Home Law SC stays Delhi HC order which prevented the EC from acting against paid news

SC stays Delhi HC order which prevented the EC from acting against paid news

Supreme Court clarified that the High Court was only the concerned case and it does not establish a precedent

The Supreme Court, in a hearing held on Friday, stayed an order of the Delhi High Court that restricted the power of the Election Commission (EC) to act against paid news. The stay will allow EC to crack down on the instances of paid news in the five states going to poll next month.

The Election Commission had filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court Division Bench order contending that motivated propaganda by politicians published in newspapers cannot be considered part of their fundamental right to free speech. The EC had petitioned that the order of the High Court should be limited only to the concerned case and it should be treated as a precedent,

A division bench of the Delhi High Court had set aside an Election Commission order which disqualified Narottam Mishra, an MLA from Datia constituency in Madhya Pradesh after it claimed to have established 42 cases of ‘paid news’ in the newspapers in the run-up to polls in 2008.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

The division bench in its order said that the Election Commission was attempting to exercise indirect control over the freedom of speech of the candidates. Para 77 of the order read, “Election Commission’s remit cannot ordinarily extend to judging content of speech; it is only to adjudge whether the election expenses incurred by the candidate or someone on her or his behalf, under her or his authority have been accounted” for.

In para 76 of the order states that the EC had “erred in interpreting” various laws and failed to establish that Narottam Mishra, a BJP minister in Madhya Pradesh, was responsible for the publication of 42 offending articles/features/ election appeals.

“The content of a media article, or a news feature or series of features on particular candidates, should ordinarily not be regulated indirectly through the directives of the EC; they essentially fall within the domain of free speech. Any indirect control would impact a citizen’s right to free speech and expression. Such indirect control would chill the right and freeze all debates — essential to democracy,” the court observed.

The Supreme Court clarified that sections 76 and 77 of the High Court order are related only to the case of Narottam Mishra, and it does establish any precedent for other decisions of EC in the context of paid news.

The Supreme Court’s order on the Delhi High Court judgement is crucial in view of the upcoming elections in the five states of Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Mizoram and Telangana.

The Supreme Court order can be accessed here [PDF].

Share This Post With Your Friends & Fans:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Election 2019 Live Updates

Track all the updates on one page as the results and trends trickle in

The Left has lost its deposit. It is time for the Right to fight Modi

Modi 2.0 heralds a new beginning for India and her people. It must not be allowed to cultivate the habits of Modi 1.0.
Shehla Rashid remembers 2014, says she had wanted Kejriwal as PM

Shehla Rashid loses it early on counting day, says “Felt like a Muslim when ‘mass murderer’ won in 2014”

As early trends show an NDA victory, Shehla Rashid calls him a mass murderer, says she had wanted Arvind Kejriwal as PM in 2014 and she had felt like a 'Muslim'.
NYT peddles Modi 2.0 as victory of India's most divisive leader

Dear New York Times, India has chosen Modi 2.0, deal with it

When India gives a thumping, unprecedented, overwhelming victory to a man who has made every single Indian feel proud of their nation and heritage, the NYT's heartburn is expected. 

The story of BJP’s rise and rise in West Bengal: The story starts not in 2019 but 2017 Ram Navami

History may remember the 23rd of May, 2019 as the day when the future of Bengal Politics changed forever. However, it was on the 5th of April, 2017, on the auspicious day of Ram Navami that the seeds of it were sown.
Rana Ayyub had a meltdown seeing BJP securing an unprecedented victory

Unprecedented Modi victory triggers meltdown for controversial journalist Rana Ayyub

Prospect of a stunning Narendra Modi victory in 2019 Lok Sabha election triggered a mental collapse for controversial journalist Rana Ayyub

Smriti… who? Smriti, the one who gave your brother a run for his money

In a major upset for Congress, BJP's Smriti Irani won the Congress 'family seat' Amethi defeating Congress President Rahul Gandhi by over 50,000 votes

Rahul Gandhi should not fire his data analysis chief, but promote him. Here is why

The divine vision of Praveen Chakravarty, "Big Data" head of Congress, is too precious

Kanhaiya Kumar’s family uses LPG stove to prepare for his victory, contrary to his claims just a few weeks ago

Kanhaiya had claimed that his mother cooked on a Chullah and not on an LPG stove as it was not viable because of being too expensive and also exhausted within 3-4 days.

‘Chup Chaap Kamal Chhaap’: The slogan that changed Bengal politics forever

While Bengal is the land of Maa Durga and Maa Saraswati, 'Jai Shree Ram' soon became a symbol of political protest.
Subscribe to Day's Top Stories

Latest articles

Connect with us

164,717FansLike
142,535FollowersFollow
64,625SubscribersSubscribe
Share This Post With Your Friends & Fans: