Home Blog Page 6501

West Bengal: Brother of BJP Panchayat Member shot dead in Malda, Trinamool goons blamed

Patanu Mondol, brother of a Gram Panchayat member from the BJP in West Bengal, Utpal Mondol, was murdered at Malda on Thursday. Mondol was allegedly shot dead by miscreants from Trinamool after barging into his home.

“We have received a complaint of murder against two persons, but they are on the run. Central paramilitary personnel will conduct route march in the area to restore confidence among the locals before the election,” a senior police officer of Malda district was quoted as saying.

District BJP president Sanjit Mishra blamed the Trinamool for Mondol’s murder. He said, “Mondol used to work as a civic police volunteer for Harishchandrapur police station. Earlier, Trinamool workers framed him in a false case and he lost his job. Thereafter, he became a BJP leader in the area and a couple of days ago he was instrumental in organising a rally in the area where more than 1,000 people gathered, unnerving the ruling party workers. Trinamool-backed goons have killed Mondol.”

“Since that victory last year, the family has been facing pressure from local Trinamool leaders. After Utpal’s victory, Trinamool workers set fire to his (Utpal’s) house and damaged the jute that he cultivated. Ruling party workers were also putting pressure on Patanu to join the Trinamool,” he added.

Khagen Murmu, the BJP candidate for Malda North, echoed Mishra’s sentiments as well. “He was our active worker and used to organise meetings. TMC-backed goons have killed him and the party is trying to spread terror before the polls,” he said.

The TMC, on the other hand, accused the BJP of murdering Mondol. Dulal Sarkar, TMC’s Malda district president, said, “The brother of the victim, Utpal, has already joined the Trinamool, and has been appointed the pradhan of local gram panchayat. Inspired by the development spree of the state government, Patanu, too, was also planning to join the Trinamool. BJP-backed goons killed him because of this.”

“The BJP is blaming the Trinamool for anything that is happening in Malda. They are trying to politicise every incident to gain mileage. Trinamool Congress is not involved in this incident at all,” said Moazzem Hussain, TMC’s candidate for Malda South.

Political violence has been a harsh reality in Mamata Banerjee’s Bengal. The Panchayat elections in the state were riddled with extreme violence and numerous cases of murder. There were numerous instances of murders, attacks, and vandalism. Even ballot boxes were looted and found destroyed in multiple areas. The TMC government is being charged with employing goons to intimidate its political rivals.

In 2018, there was a series of murders of BJP workers as saffron in the state began to rise as a serious political force. Earlier in January, a woman was gang-raped because her husband is a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party.

Congress: It is all about loving your family (business)

What is the similarity between the grand old party and Bollywood? Their constant state of denial when it comes to ‘loving their family’, or in other words, nepotism.

In both the industries (I would call Congress an industry because it is run more like a family business than as a political party), there is no educational qualification requirement. National Conference leader Farooq Abdullah, another product of nepotism who perpetuates the same, had said how a politician making his child a politician is the same as a doctor making his child a doctor. Abdullah Senior (or should it be Abdullah junior if I were to refer to him as Shaikh Abdullah’s son?) clearly forgot that even if a doctor wants his child to become a doctor, the child will still have to clear all medical examinations to become one. Just because the child has seen the parent being a doctor, he/she magically cannot become one.

Similarly, if you are born into the Nehru-Gandhi family, by default your career is ‘politician’ with aspirations of being a prime minister of India. Like the Kapoors of Bollywood. But only a few made it to the A-league and gave hits, and others faded into oblivion (like Karan Kapoor and Kunal Kapoor, Shashi Kapoor’s children who disappeared from Hindi film industry without a trace).

Usually, defenders of nepotism argue that in politics, people elect their representative and in Bollywood, the audience makes a film a hit or a flop. These delusional fans forget that nepotism doesn’t guarantee success, but it just gives the star kids easy access and more opportunities to try succeeding or just failing better. Just like the Gandhis in Congress. Just because Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi’s father, grandmother and great grandfather were prime ministers, does not automatically give them the easy access to the prime minister’s chair or the right to become the Party President without proving one’s worth.

This is also why Rahul Gandhi, who seems to have realised that Amethi may not a ‘safe’ Congress seat, which The Family has won since the 80s, is now scouring for another ‘safe’ seat.

Another similarity between family-run political parties and Bollywood is that if you are even married into The Family, your entitlement quotient increases. A spouse of a forcefully successful film star kid sometimes gets to become a producer (for taxation purposes) or an interior designer or a fashion designer. Similarly, a spouse of The Family will have country’s top lawyers defending them in various cases like money laundering. The entitlement is such that even when one is neck-deep in corruption allegations, as a spouse of The Family, one casually expresses the desire that they would contest elections if The Party wants them to. ‘If the party wants me to,’ is the political equivalent of ‘I will kiss if the story demands’.

The contempt for those who are the ‘outsiders’ in the industry is also a common factor. We all know how Kangana was mocked at, and continues being mocked at only for speaking out the obvious. An ‘outsider’ dared to say that the star kids have it easier. An ‘outsider’ Modi dared to challenge The Family. A man, who once sold tea at a railway station is now prime minister of world’s largest democracy which till now had one or the other Family member at the helm of the affairs.

How dare he? How dare he believe that the country is not an ancestral property which gets handed down through generation? How dare he not have a ‘vansh‘ for whom he could accumulate wealth? How dare he dream of an India which is not run by The Family?

Rahul Gandhi makes attractive promises for Startups, but Modi govt has already implemented them

As the Lok Sabha election approaches, Congress President Rahul Gandhi seems to have changed his campaign strategy from attacking BJP with lies to making promises. After promising the minimum income guarantee scheme, today the Congress president made some promises for startup businesses. He made 4 specific promises for startups: zero permissions for the first 3 years of any new business, elimination of angel tax, incentives and tax credits based on new jobs created by the business, and easy bank credit.


This announcement was celebrated by Congress supporters as Rahul Gandhi is promising something which was never available in the country, and hailed it as revolutionary thinking. But if we go into details, it can be seen that what Rahul Gandhi is promising, the Modi government has already delivered.

One of the major initiatives taken by prime minister Narendra Modi was the Startup India initiative, and the promises made be Rahul Gandhi are already covered by this. The Startup India already has provision for Single Window Clearance for starting a business, and it has the facility of self-certification for compliance with various labour and environment laws through a web-based portal and mobile app-based interface.

Under the Startup India scheme, no inspection of is done in the first three years regarding labour laws. Starting a new business just requires registration on a website, it does not need filling up pages of forms and doing the rounds of government offices.

Startup businesses are already exempted from paying tax for 3 years, irrespective of how many people they employ. While Rahul Gandhi proposes to link tax exemption with employment generation. This means, if a Congress party-led government comes to power, they will withdraw the 3-year blanket tax holiday and replace it with a complex incentive and tax credit system linked to the number of jobs created by a startup.

The Startup India initiative also has set up a fund of ₹10,000 crores to support startups which can be tapped by new businesses registered under this scheme as venture capital. The Modi government has also launched a 59-minute loan scheme for MSMEs, where the businesses can obtain approval for loans from ₹10 lakhs to ₹1 crore in just 59 minutes. This loan is provided without any collateral, and the application for the loan is to be submitted online, without visiting any office or bank.

For amounts below ₹10 lakhs, entrepreneurs can avail loan under the Mudra scheme, which also provides loans without any collateral or security. Startups are also guaranteed funds through National Credit Guarantee Trust Company or SIDBI over 4 years.

Rahul Gandhi promises to remove the angel tax, but he fails to mention that it was the UPA government that had introduced it in the first place. The angel tax, which comes under section 56(2)(VIIB) of Income Tax Act, was introduced by the UPA government in the 2012 union budget, but surprisingly media reports slamming it started appearing only after Modi government came to power.

It may be noted that recently the government has relaxed the norms of Angel Tax for startups. It is a mystery that while the same Angel Tax is there since 2012, it became an issue only 2-3 years ago, and Rahul Gandhi promises to remove what was originally introduced by his own government, ostensibly to curb black money.

Not only Modi government is already fulfilling the promises by Rahul Gandhi, but there are also several more benefits under the Startup India initiative. Startup businesses can participate in government tenders without the requirements of prior experience and minimum turnover. Startups are exempted from capital gains tax for a long time, and there is a provision of 80% reduction in patent filing fee for such businesses. Winding up businesses is also made easier, with the provision for closing up a venture in just 90 days.

Therefore, what Rahul Gandhi is promising for new businesses, the Modi government is already providing the same, and much more.

Will get more seats in 2019 than in 2014: PM Modi to Republic Bharat

Prime Minister Modi today in an interview to news channel Republic Bharat has asserted that the BJP-led NDA will not only win the 2019 general elections but also win with more seats than in 2014. Taking on the Mahagathbandhan, the coalition of opposition parties, PM Modi said that the opposition today is more scattered than it was in 2014.

“In Bengal, Kerala and Odisha, has there been any understanding between the Opposition parties? Then how is the gathbandhan working? It is not yet happening. If people of this country have decided to give us the majority, then who can keep us out even if they decide to ally up after the polls are done? The country has made its decision to ensure full majority and reinstate the NDA government, no one can question that,” PM Modi said adding that the BJP, as well as all its allies, will definitely win more seats than 2014.

Adding that even when it is the ruling party, it is his responsibility as a prime minister to work together with the opposition. “Be it Congress or Mamata or Mayawati, I am committed to work together with them,” he asserted that the people of the country are in favour of giving a strong mandate and full majority to the government.

Taking on the false promises of Congress, PM Modi said, “They have been talking about poverty since decades. Nehru, Indira, Rajiv, Sonia and now Rahul is also parroting the same.” He added that if the people of the country sit and read all the promises made by the opposition, they themselves will agree that they should never be given the charge to form the government.

India disappointed over Pak’s response to the dossier containing evidence of JeM’s involvement in Pulwama terror attack

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has expressed disappointment over Pakistan’s response to the detailed dossier sent by India to Pakistan containing the evidence of Jaish-e-Mohammad’s (JeM) involvement in the Pulwama terror attack and the presence of JeM’s training camps and its leadership in the territory of Pakistan.


In a statement issued by the MEA, the Ministry said that it is not surprised by Pakistan’s response as the country had acted in a similar way after the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks and after Pathankot terror attack in 2016.


The MEA said that Masood Azhar is based in Pakistan and this fact was admitted by Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Mehmood Qureshi before International media.

Earlier in the day Pakistan shared its “preliminary findings” to India on the Pulwama terror attack and denied having any role in it. The country claimed that it had examined the 22 pin locations provided by India and found no terror camps also sought further evidence from India. It also sought further evidence from India. “We have sought further information/evidence from India to take the process forward,” said Pakistan Foreign Ministry.

India’s dossier contained 91 pages and 6 parts. Pakistan has stated that only part 2 and 3 were related to the Pulwama incident and hence the foreign office has responded to those parts only.

Article 35A is constitutionally vulnerable, hampering economic growth of Jammu and Kashmir: Arun Jaitley

Finance minister Arun Jaitley has said that Article 35A of the constitution is hampering the development of Jammu and Kashmir instead of helping the state. In a Facebook post published today, Jaitley said that Article 35A was surreptitiously included by a Presidential Notification in the Constitution in 1954, and it was neither a part of the original constitution nor it was inserted as a constitutional amendment. He also asked whether the policies of Nehru for the state was a historical blunder or was it the correct course to follow.

Jaitley said that as the article discriminates between people of Jammu and Kashmir and Indian citizens from outside the state, the state is suffering. As people from outside the state can’t get jobs, can’t own property and their children can’t get admitted to government institutions, people from outside the state are unwilling to go to the state. Businesses also don’t want to invest in the state due to the same reason. Article 35A has prevented investment and dismantled the State’s economy, Jaitley said.

The finance minister added that Article 35A is constitutionally vulnerable, and while it is used as a political shield by many, it has hurt the common citizen of the state the most. It denied them a booming economy, economic activity and jobs, he said.

The complete text of Arun Jaitley’s blog has been reproduced below:

The Rule of Law and the State of Jammu & Kashmir

The seven decade history of the State of Jammu & Kashmir confronts changing India with several questions. Was the Nehruvian course, which the State had embarked, a historical blunder or was it the correct course to follow? Most Indians today believe that it is the former. Does our policy today have to be guided by that erroneous vision or an out of box thinking which is in consonance with ground reality?

The Article 35A misadventure

Article 35A was surreptitiously included by a Presidential Notification in the Constitution in 1954. It was neither a part of the original Constitution framed by the Constituent Assembly, nor did it come as a Constitutional Amendment under Article 368 of the Constitution which requires an approval by two-third majority of both Houses of Parliament. It came as a Presidential Notification and is a surreptitious executive insertion in the Constitution.

It gives the right to the State Government to discriminate between two State citizens living in the State on the basis of declaring some as permanent residents while leaving out the others. It also discriminates between permanent residents of the State and all other Indian citizens living elsewhere. Lakhs of Indian citizens in J&K vote in Lok Sabha elections but not in Assembly, municipal or Panchayat polls. Their children cannot get government jobs. They cannot own property and their children cannot get admitted to governmental institutions. The same applies to those who live elsewhere in the country. The heirs of ladies marrying outside the State are disinherited from owing or inheriting property.

How Article 35A hurt the people of Jammu & Kashmir?

The State does not have adequate financial resources. Its ability to raise more has been crippled by Article 35A. No investor is willing to set up an industry, hotel, private educational institutions or private hospitals since he can neither buy land or property nor can his executives do so. Their ward cannot get government jobs or admission to colleges. Today, there are no major national or international chains which have set up hotel in a tourism centric State. This prevents enrichment, resource generation and job creation. Students have to travel all over, including Nepal and Bangladesh, to get college admissions. Engineering colleges and hospitals, including super-speciality facility set up by Central Government in Jammu are lying under-utilized or unutilized since Professors and Doctors from outside are unwilling to go there. Article 35A has prevented investment and dismantled the State’s economy.

Article 35A, which is constitutionally vulnerable, is used as a political shield by many but it hurt the common citizen of the State the most. It denied them a booming economy, economic activity and jobs.

Our faith in the mainstream parties of the Valley and the disappointment with them

Governments at the Centre have always desired that despite political differences we must allow more space to the mainstream parties in the Valley so that the separatist space is shrunk. Three families, since 1947, dominated that mainstream space. Two of them are based out of Srinagar and one in New Delhi. Regrettably, they let down the people of the State. The two major mainstream parties, even when they condemned terrorism, it was always with ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’. It is only their absolute distancing from separatism, violence and terrorism that can create an alternative space. Being soft in criticizing separatism does no good. It is for this reason that their own space has shrunk. This is the country’s disappointment with them.

The present situation

Why should the rule of law that applies to the rest of the country not apply to the State? Should violence, separatism, mass stone throwing, vicious ideological indoctrination be allowed on the plea that if we check it, it will have a negative effect. It is this misconceived policy that has proved to be counter-productive. Today, the present government has decided that the rule of law in the interest of the people of Kashmir Valley and the larger interest of India, must equally apply to the State of Jammu & Kashmir.

The Jamaat-e-Islami, in the last several years, has indulged in ideological indoctrination which provided the manpower resource for separatism. It transformed the Valley from the liberal land of ‘Sufism’ to hardcore ‘Wahhabism’. It has been banned. Hundreds of its activists have been arrested. Its offices have been sealed. Its activities have been significantly curtailed. The Jammu & Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF), which was working over-ground, has also been banned. Several of its people have been arrested. Separatists and Hurriyat leaders, as also several undeserving cases numbering in hundreds, have had their security withdrawn. You cannot advocate a break away from India and expect India to secure you.

The NIA has cracked down on terrorist funding. The Income-tax Department has swung into action after seventeen years and discovered several sources of anti-national funding. The CBI is looking into 80,000 gun licences given in recent years.

All this has witnessed insignificant protest, no mass stone throwing incidents, reduction in domestic recruitment to terrorist organisation. The past few months have witnessed the neutralisation of the largest number of militants.

The developmental activities

Today, the Government offices are opening and working regularly. Attendance has gone up. Several corrupt officials have been booked and are in prison. Nepotism in appointment has been done away with. There are no interviews conducted. They have been abolished. Multiple legislations have been passed and several legislative measures taken by the Central Government for SC/ST and weaker sections, have been extended to the State. 42,000 new posts have been created in the last six months.

Infrastructure projects, including the Mass Rapid Transit Corporation for both the cities of Jammu & Kashmir, the Ring Road for the two cities, AIIMS in both the regions, an IIT and an IIM in Srinagar and Jammu respectively are projects which have been resolved in the last few months and are progressing further. The State has become ‘open defecation free’ with hundred per cent sanitation. Every house has already been electrified. Several long pending projects in three regions have been cleared. Fifty new colleges in the State have been sanctioned and 232 schools upgraded. A lot of decentralisation of finances has taken place.

More power has been given to Ladakh and Kargil Autonomous Hill Development Councils. A Ladakh Division has been created. A new university has been established at Ladakh.

The separatists and the terrorists have been badly hit. The two mainstream parties are only giving television bytes and their activities are confined to social media. The people of the State are welcoming the steps taken. They wanted peace and freedom from violence and terror. The rule of law is being enforced in the Valley and is ensuring people a safe and peaceful life.

 

Congress leader Digvijaya Singh resorts to personal attack against PM Modi over his marital status & education

0

In what appears as an attempt to regain Congress high command’s confidence back, sidelined Congress leader Digvijaya Singh launched a personal attack against PM Modi on Thursday. Singh claimed that PM Modi had kept his marital status and educational qualification hidden.


While addressing the media, Singh alleged suspicion against PM Modi for concealing his marital status until 2014 elections and also keeping his educational qualifications hidden. “I’m not getting personal but why did PM Modi hide his marital status up until 2014 Lok Sabha polls? Why he has still hidden his educational qualifications? Everyone wants to know about it,” he said.

This is not the first time that Congress leaders have resorted to ad hominem attacks against PM Modi. A few months back, Congress leader Vilasrao Muttemwar had said that nobody knows who Modi’s father is. Before this, Actor-turned-politician Raj Babbar had dragged PM Modi’s ageing mother after he compared the devaluing rate of the Indian rupee to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s aged mother. Senior Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar had referred to PM Modi as a ‘Chaiwala’ and had once called him as ‘neech insaan’. Shashi Tharoor had called him a ‘Scorpion sitting on a Shivling’ and that’s why they cannot hit him with a ‘Chappal’.

Known for having loose control over his tongue, Congress leader Digvijaya Singh has recently been sidelined by the senior party leaders including Rahul Gandhi. Digvijaya Singh was also reportedly involved in a verbal spat with Rahul Gandhi’s close aide Jyotiraditya Scindia. Singh is also stripped off his preferred Lok Sabha seat of Rajgadh and asked to fight the upcoming polls from the BJP stronghold of Bhopal. So the recent personal attack on Modi can be a desperate attempt by Digvijaya Singh to avert the political oblivion staring at him.

Tej Pratap Yadav resigns from the post of Convener of the Student Wing of the RJD

Fodder scam convict and former Bihar CM Lalu Prasad Yadav’s elder son Tej Pratap Yadav announced today that he will be resigning from the post of Convener of the Student Wing of Rashtriya Janta Dal (RJD).


Tej Pratap made the announcement of quitting the Chhatra Rashtriya Janata Dal on his Twitter handle. Yadav also made certain comments in his tweet which left people wondering what is cooking up in the Yadav family. He tweeted, “Those who think I am naive are naive themselves. I know who holds how much water.” He did not name anyone in his tweet which has left people speculating as to who he was referring to.

Tej Pratap keeps making headlines owing to his unusual ways. Recently he was in the news after he filed for divorce from his wife alleging that he was forced to marry her for political benefit of others. He is also known for his hobby of dressing up as different Gods. He was seen dressed up Lord Shiva during Kanwar Yatra last year and had performed pooja in Baba Baidyanath Dham in Deodhar. Yadav had also once dressed up as Lord Krishna to celebrate New Year.

TDP MLA and Chandrababu Naidu’s brother in law assaults journalist in public view, apologies after video goes viral

Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu’s brother in law and actor-turned-politician Nandamuri Balakrishna, who known for his high-headedness, is once again in the news for assaulting and threatening a journalist from Mojo TV.

The incident took place on Wednesday when the Hindupur MLA from the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), was campaigning in his constituency.

In a video which has been widely circulating on social media, the MLA is seen slapping and giving life threats to the journalist who was filming his campaign. He threw abuses at the media person mercilessly.

The video clearly shows Balakrishna threatening the journalist that he would slit him. (nariki pogulu peduta)

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLGAxLDFgwg]

The MLA who was campaigning in Hindupur was being garlanded by TDP cadres when several children tried to make their way close to the actor-politician, only to be pushed away by people who appear to be the MLA’s personal security personnel. Balakrishna, who saw the journalist filming the entire incident got irked with him and asked the journalist to delete the video immediately.

This followed with Balakrishna threatening and hurling indecent abuses at the journalist. He is heard saying, “Delete it. Delete it,” before he slaps the reporter, even as the latter insists that he did not film anything.

Even as security personnel intimidated the reporter, Balakrishna can be seen saying, “I know how to wield a knife. I even know how to hurl bombs. I will take your life.”

Hours after the incident took place and the video went viral on social media, Balakrishna issued an apology on Facebook for attacking the journalist.

Nandamuri Balakrishna took to Facebook to say, “It was a mistake on my part to assume that people who are taking videos of kids are miscreants. I felt they are misbehaving with the kids. I have no idea they are from the media. I apologize to all media persons who are troubled by my behaviour”.

However, this is not the first time Balakrishna has resorted to such offensive behaviour in public. Actor-politician Balakrishna is infamous for slapping people trying to take selfies with him. In 2004, he was accused of shooting at producer Bellamkonda Suresh in self-defence.

I would have responded to the Pulwama attack within 40 seconds, says Azam Khan

Senior Samajwadi Party, leader and Lok Sabha candidate from Rampur Uttar Pradesh, Azam Khan said that the government’s response to the Pulwama terror attack was delayed. He claimed that had he been the Prime Minister, he would have responded faster.

“I believe that our government delayed the response to the Pulwama attack. Had I been the prime minister, I would not have taken more than 40 seconds to respond”, Khan told Hindustan Times in an interview.

Khan also said that without questioning the government over attacks in Pakistan, he wanted to know why no funerals were held for the persons killed in the Indian air strikes. On the question whether he would invite Mulayam Singh Yadav to campaign for him, Khan said that he did not with Netaji’s wish for Narendra Modi to become Prime Minister again. “I don’t have any differences with him, but I am against his wish for Narendra Modi to become PM”, he said.

The BJP has fielded former SP member Jaya Prada who recently joined the party from Rampur Lok Sabha constituency against the SP stalwart Azam Khan. Jaya Prada had accused Khan of harassing her and attempting an acid attack on her.

Recently Azam Khan’s close aide and SP Sambhal District President Firoz Khan made some indecent remarks against Jaya Prada. He said that the residents of Rampur will now stay entertained and their evenings will be colourful as Jaya Prada would be visiting the district for the campaign.

Khan is also known for making controversial statements. Last year, sedition charges were filed against the SP leader for making anti-Army remarks. Khan had made remarks that suggested that Indian Army indulged in rapes.  “Armed women attacked soldiers and cut off their private parts. They cut the part they had problems with. India should be ashamed. How will the country face the world now?”, Khan had remarked.

Khan being a senior party leader has his own tantrums. In 2014, Azam Khan’s buffaloes had gone missing from his farmhouse in Rampur and within minutes of the alleged theft of buffaloes an entire team of police, led by the then DSP Sadhna Goswami went out hunting for the missing buffaloes.