Home Blog Page 7080

Sabarimala Temple Case: Petitioner says she now understands and respects the Temple traditions

0

The hearing of the Sabarimala Temple case concluded yesterday evening and the five-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by CJI Deepak Mishra reportedly asked the lawyers of both sides to compile their submissions and submit to the court within a week’s time. As reported by Organiser, Advocate Prerna Kumari, who is one of the petitioners in the case demanding the entry of women to the temple, revealed that she respects the sentiments of female devotees of the temple who are ready to wait till they turn 50 and allowed entry to the temple.

Advocate Prerna Kumari reportedly told Organiser that while signing for the petition, she did not have a better understanding of the customs of Tantric traditions being followed in the Sabarimala temple. She added that at that time she just considered that the issue of not allowing women of reproductive age into the temple is a simple matter of gender bias. She admitted that she had later come to know of the real sentiments of women devotees attached to the temple after the popular campaign of #ReadyToWait.

Previously, another petitioner Advocate Sudha Pal had also shared the same views. There are five petitioners in the case. Advocates Prerna Kumari and Sudha Pal reportedly stated that they were under the false impression that the Travancore Devaswom Board had banned women from entering the temple who are actually interested to go and offer puja there. They stated that there were also news reports that the temple had to undergo a purification ritual after actress Jayamala went inside. They both reportedly admitted that this incident had triggered them to approach the court.

Advocated Prerna reportedly added that the desire to pursue the matter legally emanated from their ignorance about the diversity of the Sanatana Dharma. She added that the age-old traditions and customs must prevail in Sabarimala. Both the petitioners reportedly stated that over the years, they have been approached by many women from Kerala and elsewhere and were told that their petition demanding entry is hurtful to the sentiments of women devotees of the temple who obey and respect the traditions faithfully. They reasserted that the media hype of the Jayamala controversy was the main reason behind their decision. Advocate Prerna has reportedly also added that by the time she understood the complete picture, it was too late to withdraw her petition and thus she had refrained herself from making any public statements. She has also added that she is not a member of the Young Lawyer’s Association.

Advocate Prerna also reportedly stated that she has nothing to do with the Happy to Bleed group who had joined the case later in 2016. She added that she is totally against the group and their campaign. Asserting a strong disagreement with attempts to turn the issue as anti-Hindu, advocate Prerna reportedly stated that Indira Jaising had joined later when the case drew national attention after the Happy to Bleed campaign. She added that the issue has been deliberately turned towards hurting the religious sentiments of practising Hindu women.

Both petitioners have reportedly stated that they are happy the honourable Supreme Court has given all parties a chance to table their viewpoints and the issue has been deliberated threadbare. They added that they would honour and welcome the judgement of the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court bench comprising of Justice RF Nariman, AM Khanwaliker, Indu Malhotra and DY Chandrachud, headed by CJI Deepak Mishra has been hearing the case. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi had represented the Travancore Devaswom Board, Mr Prasharan had represented the Nair Service Society, K Radhakrishnan represented the Padalam Royal family, V Giri represented the Tanthri of the temple while J Sai Deepak represented the group People For Dharma, who had led the #ReadyToWait campaign on behalf of women devotees.

Assam’s NRC: All that the media doesn’t tell you

0

It’s possible looking at wall-to-wall coverage of Assam’s National Register for Citizens (NRC) final draft in our newspapers that you believe a Hindu nationalist party in the Centre is rendering lakhs of unfortunate Muslims homeless.

It’s also possible that you believe in the blood-curdling call of Mamata Banerjee and fear that a civil war would reach our doorsteps.

It’s quite possible tears are welling up in your eyes at the graphic coverage of Indian Express about unfortunate victims rendered illegal in one stroke.

It’s possible you are breaking out in a sweat over the prospects of another “Partition” as snakes-in-the-sleeve come out writhing in the mud.

It’s quite possible your respect for Congress has gone a millimetre up after they gave adjournment notice in the Lok Sabha over the matter.

My advisory to you is to shove this all in the nearest bin or spare your toilet roll. You need to know that this exercise has been mandated by the Supreme Court (and not Modi government); that it’s just a draft; that no NRC exercise has been taken up after 1951 (sic), that Congress had itself promised so in the Assam Accord of 1985, and that Mamata Banerjee back in 2005 had herself wanted the illegal Bangladesh immigrants identified. In case you want to know everything there is to know about illegal migrants in Assam over the centuries and the present, just to make sure this nonsense doesn’t waste an extra second of yours from now, read this piece and no further.

If nothing, please pay heed to Home Minister Rajnath Singh who has stressed “it’s just a draft” and nobody is going to a “detention centre.”

You could also bear this basic question in mind in case your office-colleagues are thumping your desk down: All the regional leaders who are shedding copious tears on “poor” illegal migrants of Assam– “refugee in own country,” as per Mamata — whether their own people in state would welcome these 40 lakh illegals in their fold.

All things point to nothing materially changing for illegal migrants post-release of the second draft of NRC. One, India doesn’t have an agreement with Bangladesh in place (our eastern neighbours don’t even acknowledge the influx of illegal migrants from its stable). Two, a porous border allows an extradited illegal migrant to return without hassle; Three, many lakhs of illegal immigrants are already spread all over the country, especially in a metropolis such as Delhi, Bangalore and Mumbai. Who keeps a tab on them?

Sooner than later though, illegal migrants must be taken off the election rolls and ways must be found to give refuge to millions of fleeing Hindus (and other Indic minority sects) from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh with full citizenship status (without worrying about Rohingyas or Human Right Activists—for Hindus have only India to turn to while Muslims and Christians have dozens of own doors to knock around the world), illegal migrants legally committed not to indulge in political or religious subversive acts.

College affiliated to Malankara Church refuses to publish magazine with a poem about sex abuse by godmen

0

A Christian college in Kerala has reportedly refused permission to publish its student magazine because it includes a four-line poem with a less than subtle reference to the sex abuse cases plaguing the church recently. The college management has reportedly told that the poem is derogatory and it would hurt the sentiments of ‘believers’. According to a report in The Times of India, the incident has occurred in the Pazhassiraja College in Wayanad district.

According to the report, the student magazine of the Pazhassiraja College, which is managed by the Syro Malankara Catholic Church under the Eparchy of Sultan Bathery. Times of India has quoted the college principal A O Roy saying that the poem is highly objectionable and cannot be included in the magazine of an educational institution run by Christian management.

The magazine, called ‘Vyattatti’ reportedly features a poem which begins with the line, “When the father of a church becomes a child’s father”. It is reportedly a reference to Father Robin Vadakkancheril, the former vicar at the Saint Sebastian Church in Kannur who was arrested last year for raping a minor girl who got pregnant. The 16-year-old girl had later delivered a child at the Christu Raj Hospital in Thokkilangadi.

The Supreme Court of India had yesterday heard the matter where 3 medical professionals, who were also accused of involvement, were discharged and two persons, a priest and a nun were ordered to face trials along with father Robin. The Supreme Court bench led by Justice AK Sikri and Ashok Bhushan had termed the issue as ‘very serious’ and had observed,” It is disturbing that the recent cases of rapes are coming from churches in Kerala. It is shocking.”

The college principal, AO Roy has also stated that as the poem is expected to hurt the religious sentiments of a section of the society, the college cannot be responsible for the magazine. Shahul Hameed, the editor of the student magazine had reportedly said that the magazine focuses on every contemporary social issue and the stand taken by the college authorities is against the freedom of expression of students. According to the college rules, the magazine can be printed only when the publishing funds are released and the contents are approved by the principal.

It is notable here that Malankara Orthodox Church has recently been under scanner after allegations of rape and sexual exploitations was brought on several of its priests. A churchgoer had alleged that she was raped and blackmailed by five priests of the church and the exploitation had continued for years.

Talib Hussain, the ‘Braveheart’ seeking justice for Kathua rape victim arrested on rape charges

0

Talib Hussain, a “social activist and advocate”, who rose to prominence after leading an agitation seeking justice for an eight-year-old girl brutally gang-raped and murdered in Kathua district of Jammu and Kashmir earlier this year, ironically, has himself been arrested on rape charges and illegal possession of a weapon, police said on Wednesday.

He was arrested following a complaint, lodged on Tuesday by his cousin, who was allegedly raped by him one and a half months back in Chawda forest.

According to the complaint filed by this women, Hussain armed with a knife, intercepted her, clobbered and raped her while she was in the forest to graze her cattle. She, however, remained silent all this while as she was continuously threated of dire consequences by Hussain, but eventually, she broke her silence and confessed of being raped to her husband on Tuesday, following which she lodged a complaint at the Samba police station in Jammu, and subsequently, Talib was arrested from Tral in south Kashmir.

A case has been registered against him under section 376 (rape) of Ranbir Penal Code (RPC) and 4/25 Arms Act.

The rape charge came nearly a month after Talib’s estranged wife got an FIR registered at Samba police station, accusing him of domestic violence and attempting to kill her over dowry. According to the police, Nusrat Begum, married to Talib, for three years, having two children with him, went with a written complaint along with court orders to the police station along with her father, Mohammad Tahir and nearly a dozen neighbours.

Talib Hussain’s brother too had been booked for molestation and having common intention to intimidate Nusrat Begum.

Not very long back Talib Hussain was seen actively leading the fight for justice for the Kathua rape victim. In fact, his proactiveness and dedication to seek justice for the victim had earned him a title of a ‘Braveheart’ for standing tall to fight the barbaric injustice even as political parties played the blame game. As many media houses were tirelessly glorifying Talib Hussain’s prodigious efforts in the Kathua murder case, Opindia had briefly given a sneak peek into Talib Hussain’s past.

Talib Hussain had allegedly attempted to murder a scholar of Jammu University, Kapil Shastri on September 13, 2013. There is FIR No. 226/2013 against him: Talib Hussain V/s 307, 147, 148 Police Station Gandhi Nagar. He is facing trial at Sessions Court Jammu. He was also expelled from Jammu University after an Inquiry Committee found him “guilty”.

This is a matter of sheer hypocrisy that the man who left no stone unturned to fight for a woman’s justice and rights, standing up against atrocities committed against them, has himself been engaged in domestic violence- abusing a woman, mentally and physically assaulting her in the past and now has taken a step further committing the same ghastly crime against which he was proactively crusading.

Activist Tommy Robinson who was arrested for reporting about paedophile gangs, released on bail

0

British activist and founder of English Defence League (EDL) – Tommy Robinson was granted bail by the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) on Wednesday, after it ordered that he be retried for a contempt of court charge, The Guardian has reported.

Robinson whose real name is Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon, was arrested outside the Leeds Combined Courts on 25 May, while reporting about an ongoing paedophile grooming gang trial. As per reports, he was handed a 13 months prison sentence within six hours of his arrest for violating a suspended sentence which he had earlier received for a similar offence in Canterbury.

His act of recording in front of the courthouse was deemed to be in contempt of court, which applies to people being jailed for speeches or publications which might seriously impede or prejudice the course of justice in a particular case, Independent has reported.

Robinson during the grooming gang trial was filming outside the Leeds court, the footage of which went viral on Social Media. He was subsequently sent to the Onley prison.

While granting him bail, Lord Burnett of Maldon ordered that Tommy’s Canterbury conviction would stand but his Leeds case would be retired. He has been granted bail subject to the condition that he would attend the retrial of his case. He has also been ordered to stay at least 400 metres away from the Leeds crown court.

The judge also observed that the finding of contempt against Tommy was flawed and the court should have waited to hear the case on a fully informed basis.

NC MLA threatens: ‘If changes made to Article 35A and 370, Indian Flag won’t be seen in Kashmir’

0

In a shocking incident, the National Conference leader Javed Rana has threatened that if any alteration is made to Article 35A or abolishing Article 370 from the Constitution of India, he will not allow hoisting the national flag in Kashmir.


Javed Rana while addressing his supporters in his constituency Mendhar said, “Through the media, I want to request the Prime Minister that if they scrap article 35-A or Article 370, then India’s flag will not be unfurled here”. He further said that, “It is only because of Article 370 that we are connected to this country, if they scrap article 370 then our relations with India automatically ends”.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_7jeXip4AI?start=120]

Javed Rana, MLA from Omar Abdullah’s National Conference is not new to controversies. Recently, he had stoked a controversy when he said that the government agencies were behind the attack on the school bus by the stone pelters in Shopian district of the Jammu and Kashmir.

In the past, he had challenged the Prime Minister Narendra Modi to hoist the tricolour in the Lahore. He is known to be a controversial person, as he had abused the security forces in the past.

Article 35A and Article 370 are two controversial constitutional provisions providing certain benefits to the people residing in the state. Article 35A is a provision inserted into the Indian Constitution in 1954 by the then Prime Minister Nehru, which provides the Jammu and Kashmir legislature to decide who all are ‘permanent residents’ of the State and confer on them special rights and privileges in public sector jobs, acquisition of property in the State, scholarships and other public aid and welfare.

However, Article 370, a ‘temporary’ provision distinguishes the state of Jammu and Kashmir from other states of the country by providing special autonomy in the functioning of the state. Most of the constitutional provisions which are applicable for other states are not applicable to Jammu and Kashmir.

Interestingly, the CPI-M is also backing the proposal of Article 35A remaining in the constitution. They have filed a petition and requested the Supreme Court to intervene regarding Article 35A of the Constitution.  “Article 35A is very much necessary to prevent further alienation of Kashmiri people from India,” a party spokesperson said in a statement.

Cow smugglers in Rajasthan shoot at cops, break barricades to try and flee with the bovines

0

Cow smugglers were locked in a battle with the police in Rajasthan’s Bharatpur on the early hours of Monday when the smugglers fired at the cops and also broke barricades, Dainik Bhaskar has reported.

As per the report, the truck being driven by cow smugglers broke a police barrier near Sarsa square which it was being chased by a police van. Following this, the smugglers who were in possession of the bovines started firing on the police, after which they sped away towards the jungle.

Later the police found the truck stuck in a ditch at about 1:40 AM, where 21 cows were found trapped in the vehicle. The report claims that 12 out of the 21 cows were found dead and the rest nine were sent by the police to a cow shelter.

According to an Aaj Tak report, the cow smugglers fled after their vehicle was stuck but the police are yet to ascertain the identity of the smugglers.

As has been widely reported in the past, cow smugglers have time and again been caught indulging in criminal activities to facilitate their illegal trade.

Just a couple of days back, news had emerged from Bangalore’s KR Puram wherein a cow died a very painful death after a gang of unidentified culprits tried to steal it. As per the report, the criminals had tied the poor animal’s legs and were dragging her when she got stuck in a barbed wire. She was later found dead in a pool of blood.

Similarly, it was also reported last month that Muslim cow smugglers were caught sporting Hindu religious symbols to protect themselves from getting caught while being involved in criminal activities like cow smuggling and slaughtering.

Last year it was also reported how a group of tourists were attacked and molested by cow smugglers after they opposed the beating and torture being inflicted upon the poor bovines.

Amit Shah dares Mamata Banerjee to arrest him, Kolkata police says permission for rally already granted

0

BJP President Amit Shah has today stated that he will definitely go to Kolkata to address the BJP Yuva Morcha rally and stated that the West Bengal government can arrest him if they want.


Amit Shah is scheduled to address the BJP Yuva Morcha rally in Kolkata on 11th August. However, the BJP Yuva Morcha had earlier today stated that they are yet to receive permission from the Kolkata Police for holding the rally. Yuva Morcha State President Debjit Sarkar had reportedly informed media that they had submitted a formal application to the police for permission but are yet to receive any communication from them. He had added that the Yuva Morcha would go to the court if the state police refuse to grant them permission.

However, soon after Amit Shah’s statement, the Kolkata police have issued a statement clarifying that they have already granted the permission for the rally.


The Mamata Banerjee led Trinamool Congress and BJP are at political loggerheads over several issues. The recently concluded panchayat elections saw widespread violence and since then many BJP workers in the state have been killed allegedly by TMC goons. Yesterday, after the publication of the National Register for Citizenship list in the state of Assam, Mamata Banerjee has been giving inflammatory statements against BJP leadership and threatening of dire consequences. 40 lakh people in Assam do not have their names on the list that classifies any immigrants who came to India after March 24, 1971, as ‘illegal immigrants’. The BJP has made its stand clear that NRC list is in accordance with the Supreme Court directions and political parties sympathising with illegal immigrants are putting national security at risk. He asserted that the central government is committed to implementing the NRC list to the last full stop.

Understanding the Assam conflict : The NRC final draft is out and the rhetoric is not helping

0

People, in general, are averse to drastic changes. Depending on the implications of the concerned changes, reactions to them can be wide-ranging. However, we can agree that when such drastic changes affect the very way of life of a people, they can and will resort to drastic measures to preserve their culture and their traditions and the ways of their ancestors. The events unfolding in Assam perfectly encapsulates the predicament that a rapidly changing society experiences. Over the past few decades, Assam has undergone a tectonic demographic shift that has the natives suffering an existential crisis. And with the publication of the final draft of the National Register of Citizens, the entire North Eastern region of the country is on the verge of turmoil.

One could perhaps blame the long years of the Congress regime for the current crisis in Assam. But the trouble really began with the mismanaged partition of the country in 1947 itself. A farsighted Prime Minister would have struggled hard to ensure a complete exchange of population involving the Hindu and Muslim residents of the newly created states of India and Pakistan. However, not pursuing such a path set in motion a long series of events that has culminated into a festering wound which threatens to consume the whole of North East India.

The organized genocide of the Bengali Hindu population by the Pakistani Army in present-day Bangladesh forced many to migrate to India and live as refugees, most of whom were Bengali Hindus. Since the Indo-Pak war in 1971, however, the religious denomination of those seeking residence in India has changed vastly. The influx of immigrants into Assam from Bangladesh resulted in huge protests, which often turned violent, that culminated with the signing of the Assam Accord between the Government of India and the leaders of the movement in 1985. The NRC exercise is in concordance with the spirit of the accord that was signed in the presence of the then Prime Minister of India, Rajiv Gandhi.

In some circles, it might be politically incorrect to say such a thing but it remains a fact that the Muslim population has grown at a disproportionate rate in Assam over the past few decades. Such a stark rise in the Muslim population has made the native population wary and fearful of the consequences of becoming a minority community in their own state. Many districts in Assam have witnessed a mushrooming growth of mosques and the expansionist nature of Islam has made many wary of the potential loss of their culture and traditions. It was discovered that many of the accused in the recent spate of rapes in the state were committed by members of the minority community and certain politicians claim that illegal immigration is to be blamed for the rising crimes against women in the state.

In recent years, illegal immigration has been the cause of much violence in the state. In 2012, the Bodoland riots ravaged the state which left 77 dead and hundreds and thousands of others displaced. Sansuma Khunggur Bwiswmuthiary, MP from Bodoland, put the blame on illegal immigration for the violence. Violence erupted after 4 Bodo youths were shot at by unidentified miscreants. Hundreds of villages were destroyed through arson and most of those affected were Bengali Muslims. In response to the riots, Muslim mobs in other parts of India resorted to widespread violence and people from the Northeast were fearful of their lives. Thus, what happens in Assam won’t be confined to Assam alone. It has direct implications for the entire North East and the nation at large.

The conflict is incorrectly viewed through the prism of Hindu-Muslim tensions alone. The ethnic aspect of the matter cannot be ignored as well. A significant chunk of people in Assam is averse to granting citizenship to Bengali Hindus who fled Bangladesh as refugees as well. According to them, the BJP is attempting to make Assam the dumping ground for Bengali Hindus through an amendment of the Citizenship Act which seeks to grant citizenship to minority communities in neighbouring countries, a view that is subscribed to by the state unit of the Congress as well. As the Joint Parliamentary Commission (JPC) on the Citizenship (Amendments) Bill, 2006 began its hearing in Assam, the state was rocked by protests by groups who opposed citizenship being offered to Bengali Hindu refugees from Bangladesh. Hence, there is a significant possibility of the state witnessing a three-way communal strife between the Assamese, the Bengali Hindus and Bengali Muslims. However, there is another section of Assamese people, a much larger section presumably although not as loud as the other, who are of the opinion that Bengali Hindus do not pose a threat to their way of life contrary to Bengali Muslims and that those primarily responsible for the ongoing influx of illegal immigrants into Assam are Bengali Muslims. Therefore, depending on the demography of the concerned regions, riots may well have a religious angle in some and an ethnic angle in others.

The NRC has opened a whole can of worms as no one appears to have any clue as to what fate awaits the 40 lakh people whose names haven’t featured in the NRC. Although the government, on various occasions, has affirmed its commitment to deport all illegal immigrants, there is much doubt whether deportation on such a scale is even possible. R Jagannathan, Editorial Director at Swarajya, has proposed that the illegals be allowed to stay as residents, the only penalty being that they will be struck off the electoral rolls for 10 years after which they will be eligible for citizenship. The only problem with this solution is that it’s not really a solution at all, it is a cop-out. Basically, we are telling people across the border that they can come to India illegally without any consequences and become eligible for citizenship 10 years later. More importantly, such a deal will not pacify the Assamese people. Mr Jagannathan also says, “Moreover, by merely implying that so many people may face deportation, we are asking for communal trouble here.” But we are also asking for communal strife here if we assert that deportation is not an option on the table.

We have to be realistic about current circumstances. There doesn’t appear to be a solution to the problem that would please everybody. And the entire North East appears to be on the verge of imminent turmoil that it cannot escape. Illegal immigration is cancer and sometimes, the only solution to cancer is chemo. And many times, even chemo may not help. A forced deportation of 40 lakh people (the numbers might reduce considering they still have time to appeal and prove their citizenship) might be that chemo although I must admit such an exercise appears impossible to carry out. The situation isn’t helped by politicians like Mamata Banerjee either who are willing to sacrifice the interests of the nation for their own petty politics.

Narendra Modi government provides Supreme Court collegium a ‘proof’ for nepotism in judiciary

0

After politics and film industry, the nepotism bug now seems to have bit the judiciary, if the central government is to be believed. As reported by Times of India, the Centre has written a letter with ‘proof’ to the Supreme Court mentioning the existing nepotism in the appointments within the judiciary.

In the letter, the government has highlighted the relationship of advocates with sitting and retired HC and apex court judges in at least 11 out of 33 recommendations for the Allahabad High Court.

By virtue of a 1993 SC judgement, the chief justice of respective high courts and two other senior-most judges of the court comprise a collegium which identifies suitable candidates, carry out due diligence and recommend names for appointment of judges. The shortlisted candidates are then scrutinized by a collegium of five senior-most judges of the SC headed by the Chief Justice of India. The Central government then undergoes intelligence bureau-led inquiry if a lawyer is slated for elevation to a judge in the High Court and Supreme Court. The Centre can raise objections and seek clarifications, but cannot stop the appointment.

Now, the government had forwarded a list of 33 such advocates recommended for a judgeship by the Allahabad HC collegium with its own findings to the apex court after finding only 11-12 of the advocates recommended competent to be made judges. In an unprecedented move, the government has also mentioned relations of many of these candidates with the sitting and retired judges to put across a point that such appointments should be disregarded so that a level playing field for other competent advocates is created. It was reported that when the recommendation was sent earlier, the law ministry had received various complaints from the Allahabad and Lucknow bar against the recommendations and had asked the intelligence bureau for a background check on each of the candidates. The list had allegedly included the brother-in-law of a sitting SC judge a first cousin of another SC judge besides relatives of former judges of the apex court and the high courts. It was reported that at least 10 judges were in some way related to former and sitting judges of the higher courts.

As TOI reported, this is not the first time that the Allahabad High court has got into such an embarrassing situation. Two years back, the then Chief Justice of India T S Thakur had rejected 11 out of 30 candidates as the recommended candidates were related to the judges and politicians.