Monday, April 12, 2021
Home Opinions The conduct of 'Secular' parties on CAB shows there's no difference between them and...

The conduct of ‘Secular’ parties on CAB shows there’s no difference between them and Muslim communal parties

While 'Secular' parties may say different things or claim to endorse different values when it really comes down to it, there's no difference between them and Muslim communal parties. Actions speak louder than words, after all. And however much they may deny it, in the end, their actions betray their intentions.

The Citizenship Amendment Bill was tabled in the Parliament today by the Union Home Minister Amit Shah. And as expected, there was great resistance from the Opposition parties today. The resistance only demonstrates that there’s a very thin line between the ‘secular’ parties in India and those that are identifiably Muslim parties. And sometimes, on matters such as the CAB, the thin line evaporates completely.

Senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor, who had only yesterday cheered for foreign interference in India’s internal matters, said that the Citizenship Amendment Bill was in violation of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution and opposed the introduction of the Bill itself. In a notice that he submitted, Tharoor said that the CAB infringes upon the principle of “equality before the law” and the “equal protection of laws” guaranteed to all persons, including non-citizens. He said that the Bill also endorses the idea of exclusion on the basis of religion and said that Bill was “an assault on the foundational values of our republic”.

The leader of Congress in the Lok Sabha, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, who has made it a habit of making crass remarks, too, adopted the same stance and said that the Bill violated articles of the Indian Constitution. He said that the CAB is nothing but “targeted legislation over minority people of our country”.

Trinamool Congress MP Saugata Roy made similar arguments and said that the CB is “divisive and unconstitutional” and “it violates article 14 of the constitution”. He went one step further to assert, “This law is against everything our founding fathers including Dr.Ambedkar envisioned.”

The language adopted by the ‘Secular’ parties on the Citizenship Amendment Bill is remarkably similar to that of Muslim Communal parties such as the AIMIM and the AIUDF. Of course, Asaduddin Owaisi was more caustic as only he can afford to be but there was no difference in the tone and tenor between the two sides. Owaisi claimed that if the Bill were to be passed, then Amit Shah’s name will be featured with Adolf Hitler and David Ben-Gurion.

Read: Congress leader P Chidambaram plays the religion card, says BJP abrogated Article 370 because there is a Muslim majority in Kashmir

The latter is considered the primary national founder of the State of Israel and served as its first Prime Minister. Badruddin Ajmal, the AIUDF supremo, said that the Bill was “against the Constitution and against Hindu-Muslim unity. We will reject this Bill and Opposition is with us on it. We will not let this bill pass.”

The conduct of the ‘Secular’ parties on the matter of the CAB clearly demonstrates that Muslim communal parties will always be their natural allies and they will ‘oppose’ any Bill that the latter are not fond of. On all contentious issues, the ‘Secular’ parties will always side with the hardline Muslim factions. Therefore, a question has to be asked here, if ‘Secular’ parties consistently support Muslim communalists on every contentious matter under the Sun, is there any difference between them and parties such as AIMIM and AIUDF?

Read: Hindu massacres and demand for Sharia: The story of Rahul Gandhi’s ally IUML, an offshoot of Jinnah’s Muslim league

The same was observed during the abrogation of Article 370. Nearly all the ‘secular’ parties opposed the move, sometimes, to the chagrin of their own members. In that instance as well, the stand taken by the ‘Secular’ parties was indistinguishable from that of the Muslim communal parties. The same was observed during the move to criminalize Triple Talaq. Every single ‘Secular’ party supported the barbaric practice that infringes upon the dignity of a woman.

Thus, while ‘Secular’ parties may say different things or claim to endorse different values when it really comes down to it, there’s no difference between them and Muslim communal parties. Actions speak louder than words, after all. And however much they may deny it, in the end, their actions betray their intentions.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Editorial Deskhttp://www.opindia.com
Editorial team of OpIndia.com

Related Articles

Trending now

Gangster Mukhtar Ansari, who was suffering from illness in Punjab, recovers miraculously in UP but has been trying to ‘fall ill’ again ever since

On Monday (April 12), Mukhtar Ansari will be presented before a Court in Uttar Pradesh. The case pertains to the assault of a janitor and Deputy jailor in Lucknow.

Shops burnt, stones pelted on police in Baran, Rajasthan after 3 Muslim men stabbed one Kamal Singh: What we know so far

Shops burnt, police personnel injured, stone pelting, fire department vehicles attacked in Chhabra, Rajasthan.

After explosive Clubhouse confessions, Prashant Kishor starts building ground to blame only Mamata Banerjee if Bengal is lost: Here’s how

While trying to fire-fight fall-out from Clubhouse conversation, Prashant Kishor has set narrative to blame Mamata Banerjee and TMC for West Bengal loss

Madhya Pradesh: Police arrest 4 Muslim men for putting up posters of Yati Narsinghanand Saraswati, hurling expletives, AIMIM protests

Balaghat Police arrested four Muslim men for pasting posters against Yati Narsinghanand Saraswati on Jama Masjid Road

‘They came with bombs’: Eyewitness reveals how Anand Burman was killed in West Bengal for working for the BJP

Anand Burman, a BJP voter, was killed during the violence that ensued in the 4th phase of the elections in West Bengal.

Why Mamata Banerjee should take entire moral responsibility for the violence in Cooch Behar

The way the Bengal election has unfolded, Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee clearly feels like she is in a corner

Recently Popular

Watch: Arnab Goswami’s special message for Barkha Dutt after Sachin Vaze lands in Taloja Jail

Without explicitly naming Barkha Dutt, Arnab Goswami slammed the journalist for celebrating his unlawful arrest.

Maharashtra Congress leader slams Aaditya Thackeray for clearing Rs 3,693 crores to renovate bungalows of Shiv Sena corporators

Janardan Chandurkar requested governor to intervene after Aaditya Thackeray allotted Rs3,693 crores to Shiv Sena corporators

Asked BARC to pay if they wanted to avoid torture: Sachin Vaze, money laundering and the Rs 30 lakh bribe in TRP case

Citing sources, TOI reported that BARC officials had admitted to the ED about making such a payment to Sachin Vaze via an inspector.

After explosive Clubhouse confessions, Prashant Kishor starts building ground to blame only Mamata Banerjee if Bengal is lost: Here’s how

While trying to fire-fight fall-out from Clubhouse conversation, Prashant Kishor has set narrative to blame Mamata Banerjee and TMC for West Bengal loss

Rafiqul Islam Madani: All you need to know about the Bangladeshi dwarf cleric who preaches Islamic radicalism and wants to capture Delhi

"If we have to be martyred opposing Modi, then, we are all willing to be martyred", Rafiqul Islam Madani had said ahead of Modi's Bangladesh visit

Lutyens journalist speaking ‘truth to the power’ by discussing Mamata Banerjee’s toilet routine

An embarrassed Prashant Kishor jokingly asked the Lutyens journalist, "Am I expected to answer this also?"
- Advertisement -

 

Connect with us

254,077FansLike
528,610FollowersFollow
24,200SubscribersSubscribe