Home News Reports Sabarimala Temple Case: Petitioner says she now understands and respects the Temple traditions

Sabarimala Temple Case: Petitioner says she now understands and respects the Temple traditions

The hearing of the Sabarimala Temple case concluded yesterday evening and the five-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by CJI Deepak Mishra reportedly asked the lawyers of both sides to compile their submissions and submit to the court within a week’s time. As reported by Organiser, Advocate Prerna Kumari, who is one of the petitioners in the case demanding the entry of women to the temple, revealed that she respects the sentiments of female devotees of the temple who are ready to wait till they turn 50 and allowed entry to the temple.

Advocate Prerna Kumari reportedly told Organiser that while signing for the petition, she did not have a better understanding of the customs of Tantric traditions being followed in the Sabarimala temple. She added that at that time she just considered that the issue of not allowing women of reproductive age into the temple is a simple matter of gender bias. She admitted that she had later come to know of the real sentiments of women devotees attached to the temple after the popular campaign of #ReadyToWait.

Previously, another petitioner Advocate Sudha Pal had also shared the same views. There are five petitioners in the case. Advocates Prerna Kumari and Sudha Pal reportedly stated that they were under the false impression that the Travancore Devaswom Board had banned women from entering the temple who are actually interested to go and offer puja there. They stated that there were also news reports that the temple had to undergo a purification ritual after actress Jayamala went inside. They both reportedly admitted that this incident had triggered them to approach the court.

- Ad - - article resumes -

Advocated Prerna reportedly added that the desire to pursue the matter legally emanated from their ignorance about the diversity of the Sanatana Dharma. She added that the age-old traditions and customs must prevail in Sabarimala. Both the petitioners reportedly stated that over the years, they have been approached by many women from Kerala and elsewhere and were told that their petition demanding entry is hurtful to the sentiments of women devotees of the temple who obey and respect the traditions faithfully. They reasserted that the media hype of the Jayamala controversy was the main reason behind their decision. Advocate Prerna has reportedly also added that by the time she understood the complete picture, it was too late to withdraw her petition and thus she had refrained herself from making any public statements. She has also added that she is not a member of the Young Lawyer’s Association.

Advocate Prerna also reportedly stated that she has nothing to do with the Happy to Bleed group who had joined the case later in 2016. She added that she is totally against the group and their campaign. Asserting a strong disagreement with attempts to turn the issue as anti-Hindu, advocate Prerna reportedly stated that Indira Jaising had joined later when the case drew national attention after the Happy to Bleed campaign. She added that the issue has been deliberately turned towards hurting the religious sentiments of practising Hindu women.

Both petitioners have reportedly stated that they are happy the honourable Supreme Court has given all parties a chance to table their viewpoints and the issue has been deliberated threadbare. They added that they would honour and welcome the judgement of the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court bench comprising of Justice RF Nariman, AM Khanwaliker, Indu Malhotra and DY Chandrachud, headed by CJI Deepak Mishra has been hearing the case. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi had represented the Travancore Devaswom Board, Mr Prasharan had represented the Nair Service Society, K Radhakrishnan represented the Padalam Royal family, V Giri represented the Tanthri of the temple while J Sai Deepak represented the group People For Dharma, who had led the #ReadyToWait campaign on behalf of women devotees.

Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Big Story

Strange rumours are coming out of Kashmir. Shah Faesal, supposedly, is Doval's stooge.

2019 World Cup Is Here!

Catch the latest on Cricket World Cup as it unfolds, special coverage by Opindia

To Advertise on Opindia.com Click here

Here is why Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy were stopped at the airport and were not allowed to leave the country

Radhika and Prannoy Roy of NDTV have said that they were not allowed to leave the country because of a concocted ICICI loan case. Read about that case in details

P Chidambaram finally arrested by CBI after officers scale wall of his residence as the gates were locked

Chidambaram arrested from his residence after he addressed a press conference at Congress office

Is Shah Faesal Ajit Doval’s asset? Unlikely, Swati Chaturvedi may be unwittingly helping the central government

Strange rumours are coming out of Kashmir. Shah Faesal, supposedly, is Doval's stooge.

Read full details of new FIR filed by CBI: Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy and Vikram Chandra accused of criminal conspiracy, cheating and corruption

A new FIR has been filed by the CBI against Prannoy Roy, his wife, Radhika Roy, and former CEO of NDTV, Vikram Chandra in a case related to money laundering.

Poetic Justice: P Chidambaram falsely hounded Amit Shah and Narendra Modi, now he is on the run for his own transgressions

When P. Chidambaram was the Union Home Minister, Amit Shah was unceremoniously arrested and slapped with charges of murder, extortion, and kidnapping among others over the Sohrabuddin encounter case.

The Zomato controversy: Their business plan, the dispute and a dark tale of greed, exploitation and fear

The controversy stems from deep discounting, favouritism, monopolistic trade practices amongst others, creating a rift between the delivery platforms like Zomato and Restaurateurs

All that Pakistan is left with is a war of misinformation: Here are the myths and propaganda about Kashmir

Pakistan has gone to the two of the most dangerous forces for support- A fanatic faith and cruel communism, latter being more fanatic than the former.

You are a glorified broker who takes all the credit for our product: Restaurateur rips Zomato apart in an open letter

'You are merely a delivery agency. It is not your product. Just do your job and deliver the food', restaurant owner writes to Zomato
Hartosh Singh Bal resorts to factually incorrect details to target Amit Shah

Fact-Check: Unlike Chidambaram who tried to escape from law, Amit Shah resolutely faced trial and was acquitted

Hartosh Singh Bal equated P Chidambaram's disgraceful escape with Amit Shah's tenacity to face the law

19 hours and counting: P Chidambaram abandoned his driver after leaving SC, phone switched off, untraceable since then

Earlier today, a lookout circular was issued against Chidambaram after he was refused interim relief from the Supreme Court.
Subscribe to Day's Top Stories
[newsletter_form type="minimal"]
- Advertisment -

Latest articles

Connect with us

181,042FansLike
171,671FollowersFollow
90,128SubscribersSubscribe
Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post