Home Blog Page 6519

ED files supplementary chargesheet: Nirav Modi’s sister helped divert Rs 1201 crores through shell firms

Along with Nirav Modi, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has started an investigation against his sister, Purvi Modi. As per a report in Hindustan Times, in a supplementary charge sheet filed before the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court, the ED has claimed that Rs 1,201.18 crore was diverted with the active participation of Purvi, Nirav Modi’s sister.

The charge sheet which was filed on March 8 claims that Mehta was a director in Dubai and Hong Kong-based companies which received funds through LoUs by Nirav Modi.

The ED, in the charge sheet say, “The proceeds of crime generated through fraudulent acts have been syphoned off and laundered to various overseas companies and countries for concealment, layering and integration into main financial system through acquisition of properties or through investment in financial assets and layering through various accounts in different countries, with the active partaking by Purvi.”

However, in her reply before the court hearing of the plea filed by ED for the confiscation of Nirav Modi’s properties, Purvi maintained she had nothing to do with the alleged proceeds of the crime.

Meanwhile, the agency had attached her savings account with the syndicate bank which had a balance of Rs 1.96 crore.

Mehta was listed as a director in a shell company floated by the fugitive, Nirav Modi, called Lili Mountain Investment Company based in the British Virgin Islands which he used to transfer Rs 343.02 crore between March 2013 and March 2014.

Moreover, Mehta is also the owner/director of the Dubai-based Fine Classic FZE, which had, in a separate transaction, transferred Rs 446.12 crore to Firestar Holding Ltd in Hong Kong, a subsidiary of Firestar International Pvt Ltd. For this transaction, Firestar issued preference shares to Fine Classic FZE and later transferred that amount to Mehta seemingly as the redemption of those shares.

Additionally, Purvi is listed as a beneficial owner of Singapore-based Novelar Investments Private Ltd and Islington International Holdings Pvt Ltd.

She is also a settler of The Ithaca Trust, which Nirav Modi used to buy at least two properties in New York within a month of leaving India in early 2018.

On May 24 2018, a charge sheet including 24 accused, namely, Nirav Modi, his father, brother Neeshal Modi, sister Purvi Modi, brother-in-law Mayank Mehta and firms M/s Solar Exports, Stellar Diamonds and Diamonds R Us, was filed in the USD 2 billion PNB fraud case stating that over Rs 6,400 crore of bank funds were allegedly laundered abroad to dummy companies.

In fact, investigators had revealed that Purvi, a Belgian citizen, was the point person handling Nirav’s money. She was the third in the family to have Red Corner Notice against her. Interpol’s Loyn office had in September, last year, on the request of the ED, issued a Red Corner Notice against absconding diamond businessman Nirav Modi’s sister Purvi Modi in connection with the Punjab National Bank scam.

Since the fraud came to light, the agencies have been in relentless pursuit to extradite the fugitive Nirav Modi, back to India.

In the latest Nirav Modi has been arrested in London and sent to judicial custody until March 29, meanwhile, the Prevention of Money laundering Act (PMLA) court in Mumbai has given its approval to the Income-tax department to auction 68 paintings and 11 luxury cars owned by the absconding billionaire Nirav Modi in a bid to recover its dues.

Sam Pitroda calls his statement trivialising Pulwama terror attack and shielding Pakistan a ‘trivial matter’

Earlier in the day, Rahul Gandhi’s close aide and confidante Sam Pitroda had stirred a hornet’s nest with his controversial remarks about the Balakot airstrikes conducted by India deep inside Pakistan territory. Pitroda had said that such attacks have happened before as well, as the Mumbai terror attack, and that the Balakot airstrikes were not the right response. He had also asked for proof of the government’s assertions of how many terrorists were killed in the airstrikes considering the foreign media has raised questions. Now, he has made matters worse with his so-called ‘clarification’ on his statement by calling it a ‘trivial matter’.


Sam Pitroda, the Indian Overseas Congress Chief said that he doesn’t understand the controversy here and that he is baffled by the response to his statement. He said it “shows how people react to trivial matters in India”.

He also said that he is asking these questions as a citizen of India and that “he has a right to know what happened”.


Congress too has said that the statements by Sam Pitroda are his personal views and doesn’t reflect the views of the party on the whole.

Sam Pitroda’s remarks also show his utter disdain for Indians on the whole, apart from trivialising the Pulwama terror attack and calling India’s Balakot airstrikes as an incorrect response. In his statement, Pitroda says that the reaction to his statement shows how “Indians react to trivial issues” thereby mocking Indians and their sentiments attached to the martyrs of Pulwama attack and their demand for retribution from Pakistan.

While this “clarification” by Sam Pitroda is no clarification at all and rather, a reinforcement of his earlier statement, Congress too cannot distance itself from the statements by merely stating that these are Pitroda’s personal views. Several Congress functionaries have made similar statements that insult the martyrs of the Pulwama terrorist attack and deride India’s response to the terror strike.

Congress leader B K Hariprasad, a Rajya Sabha MP from Karnataka, had stirred a controversy by mocking the Pulwama terrorist attack which claimed the lives more than 40 CRPF personnel. Hariprasad called the terrorist attack a ‘fixed-match’ between PM Modi and Pakistan.

Goa Congress leader Chellakumar had alleged that the Pulwama attack was orchestrated by PM Modi and went on to ask where were the bodies of terrorists who were killed in the airstrikes and Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala had mocked the martyrs by calling the Pulwama terrorists as “so-called homegrown terrorists”.

In fact, after the dastardly attacks, Rahul Gandhi had himself shown the utmost respect for Pakistan and its terrorists by referring to terrorist Masood Azhar as “Masood Azhar ji”.

The Congress’ party’s official stand seems no different from Pakistan’s and Sam Pitroda’s statements, who is a close confidant of Rahul Gandhi. Congress cannot brush over it by saying that these were his personal views and does not reflect the views of the party.

Union Ministers Piyush Goyal and Harsh Vardhan among seven Indians named in ‘World’s 100 most influential people in climate policy 2019’

Union ministers Piyush Goyal and Dr. Harsh Vardhan are named among the seven Indians mentioned in the “World’s 100 Most Influential People in Climate Policy 2019″, for their significant contribution towards battling climate change.

‘Apolitical’, a global network of for government helping public servants find the people, ideas and partners they need to tackle climate challenges, has published the list on its official website.

They are among the seven Indians who have been recognised for their efforts. The list was unveiled on the late evening on March 20.

According to his profile on the Apolitical’s website, Union Minister for Railways and Coal, Piyush Goyal has been instrumental in speeding up the electrification of nearly 18000 unelectrified villages and has also played an important role in the rollout of a drastic power sector reform and the world’s largest LED bulb distribution programme.

A 2018 Carnot Prize recipient for his contribution to energy policy, Goyal, under his leadership, has led India to witness a massive proliferation of renewable energy through the world’s largest renewable energy expansion programme.

Union Minister for Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Dr. Harsh Vardhan the other Indian who found a mention in the list, has focused on motivating scientists to develop new technologies that address social and environmental problems.

He has also played a vital role in making India a leader in environmental preservation. In 2008, Harsh Vardhan launched the anti-plastic bag campaign in Delhi and the ‘Green Shopper Campaign’, which encourages business enterprises to manufacture environment-friendly products.

The present government understands that Climate Change is one of the serious challenges faced by humanity. Prime Minister Modi has set ambitious targets for his government to achieve clean energy initiatives. Last year, United Nations Environment Programme chief, Erik Solheim, had praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi, for his initiatives to tackle the global issue of Climate Change.

Meanwhile, third in the list was, Pune’s mayor Mukta Tilak, who is also the wife of renowned activist and freedom fighter Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak’s great-grandson Shailesh Tilak. According to her profile on the website, under her guidance, Pune banned all dumping of solid waste and implemented measures to cut down on carbon and improve air quality.

On account of her work, Pune received the Award for Innovative Policy at the 2018 Climate and Clean Air Awards at the Global Climate Action Summit.

Jyoti Kirit Parikh, the executive director of Integrated Research and Action for Development and a member of the Prime Minister’s Council on Climate Change in India who served as energy and environment consultant to the World Bank and the United Nations Development Program was also amongst the seven Indians named in the list. Parikh, in 2007, was also a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change which was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

Amongst others was, a well-renowned environmentalist and political activist, who is also the director of the Centre for Science and the Environment and the editor of the fortnightly magazine, Down To Earth,  and a recipient of the World Water Prize, Sunita Narain.

Another environmental activist, Vandana Shiva, was among those mentioned in the list. Meanwhile, Upendra Tripathy, the director general of the International Solar Alliance and the recipient of the Prime Minister’s Award for Excellence in Public Administration in 2009 along with Varshini Prakash, who is the co-founder and executive director of Sunrise, a youth-led movement advocating for political action against climate change in the United States were also recognised for their contributions.

#JantaMaafNahiKaregi PM Modi calls out Congress for their pro-Pak stand after Sam Pitroda’s shocking comment

Prime Minister Modi today took to Twitter to call out the Opposition for their pro-Pakistan statements following the Pulwama terror attack as well as the airstrikes carried out by Indian Air Force on Jaish-e-Mohammad terror camps across the border in Pakistan.

Coming down heavily on Sam Pitroda, a Congress loyalist and Rahul Gandhi’s trusted aide, Prime Minister called his pro-Pakistan statement shameful.


Emphasising that the new India will not sit quietly and will, in fact, strike back, PM Modi accused Congress of being ‘unwilling’ to respond to terror.


Stating that the opposition is a natural habitat for terror apologists and questioners of our armed forces, PM Modi even called out Samajwadi Party leader Ram Gopal Yadav for casting aspersions that the CRPF soldiers were ‘killed’ for votes by the BJP.


Adding that the opposition has time and again insulted our armed forces, PM Modi appealed to everyone to question the opposition on their despicable statements.


‘Janta Maaf Nahi Karegi’, the people will not forgive, he said.

On Friday, Sam Pitroda, the chief of Indian Overseas Congress and a close confidant of Congress President of Rahul Gandhi questioned the death toll in the Balakot airstrike carried out by the Indian Air Force in response to the Pulwama terror attack while saying that it was wrong to attack Pakistan for Pulwama attack.

Speaking to the news agency ANI on the terror attack which killed over 45 CRPF personnel in Jammu and Kashmir, Sam Pitroda said, “Don’t know much about attacks. It happens all the time. The attack happened in Mumbai also, we could have then reacted and just sent our planes but that is not the right approach. According to me, that’s not how you deal with the world.”

Shockingly, Sam Pitroda further added that it was not right to “punish” Pakistan because of a few terrorists. “Eight people (26/11 terrorists) come and do something, you don’t jump on entire nation (Pakistan). Naive to assume that just because some people came here and attacked, every citizen of that nation is to be blamed. I don’t believe in that way,” Sam Pitroda told ANI.

The statements made by Sam Pitroda are neither shocking nor surprising anymore as Congress leaders have been raising doubts on the Balakot air strikes conducted by the Indian Airforce. Congress President Rahul Gandhi himself was caught on camera dancing just hours after the Pulwama attack. Congress then deleted the video after it was pointed out.

Congress leader B K Hariprasad, a Rajya Sabha MP from Karnataka, had stirred a controversy by mocking the Pulwama terrorist attack which claimed the lives more than 40 CRPF personnel. Hariprasad called the terrorist attack a ‘fixed-match’ between PM Modi and Pakistan.

Similarly, Goa Congress leader Chellakumar had alleged that the Pulwama attack was orchestrated by PM Modi and went on to ask where were the bodies of terrorists who were killed in the airstrikes. Kumar had also floated a conspiracy theory that the Pulwama terror attack, the responsibility of which was claimed by Pakistan based terror group Jaish-e-Mohammad, was an inside job.

Just after the cowardly attack by a Kashmiri terrorist belonging to the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Muhammad claimed 40 lives of our CRPF soldiers, the Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala had rubbed salt on their wounds by alleging that the terrorist was a ‘Home-grown so-called terrorist’.

The Indian Air Force had carried out successful ‘non-military pre-emptive strikes’ on Jaish-e-Mohammad terrorist camp deep inside Pakistan to dismantle the terror apparatus that had inflicted the suicide attack in Pulwama killing more than 40 brave security personnel of the country.

Following the airstrikes, Pakistan had attempted to attack Indian military establishments before Indian airforce intercepted to thwart their attacks. With its strike package comprising of various aircraft, Indian airforce was successful in pushing back Pakistani jets and during the air fight, one MiG-21 Bison was hit after it had shot down a more lethal Pakistan’s F-16.

Jammu and Kashmir: Former HC Judge who gave “Article 370 is permanent” verdict is National Conference’s Lok Sabha candidate from Anantnag

Justice Hasnain Massodi, a former Judge of Jammu and Kashmir High Court, who had delivered a judgment stating that Article 370 is a permanent feature in the Constitution, is now all set to contest in upcoming Lok Sabha elections, reports Live Law.

Reportedly, National Conference led by Omar Abdullah has decided to field the retired judge Justice Hasnain Massodi from Anantnag Lok Sabha Constituency. Massodi, just months before his retirement, had delivered a controversial judgment regarding the status of Article 370 of the Constitution of India.

A bench headed by Massodi along with Justice Janak Raj Kotwal had observed that Article 370, which is included Part XXI in the constitution titled “Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions” has assumed a place of permanence in the Constitution. The bench had held that the Article 370 is beyond amendment, repeal or abrogation, as Constituent Assembly of the State before its dissolution did not recommend its amendment or repeal.

Article 370, a ‘temporary’ provision distinguishes the state of Jammu and Kashmir from other states of the country by providing special autonomy in the functioning of the state. Most of the constitutional provisions which are applicable for other states are not applicable to Jammu and Kashmir.

While hearing a petition in Ashok Kumar vs. the State of J&K case pertaining to the applicability of reservation in the state of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 16 of the constitution, the bench had held that Clause (4A) of Article 16 of the Constitution is not applicable to the State and the constitutionality of Section 6 of Reservation Act and Rules 9, 10 and 34 of Reservation Rules is to be tested on the touchstone of unamended Article 16. It finally held these provisions are ultra-vires Article 16 Constitution of India.

Justice Massodi had observed that “The State of Jammu and Kashmir while acceding to Dominion of India, retained limited sovereignty and did not merge with Dominion of India, like the other Princely States that signed Instrument of Accession with Dominion of India. The State continues to enjoy special status to the extent of limited sovereignty retained by the State.”

“The limited sovereignty or special status stands guaranteed under Article 370 of the Constitution. The only other Constitutional provision made applicable by Article 370 of the Constitution to the State is Article 1. No other provision of the Constitution as provided under Article 370 (1), would be applicable to the State except, by Presidential order in consultation with the State in case the provision is akin to subjects delineated in Instrument of Accession and with concurrence of the State, in case it does not fall within ambit of Instrument of Accession,” the bench had observed.

However, Article 35A and Article 370 are two controversial provisions present in the constitution, providing certain benefits to the people residing in the state. The two provisions- Art 35A and 370 are very much against the idea of equality that has been promised under the Article 14 of the constitution as these two controversial provisions bars people outside the state to exert their rights in the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Since fundamental Rights enjoys precedence over ordinary rights under the Indian Constitution, both Article 35A and 370 are subservient to Article 14, thus making both provisions null and void.

Article 35A is a provision inserted into the Indian Constitution in 1954 by the then Prime Minister Nehru, which provides the Jammu and Kashmir legislature to decide who all are ‘permanent residents’ of the State and confer on them special rights and privileges in public sector jobs, acquisition of property in the State, scholarships and other public aid and welfare.

‘Attacks happen all the time, Airstrikes on Pakistan wrong approach’: Rahul Gandhi’s close aide Sam Pitroda shields Pakistan

On Friday, Sam Pitroda, the chief of Indian Overseas Congress and a close confidant of Congress President of Rahul Gandhi questioned the death toll in the Balakot airstrike carried out by the Indian Air Force in response to the Pulwama terror attack while saying that it was wrong to attack Pakistan for Pulwama attack.

Speaking to the ANI on the terror attack which killed over 45 CRPF personnel in Jammu and Kashmir, Sam Pitroda said, “Don’t know much about attacks. It happens all the time. The attack happened in Mumbai also, we could have then reacted and just sent our planes but that is not the right approach. According to me, that’s not how you deal with the world.”


Shockingly, Sam Pitroda further added that it was not right to “punish” Pakistan because of a few terrorists. “Eight people (26/11 terrorists) come and do something, you don’t jump on entire nation (Pakistan). Naive to assume that just because some people came here and attacked, every citizen of that nation is to be blamed. I don’t believe in that way,” Sam Pitroda told ANI.

Sam Pitroda also asked for proof of how many terrorists were killed in the Balakot Airstrikes referring to the “doubts raised by foreign media”.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw13rkRPUB8]

The statements made by Sam Pitroda are neither shocking nor surprising anymore as Congress leaders have been raising doubts on the Balakot air strikes conducted by the Indian Airforce. Congress President Rahul Gandhi himself was caught on camera dancing just hours after the Pulwama attack. Congress then deleted the video after it was pointed out.

Congress leader B K Hariprasad, a Rajya Sabha MP from Karnataka, had stirred a controversy by mocking the Pulwama terrorist attack which claimed the lives more than 40 CRPF personnel. Hariprasad called the terrorist attack a ‘fixed-match’ between PM Modi and Pakistan.

Similarly, Goa Congress leader Chellakumar had alleged that the Pulwama attack was orchestrated by PM Modi and went on to ask where were the bodies of terrorists who were killed in the airstrikes. Kumar had also floated a conspiracy theory that the Pulwama terror attack, the responsibility of which was claimed by Pakistan based terror group Jaish-e-Mohammad, was an inside job.

Just after the cowardly attack by a Kashmiri terrorist belonging to the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Muhammad claimed 40 lives of our CRPF soldiers, the Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala had rubbed salt on their wounds by alleging that the terrorist was a ‘Home-grown so-called terrorist’.

The Indian Air Force had carried out successful ‘non-military pre-emptive strikes’ on Jaish-e-Mohammad terrorist camp deep inside Pakistan to dismantle the terror apparatus that had inflicted the suicide attack in Pulwama killing more than 40 brave security personnel of the country.

Following the airstrikes, Pakistan had attempted to attack Indian military establishments before Indian airforce intercepted to thwart their attacks. With its strike package comprising of various aircraft, Indian airforce was successful in pushing back Pakistani jets and during the air fight, one MiG-21 Bison was hit after it had shot down a more lethal Pakistan’s F-16.

DMK leader’s company linked with largest ever FDI in Sri Lankan oil refinery project at USD 3.85 billion

A Singapore based company has emerged as the largest investor in a Sri Lankan oil refinery project, with a record FDI of USD 3.85 billion USD. As per a report in The Hindu, the stakes in the company are held by family members of DMK leader and former union minister of state S Jagatrakshakan.

As per reports, Sri Lanka’s Board Of Investments has recently announced the record level investments in the Oil refinery project. In the announcement, Singapore based Silver Park International Pte Ltd, was announced as the highest investor.

As per reports, Sri Lanka’s deputy minister of international trade, Nalin Bandara, has recently announced that Silver Park International and Oman’s Ministry Of Oil and Gas will jointly develop the Oil Refinery. The FDI for the project is being cited as the highest ever in Sri Lanka.

The refinery is to be built over 237 hectares of land at a distance of 235 km from the country’s Chinese owned port, Hambantota.

In this, the Singapore firm, Silver Park International, will be reportedly putting 70% of the share capital, about 1887 million USD. The remaining amount of about 2000 million USD is to be raised as loan capital.

Silver Park International is reportedly owned by India’s Accord Group, a company established by Jagatrakshakan’s family.

However, the government of Oman has reportedly denied being a part of the deal, raising further questions about the FDI and the Singapore-based firm’s involvement in the project. Later, the Sri Lankan officials clarified that though the Government of Oman is yet to sign a deal with the Singapore firm, Oman Oil Company has registered their intention for a 30% stake and Silver Park International is confident of the implementation of the project.

As per a report in The Hindu, Silver Park International is registered with Singapore’s national regulator Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA). Three of the company’s four directors have addresses in Chennai, India. The Three directors are Jagatrakshakan Sudeep Anand, Jagatrakshakan Sri Nisha, and Jagatrakshakan Anusuya.

They are respectively the son, daughter, and wife of DMK leader S Jagatrakshakan. Jagatrakshakan has also been announced as DMK’s Lok Sabha candidate for the Arakonam constituency. He was previously a minister of state for commerce and industry in the UPA-II government.

Jagatrakshakan or his family members have not issued any comments in this regard so far. It is notable here that in July 2016, Income Tax officials had conducted raids on multiple locations related to the former minister. Officials had stated that tax evasion amounting to about Rs 200 crores was suspected. For several days, almost 300 officials had raided residences, offices and other establishments owned by the former minister.

Rahul Gandhi’s lucrative and seemingly clandestine means of income and his links to scam accused FTIL, Unitech

Only recently, OpIndia broke the story about Rahul Gandhi and his dubious land deal with one HL Pahwa in 2008, that connects Rahul straight to arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari. The land that was brought by Rahul Gandhi was purchased at a measly price of Rs. 26,47,000. This land purchase was mentioned in his election affidavit of 2009. HL Pahwa himself has several dubious connections. Robert Vadra and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra had also purchased land from HL Pahwa and then sold it back to Pahwa himself at a much-inflated price. To make good on these payments, Pahwa took money from one CC Thampi who is in turn inextricably linked the arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari and Robert Vadra.

Congress’ response to Rahul Gandhi’s own links with arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari coming to the fore was weak and rhetorical. They accepted that such a land deal took place, however, refused to comment on his links with arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari.

After this story was broken and especially, after Congress’ weak response to it, one began to wonder where Rahul Gandhi makes his money from. Gandhi’s assets have grown exponentially in the past few years if one compares his election affidavits from the year 2004, 2009 and 2014.

Rahul Gandhi’s assets per his election affidavits went up from Rs 55,38,123 in 2004, to over Rs. 2 crores in 2009 and finally, over Rs 9 crores in 2014. It must also be remembered here that in 2011-12, there are allegations that Rahul Gandhi had escaped incomes of Rs. 155 crores through AJL for which, the IT department has slapped a Rs. 100 crores tax notice on Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi. 

With such astronomical increase, one is bound to wonder what Rahul Gandhi source of income is, considering, the only legitimate income according to his public record is that of the salary drawn by him as Member of Parliament, and that interest he earns of his deposits.

While disclosing one’s source of income is not asked for in the affidavits, Rahul Gandhi was neither a professional before getting into politics nor has any declared interests in any legitimate business.

We tried to dig into and piece together what Rahul’s source of income might be.

Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi rent farmhouse to scam accused FTIL

In 2013, Rahul Gandhi and his sister, Priyanka, rented their 4.69 acre farmhouse in Delhi to Financial Technologies (India) Ltd. (FTIL), merely 10 months after a show cause notice was served to National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL), a company promoted by FTIL, for alleged norm violations.

As per an Indian Express report, FTIL had signed an 11-month lease agreement to rent Indira Gandhi Farm House in Mehrauli at a monthly rent of Rs 6.7 lakh. FTIL also paid an interest-free deposit of Rs 40.20 lakh vide two separate cheques of Rs 20.10 lakh each respectively to Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi.

Indian Express also reported that it had sent a questionnaire to the Congress party to which Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala had responded. “Indira Gandhi Farm was rented out for 8 months and 22 days i.e. 1 February 2013 to 22nd October 2013 to FTIL. The entire rent received from the tenancy was disclosed in the income tax returns and income tax was paid in accordance with the law. During the period of tenancy, one Mrs. & Mr Khairnar occupied the property,” Surjewala had said. Surjewala further denied that there was any intervention made on behalf of Jignesh Shah or FTIL by anyone in the Nehru-Gandhi family in any proceedings against them.

The NSEL scam had broken out into the public domain in July 2013. The NSEL was India’s first electronic spot exchange that was established with the purpose of serving as a single market for both manufactured and agricultural products across the country. It started operating in 2008.

After a Department of Corporate Affairs (DCA) order, the NSEL was forced to halt trading of all contracts in July 2013. Eventually, 24 trading entities defaulted on their payment to the spot exchange, which amounted to around Rs.5,600 crores.

In March 2018, the Mumbai headquarters of the FTIL was raided by the CBI. The offices and residences of Jignesh Shah were also raided along with the residences of top executives Shrikant Javelgekar and Joseph Massey.

While the NSEL scam broke out in June 2013, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra rented their farmhouse to FTIL from January 2013 to October 2013. This goes to show that while the multi-crore scam broke out, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi were profiting from FTIL. In fact, The Congress government had exempted the NSEL from complying with the provisions of the Forwards Contracts Regulations Act through a notification dated June 5, 2007. Later, it was discovered that the NSEL traded in contracts which were in violation of the conditions under which it was granted the exemption.

The question of impropriety arises from the fact that while a multi-crore scam was perpetuated because the then Congress government gave concessions to the firm, Rahul Gandhi, who now wishes to lead the nation, was profiting from the scam accused by earning rent every month.

Other rentals of the farmhouse

After OpIndia published the last report about Rahul Gandhi’s financial dealings with HL Pahwa and his connection to Sanjay Bhandari, we received information that Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra also earned astronomical rents by renting the farmhouse to another Industrial house. Together, they allegedly earned over Rs. 3 crores starting from the financial years 2007-08 right up to Financial years 2012-13 by renting this farmhouse to this industrial house. It was after this, that the farmhouse was rented to FTIL started February 2013.

Interestingly, the value of the property that was being rented, the Indira Farmhouse, was listed as a little over 9 lacs in Rahul Gandhi’s election affidavit. Thus, the question that is unanswered at this point is how were Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra earning rent that was 4 to 9 times the value of the property. Further, it is alleged that this Industrial house never took possession of the farmhouse at all though the rent was transferred to Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi.

Property bought from Unitech Ltd, accused in the 2G scam

In an Indian Express report, it was reported that Rahul Gandhi purchased two commercial properties in October 2010. One was worth Rs. 1.44 crores and the other Rs. 5.36 crores. The two properties were located at Gurugram’s Signatures Towers-II which were owned by Unitech.

According to information given to OpIndia by a whistleblower, it is alleged that the agreement to sell had disclosed the value of the property at 1.4 crores and 5.36 crores and only advance payment of a little over 4 crores by Rahul Gandhi was reflected. Allegedly, documentary proof if the rest of the payment doesn’t appear available.

Allegedly, Rahul Gandhi also received interest income during Financial Year 2010-11 to Financial Year 2014-15 on the deposit with Unitech Ltd.

This transaction is rather interesting. While Rahul Gandhi had allegedly paid somewhere around Rs 4 crores (for properties that were valued at far more), he was also receiving interest income from 2010 to 2014-15 on the deposit with Unitech. What is unclear here is whether the Rs 4 crores was paid as advance for the two properties or as an interest-earning deposit? And if indeed it was as an interest-earning deposit, then what was the advance or payment for the two properties purchased by Rahul Gandhi?

Unitech is infamous for its involvement in the 2G scam. In early 2008, Unitech Wireless, a subsidiary of Unitech, was granted a pan-India telecom license by the government for Rs. 1,658 crore under the infamous first-come, first-serve policy. Subsequently, it sold 67% of its shares to Telenor of Norway for Rs 6,120 crore. This placed the value of the company at Rs. 9,100 crores. The stake sale happened when the company had no other asset, therefore, it was only fair to assume that it was the value of the license it held.

Then, the CAG report blew the lid off the scam. It said that the inexpensive spectrum sale caused a loss of Rs. 1.76 lakh crore to the government exchequer while benefiting private entities like Unitech. It was further alleged that rules and guidelines were violated in the process which suggested a collusion between those who got the licenses and those who received it.

Interestingly enough, in his 2009 election affidavit which was filed sometime in April that year, Rahul Gandhi had declared his assets worth to be somewhere around 2 crore rupees. Therefore, within the span of 18 months, Rahul Gandhi acquired the means to buy properties worth Rs. 6.80 crores. Furthermore, in his 2014 election manifesto, his worth had risen to 9 crores.

In his 2014 affidavit, Rahul Gandhi discloses that he had made an advance to purchase property to the tune of Rs. 6,89,14,673. In his previous affidavit of 2009 which was filed in April 2008, his total assets were Rs. 2,32,74,706. Considering the property was purchased in 2018, it is interesting that within the span of 18 months, Rahul Gandhi acquired the means to buy properties worth Rs. 6.80 crores.

This, when according to a Times Now report, in 2010-11, Rahul Gandhi had declared his income from properties as Rs. 68L. This begs the question of where he got Rs 6 crores within 18 months to purchase property?

The timeline of the entire series of events is also interesting. In October 2009, the CBI registered a case into the alleged irregularities in the allocation of 2G spectrum. On October 8, 2010, the Supreme Court sought the then UPA government’s response to the Comptroller and Auditor General’s or CAG report on the alleged scam. In October, the same year, Rahul Gandhi purchased two commercial properties at Gurugram’s Signatures Towers-II owned by Unitech. Needless to say, this property doesn’t find a mention in his 2014 affidavit. Intriguingly, several of such deals struck with dubious, scam-ridden individuals is strategically struck to avoid the hint of it appearing in his election affidavits which is for public consumption.

What is even more interesting, is that in 2017, Judge OP Saini had noted that for the past 7 years, he had been waiting every 7 days for the government to come up with some evidence in the 2G scam, but nothing was submitted. A major part of those 7 years, there was a Congress government in power. 

One wonders then, why the Congress government refused to submit any proof of the 2G scam to the court, while Rahul Gandhi was conducting business with the very people who were involved in the scam. This certainly does raise questions of impropriety and Rahul Gandhi out to answer why he was conducting business, the deal which in itself is shrouded in mystery, while his government was investigating Unitech for a scam? 

After the scam broke into the media, numerous politicians and bureaucrats and businessmen were taken into custody following national outrage. Unitech Managing Director Sanjay Chandra was one of them. He got out of prison in 2012, a year after he went in.

Backops and Rahul Gandhi’s stakes

One of Rahul Gandhi’s many financial interests was one he had in the United Kingdoms. In an affidavit filed for the Lok Sabha Elections in 2004, Rahul Gandhi mentions a property he owned of Backops Limited and three of its European accounts, two of which were with HSBC-UK. The firm was reportedly dissolved in 2009.

This is the same firm in the annual return of which Rahul Gandhi was listed as a British citizen. It was also alleged that Rahul Gandhi was the Director and Secretary of UK based company.

According to the affidavit, the Congress President also owned 83% in Backops Services. It was registered at the Registrar of Companies, New Delhi. According to a Data Services website, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Rahul’s sister, was one of the directors in the firm. The firm last filed its balance sheet on the 31st of March, 2010. Intriguingly, although the firm is mentioned in his 2004 affidavit, it doesn’t find any mention in his 2009 election affidavit. Therefore, the question arises, what happened to the 83% stake that Rahul Gandhi had in the firm?

Even more intriguingly, a Rediff report from June 2004 mentions that the Backops Services was established in May 2002 with one family friend Manoj Muttu and Rahul Gandhi as Directors. It was only on the 25th of March, 2009, merely days before filing his affidavit for the 2009 General Elections that Priyanka Gandhi was appointed as the Director of the firm and Rahul Gandhi ceased to be one.

Therefore, it also emerges that while Backops Private based in U.K. was dissolved in 2009, Backops Services continued to exist in India until the 31st of March, 2010 at the very least with Priyanka Gandhi being instated as the Director in the firm merely days before Rahul Gandhi filed his affidavit for the 2009 Elections.

Also, in the Rediff report from June 2004, it was reported that the firm had an authorised share capital of Rs 25 lakh divided into 25,000 equity shares of Rs 100 each. and Gandhi was the largest shareholder with 2,500 shares. But in his 2004 election affidavit just a couple of months earlier, Gandhi mentions that he had an 83% share in the firm. Therefore, what happened to the rest of the 73% shares he owned in the space of a couple of months? If he sold his shares, then why isn’t any of it mentioned in the 2009 election affidavit?

Questions that Rahul Gandhi must answer

1. How did Rahul Gandhi’s assets from a mere 55 lakh to 9 crores between 2004 and 2014 considering his only legitimate income is that of MP’s salary and he was never a professional in his own right outside of politics?

2. Why did Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi rent their farmhouse to FTIL, merely 10 months after a show cause notice was served to National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL), a company promoted by FTIL, for alleged norm violations? Since the Congress government gave many concessions to FTIL helping the scam being perpetrated, did Rahul Gandhi and his family know the scam accused? If they did, what was the nature of their association?

3. The farmhouse was rented to FTIL while the investigations were ongoing. There are several allegations that the Congress government went slow in prosecuting the NSEL scam accused. Was the business transaction between Rahul Gandhi and FTIL one of the reasons?

4. Before FTIL, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi had rented their farmhouse to another Industrial house. How did Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi earn rent from a farmhouse valued at 9 lakh which was 4 to 9 times the value of the farmhouse? Does this point towards crony capitalism?

5. When Rahul Gandhi bought two properties from Unitech Ltd, one was worth Rs. 1.44 crores and the other Rs. 5.36 crores. The two properties were located at Gurugram’s Signatures Towers-II which were owned by Unitech, did he make good on his entire payment? If not, and if it true that only about Rs. 4 crores have been paid, why was the rest of the money not paid?

6. Unitech was deeply involved in the 2G scam. In October 2009, the CBI registered a case into the alleged irregularities in the allocation of 2G spectrum. On October 8, 2010, the Supreme Court sought the then UPA government’s response to the Comptroller and Auditor General’s or CAG report on the alleged scam. In October, the same year, Rahul Gandhi purchased two commercial properties at Gurugram’s Signatures Towers-II owned by Unitech. Why was property bought from Unitech Ltd days after the SC had sought a response from the Congress government on the CAG report on 2G scam?

7. The SC had said in 2017, that he had waited for 7 years for any evidence to be presented in the 2G case but the government never complied. A majority of that time was under the Congress government. Was there a quid-pro-quo arrangement as far as Unitech is concerned?

7. The 2G scam and the FTIL scam was carried out during the Congress government’s regime. All the deals between Rahul Gandhi and the scam accused also happened during the Congress regime when the investigations were already on. In fact, the deals happened while allegations of Congress government going slow in these investigations were at its peak. Rahul Gandhi should explain this potential impropriety.

8. Backops Private based in U.K. was dissolved in 2009, Backops Services continued to exist in India until the 31st of March, 2010 at the very least with Priyanka Gandhi being instated as the Director in the firm merely days before Rahul Gandhi filed his affidavit for the 2009 Elections. Why? What happened to the 83% shares owned by Rahul Gandhi?

9. In the 2004 election affidavit, Rahul Gandhi declared his total assets to be Rs. 55,38,123. He also had NIL liabilities. In 2009, Rahul Gandhi purchased 2 shops in Metropolitan Mall Saket, Delhi, for Rs. 1,63,95,111. Where did the money come from? What was his source of income?

10. Rahul Gandhi showed Rs 68 lakh as income from house properties in 2011-12. According to an estimate of the going rate, the rent for those shops would be somewhere around Rs. 150 per square feet. The properties that Rahul Gandhi owned were 514 square feet and 996 square feet. Simple math would dictate that from those two properties, Rahul could not have earned a rent of Rs. 68 lakhs. Where did the rest of the money come from considering these were the only two properties listed in his 2009 affidavit.

11. After the OpIndia expose, Congress had admitted that Rahul Gandhi bought land from HL Pahwa. However, they had said that the land was then gifted to Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. Priyanka also has several land deals to her credit with HL Pahwa who sells and then buys the same land back at an inflated price. Even Backops Directorship, was at that time, transferred to Priyanka Gandhi. Is Priyanka Gandhi Vadra not fighting elections in 2019 because the Election Affidavit would open a can of worms?

AAP propagandist tweets false claim about Adani Group, deletes due to fear of defamation

Aam Aadmi Party propagandist Dhruv Rathee was again caught lying and making fake claims on Adani Group. Yesterday, Rathee tweeted an image of a forest in Chhattisgarh claiming that Prime Minister Modi ‘sold off’ 1,70,000 hectares of most dense forest in India to Adani.

Tweet by Dhruv Rathee making false allegations on Adani Group

However, Adani Group took to Twitter to call out Rathee’s lies. In a tweet last night, Adani Group strongly objected to the factually incorrect tweet which made malicious claims against the company. “We have not acquired the referred piece of land nor has the government sold it to us. We do not own any mine in Chhattisgarh,” Adani Group tweeted. Threatened with legal action, Rathee deleted his tweet.

Read also: Pro-AAP video blogger associated with Dhruv Rathee caught spreading fake audio on Pulwama attack

This is not the first time AAP propagandists were forced to delete their tweets because of their false claims against Adani. Last month, in wake of Pulwama attacks, Delhi’s education minister, Manish Sisodia, had made a false claim that Adani Group was supplying electricity to Pakistan. However, when Adani Group called out his lies, Sisodia deleted the tweet quietly without clarifying or apologising for the fake news.

Rathee himself is not new to spreading fake information. In October last year, he was sued for defamation to the tune of Rs. 15 Lakhs by a software engineer and BJP volunteer Vikas Pandey.

also: Dhruv Rathee speaks the same language as the terrorist who killed 40 CRPF jawans in Pulwama attack

PM Modi to contest from Varanasi, Amit Shah from Gandhinagar, Smriti Irani from Amethi: Read full first list of BJP candidates

The Bharatiya Janata Party has released its first list of 184 candidates to contest in 20 different states for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections. The list was announced by Union Health Minister JP Nadda.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi will contest from Varanasi, while BJP President Amit Shah will contest from Gandhinagar, which is vacated by BJP stalwart LK Advani. Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh will contest the elections from Lucknow with Nitin Gadkari contesting from Nagpur.

Most of the cabinet ministers and senior leaders of the BJP, who had contested in 2014 polls have retained their constituency. Union Minister VK Singh is all set to contest from Ghaziabad, Hema Malini from Mathura, Sakshi Maharaj from Unnao, and Smriti Irani from Amethi.

The BJP has fielded Kiren Rijiju from Arunachal West constituency, while Dr Jitendra Singh will be fighting from Udampur of Jammu and Kashmir. Union Sports Minister Rajyavardhan Rathore will contest from Jaipur.

Union minister Babul Supriyo will contest from the Asansol Lok Sabha seat in West Bengal, while Rahul Sinha will contest from Kolkata North and CK Bose from Kolkata South. Union Culture Minister Dr Mahesh Sharma will be contesting from Gautam Buddh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh.

In Karnataka, Union Minister Anant Kumar Hegde is fielded from Uttar Kannada constituency, while Dr.Umesh Jadhav is set to take on Leader of Opposition and senior Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge at Gulbarga. Tamil Nadu BJP President Dr Tamilsai Soundararajan is set to contest from Thoothukkudi (Tuticorin).

Former Governor of Mizoram, Kummanam Rajasekharan will take on Congress leader Shashi Tharoor from Thiruvananthapuram, while Minister Alphons Kannanthanam will be contesting from Ernakulam.

The Bharatiya Janata Party with this announcement of 184 candidates has made gained a massive advantage as opposition parties are still pondering over the selection of candidates. With this announcement, the party cadres of the BJP can begin the preparations for the campaign for their respective candidates and also get sufficient time to analyse the situation on the ground.

The Election Commission announced the dates of the General Election 2019 and the elections will be held in 7 phases instead of 9 phases previously starting from 11th April 2019 to 19th May 2019. The results will be announced on  23rd May 2019.

Interestingly, nearly 900 million voters in this year elections as against 814.5 million in 2014 and out of that, 15 million voters are aged between 18-19 years, presumably, first-time voters will be exercising their right in the upcoming elections.