Home Blog Page 1946

‘They are among top 10 in the world, not arbitrary to classify them as elites’: Delhi HC rejects plea challenging exemptions to Bajrang Punia and Vinesh Phogat

On the 22nd of July, the Delhi High Court dismissed the plea filed by ace wrestlers Antim Panghal and Sujeet Kalkal. The plea had challenged the exemption granted to wrestlers Bajrang Punia and Vinesh Phogat which allowed their direct entry into the Asian Games 2023. 

Justice Subramonium Prasad claimed that the unanimous decision of the ad-hoc committee was not arbitrary or perverse. Claiming that the two athletes are among the top 10 wrestlers in the world, it is not arbitrary to classify them as ‘elite athletes’. 

The court said, “It is nobody’s case that Respondent No.3 & 4 (Bajrang Punia and Vinesh Phogat) are not well known in their respective categories. In fact, both the athletes are in the World Top 10 rankings and, therefore, the categorisation of these athletes as elite athletes also cannot be said to be perverse or arbitrary.”

The court clarified that it was not commenting upon the merits of Panghal and Kalkal as they have also excelled in the field of wrestling, however, it declined to intervene in this matter. 

The court argued that since the Asian Games 2023 will begin in September, there are only two months left, and in case the ‘elite athletes’ sustained injury they would not be able to recover from it. With that, the court added that they are also medals probable and thus the decision to allow them direct entry to the Asian Games was not arbitrary. 

It added, “The Asian Games are to begin in about two months’ time, and in case the injury is caused to the elite athletes, who are medal probables, the time for recovery is extremely low and, therefore, the decision taken by the Committee to exempt Respondents No.3 & 4 (Punia and Phogat) from selection trials in order to ensure that they are not to exposed to injuries during trials cannot be said to be arbitrary or capricious or perverse.”

Earlier on Tuesday, 18 July, the Indian Olympic Association’s (IOA) ad-hoc committee granted exemptions to Punia and Phogat from the trials for the men’s freestyle 65 kg and women’s 53 kg categories. This decision was met with stiff opposition from coaches, current and former athletes, and their parents. 

In a video communication, Antim Panghal raised objections to the ad-hoc panel’s decision. The 19-year-old wrestler from Hisar, along with 21-year-old wrestler Sujeet, currently training in Sonepat, expressed their belief that trials should be conducted fairly, without granting any exemptions to any wrestler. They also emphasised that the entire process should be video-graphed to ensure transparency.

Upset and dejected at the ad-hoc panel’s decision, Panghal asked whether she should quit wrestling completely. 

She said, “Hum pehelwani chhod dein? (Should I quit wrestling?) All I want is a fair trial. I’m not saying that only I can defeat her, there are many women wrestlers out there who can do so.” 

A day after the exemption was granted, on 19th July, under-20 World Champion Antim Panghal and Under-23 Asian Champion Sujeet Kalkal filed a petition in the Delhi High Court challenging the decision by the IOC’s ad-hoc committee. They challenged the exemption and urged the court to direct the wrestling body to conduct a fair selection process for the Asian Games.

The petition was moved by advocates Hrishikesh Baruah and Akshay Kumar. They wanted the court to quash the directive issued by the IOA ad-hoc committee and set aside the exemptions granted to wrestlers Punia and Phogat. 

While Panghal and Kalkal challenged the exemption in the Delhi High Court, several wrestlers and their parents protested at the venue for the trials in New Delhi. Resultantly, the trials at the Indira Gandhi Stadium in the national capital will go ahead behind closed doors on the 22nd and 23rd of July. 

Except for the two weight categories, wrestlers will try their luck to secure a ticket for the grand event scheduled to be held in China later this year. 

On the 22nd of July, the trials for men’s Greco-Roman and women’s wrestling commenced. A day later, on the second and final day, 23rd July, trials for the freestyle team will be held. The committee will oversee trials in a total of 18 Olympic weight categories except for the two for which Punia and Phogat’s have already been exempted.

Karnataka: Three persons arrested over ‘unstable prime ministerial contender’ posters against Bihar CM Nitish Kumar in Bengaluru

Three people were apprehended by the Karnataka police on 22 July in connection with installing posters critical of Bihar CM Nitish Kumar in Bengaluru during the recently completed meeting of the opposition parties. The three persons arrested have been identified as Sriram, Nandakumar, and Mohan, all of whom live in Bengaluru’s Sheshadrip uram neighbourhood.

Sriram sponsored the mounting of the posters, according to the police. They were printed using Nandakumar’s printing press. The tempo that belonged to Mohan was utilised to transport them. The men displayed the posters at twenty different spots throughout the city. They were also concisely placed on the route leading to Bengaluru Airport. The police are now questioning them to learn whether political figures were involved in the instance.

The posters mocking the Janata Dal-United supremo first appeared on 18 July in a number of prominent locations throughout Bengaluru, including the Chalukya Circle, Windsor Manor Bridge and Airport Road near Hebbal locality. They referred to the seasoned politician as an “Unstable Prime Ministerial Contender” along with a picture of him.

The development occurred while opposition parties were conducting a two-day massive ‘unity’ event in the city to demonstrate their power before the pivotal 2024 general elections and create a platform against the incumbent Bharatiya Janata Party alliances.

The posters recounted mishaps of bridge collapses that took place in Bihar during his administration and read, “Bangalore rolls out the Red Carpet for Bihar CM Nitish Kumar. First date of Sultanganj bridge collapse – April 2022. Second date of Sultanganj bridge collapse – June 2023.”

The fact that he was invited to the occasion was also critiqued and stated, “Bangalore rolls out the red carpet for CM Nitish Kumar.” Another derided him and mentioned, “Shri Nitish Kumar, the CM, Government of Bihar, the man who builds underwater bridges.” Additionally, they featured photographs of the fall of the Sultanganj Bridge.

The posters poked fun at his ability to be a strong leader of the opposition. “Sultanganj Bridge, Nitish Kumar’s gift to Bihar, that keeps collapsing. While bridges in Bihar cannot withstand his reign, count on him to lead the ‘Opposition Party’ campaign.”

The police responded quickly and took down the posters after becoming aware of them being displayed at Chalukya Circle, a short distance from the meeting that Nitish Kumar was scheduled to attend.

D.K. Shivakumar, state Congress president and the deputy chief minister of Karnataka had accused the BJP of hanging up the posters attacking the veteran JD(U) leader. He alleged, “It is all our BJP friends’ work. He is a big threat to BJP and by putting up posters against him they are giving him publicity. The Congress party is ready to fight all these forces. Like cowards, they are doing it. Nitish Kumar too knows Karnataka politics well.”

Chattisgarh: ED arrests IAS officer Ranu Sahu in connection with coal levy scam

On Saturday, July 22, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested IAS officer Ranu Sahu in Chattisgarh in connection with the coal levy scam. The arrested civil servant is posted in the state agriculture department. The arrest came after ED conducted raids at her premise on Friday. 

ED counsel Saurabh Pandey said that “Ranu Sahu was arrested for her involvement with an alleged coal levy case, and she was produced in a court hearing Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) cases here to seek her custody.”

Advocate Pandey added that IAS Ranu Sahu has been remanded in three-day ED custody. ED has provisionally attached Sahu’s property worth Rs 5.52 crores.

Meanwhile, Sahu’s counsel Faizal Rizvi termed the grounds of her arrest as “imaginary” adding his client has been arrested despite cooperating in the probe. 

It is notable that Ranu Sahu is the state’s second IAS officer to be arrested in the matter. Last year, 2009 batch IAS Sameer Vishnoi was arrested after he and his wife were found to be in possession of Rs 47 Lacs of unaccounted cash and Gold jewellery of 4 kg.

Sahu, a Chhattisgarh-cadre IAS officer from the 2010 batch had previously served as a collector for the coal-rich districts of Korba and Raigarh.

The ED raided 15 sites across the state earlier this week, including Sahu’s residence in Raipur, in what agency sources claimed was a new case. The agency also raided Congress Treasurer Ram Gopal Agrawal’s residence. The ED has also raided the homes of bureaucrats, lawmakers and business owners in connection with two scams involving the coal levy and the liquor sales.

The ED had previously stated that the illegal coal levy scam involved a cartel of bureaucrats, businessmen, middlemen, and politicians extorting over Rs 25 per tonne of coal moved throughout the state, with the scam estimated to be worth over Rs 800 crore.

In February this year, the Enforcement Directorate filed a second chargesheet in the case at Raipur PMLA court. The ED chargesheet stated that a Chhattisgarh civil services officer Saumya Chaurasia, then employed as deputy secretary to CM Bhupesh Baghel, is the suspected key individual in creating the syndicate led by the main accused Suryakant Tiwari and that she directly obtained profits of crime to the tune of more than Rs 30 crore.

Andhra Pradesh ex-minister killing: CBI presents YS Sharmila as ‘secret witness’ in YS Vivekananda Reddy’s murder case

The CBI’s second and final chargesheet in the high-profile murder case of Former Andra Pradesh Minister YS Vivekananda Reddy was made public on the 20th of July. In its chargesheet, the CBI revealed that its ‘secret witness’ in the case was none other than YS Sharmila. Notably, she is the younger sister of CM Jagan Mohan Reddy and the YSR Telangana party’s founder and President. 

The CBI chargesheet and her statement given before the CBI officials came out on Friday, 21st of July. In her statement, Sharmila stated that his paternal uncle Vivekananda Reddy wanted to ensure that Avinash Reddy doesn’t get a ticket from Kadapa in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. 

She categorically stressed that there is a link between the murder and his political moves targeting Avinash Reddy’s political chances. 

She added that there was a cold war-like situation between the two families of  Vivekananda and Avinash Reddy. It is important to note that both their families are closely related and Jagan’s wife Bharathi is the daughter of Bhaskar Reddy’s sister. 

Sharmila further revealed that her uncle Vivekananda had contested against YS Avinash Reddy earlier. According to her, Avinash’s family may have developed ill will against Vivekananda for these reasons.

Sharmila also told the CBI officials that her uncle had blamed Bhaskar Reddy, his brother Manohar Reddy and Avinash Reddy for his defeat in the Andhra Pradesh legislative council elections in 2017. She added that he then decided to teach them a lesson.

She said, “They might have kept this in their heart that this person (Vivekananda) was coming in their way. It may be a political murder or motive.” 

According to the charge sheet, Sharmila’s testimony has corroborated the agency’s theory that YSRCP’s Kadapa MP YS Avinash Reddy (second cousin of Jagan and YS Sharmila) and his father Bhaskar Reddy are the main accused in this murder case and political motives were the reason for the killing. 

As per the theory put forth by CBI, Avinash Reddy and his father Bhaskar wanted to eliminate Vivekananda as their families had been embroiled in a long-running political rivalry, however, this worsened over the Kadapa MP seat in 2019. Subsequently, the father-son duo allegedly hatched a plan to murder Vivekananda with their aide D Siva Shankar Reddy. Apparently, a few of Vivekananda’s closest aides including Yerra Gangi Reddy, Sunil Yadav, and Dastagir were also involved in this murder case. 

According to the CBI, Vivekananda informed Jagan that he should allocate the party’s ticket for the Kadapa seat to either his mother, YS Vijayamma, or his sister Sharmila. In her statement, Sharmila too confirmed this theory. 

She said that Vivekananda came to her two months before his murder and insisted that she agree to his proposal to keep Avinash and his family out of the fray. She claimed that she accepted his proposal despite the fact that she had apprehensions about whether his brother Jagan would give her the ticket.

In the 2011 by-polls, Vivekananda contested as the Congress candidate from Pulivendula assembly seat. YSRCP had fielded Vijayamma who won the seat. Later in the 2014 polls, Avinash was chosen as the Kadapa MP candidate. When Vivekananda thought that Jagan may not give him the seat for the 2019 polls, so he saw Vijayamma or Sharmila as alternatives to block Avinash’s bid for the ticket. 

Sharmila’s testimony to CBI was recorded on the 7th of October, 2022 at the CBI office in Delhi. On account of that, the CBI had earlier stated that it had convinced a key witness to corroborate its theory. In its final charge sheet, the central agency has charged both Avinash and his father Bhaskar Reddy for planning the murder and hiring four assailants. 

The political blame game

On the 15th of March 2019, YSRCP leader YS Vivekananda Reddy was brutally killed at his residence in the Kadapa district of Andhra Pradesh. He was a former Minister, the young brother of Former Andra Pradesh CM YS Rajasekhara Reddy, and the paternal uncle of current Andra Pradesh CM Jagan Mohan Reddy. The CBI took over the case in July 2020.

Back then, YSCRP released a press note stating, “Preliminary conclusions of the post-mortem stated that YS Vivekananda Reddy had been murdered. The coroner’s report held that there were seven stab wounds on his body made by a sharp object.”

The Police added that the deceased suffered multiple injuries caused by a sharp weapon, probably an axe. 

At that time, YSRCP President Jagan Mohan Reddy blamed the TDP for his uncle’s murder. Demanding a CBI inquiry, he asserted that only a probe by an independent agency could reveal the truth. 

However, later Vivekananda’s daughter Suneetha asked the Andhra Pradesh High Court to allow for a CBI inquiry. She claimed that AP CM Jagan was unwilling to pursue it. 

Four Tihar jail officials suspended for security lapse after terrorist Yasin Malik’s physical appearance at the Supreme Court

On 22nd July 2023, Delhi’s Tihar Central prison authorities took stringent action after a serious security breach occurred on 21st July 2023 when separatist leader Yasin Malik was physically presented in the Supreme Court violating orders. Four officials from Tihar Jail have been suspended in connection with the incident. The suspended officials include one deputy superintendent, two assistant superintendents, and one head warder of jail number 7.

Suspension of Tihar Jail Officials

Delhi prison authorities, led by Director General (Prisons) Sanjay Baniwal, suspended the four Tihar Jail officials after a preliminary investigation pointed to their responsibility for the security lapse. Baniwal ordered a detailed inquiry to determine the extent of the officials’ involvement in the incident. The deputy inspector general (prisons headquarters) Rajiv Singh was assigned the task of conducting the inquiry and submitting a report by Monday.

Director General Sanjay Baniwal stated, “I’ve already ordered a detailed inquiry in the matter to be conducted by deputy inspector general (prisons headquarters) Rajiv Singh to fix the responsibility of erring officials. He has been asked to submit his reports in this connection by Monday as it was a serious lapse on the part of jail officials.”

He added, “We have a clear-cut instruction to produce Malik through video conferencing only. Instead, Malik was produced in person before the court. It’s definitely a gross lapse on our part. The erring officials will not be spared.”

Yasin Malik appearing in court is a major security lapse: Supreme Court

Yasin Malik, who is serving life imprisonment in a terror funding case, made a physical appearance in the Supreme Court despite there being no summon or authorisation from the court for his presence. The apex court, represented by a bench of justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta, expressed shock at his presence and recused from hearing the matter as it was not within their expectation. The court emphasised the availability of virtual modes for appearances, indicating that physical presence was unnecessary.

The Supreme Court clarified that it had not issued any orders mandating Yasin Malik’s personal appearance in court. The court expressed shock and surprise at the incident, highlighting the seriousness of the breach in security protocols. The bench of justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta stated, “There was no such order passed by the Supreme Court asking Yasin Malik to present before it.”

The case for which Yasin Malik appeared in the Supreme Court

The case in which Yasin Malik appeared physically was related to an appeal filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), challenging a September 2022 order passed by a TADA court in Jammu. The order required Malik’s personal presence for cross-examination of witnesses related to the 1990 killing of four Indian Air Force (IAF) personnel in Srinagar and the 1989 abduction of Rubaiya Sayeed, daughter of former Union Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed.

The Supreme Court had stayed the Jammu court’s order in April 2023, issuing a notice to the respondents, including Yasin Malik, to appear either in person or through an authorised lawyer. However, the court’s order did not specifically call for Malik’s physical presence. As per home ministry guidelines, all terrorists are required to present via video conferencing when their personal appearance in a hearing is required, and there is a ban on physically transporting to courts as it is a major security risk.

Solicitor General’s Response and Letter to Home Secretary

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, expressed serious concerns over the security lapse. He brought to light the Ministry of Home Affairs directive, issued under section 268 of the Criminal Code of Procedure, which prevented Yasin Malik’s physical removal from the jail premises for security reasons.

In a letter addressed to Home Secretary Ajay Bhalla, Mehta expressed his firm view that the incident was a grave security lapse. He emphasised the risks associated with Malik’s presence, given his background as a terrorist and separatist with connections to terror organisations in Pakistan. Mehta stressed that the incident not only jeopardised Malik’s security but also put the Supreme Court’s security at risk.

“It is my firm view that this is a serious security lapse. A person with a terrorist and secessionist background like Mr. Yasin Malik who is not only a convict in a terror funding case but has known connections with terror organisations in Pakistan could have escaped, could have been forcibly taken away or could have been killed,” Solicitor General Mehta stated in the letter.

Congress leader says Punjab Congress won’t ally with AAP days after Rahul Gandhi and Arvind Kejriwal came together as a part of I.N.D.I.A

Days after the announcement of an alliance of opposition parties, named I.N.D.I.A and which included the AAP and Congress, the Punjab Congress unit has expressed its disapproval of joining hands with the Arvind Kejriwal-led party. Punjab LoP and Congress leader Partap Singh Bajwa said there is no question of Punjab Congress forming an alliance with the ruling AAP party.

“Congress for a long time has been one of the two major parties of Punjab…People wanted a change, they brought these people (AAP) to power and people have been suffering…Punjab has been suffering be it economically, law & order and otherwise also…I am sure in the 2024 parliamentary elections Congress will come back with a big margin. One alliance is led by BJP the other by Congress, so when cast their vote it is going to be either for BJP or for Congress. AAP does not figure anywhere. Why should we form an alliance with AAP?” Bajwa told ANI.

Objecting to the formation of an alliance with Congress, Bajwa said, “Punjab Congress unit is completely against this (forming an alliance with AAP)… I will meet Mallikarjun Kharge on Monday and will request him to not forge an alliance with them (AAP). We were not in alliance with them in past and will not be in future also.”

Earlier, Punjab Congress chief Amarinder Singh Warring too voiced similar apprehensions regarding the party’s inclination to stitch an alliance comprising AAP. He accused the AAP of targeting its party leaders and said former Punjab Deputy Chief Minister OP Soni was “forcibly put in jail”.

He emphasised that the treatment their leaders received, being targeted and imprisoned, has reached an unacceptable level. Although they refrained from complaining in the past, the recent arrest of their Deputy Chief Minister (former) OP Soni, who is unwell, and was forcefully incarcerated, has crossed the line. Warring held the AAP accountable for any adverse consequences that may befall Soni while in custody. He made it clear that reconciliation between the Congress and AAP in Punjab is out of the question.

The disapproval came days after 26 opposition parties, including Congress and AAP, agreed to be a part of the alliance, dubbed as I.N.D.I.A or the Indian National Democratic Inclusive Alliance, in a bid to stop the Modi juggernaut. However, the staunch opposition it has countered from the Punjab Congress unit suggests that the alliance, which is in all likelihood a consortium of opportunistic political parties driven by the common goal of ousting Modi rather than ideological convergence, may well be on shaky ground as the latent internecine differences surface and threaten to unravel a tenuous coalition.

ISIS is an American phenomenon, have documents to show that the USA trained them: Taliban

0

Taliban appointed Governor of Kabul, Mohammad Qassim Khalid has said that the US is behind Daesh (ISIS) and that the group is an American phenomenon, according to TOLO News.

TOLO News is an Afghan news channel broadcasting from Kabul. Khalid in a special interview with TOLO News said that he has the documents that show the US has trained Daesh. He said: “The enemies do not want Afghanistan to be calm and so they create bias through various ways. Daesh is … produced by the US. It is a fact that Daesh is an American phenomenon.”

Khalid also denied the killing of the co-founder and second leader of al-Qaeda in the capital city of Kabul, Ayman al-Zawahiri, saying that there is no evidence to prove Zawahiri was killed in Kabul.

“The US claims that they eliminated Daesh in Afghanistan. The documents and evidence that would be valid for the media or between countries have not been provided by them,” he said, as per TOLO News.

Khalid also talked about land grabbing in Kabul, saying that 300,000 acres of land has been grabbed by various people.

“Around 150,000 acres of land is being assessed and around 100,000 acres of land has been identified,” he said.

He also urged the former Afghan officials and political leaders abroad to return to the country.

Months after the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan in 2021, the Islamic State-Khorasan (ISIS-K) has mangaed to expand its reach to nearly all of Afghanistan’s provinces. This was stated by the U.N. mission in Afghanistan in November, reported The Washington Post.

ISIS-K has also stepped up the tempo of its attacks, carrying out suicide bombings, ambushes and assassinations. It has claimed 224 attacks in Afghanistan since August 2021, 30 of which were considered significant, according to SITE Intelligence Group, a non-profit that monitors terrorist groups. A bomb blast that killed at least 21 worshipers, including an influential cleric, and injured more than 30 others in Afghanistan’s capital during evening prayers on Wednesday evening, according to Taliban officials and residents, has renewed focus on the threat to the Taliban posed by Afghanistan’s Islamic State affiliate.

Residents of the Khair Khana area of Kabul told The Washington Post that the prayer leader who was killed, Amir Mohammad Kabuli, was an outspoken preacher unaffiliated with any one faction. 

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Pakistan: Power tariff sees a massive increase of up to PKR 7.50 as the bankrupt country scrambles to meet IMF demands

0

As Pakistan moves forward to meet the IMF terms, the federal cabinet authorised a significant increase in the electricity base rate through circulation summary in a late-night decision, according to sources cited by ARY News on Saturday.

Sources privy to the development told ARY News that the federal government has increased the basic power tariff by Rs 3 for some customers and by Rs 7.5 per unit for some other consumers. The cabinet approved a hike in power tariff on the recommendation of the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra).

According to the proposal, the government recommended an increase of PKR 3 per unit for the non-protected residential consumers using 1 to 100 units which will take the current per unit cost from PKR 13.48/unit to 16.48/unit.

Similarly, for the residential consumers using above 700 units, the government proposed a hike of Rs 7.5/unit from the existing PKR 35.22/unit to 42.72/unit.

Sources say the government has sent the matter to the Nepra to increase the tariff and the regulator will hold a public hearing to decide the matter before releasing a final notification. If approved, the new tariff will take effect from July 1.

Nepra on July 14 allowed the federal government an increase of PKR 4.96/unit in base electricity tariff. The move comes as Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had reassured IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva that he would not tolerate an iota of violation of the agreement reached with the global lender.

International Monetary Fund (IMF) asked Pakistan to hike the power and gas tariffs further as details of the IMF-Pakistan deal emerged, ARY News reported on Tuesday.

The details of the Pakistan-IMF deal stated that Pakistan needs to be strict with the monetary policy further to decrease inflation in the country. IMF also welcomed the increase in the interest rate by Pakistan.

IMF asked Pakistan to gradually decrease the subsidy in the power sector, and expenses related to salaries and pension. The country needs to make reforms regarding pensions.

Furthermore, the IMF warned Pakistan to not take new loans from the State Bank and clear the pending dues of the power sector. The IMF country report stated that the State Bank of Pakistan should be allowed to work independently on the monetary policy and autonomy should be given to the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).

The unemployment rate which was 6.2 in 2022, may rise to 8.5 per cent in 2024 in Pakistan, the report added. The financial loss of Pakistan will remain at 7.5 percent and the debt ratio will be 74.9.

However, IMF welcomed the strengthening of Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) through a targeted expansion of the beneficiary base but called for sustained efforts to ensure the enrollment of all deserving families into the CCT schemes.

It is pertinent to mention here that the IMF executive board approved the bailout loan program of USD 3 billion this week after months of delay, boosting Pakistan’s financial stability ahead of elections this year. Fitch Ratings upgraded Pakistan this week on the improving funding environment.

Later, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) received USD 1.2 billion from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as the first tranche of a USD 3 billion bailout to stabilize the economy.

Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, said in a television statement that the remaining USD 1.8 would be released after two reviews, meaning that there would be two instalments.

Pakistan’s foreign reserves had jumped by USD 4.2 billion during the last four days, he said – in a reference to a USD 2bn deposit made by Saudi Arabia and another USD 1bn received from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). 

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

As video of Halal certified tea bags served in a train goes viral, here is why even vegetarian products are forced to get Halal certification

A video of a heated exchange between an official of the Indian railways and a passenger angry after being served halal-certified tea has gone viral. The passenger in the video questioned the railway staff as to what halal-certified tea is and why it was being served during the month of Sawan.

In the undated video, the passenger is heard saying that he is a devout Hindu and that consuming anything with a halal certification hurts his religious sentiments. “Sawan ka mahina chal raha hai, aap halal chai pila rahe hain. Ye kya likha hua hai? Halal certified. Kya cheez hai ye?” the man said.

To this, the railway official is heard telling the passenger that it is a packet of masala chai premix as he points out that the ingredients in the packet are completely vegetarian.

The incident reportedly occurred on the Vande Bharat Express, where the passenger was served the premix tea from the brand ‘Chaizup.’ The passenger was confused and concerned since the tea premix had a “halal certification” even though it was advertised as “100% vegetarian,” especially since it was the Hindu holy month of Shravan.

After the video went viral, IRCTC tweeted a clarification explaining why such products, despite being 100% vegetarian mandatorily need to carry halal certification. “Your concerns are appreciated. The mentioned brand premix tea has the mandatory FSSAI Certification. The product is 100% vegetarian with mandatory “Green Dot” indication. Further, as per the manufacturer, the product is also exported to other Countries which mandates “Halal certification” for such products,” read the tweet.

A fierce debate on social media about food certification and its religious connotations was ignited by video of the exchange. Many people are confused as to how tea premix could be certified as Halal or why is that even necessary. 

In previous articles we have explained how the Halal meat industry practises discrimination against non-Muslims and eventually cuts off non-Muslims from jobs and employment, just to maintain the religious requirements of the Halal process.

Many companies, Islamists, and Halal proponents have clarified that the Halal certificate is also there for non-meat products like vegetarian food items, cosmetics and other FMCG goods. There have been claims from some elements that Halal certification is just a certification for ‘purity and authenticity’, and a Halal certification (on non-meat products) does simply imply that the product is ‘good’.

While it is understandable that Halal slaughter has over the years generated the most revulsion from people, Halal certification for non-animal products should not be ignored either. Although outwardly different, fundamentally, the certification process for both are the same and are intended to achieve the same objectives.

Halal certification is purely religious, even in non-meat products because it considers whether the said products contain any ingredients that are prohibited in Islam. The very idea is discriminatory in itself because the basis of the certification here is a religious belief, whether a certain ingredient is ‘allowed’ in the Islamic faith or not.

So the question here is, why do we need a Halal certificate anyway? And more importantly, what is the justification behind the certification apart from religious belief?

Why even vegetarian products are forced to get Halal certification

Halal India, the certification authority, states that processed food is considered halal if it is not contaminated by ingredients that are considered ‘najis’ as per Sharia Law. Furthermore, the equipment used for its production should not be contaminated with ‘najis’ either. ‘Najis’, as per Sharia law, are substances that make a product ritually unclean. Substances such as alcohol, dogs, swine and milk of animals Muslims are not permitted to drink and other such things are considered ‘Najis’.

There is one marked difference between Halal slaughter and certification for products that do not contain animal products. Halal slaughter can only be performed by a Muslim man. Thus, non-Muslims are automatically denied employment at a Halal firm. There are certain other conditions that must be fulfilled that make it quite clear that it is intrinsically an Islamic practice. Guidelines available at the official websites of certification authorities make it abundantly clear that non-Muslim employees cannot be engaged in any part of the slaughtering process.

However, in the case of products that do not necessarily contain animal products, non-Muslims can be employed for the preparation of the product. However, the certification authorities still only employ Muslims. Therefore, Halal certification is a business operation that makes money off even non-animal products by monopolizing the certification process.

In short, for every product that is sold, a certain amount of the revenue must be handed over to these certification authorities that always employ people who belong to the Muslim community. Essentially, Halal certification is no longer about choice but about making others pay for Islamic beliefs.

It is also important to remember that the Government of India does not mandate Halal certification, it only has its FSSAI certification. Thus, halal certification bodies are a way for Islamic fundamentalists to push themselves into business operations, thereby ensuring that the Muslim community always has a monopoly over a share of the revenue and it is a business model that only employs Muslims.

So when acquiring a Halal certificate is not mandatory then why even in countries where Muslims are a micro-minority, business establishments work overtime to ensure that their products are Halal certified?

This phenomenon is explained quite eloquently by the rather eccentric but brilliant scholar, Nassim Nicolas Taleb, through the concept of ‘The Most Intolerant Wins‘. He asserted that if there is a section of the population, albeit a minority, who will not consume something at any cost owing to their belief system but the larger majority simply doesn’t care enough, then businesses will only be overeager to accommodate the ‘intolerance’ of the minority population.

Thus, if there’s a minority population (say, A) that will only consume Halal products (say, H) and there’s a majority community (say, B) that’s not motivated enough to care either way, then H will become the norm in the market, as it has become, as B will consume H but A will not consume anything but H. H is the lowest common denominator and theoretically, businesses profit more only by appealing to the lowest common denominator. It is pertinent to mention here that this proposition holds true only where secular values have become the norm. This won’t hold true in Islamic societies or Israel.

BJP is planning to pull off another Pulwama-like ‘staged incident’: Mamata Banerjee peddles conspiracy theory, accuses BJP of defaming Bengal

On Friday (July 21), West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee courted controversy for trying to pass off the 2019 Pulwama terror attack as a ‘staged incident.’ She made the contentious remarks during the Martyr’s Day rally at Esplanade in Kolkata.

At about 14 minutes and 37 seconds into her speech, Banerjee claimed, “I will tell the students and the youth that the BJP is planning to pull off staged events such as Pulwama (terror attack).”

“They are planning to create fake, staged videos like in movies. They will stage dramas, shoot videos and defame Bengal. This is their conspiracy,” she brazened it out.

Martyrs’ Day rally is the annual event of Trinamool Congress. It is held to commemorate the death of 13 Youth Congress workers killed in a police firing in Kolkata in 1993. Mamata Banerjee was the State president of the Indian Youth Congress at the time of the incident.

Pulwama suicide bombing attack and a lesson for Hindus

On February 14, 2019, a convoy of vehicles carrying Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel to Srinagar via National Highway 44 came under a suicide bombing attack.

A 22-year-old Adil Ahmad Dar, a Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terrorist from Kakapora in Jammu and Kashmir, rammed his explosive-laden vehicle into a bus carrying the CRPF personnel. 40 of our jawans were martyred.

While India was still mourning the attack, a video of Adil went viral on social media. Recorded prior to the suicide bombing, it gave out a clear message that the Pulwama attack was not just limited to the Indian State but was also an act of vengeance against the Hindu majority.

In the video, the Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorist dehumanised the Hindu community as ‘Hindustan ka Napak mushrikon‘ (impure idol worshippers of India) and ‘Gae ka Peshab Peene Walon’ (cow piss drinkers).

The selective usage of slurs targeting the Hindu community, which considers cows as sacred, made it clear that the Pulwama attack was not just another case of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. It was also on Hindus, the ‘cow piss drinkers.’