed that the late Emperor executed a ‘waqfnama’ in favour of the board which grants them the ownership. Upon this, the bench reportedly stated, “then show us the original deed executed by Shah Jahan. Show us his signature.” The bench has granted a week’s time to the Waqf Board to submit the papers.

CJI Mishra also had certain questions for the Waqf Board. He asked that Shah Jahan was put under custody and used to view the Taj Mahal through a window and how did he sign the Waqfnama. The bench also remarked that the Taj Mahal and all other heritage monuments were passed on to the British after the end of the Mughal rule. From them, all the properties were vested to the government of India after the independence and all heritage monuments have been managed by the ASI.

Advocate ADN Rao, who appeared for the ASI claimed that there is no ‘waqfnama’ and after the end of Mughal rule, under the 1858 proclamation, all Mughal properties were taken over by the British and they were handed over to the Indian government under 1948 Act.

The Sunni Waqf Board had given the order in 2005 on a petition filed by an individual named Mohammad Irfan Bedar. Bedar had moved to the Allahabad High Court after the board delayed declaring order on his 1998 petition. On the Allahabad High Court’s order, the Waqf Board had passed decision and claimed ownership of the Taj Mahal. The ASI had moved to the SC in August 2005 and got a stay on the order.

The three-membered Supreme Court bench comprised of CJI Deepak Mishra, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice AM Khanwalikar.


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans after Pulwama attack

How Ravish Kumar and Vinod Dua misled people about ‘martyr status’ to CRPF jawans

Ravish Kumar of NDTV is a man known for many lows. But this may well be his lowest point.
Days after Pulwama attack, Kamal Haasan toes the Pakistan line

Kamal Haasan demands ‘referendum’ in Kashmir, terms Pakistan Occupied Kashmir as ‘Azad Kashmir’

Days after Pakistan sponsored Pulwama attack, Kamal Haasan has echoed the sentiments of terrorist state Pakistan when he sought a 'referendum' in Jammu and Kashmir

Pakistan quotes The Quint, Karan Thapar and Praveen Swami to brand Kulbhushan Jadhav as a ‘RAW spy’ at ICJ

Pakistan quoted several articles published in Indian to present its case during Kulbhushan Jadhav hearing at the International Court of Justice

The Hindu not only cropped the Rafale dissent note, but also had digitally manipulated it

Comparison of Hindu document with ANI document shows that Hindu had doctored the Rafale dissent note

Man whose number was made public by Barkha Dutt for stalking, claims he is getting threatening calls, says didn’t abuse Barkha

In her tweet, Barkha demanded the Home Minister of the country, Rajnath Singh, himself intervene in the matter which is routinely dealt with by local Police.

Kavita Krishnan uses 4 year old photograph to claim PM Narendra Modi was laughing after Pulwama attack

Using a old photo, Kavita Krishna claimed the Modi was having fun at election rallies after Pulwama attack

Meet the people whose main concern is if Modi may ‘benefit’ due to terror strike, not tears of martyrs’ families

While the Country held its breath and read gut-wrenching stories of the Jawans martyred in the Pulwama attack, the 'liberals' were more concerned about politics than the tears of the martyr's families.

Imran Khan’s deranged statement on Pulwama terror attack tailor-made to appeal to Indian ‘liberal’ sensibilities

In his statement on the Pulwama terror attack, Imran Khan claimed that his country had nothing to gain from attacking India. Apart from that, he threatened India with retaliation should the Indian Army decide to attack Pakistan.

JNU ‘student’ who was accused of stealing funds in Kathua case found spreading rumours about Kashmiri girls trapped in Uttarakhand

CRPF also issued a notice that certain 'miscreants' on social media are spreading rumours and hate on social media

Pakistan funded Islamic terrorist blows up 300 kgs of IED, actor brings ‘Hindu right wing’ argument to shield Pakistan

Jaaved Jaaferi refuses to hold Pakistan accountable for the attack, instead equates Hindus with Jaish Terrorists.

Latest articles

Connect with us

137,509FansLike
110,457FollowersFollow
23,129SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these