Home Blog Page 2290

‘Why not talk about #MeToo on Pratik Sinha?’ ‘IndiaMeToo’ slammed over non-coverage of sexual harassment allegations against Alt News cofounder

On April 12, Arnaz Hathiram, founder of Voice For Men India, raised questions over ‘IndiaMeToo’ not covering allegations of sexual harassment against Pratik Sinha, co-founder of propaganda website Alt News. In a tweet, she said, “Hi IndiaMeToo. Why didn’t you post the #PratikSinha #MeToo story? Your credibility is ZERO when you decide which case is genuine or false.”

She was quoting IndiaMeToo’s tweet which claimed that many survivors of sexual misconduct who came forward during the MeToo movement in India were slapped with defamation cases and legal notices. The tweet read, “Between 2018-2020 dozens of #metoo survivors who spoke up were hit with defamation cases and legal notices. For many in India, there’s little to no access to legal resources. This created a chilling effect and survivors were eventually silenced.”

Speaking to OpIndia Arnaz said, “Being a woman myself, I won’t deny that we do have many sexual predators in our society. Justice cannot be denied to any victim ever. However, the #MeToo campaign, even if started with good intentions, ended up becoming a political tool to fix men who had a certain ideology. There were endless campaigns run with the hashtag #BelieveAllWomen, which effectively declared the word of the woman as final and true.”

Pointing out the bias the MeToo movement in India followed, she said, “Ironically, when men from another side of the political spectrum were being called out, the #MeToo movement became very selective. I clearly remember how Anurag Kashyap, despite an FIR against him, was labelled as innocent by the same champions who ran #BelieveAllWomen campaigns.”

Regarding the importance of highlighting Sinha’s case, she said, “Pratik Sinha’s case can’t be missed as well. At the outset, I have not declared PS to be guilty or innocent. But when the MeToo handle chose not to post the allegations against him, it raised serious questions about the motive behind the movement. One would recall, how back in 2018-19, any man who was called out even from an anonymous handle, was compelled to step down from work, while today PS continues his job as usual. This is not about individual cases. This is about the hypocrisy in the name of ‘Justice for Women’.”

Allegations against Pratik Sinha

In January 2023, a woman accused Sinha of sexual harassment. Sharing her ordeal from an anonymous Instagram handle ‘fightforjustworld’, she alleged that Sinha is not only highly manipulative and a ‘sex maniac’ but also used the same modus operandi that he used with her with other women to get them into a physical relationship with him. The woman also expressed fears of her allegations being dismissed by stating that after her post, she would be called an ‘RSS stooge, a BJP mole’ as she was targeting Alt News but had “been fighting against the right wing with my own means and ways”.

She mentioned having known Pratik Sinha for years and started talking to him in 2020. On the first day, Sinha asked for her number which she gave without hesitation as he was “trustworthy”. In less than two months, he expressed “more than friendship” feelings for her. She told him to wait for two years as she was busy with her academic commitments. They continued to talk.

However, in November 2020, he told her it would not be possible for him to continue the relationship or talk. Next month, he took back his remarks and pushed her to meet. In February, she stopped talking to him but he kept pursuing her. In May, he expressed a desire to continue the relationship and maintained wanting a serious relationship. In July, he asked her to meet before he shifted to Kolkata. In September, they met. After 12 days of the meeting, he told her that he was misleading her, and the assurances he gave were all part of his act.

As she warned Pratik she would go public, his female friend approached her to resolve the matter. She wrote, “He immediately sought the assistance of his friend to mediate, who in turn contacted me. She messaged & called me on the pretext of “trying to resolve the issue” but the real purpose was to dissuade me from going public, to coax me into silence, & thus “protect him”.

The “friend” told her Sinha was in multiple physical relationships with women. As per the “friend”, Pratik was a ‘sex maniac’, “someone who was desperate for sex and would go to any extent of lying to get women into his bed”. Notably, he had been avoiding her calls and messages and even blocked her.

When confronted, Sinha allegedly created a “bad relationship in the past” story. He claimed to have a psychological condition that makes him lie to get what he wants, and he was trying to approach a therapist for the same.

Railway jobs were given by snatching land of poor: PM Modi tears into Lalu Prasad Yadav during inauguration of Delhi-Jaipur Vande Bharat Express

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the first Vande Bharat Express in Rajasthan. The 14th Vande Bharat rail service will operate between Jaipur and Delhi Cantt. Ashok Gehlot, the chief minister of Rajasthan, also attended the event. The Vande Bharat Express is a part of the government’s ‘Make in India’ initiative to modernize the railway system.

While taking during the event, the PM attacked the opposition by stating that previous administrations exploited the railroads for their own political ends. He asserted how the railways were abused and turned into a political arena following independence.

He slammed Lalu Prasad Yadav, the former minister of railways in the Congress-led UPA government, for the ‘Land for Job Scam.’ The ex-chief minister of Bihar and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief Lalu Prasad Yadav and his family are facing allegations of taking land in exchange for railway jobs.

“It was the country’s misfortune that a crucial department like railways, which plays a major role in the life of a common man, was also made an arena of politics. The condition was that there was politics in railway recruitment. By snatching the land of poor people, they were given a job in the railways,” he charged.

The past administrations, according to him, put political considerations ahead of the upgrading of the railways. He criticized them for acting politically self-serving in deciding who would be the railway minister and which train would operate at which stop. He complained that such trains were just announced for political purposes in the budget and were never actually run.

He applauded the present government’s initiatives for modernising the railroads. He noted that beginning in 2014, all circumstances began to alter and the strain of political negotiation was lifted off the railways. He mentioned that the railways have reached new heights and that the revival of Indian Railways has made every Indian proud.

“Rajasthan is getting its first Vande Bharat Express today from Ajmer to Delhi. The Vande Bharat train will boost the tourism industry in Rajasthan. Vande Bharat Express is the first semi-highspeed train that is made in India. It is one of the most compact and efficient trains. It is equipped with a safety system,” he proclaimed.

Vande Bharat Express will start regular service on April 13. It will run from Ajmer to Delhi Cantt, stopping through Jaipur, Alwar, and Gurugram. The train will cover the route between Delhi Cantt. and Ajmer in 5 hours and 15 minutes, per the scheduled timetable.

The indigenously manufactured train is the world’s first semi-high-speed passenger train on high-rise overhead electric (OHE) territory. It will enhance accessibility to popular tourist locations in Rajasthan, such as Pushkar and the Ajmer Sharif Dargah, among other destinations that draw large numbers of people all year long.

Gujarat BJP MLA Purnesh Modi files reply in Surat Court on Rahul Gandhi’s appeal to stay his conviction in defamation case

Bharatiya Janata Party’s Surat West MLA Purnesh Modi on Tuesday filed a reply in Surat Sessions court on the appeal filed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to stay his conviction by the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s court. The district government pleader will submit their response on April 13, the same day as the hearing.

Rahul Gandhi was found guilty of criminal defamation on March 23 and given a two-year jail term by Surat Chief Judicial Magistrate H H Varma. His attorney Kirit Panwala requested an appeal against the ruling in the Surat Additional Session Court of Judge R P Mogera after the court had granted him bail. The Wayanad MP has been disqualified from Lok Sabha following his conviction as per provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

In accordance with Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act (RPA), at the end of his two-year jail term, Rahul Gandhi will be barred from contesting elections for another six years, if his conviction is not suspended.

On April 3, Rahul Gandhi through his lawyer filed an appeal on the stay of conviction, the court, thereafter, ordered the lawyer of the BJP MLA, who is the complainant in the defamation case, to file his reply on or before April 11. On Tuesday, the latter and three of his associates showed up to the Additional Session Judge Mogera’s fourth-floor court where district government lawyer Nayan Sukhadwala was also present.

While the latter asked for permission from the court to file a reply on April 13 since he did not get all the papers, the BJP leader’s attorney Ketan Reshamwala submitted a copy of the reply to the appeal. The request of the govt lawyer was granted by the judge.

“The court had fixed arguments in the first half of April 13. Both Purnesh Modi and Rahul Gandhi will not remain present in the court on April 13. The lawyers from both the prosecution and defence will argue,” stated Ketan Reshamwala, after submitting a copy of the reply to the appeal to the judge.

“We have raised certain issues and objections and we will definitely argue before the court on April 13. The court had fixed arguments in the first half of April 13. Both Purnesh Modi and Rahul Gandhi will not be present in the court,” he added.

Purnesh Modi informed, “As a part of the court proceedings, today I remained present in Additional Session Judge Mogera’s court. I cannot reveal more, as it is a sub judice matter. We have full faith in the judicial system and whatever decision it takes, we will accept it. On April 13, our advocate Harshit Toliya will also remain present in the court for the final hearing.”

On April 3, the convicted Congressman submitted two petitions to a Surat sessions court, one was for bail and a sentence suspension, and the other was an appeal against his conviction. The petition will be heard on April 13 according to the posting by Additional District and Sessions Judge RP Mogera.

The case against Rahul Gandhi was over his remark, “Nirav Modi, Lalit Modi, Narendra Modi, how come they all have Modi as a common surname? How come all the thieves have Modi as the common surname,” which he made on April 13, 2019, during an election rally in Kolar in Karnataka.

Pune BJP’s Ravindra Salgaonkar files complaint against former Dy CM Ajit Pawar over land grabbing case, says he is being threatened

The BJP officials on Wednesday filed a police complaint against NCP leader and former Dy CM Ajit Pawar over a land issue in Maharashtra’s Pune district. The BJP official who filed the complaint has been identified as Ravindra Salgaonkar. He said that Pawar was creating pressure on him over a land issue and that he had been issued severe threats.

According to the TV9 Marathi report, Ravindra Salgaonkar who is the president of Shivajinagar constituency of BJP filed a complaint at the Khadak police station on April 12. He said in the complaint that he was being threatened by Pawar and his associates over a land issue in the district.

Salgaonkar also stated in the complaint that the legal case regarding the land ownership issue is still pending in the court. However, he alleged that Pawar conducted illegal computation of the disputed land. He also reiterated that he was threatened and pressured after he objected to the illegal activities led by Ajit Pawar.

This comes on the day when the Enforcement Directorate (ED) submitted a chargesheet in the Maharashtra State Cooperative (MSC) Bank scam case, in which it had earlier attached the properties of a sugar mill linked to NCP leader and Maharashtra’s former Deputy Chief Minister, Ajit Pawar and his wife Sunetra Pawar, to a court dealing with money laundering cases.

However, Ajit Pawar and his wife Sunetra’s names have been dropped from the ED chargesheet but names of some companies, which came up while probing the MSC Bank scam, have been retained. State BJP President Chandrakant Bawankule while commenting on the issue said that the ED omitted the leader’s name as it found no evidence against the leader. However, Ajit Pawar stated that he has not attained clean chit in the matter and that the ED investigation against him is still underway.

Not one Tamil player: PMK MLA demands ban on IPL team Chennai Super Kings in Tamil Nadu

An MLA in Tamil Nadu has demanded that the IPL team Chennai Super Kings should be banned because it does not have any players from the state. SP Venkateshwaran, a Dharmapuri Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) MLA, made the demand while addressing the state legislative assembly on Tuesday.

He argued that the team should be disqualified since it claims to represent Tamil Nadu even though none of its players is from the region. He made the statement during the demands for funding for the Sports and Youth Welfare Department, claiming that he just reflected public sentiment on the issue.

“Today, the IPL tournament is very popular among the youth. Even though there are many talented players in Tamil Nadu, Chennai Super Kings doesn’t even have one native player. However, the management earns huge commercial profits by advertising to the people of Tamil Nadu as the ‘Tamil Nadu team.’ The CSK team which doesn’t give prominence to Tamil players should be banned,” he said in the assembly.

“A lot of youngsters are watching IPL with lots of interest. Chennai is the capital of Tamil Nadu. Our leader Ayya (Dr Ramadoss) has launched a campaign ‘In search of Tamil’ to raise awareness among youth about the importance of protecting the Tamil language,” the PMK leader later stated while talking to the media.

He alleged, “Many people contacted me and said they are hurt that despite keeping Chennai as part of its team name, it does not provide opportunities for our talented native players and should be banned.”

“I just echoed the sentiments of the people in the Assembly today. They are making profits from our people by projecting as if they represent Tamil Nadu but there are no Tamil Nadu players (in the team). I want more people from our state to be part of the team,” he added.

The incumbent Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government should offer free tickets to IPL games to MLAs, SP Velumani, a former minister from the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), advocated during the same discussion. He noted that his party had done so while in power.

“In the previous regime run by us (AIADMK), we had given up to 400 passes to all the MLAs. But now the DMK government is not providing passes to AIADMK MLAs. This should be considered,” he made an appeal to Udhayanidhi Stalin, chief minister M. K. Stalin’s son and the state minister responsible for developing sports.

Today, CSK hosts Rajasthan Royals at the MA Chidambaram Stadium in Chennai. It will be a significant moment as Mahendra Singh Dhoni will captain CSK for the 200th time in the IPL, the most by a captain in the T20 league’s history.

Exclusive details of fact-finding report on Jihadi violence in Bengal during Ram Navami: Role of Police, Mamata Banerjee, false cases against Hindus and more

A six-member fact-finding team led by former Patna High Court Chief Justice Narasimha Reddy said that West Bengal Police allowed the violence to go on during a Ram Navami Shobha Yatra (march) in the Hooghly district. The interim report of the Fact-Finding Committee headed by Justice L Narsimha Reddy said that the “riots were pre-planned, orchestrated and instigated.”

While speaking to the media, Justice Narsimha said, “There was a concerted effort to attack the Ram Navami procession. The rally started peacefully. At certain localities, police deployment was there. Once the rioters started throwing stones, the police coolly walked away. At residential localities, rioters entered forcefully entered places and broke the glass windows of the residents of the particular section who were busy celebrating Ram Navami.” He further said, “We are not allowed to visit violence-hit areas. Even in areas where they have not implemented Section 144, we are not allowed to go. I think the police department knows that after visiting those places we will get to know what exactly happened there. We are not allowed to meet victims. No one from the police is answering our calls. We feel that police did not take any action in stopping the recent violence and allowed it to happen”. He further stated that police in West Bengal are acting like dictators in this incident. 

This revelation was not just made by the fact-finding team headed by Retd Justice L Narsimha Reddy. Earlier, the Calcutta High Court had also come down heavily on the Mamata Banerjee government and observed that violence orchestrated on the occasion of Ram Navami was prima-facie ‘pre-planned.’ It made the observations while listening to a plea by BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari to transfer the probe in the case to the National Investigation Agency (NIA).

A 2-Judge Bench of Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya and Acting Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam heard the matter. “Internet suspension usually takes place when there has been an external danger or infiltration etc,” the court asked.

“But for a religious procession, we don’t understand why (internet was suspended). Sudden violence is when people are walking and there is an altercation etc. But your (State’s) reports prima facie show these (violence) were all pre-planned,” Acting Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam added. “There are allegations of stones being hurled from rooftops. Obviously, it is not possible for anyone to take stones up to the rooftop within 10 to 15 minutes,” he further pointed out.

These scathing observations have been made by the High Court and the fact-finding committee first and foremost squarely indict the West Bengal government and the police for letting the violence carry on unabated but also busts the narrative of Mamata Banerjee and the entire ecosystem that blamed Hindus for the violence.

OpIndia has accessed the full interim fact-finding report by the team led by Retd Justice Narsimha Reddy and the details contained therein prove clearly that the violence against Hindus on Ram Navami was pre-planned and most importantly, a direct result of instigation. The report has been summarised below in 17 points and 5 demands that the committee has made.

1. The most important aspect of the report is the indictment of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. Saying that the violence on Ram Navami was pre-planned, orchestrated, and instigated, the report says that the direct trigger for the violence was the “grossly inflammatory speech of the Hon’ble Chief Minister of West Bengal”.

The report says, “The Committee has come across several user-generated videos and media reports also reporting multiple videos, which confirms that the peaceful Ramnavmi procession was targeted and the rioters were exhorted to stop and target the procession. In this context the Committee has seen a video of the Hon’ble Chief Minister Mama Banerjee, that is being played across TV media channels, wherein the Hon’ble Chief Minister just before the processions on Ram Navami while sitting on dharna, made a call through a communal speech that any procession passing through ‘Muslim areas’ (as spoken verbatim) will be seriously acted upon. Thereafter, as per the facts and evidence discussed below in this report, it would appear that communally charged mob violence broke out against people taking part in the peaceful Ram Navami processions and at the same time the state police were found completely missing in action to control rioters”.

2. Calling Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee “grossly biased and prejudiced”, the report details how while she failed to control the communal violence and safeguard innocent victims, she went on to claim in a biased manner that the “route undertaken by the Ram Navami procession had been changed at the last moment. The report debunks this claim by the Chief Minister and writes, “Whereas, upon discussion with several victims and participants, it is learnt that the said route had not been changed and also that the route had been intimated to the state police well in advance and was also approved by them”.

3. The report reveals that the Hindus had sought additional security because of apprehensions of communal violence since even in the previous year, Hindus had come under attack in Howrah in the 100-metre stretch.

The state police failed to provide such security in advance and also failed to secure the life and property of procession takers knowing fully well the sensitive nature of the area. “Because of the state’s utter failure, the procession takers were attacked under heavy stone pelting which is visible on record through several self-made videos”, the report says.

4. In a scathing comment, the committee report says that it appears that the police deliberately functioning in a partisan manner, “by choosing not to provide security or take action against rioters to prevent violence, apparently under political compulsions which have resulted in unparalleled violence against innocent persons who had merely intended to celebrate a widely revered festival as common and peaceful citizens”.

5. Even after the violence, the report says that the Chief Minister of Bengal, Mamata Banerjee, continued to make partisan and biased statements where she blamed the Hindus for the violence without inquiry, giving the rioters a clean chit. “The video is particularly disturbing as the Chief Minister of the State without proper enquiry and investigation had effectively given clean chit to a particular community claiming that they cannot do any wrong during the time of Ramzan, thereby blaming the Hindus for the entire chain of violence that had taken place”. This speech, the report says, was a trigger for further violence and riots.

6. The report goes on to talk about how Mamata Banerjee instigated the Muslims further by urging them to take the law into their own hands to teach the Dangabaaz (Hindus, according to her) a lesson. “This video is particularly disturbing as it appears the elected head of the State of West Bengal, who is also the heir of law and order of the State has been explicitly inciting communal violence b making communal comments in her public speeches to win the confidence of the minorities”, the report says.

7. In another scathing comment, the report says that Mamata Banerjee was “influencing the course of the investigation and instigating mob violence on a religious basis through hate speech”. The report also says, “such videos in circulation amount to communal hate speech invoking religion and making a call to violence and kilings”.

8. The most important part in the report alludes to Mamata Banerjee’s speech where she spoke about “Allah”. “In the aforementioned vídeos in circulation, the Chief Minister can be clearly seen addressing a gathering where she is provocating a particular community by invoking the name of Allah and asking them to “khatam” finish the procession takers who she is labelling as”dangabaaz”/ rioters”.

9. Indicting the state police, the report says that the fact that MLA Biman Ghosh was also injured in the violence despite having CISF security speaks to the intent of the state police where they were supporting the illegal and communal elements throughout the course of the violence.

10. Talking about the chequered history of West Bengal, the report says that “All of these acts discussed ought to be seen in the light of a chequered history in West Bengal of attack and desecration of Hindu Temples, including an instance of this Committee having visited such vandalised temple in its visit to Islampur in February 2023”. It talks about the fact that the people of Bengal live under constant fear of the state machinery and their sponsored goons and this is proved by the fact that the victims of the violence during Ram Navami did not even file police complaints because they were scared of the constant threat to themselves and their family. The police, the report says, have not helped the victims, but rather intimidated them with the threat of false cases.

11. Most importantly, the report says that the West Bengal police are making false arrests. “There had been arbitrary arrest and the police have been trying to hide their inaction under the garb of Section 144 of the CrPC and sub-judice subject matter before the Hon’ble High Court”, the report said.

12. Talking about the complete breakdown of law and order in the state, the report specifically mentions certain police officers and their failure to maintain law and order in the state. “The role of Shri Amit P. Javalgi, IPS, Commissioner of Police, Chandannagar and Shri Praveen Kumar Tripathi, IPS, Commissioner of Police, Howrah has been found to be lacking in the control of violence and riot control. There was a very delayed response by the police in the areas where violence was reported. Further, not allowing the committee to visit riot-affected areas only shows the complicity of these senior police personnel in appeasing communal elements creating violence at an unprecedented scale that can also be seen through numerous user-generated videos and personal accounts of affected victims”, the report said.

13. The report reveals that when the committee sought permission from the Commissioner of Police Howrah District and the Commissioner of Police Chandannagar to visit the riot-affected areas for assessment, the permission was arbitrarily denied. Instead, the police issued letters to the committee to not visit the affected areas. The committee on its part responded to the letters, however, when they were left unanswered by the police, they attempted to visit the area, however, they were stopped and not allowed to enter. Calling this a suppression of fundamental rights, the committee then visited a Hindu victim in SSKM hospital who was grievously injured in the violence. The report reveals that even though he was grievously injured, the police refused to file an FIR in the case.

14. It details how on the 8th of April, the committee spoke to the media about not being allowed to visit riot-affected areas. On the 9th, the committee proceeded towards Howrah where they were stopped. Thereafter, they went to meet the Commissioner who refused to meet them or listen to their voices. The committee, the report says, also offered that the police can accompany them to the areas so there are no apprehensions, however, this request was also denied.

The report says, “Since the committee was stopped from entering the areas of violence, an open offer was made to the victims that they are free to meet the committee at their convenience. Subsequent to this 24 victims of the communal riots volunteered to meet the committee in a private and cordial interaction. The fear of violence and retribution was apparent as they feared retribution in case their identities became public through media or other sources. The victims indicated that most of them were either part of a peaceful Shobha Yatra in the Shibpur locality in Howrah, on the occasion of Ram Navami or had volunteered to provide them with water and refreshments along the route on the side of the streets and they were an unarmed and peace-loving citizen. They stated that such Shobha Yatra has been organized regularly on Ram Navami for many years. They further stated that heavy stones were piled up on the rooftop of the buildings and at the moment the procession was passing through heavy stones were pelted started on the procession as well on other members present, which they suspected had been pre-planned and hideouts arranged from buildings from the opposite side and police failed to act in any manner. Thereafter, when residents moved towards their gated societies, the threat persisted and violence was being continued causing injury to peaceful residents including women, children and no less police officials as well as damage to property”.

15. One of the most shocking details that emerged from the report was the police used tear gas and lathi-charged innocent civilians inside their gated communities while not acting against the rioters. The victim who revealed these details to the committee also said that it was seen that as soon as the police left their area, a Muslim mob gathered and started indulging in violence in the area. The mob also entered gated communities to cause damage. The report says that the victim will also be submitting videos to back his claims. Victims revealed further that the police refused to respond to their frantic calls when the mob was indulging in violence despite the police station being only a few hundred meters from the area of violence.

16. The victims who spoke to the committee were in constant fear of state persecution. The report says, “During interaction with the victims, it was apparent that fear of persecution and implication in false cases was rife amongst all. It was requested by almost all victims that their identities be kept confidential. However, they still described the living scenario during the troubled times including that the state police were complicit in the violent acts that continued for a prolonged period, and they deliberately backtracked at instances that contemporaneously led to mob attacks within a span of few minutes in the same spots where the police scattered away from”.

17. In its concluding points, the committee makes the following revelations:

  1. The rioters and their backers acted with the active support of the state machinery.
  2. The damage could not have been this widespread without the active support of the State government.
  3. The evidence points to the active role of the police which allowed the violence to carry on.
  4. The police was aware of the procession being taken out from an area that saw violence last year as well. That they did not give protection despite request proves their role.
  5. The actions of the state police seems to have been motivated and guided by the political advantage that could come by due to the appeasement of a particular community, albeit at the command of their political masters.

The committe made the following demands in their report:

  1. The committee, keeping in view the ends of justice, appropriate police action in the matter by filing of the FIR’s against the culprits behind the riots.
  2. They demanded that the investigation of the riots be handed over to the National Investigation Authority (NIA) to ensure that the investigations are being carried out in a fair, impartial and independent manner.
  3. Give protection to the victims who are living in mortal fear.
  4. Withdraw false cases that have been filed against innocent victims.
  5. Extension of deployment of central forces as a confidence building measure since the people have lost faith in the police.

Ram Navami violence in West Bengal

Several disturbing videos of the incident went viral on social media. A large contingent of police was deployed to contain the law and order situation in the area. The cops conducted a flag march, fired tear gas shells and chased away the rioters.

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had insinuated that violence occurs when Hindus take out Ram Navami processions through ‘Muslim areas’ and also attempted to give a clean chit to the Islamists by invoking their Faith and Ramzan.

On March 30 this year, stones were pelted on a Ram Navami procession from the terraces of the buildings in the Shibpur area of Howrah. This led to a clash between the Hindu and Muslim groups, leading to violence and arson. Vehicles and shops were also torched during the attack.

Bollywood singer Lucky Ali apologises for his ‘Brahman are a lineage of Ibrahim’ Facebook post

After facing backlash over his Facebook post claiming that ‘Brahman’ comes from ‘Abraham’, Bollywood singer Maqsood Mahmood Ali alias Lucky Ali apologized for the same on Tuesday.

In a Facebook post, addressing the controversy around his Facebook post, singer Lucky Ali claimed that he did not intend to cause anger or distress among people rather he only wanted to ‘bring people together’. The singer also added that after seeing ‘Hindu brothers and sisters upset over his controversial post, he will be careful about what he is posting and how he phrases his thoughts.

“Dear Everyone, I realise the controversy of my last post. My intentions were not to cause distress or anger to anyone and I deeply regret that. My intentions, instead, were to bring us all closer together… but I realise how it didn’t come out in the way that I meant it. I will be more aware of what I am posting and of my phrasing as I see now that it has upset many of my Hindu brothers and sisters. For that, I am deeply sorry. I Love you all…,” the singer wrote in a Facebook post. 

Notably, in a now-deleted Facebook post, singer Lucky Ali, had asserted that the word ‘Brahman’ is derived from Brahma which comes from Abram which comes from Abraham or Ibrahim. The singer had not cited any scriptural evidence to back his claim linking the concepts of the Hindu religion to that of Abrahamic ones. 

“The name ‘Brahman’ comes from ‘Brahma’ which comes from ‘Abram’…which comes from Abraham or Ibrahim… ‘Brahmans’ are a lineage of ‘Ibrahim Aliahisalam – The Father of all Nations.’ “So why is everyone just arguing and fighting without reasoning amongst themselves?”

Lucky Ali’s now-deleted Facebook post

Although the backlash compelled the singer to delete his contentious post and apologize for the same, Ali’s attempt to paint Brahmins as descendants of Ibrahim is yet another endeavour to reinforce the supremacy of Abrahamic faiths, which are just 1,400-2,000 years old, and belittle the millennia-old Hindu civilizations that trace the roots of the faith back several thousand years. It also illustrates the longstanding Abrahamic practice of casting themselves as the fountainhead of all civilizations, from which different cultures and religions branched out.

Maharashtra: ED submits chargesheet in MSC bank scam case, drops names of former Dy CM Ajit Pawar and wife Sunetra

On Wednesday, the Enforcement Directorate submitted a chargesheet against the Maharashtra State Cooperative (MSC) Bank, in which it had earlier attached the properties of a sugar mill linked to NCP leader and Maharashtra’s former Deputy Chief Minister, Ajit Pawar and his wife Sunetra Pawar, to a court dealing with money laundering cases.

However, according to the reports, Ajit Pawar and his wife Sunetra’s names have been dropped from the ED chargesheet but names of some companies, which came up while probing the MSC Bank scam, have been retained. The matter is listed for hearing on April 19.

In July 2021, the Enforcement Directorate revealed that, in a case involving the Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank, it had attached assets such as land, a building, equipment, and machinery worth over Rs 65 crore (purchase price in 2010) of Jarandeshwar Sahkari Sugar Mill, which is situated in Koregaon in Maharashtra’s Satara district. The assets were leased to Jarandeshwar Sugar Mills Pvt Ltd by Guru Commodity Services Pvt Ltd.

During its investigation, the ED discovered that Sparkling Soil Pvt Ltd, a business connected to Ajit Pawar and his wife Sunetra, owned the bulk of the shares in Jarandeshwar Sugar Mills. The ED’s first such step in the Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank scandal, in which the bank is alleged to have fraudulently issued loans of Rs 25,000 crore, was the seizure of the Jarandeshwar Sugar Mill in Satara.

The MSC Bank scandal came to light after a PIL was filed in the Bombay HC by four petitioners. The petitioners said that several sugar mills failed to make payments on loans totaling crores, and that banks had seized the mills and sold most of them at auction to various officials, including prominent politicians.

One of the bank’s directors, Ajit Pawar, bought a few mills during the auction. The Economic Offenses Wing then conducted an investigation after the Bombay High Court ordered to file a FIR.

The ED then submitted an intervention in opposition to the closure report that the EOW had filed before the Mumbai Sessions Court in 2020. Additionally, protest petitions were submitted by petitioners in opposition to the closure report.

According to the central investigation agency’s investigations, Guru Commodity Services Pvt Ltd was a fictitious business used to purchase Sparkling Soil Pvt Ltd, while the sugar mill was truly owned and operated by the Jarandeshwar Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd. “The major part of the funds utilised towards purchase of SSK was received from Jarandeshwar Sugar Mills Private Limited, which received the same from Sparkling Soil, a company related to Ajit Pawar and his wife,” the ED said in a statement.

Further investigation found that between 2010 and 2021, Jarandeshwar Sugar Mills utilised Sparkling Soil Pvt Ltd as a means of acquiring loans totalling almost Rs 700 crore from the Pune District Central Co-operative Bank and other financial institutions.

Punjab: Four dead in firing at Bathinda Military Station, search ops on

0

Four deaths were reported in a firing incident in Punjab’s Bathinda Military Station on Wednesday morning, the Indian Army said.

As per a statement by Army’s South Western Command, the firing incident occurred at around 4.35 am inside the Bathinda Military Station. “Four casualties were reported in the incident. The Station Quick Reaction Teams were activated and the area was cordoned off and sealed. Search operation in progress”, as informed by HQ SW Command. 

Further details on the incident are awaited.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Govt attempting to get Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj’s ceremonial sword ‘Jagdamba’ from the UK for a year: Read how it went to London

0

One of the three popular swords of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, ‘Jagdamba’, may soon travel to India from the United Kingdom (UK) for a year. The sword will be kept in a museum to commemorate the 350th anniversary of the famed Maratha ruler, as per reports.

As per records, Shivaji IV, the descendant of Maratha King Shivaji, presented the sword to Albert Edward, then Prince of Wales and later King Edward VII, during his visit to India in 1875-76. At that time, Shivaji IV was only 11 years old. As per the Indian Express report from 2022, the sword was more of a coercive extraction by the British rather than a genuine gift. Shivaji IV was forced to “gift” the sword like many other kings of that time. The three popular swords of Shivaji were named ‘Bhavani’, ‘Jagdamba’, and ‘Tulja’.

The sword currently resides at Saint Jame’s Palace in London under the purview of the British Royal Family. As per the Hindu’s report, the government of Maharashtra has started talks with the centre to bring back the sword. Speaking to The Hindu, state Cultural Affairs Minister Sudhir Mungantiwar said he would hold discussions with the officials in the UK. The central government will be the guarantor for the sword to get it back to India briefly.

He said, “I will personally reach out to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in this regard. We wish to keep it in Maharashtra for at least one year. It is touched by the Maharaj [Shivaji Maharaj] and is extremely valuable for us since.” Mungantiwar added, “It will be a moment of pride if we get back the Jagdamba sword to mark the 350th anniversary of Shivaji’s coronation in 2024. Once we get the sword, we will organise a series of events across the State for the special day.”

Notably, after India gained independence, Bal Gangadhar Tilak was the first Indian leader to make an attempt to bring back the sword. Later, several Chief Ministers of Maharashtra, including first CM Yashwantrao Chavan, attempted the same.

According to historian Indrajit Sawan, author of Shodh Bhavani Talwaricha (In search of Bhavani sword), when the Prince of Wales scheduled a visit to India, he had instructed the British officials to find the “best antique” weapons with historical significance for his collection. Several Indian Kings, including Shivaji IV, “gifted” him weapons during the visit. As a return gift, Shivaji IV was presented with a sword that is currently placed at the New Palace Museum at Kohlapur.

The Maharashtra government has been trying to bring back the sword since November November 2022. At that time, Mungantiwar said he would discuss with British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to bring back the sword.

The dimensions of the historic sword are “127.8 x 11.8 x 9.1 cm”. The length of the blade is 95 CM. Its catalogue at the museum reads, “Sabre: Maratha straight, one-edged old European blade, with two grooves on each side, in one of which IHS is stamped three times; the raised steel supports at the hilt are damascened with gold in floral designs; the guarded hilt is iron with a broad knuckle guard and a circular pommel, terminating in a spike and encrusted with heavy open-work floral decoration of gild thickly set with large diamonds and rubies. Presented by H.H. the Maharaja of Kolhapur as a relic of the Maratha Chief Shivaji to whom it formerly belonged.”

The devotion towards the sword and other items of Shivaji Maharaj

Many Indian tourists who visit the British Museum have been seeing paying respect to the items belonging to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.

Recently, a video by Karan Sonawane, who goes by the handle FocusedIndian on Instagram, went viral where he was seen paying respect to items on display that belonged to Shivaji Maharaj. He noted that the Jagdamba Talwar was not on display in the museum. It is in the private collection of the Queen. Only the ‘Vaaghnakh’ was on display.

Kohinoor was “gifted” to the British just like the sword

It is pertinent to note that the famous Kohinoor diamond was also “gifted” to the British in the same way as the sword of Shivaji Maharaj. During the Second Anglo-Sikh War in 1849 AD, the British army made Raja Ranjit Singh’s son Duleep Singh surrender the Sikh empire. Following that, the British Government in Lahore entrusted the famous Kohinoor diamond to the treasury of the British East India Company. When Duleep Singh, then 11 years old, ‘surrendered’ the Sikh kingdom to the British, it is said he also surrendered the Kohinoor diamond.