Home Blog Page 6859

Firm that gave loan to buy land from Robert Vadra received exemptions from I-T Settlement Commission: Reports

0

A report by The Indian Express has revealed a series of transactions that took place between BPSL (Bhushan Power and Steel) and Robert Vadra owned Skylight Hospitality via another company, which are under ED radar. ED has also asked for a response from Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) which provided 500 crore exemption to BPSL, in contravention of rules.

The Bikaner Land Deal of 2011-12

Robert Vadra owned firm Skylight Hospitality had sold a plot of land in Bikaner district of Rajasthan to Delhi-based Allegeny Finlease Pvt Ltd. The 70-hectare plot amounted to ₹5.15 crore.

According to financial records of Allegeny Finlease Pvt Ltd., the amount used to buy the land from SKylight Hospitality came in the form of a loan from BPSL in the same year. BPSL gave ₹5.64 crore to Allegeny as a loan.

Around the same time of the deal, in the month of December 2011, BPSL approached ITSC against a show-cause notice issued to it by Income Tax department. The notice was pertaining to income additions for assessment years 2004-05 to 2011-12 on various accounts that aggregated to over Rs 800 crore.

ITSC acknowledged the response and termed it ”not invalid” in February 2012, only to issue its first draft order in mid-June 2013. In its order, ITSC reprimanded BPSL for non-compliance with norms and provided no respite from IT Acts and punishment. Interestingly, a fortnight later, ITSC again issued a draft order, reversing its warning and exempted BPSL ₹500 crore, bringing down the questioned income addition to ₹317 crore. The reconstituted bench’s decision had completely turned the previous draft order which was issued merely two weeks ago, thus suspicious.

” ….considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the co-operation extended to the Commission during the hearing, immunity is granted from prosecution and penalty imposable under various sections of the Income Tax Act.” The changed draft order said.

During the investigation, it also turned out that land deal between Skylight Hospitality and Allegeny Finlease Pvt Ltd. was also high-priced. Reports say that Vadra’s Skylight Hospitality had brought the same land (Given to Allegeny) at seven times lower rate in Jan 2010, at ₹1 lakh per hectare. But it was sold to Allegeny at a whopping ₹7 lakh per hectare.

In the same year, Mahesh Nagar, an authorised representative of Skylight Hospitality, bought power of attorney on two parcels of land. It was sold to him by a real-estate agent.

At present, the land discussed in deals lays unused and taken over by weeds, on the Jaipur Highway near Gajner. Only the two parcel of land sold as power of attorney has a solar plant owned by Fronche in Gajner.

ED probe and responses from ITSC

ED has written to ITSC for details of the suspicious transactions. The ITSC has been asked to clarify why the decision taken in mid-June by ITSC was turned by the reconstituted bench. Preceding this letter written two months ago, ED had also written another letter on the same lines. At that time ITSC had answered that folders of transactions have got destroyed in a fire accident.

Chairmen of ITSC Akhilesh Prasad said that he is unaware of the controversy and he doesn’t know details about it, as it happened years ago. Indian Express also reported that there has no response from BPSL till date on the controversy.

In recent times this is the second time Robert Vadra has landed in trouble. We have widely covered the controversial links between shady arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari and brother-in-law of Rahul Gandhi, Robert Vadra. We had reported that Dassault had refused to partner with Bhandari’s Offset India Solutions (OIS) due to his proximity to Robert Vadra and that classified documents were found in his possession and was charged under the Official Secrets Act.

ABVP and Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram seek thorough inquiry into Christian Missionary Chau’s visit to North Sentinel Island

0

RSS affiliates Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram and Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) have demanded a thorough inquiry into the incident of killed Christian missionary John Allen Chau approaching the Sentinelese tribe to convert them as reported by Economic Times.

They have reportedly demanded that all those people who were aware of his visit and intention should be charged with sedition. The organisations have approached the tribal affairs minister Jual Oram, requesting him to look into the nexus of officials and evangelists.

In a letter written by them, they have stated that the Sangh Parivar has been working with the tribes of Andaman and Nicobar islands since 1985, but it has never tried to go to the North Sentinel Island as rules didn’t permit them.

The letter further reads, “The intrusion of foreigners in the reserved areas of A&N islands has increased, particularly those having religious motives. The tribal groups of these islands, except the Nicobaris, practice primitive animism (Hinduism). The Christian missionaries, therefore, find it easy to exploit the cultural vulnerability of these tribes and, in evangelical zeal, go all out to convert them to Christianity”.

The letter also points at the failure of the intelligence agencies and the possibility of Chau being a spy. The organisations have sought a meeting with Home Minister Rajnath Singh in this regard and have planned a rally on December 1 to protect the culture of Andaman and Nicobar Tribes.

The Sentinelese people, whose population was estimated to be 40 in the 2011 census, are known to be hostile and resist contact with the outside world. Khagen Soren, who is in charge of the working of the Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram in the Andamans, said the network of Sangh karyakartas have been mobilised to keep tabs on evangelical activities in the region and groups have been made to facilitate visits of Sangh volunteers to tribal households.

The Sangh Parivar has also convinced some members of the greater Andamani tribe that they have been working with for the past few years to present their culture and beliefs at the Bharat Gaurav national conference of the ABVP to be held in Gujarat next month.

Coal Scam: Special Court convicts 5 including former Union Coal Secretary

A Special Court in Delhi has convicted 5 individuals including former Union Coal Secretary H.C. Gupta for alleged irregularities in allocation of coal blocks in West Bengal.


The Court held them guilty for criminal conspiracy and has fixed the date of December 3 for argument on the quantum of sentence.


The case is related to the irregularities in the allocation of Moira and Madhujore (North and South) coal blocks in West Bengal. The contract was awarded to Vikas Metal Power Ltd.

Gupta has been embroiled in several cases. In December 2017, a special court had found Gupta and former Jharkhand Chief Minister Madhu Koda guilty of corruption and other offences by a special court.

The CBI reportedly wanted to close the case but the special judge Bharat Parashar, rejecting the closure report, ordered the five accused to be put on trial. Gupta has been convicted in several cases.

In previous years, despite the cases against him, the bureaucracy had come out strongly in support of Gupta. They had praised him for his “honesty and sincerity” and it claimed that he was being unfairly targeted.

The mega coal scam, known as Coalgate in Indian media had been a major embarrassment for the Manmohan Singh led UPA government. Huge irregularities in the allocation of coal blocks had come to light in 2012 when the CAG had stated that the government had sold leases for 200 coal fields at low prices to benefit a few and cost the ex-chequer the loss of about 1.86 lakh crores.

After Anand Ranganathan’s, Vivek Agnihotri’s tweets, which were critical of judiciary, blocked from being read in India

As the censorship debate rages on across the world, after scientist and columnist Anand Ranganathan, it has now come to light that some tweets of filmmaker and author Vivek Agnihotri have also been withheld in India ‘in response to a legal demand’.

We had earlier reported how Twitter is fast becoming a platform where ideological battles are fought, at times, by stifling the voice of those they disagree with. Earlier, scientist and columnist Anand Ranganathan’s tweets were withheld in India ‘in response to a legal demand’. While Netizens were trying to understand what the ‘legal demand’ was, in response to which his tweets were withheld, it now appears that some of the filmmaker and author Vivek Agnihotri’s tweets have met the same fate.

The following screenshot shows the message readers get while trying to access some tweets of Vivek Agnihotri.

Tweets by Vivek Agnihotri withheld

It appears that as of now, 12 tweets by Vivek have been withheld on Twitter in “response to a legal demand”. Following is a screenshot of the thread where responses from 5th October 2018 can be seen, but the parent tweet of Agnihotri, to which people responded to, has been withheld.

Vivek’s tweet from October ‘withheld’.

According to the Twitter help page, a user would see such a message if the tweet was withheld vide a legal demand, like a court order. While it is still unclear why Vivek’s tweets were withheld, Anand Ranganathan has got some response from Twitter after he wrote to them demanding answers for withholding his tweets.

Anand Ranganathan had repeatedly requested Twitter to offer an explanation as to why his tweets were withheld in India. Today, Ranganathan got a response from Twitter. The response, which was later tweeted by Anand suggests that his tweets were withheld because he tweeted about the contempt notice received by Vivek Agnihotri and thereafter, offered his support to Vivek.


Ranganathan’s tweets where he stood by Vivek against a contempt notice against Vivek, seem to have been banned following a High Court order. If one looks at the order tweeted by Anand, one sees that Vivek Agnihotri’s name is also included

A portion of the court order tweeted by Anand Ranganathan

Right above Anand Ranganathan’s name, Vivek Agnihotri’s name also appears as one of the persons whose tweets are to be withheld. Hence, from above it seems like Vivek’s tweets are withheld in India on basis of the same court order. Vivek was informed of his tweets being withheld on Thursday.

We’d update this article without prejudice to any party when there’s a new development in the case.

Telangana: “Tumhare Baap ko bolun kya”, KCR tells youth who asked him a question

The incumbent CM of Telangana K Chandrasekhar Rao was seen losing his cool again yesterday when he spoke rudely to a man who had asked him a question on reservation quota for minorities.


As per reports, the caretaker CM was addressing a public meeting in Kagazangar in Komaram Bheem Asifabad. During his interaction with the people, a man stood up to ask him a question about the proposed 12% reservation to minorities.

KCR was seen replying to the man,”Baat karte baitho, baitho khamosh baitho” (I am speaking, sit silently).

He showed irritation when the man apparently did not sit down and went on to say, ” Cheptha kadha ra bhai, thondara endhuku padthunavu” (i am going to speak, why are you in such a hurry).

He further added, “baitho khamosh baitho. Bolraha hun na baitho, kya tumhare baap ko bolun kya baatein? (sit silently, I am telling you to sit, shall I tell your father?)

Some volunteers reportedly rushed towards the man asking questions but KCR stopped them.

KCR’s party TRS has long been promising 12% quota for Muslims in the state. He had recently announced in poll rallies that his party will give 12% reservation to Muslims and it is the NDA government at the centre which is obstructing the proposal.

BJP President Amit Shah had slammed KCR for his Muslim quota claim and stated that religion-based reservations are unconstitutional. He had added that as the SC had made it clear that there is a 50% ceiling on total reservations, KCR should make it clear that among the SC, ST and OBCs, from whose reservation cap his TRS government is going to carve out a quota for Muslims. He had added that the BJP will never allow a religion based quota in the country.

Telangana will go to polls on December 7.

Barkha Dutt threatened to get him fired if she’s not allowed entry into sensitive area, claims Retd Air Marshal

Much has been said about how journalists treat the reportage of defence related issues and especially, situations that pose threat to national security. Recently, we observed the 10th anniversary of the gruesome terrorist attack of 26/11, perhaps the first time that the glaring media insensitivity and irresponsibility came to the fore as the Supreme Court itself came down heavily on the media, for potentially compromising national security.

Now, another incident has come to the fore that exposes how brazenly and irresponsibility the media behaves during times of national crisis and in their handling of national security issues. A Retired Air Marshal, Air Marshal S Y Sarur, has taken to Twitter to narrate an incident during the Kandahar hijacking in 1999.

During this situation of pandemonium and the national security issue, Retired Air Marshal S Y Savur has claimed that Barkha Dutt, the ex-NDTV journalist who now freelances doing videos etc in various portals, threatened to get him, then Air Commodore, fired if she and her team weren’t allowed in the Tech area, which by all means, would have been a sensitive area at the time of the hijacking. Retd Air Marshal S Y Savur was the Air Commodore commanding Air Force station in Palam.


Indian Airlines Flight 814 commonly known as IC 814 was an Indian Airlines Airbus A300 en route from Tribhuvan International Airport in Kathmandu, Nepal to Indira Gandhi International Airport in Delhi, on Friday, 24 December 1999, when it was hijacked. The hijacking was said to be done by Harkat-ul-Mujahideen active assistance from Pakistan’s ISI.

The hostage crisis lasted for seven days and ended after India agreed to release three terrorists – Mushtaq Ahmed Zargar, Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, and Maulana Masood Azhar.

Air Marshal Savur’s revelation on Twitter is shocking, to say the least. It is hard to imagine a journalist holding the power to threaten and air commodore to let her enter a sensitive area with impunity.

Update: After the publication of this report, Retd Air Marshal Savur deleted his tweets. He, however, did not deny or retract his statements. The same can be confirmed from his response to Barkha Dutt below:

Editor’s Note: Any commentary or tone in this article is of OpIndia editorial desk alone, and not of Mr Savur.

BJP spokesperson refuses to criticise Sidhu in front of Pakistani guest on TV debate

BJP Delhi spokesperson Tajinder Bagga, who was invited to a debate last night to discuss the Gurudwara Kartarpur Sahib Corridor, refused to criticise Sidhu in front of Pakistani guest saying that it is our internal matter and he would not be critical of Sidhu in front of Pakistani guest.

In the above video, during the debate, Bagga could be heard saying he would not like to discuss grievances he has with Sidhu in front of the Pakistani guest. He added that this is an internal matter of our country and that he would speak up and criticise Sidhu, but not in front of a Pakistani guest.

Speaking to OpIndia, Bagga said that he refuses to indulge Pakistan because of the duality it shows on issue of terrorism. “On one side they are saying if India takes one step forward, we will take two steps for peace, on the other side Pakistan hosts the Khalistan Referendum 2020. And this is just one example, Pakistan has been sponsoring terrorism while talking of making peace effort,” said Bagga.

Khalistan Referendum 2020 is a movement by Sikh separatist groups to influence Sikhs to ‘liberate Punjab from India’s occupation’ through a referendum. A convention is planned in Pakistan in November 2019 to influence Sikhs who visit Kartarpur Sahib Gurudwara who visit the shrine to commemorate Guru Nanak’s 550th birth anniversary.

Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu has come under lot of fire recently for his controversial stand and statements on the relation with Pakistan. His hug with Pakistan Army Chief General Bajwa while sitting next to Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir President during Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan’s swearing-in ceremony had raised quite a few eyebrows. He had recently referred to Imran Khan, who is believed to be a pro-Taliban terrorist sympathiser, as ‘an angel‘. Sidhu was also criticised for posing with Khalistani terrorist Gopal Chawla during the Kartarpur Corridor groundbreaking ceremony.

Sidhu is not the only Congress leader who has shown a softer side to the country which sponsors terrorism on Indian soil. Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar had also hailed Pakistan and shamed Indian leaders in Pakistan while praising Jinnah. Earlier he had called for the support of Pakistan to not only remove the current government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi but also to help Congress come to power.

The fanaticism of ‘All Nations’, the Christian missionary organisation which trained John Allen Chau

We have reported extensively on John Allen Chau’s misadventure in the North Sentinel Island, the Christian missionary who met his death at the hands of the Sentinelese tribe during his attempt to convert them to Christianity.

We have also reported that the head of the evangelical organization, Mary Ho of All Nations that he was a part of, asserted that he had broken no laws contrary to claims by Indian authorities and that he had travelled on a tourist visa because Missionary Visas are not easy to come by. He had risked wiping out the entire tribe to ‘establish the kingdom of Jesus in the island’.

In another report, we have documented how the Christian missionaries harbour some delusional beliefs regarding their conversion agenda. They earnestly believe that every group under the Sun must have a Christian representation for Judgment Day to arrive. And Chau, quite clearly, was willing to risk his own life and that of others to achieve that end.

Today, we are going to delve into ‘All Nations’, the missionary organization which trained Chau. He joined the organization as a missionary in 2017. We shall examine their beliefs and worldview.

Vision and Mission

The Vision and Mission statement on All Nations’ website states, “OUR VISION IS TO SEE JESUS WORSHIPED BY ALL THE PEOPLES OF THE EARTH. OUR MISSION IS TO MAKE DISCIPLES AND TRAIN LEADERS TO IGNITE CHURCH PLANTING MOVEMENTS AMONG THE NEGLECTED PEOPLES OF THE EARTH.” “All Nations aspires to see disciple-making movements in every people group of the world so that Jesus may be worshipped by every tongue, tribe and nation.”

Glorification of Chau

The head of the organization’s statement on Chau’s death turns him into a martyr and lionizes him. “John was a gracious and sensitive ambassador of Jesus Christ who wanted others to know of God’s great love for them,” said Ho. “As we grieve for our friend, and pray for all those who mourn his death, we also know that he would want us to pray for those who may have been responsible for his death.” “We remember too, how throughout church history, the privilege of sharing the gospel has often involved great cost. We pray that John’s sacrificial efforts will bear eternal fruit in due season.”

Such glorification may indeed inspire some other missionary with delusional beliefs to embark upon a suicide mission which could have similar consequences. As per the report on All Nations’ website, Chau had already been in missions to dangerous places such as Iraq and Kurdistan.

Muslims are ‘broken’, says All Nations

There are several other problematic aspects of the organization’s beliefs. They sincerely believe that every non-Christian is ‘broken’. In the section on their website titled ‘People of Peace: How to reach your Muslim neighbours‘, they say of Muslims:

“Muslim refugees are coming to our cities and even some are coming to our neighbourhoods They are lonely. We can be their friends. They are broken. We can connect them to healing. They are seeking. We can introduce them to the One whom they seek.”

The missionary organization regards its evangelism as countering ‘spiritual warfare’. In their list of ‘8 key Global Priorities’, they state, “To actively multiply global w-rship and pr-yer, and counter spir-tual warfare so that AN fulfils its mis-ion through the power of the H-ly Sp-rit, reliance on J-sus, and the pursuit of G-d’s Glory.” Conversion of Muslim refugees is also listed as a key priority. They say, “To develop strategies and plan to engage, disc-ple, and ch-rch plant among the M-slim ref-gee population in Europe, Africa, North America and the ME so that they would reach their own and other peoples in the nations.”

(The portions in quotes have been reproduced exactly as from their website without any correction of presumably typing errors)

‘The God of Hard Places’

The organization also appears to have been aware that their missionaries were risking their lives to convert people to Christianity. There is no indication that they tried to dissuade them from such foolhardy adventures. In an article titled ‘The God of Hard Places’, Skylar Moore reports on the missionary work of one of their ‘church planters’.

The report quotes the missionary as saying:

“When I tell people where I go in ministry, even the local Christians usually discourage me by saying it’s too dangerous, etc. But I find that God opens up opportunities.”

The report does not mention the name of the country she was working in and only refers to it as a ‘closed access country’. The report quotes her further, “I’m the first white person to ever sleep in that village. And it’s really the help of the locals, not the missionaries, that makes the work most fruitful. Every time I preach, God always provides someone out of the crowd who becomes my translator to help with my limited language skills. Often that person becomes a real evangelist in their area. But there is also spiritual warfare: the whole time I was there last time, someone came and set up a black magic booth, demonstrating levitation and all kinds of dark spiritual power to compete with God.”

Then the missionary says, “I see the spiritual side of things even in the animals: pigs and monkeys are known to kill people in that area, and usually when they get close, they attack. My first night in my tent, a pig came right up to me, but instead of charging, it just lay down, as if to guard the place. Then monkeys came and did the same thing, settling into the trees above my tent as if to guard it instead of harming me or trying to steal food. It’s hard to describe the eeriness of such experiences.”

The report ends with the words, “If you have a heart to share Jesus somewhere in the world, even locally, and are wondering where to start, just ask us! We’d love to help you get started. And, thank you for praying for our missionaries and for what God is doing among unreached people groups!”

Thus, we have a clear instance where the organization was completely aware of its missionaries engaging in life-threatening activities and yet, the organization appears to encourage such behaviour in its report.

The missionaries also appear to suffer from a delusion of grandeur. One article states, “On the earth, we have two basic influences, the kingdom of God and the kingdom of Satan, there is no grey area. If we want to be people who carry the presence of God, we are called to discern the two kingdoms and act on God’s alone—not only for our sake but also for the sake of others.”

The Pocket Guide to Church Planting

In their ‘pocket guide to Church planting‘ by Pam Arlund, the organization makes it zealotry abundantly clear. The short guide tells missionaries, “Meet people where they are. Hang out with those who don’t know Jesus. Get outside the Christian bubble. Resist the temptation and emotional need to focus on team issues that absorb your time and energy. Look for pockets of people that have no Jesus followers in them. When you meet people, don’t extract them out to meet your friends. You go and meet their friends.”

Thus, they clearly ask their adherents to even establish an acquaintance with the explicit objective of conversion. Later in the document, the author says, “Encourage young believers to remain friends with their friends! Instead of you bringing the young believer into your world, go and enter into their world. Instead of introducing them to all of your friends, you go and meet their friends. Instead of showing them the places where you hang out, you find out where they hang out and go there.”

Conclusion

Thus, we have at least one documented occasion where the organization was aware that one of its missionaries was taking risks which could potentially cause the person’s death. Yet, going by the tone of the report, it doesn’t appear that the organization ever made an attempt to dissuade the missionary from taking such risks. Ho’s statements on the death of Chau are extremely problematic and could very inspire another delusional missionary to embark on a suicide mission. As per her own admission, she was “surprised by the “soft-spoken, very gentle young man” who had a very “radical call” to find “unreached groups.”

Was she aware that Chau was about to travel to the North Sentinel island risking his life? Did she make any effort to stop him? even more incriminating for All Nations, Ho’s recent statements reveal that she had knowledge about Chau’s trip. She asserted that Chau received 13 immunizations before leaving and quarantined himself. Her knowledge about Chau’s preparations reveal that she was aware about his suicidal mission. Did she then make any effort to stop him? She said further, “He set an example for all of us to follow the purpose that we were created for–to follow the calling that is on our lives and to be fully prepared.”

Taking into account all these things, the organization’s conduct appears to be hazardous to the health of its missionaries and even of “unreached” people like the Sentinelese. In fact, some would argue that the zealotry of such missionaries risks the very right to life and religion of others considering their only mission is to subvert faith, and in the case of the Sentinelese, risk lives. Under such circumstances, should the organization be held responsible for Chau’s death as well?

Congress using slain gangster’s family to appeal for Rajput votes in Rajasthan

As the Rajasthan’s state assembly election campaign reaches its last leg with all the political parties fighting it out till their last breath, the Congress, who has a penchant to indulge in caste-based politics, is trying to use the death of Anandpal Singh, the most wanted gangster, who was celebrated among Rajputs and considered their ‘messiah’ (redeemer).

Reports have emerged that the mother of the slain gangster, Nirmala Kanwar is likely to contest either as a Congress candidate or an independent candidate supported by the Congress in the Rajasthan Assembly elections.

In its latest gimmick, the Congress has also been seen using the slain’s daughter to further their agenda, which thrives on dividing people on the basis of caste, against the BJP. The Congress strategises to use Yogita Singh, slain Anandpal Singh’s daughter as a sympathy card to woo Rajput voters.

Anandpal Singh
File photo of Anandpal Singh

Yogita Singh, while addressing a program under the chairmanship of District President Keshar Singh, Ravana Rajput, in Sujangarh Ravana Rajput Sabha building on Sunday, blamed the BJP government for the death of her father. This program was attended by various Congress leaders, including Congress nominee Bhawarlal Meghwal.

In many such gatherings addressed by the slain gangster’s family, especially his daughter, Congress supporters have raised slogans in gangster’s favour in presence of party candidates. The gatherings see appeal made to the Rajput society to take ‘revenge’ from the BJP government by voting in favour of Congress.

This caste-based campaigning, which the Congress is maliciously using to gain popularity in BJPs’ predominant domain, Rajasthan, was earlier also used to belittle the incumbent government.

Congress carrying on their age old tradition of playing caste-based politics, instead of condemning the protest, in which at least one person was killed and 32 people, including 20 policemen, were injured, latched on to this opportunity to belittle Congress’ biggest threat, the BJP.

Eluding the police for almost two years, the dreaded Rajasthan gangster, Anandpal Singh(47), wanted in 37 cases including murder, finally met his end in a police encounter on June 24, 2017. Anandpal Singh was arrested in 2012 for murder from a farmhouse in Jaipur. In 2015, he dramatically escaped from police custody on his way back from court to a prison in Ajmer.

Belonging to Rajasthan’s Ravana Rajput community, Singh came from a small village in Saawad in Ladon tehsil of Nagaur district in Rajasthan. One of the most dreaded gangsters was, however, hailed by the people of his community for having created employment opportunities for them.

His killing had stirred a controversy with people of the Rajput community protesting, alleging, that the gangster wanted to surrender but was shot dead by the police in cold blood. The protestors and his family had then demanded a CBI probe in the case. Congress’ controversial leader Digvijaya Singh had jumped into the controversy surrounding the death of Anandpal Singh, saying Rajasthan’s Rajput ministers should resign if Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje does not order CBI probe into the encounter of the gangster.

In fact, it has been recently reported that the SOG involved in Anandpal Singh’s encounter is still getting death threats from the gangster’s brothers and close aides. The state government has decided to beef up the security of these police personnel in lieu of the continuous threats being received by them.

This is, however, not the first time Congress has taken recourse to caste-based politics. During the buildup to the Gujarat elections, the Congress party had surprised many by openly declaring its intention to woo Hindus, with Rahul Gandhi going on a literal “temple run” during the state’s campaign. The party further ‘saffronised’ Rahul as a Janeu-dhari Shiv Bhakt’ when rumours spread about his name being registered in the non-Hindu register of the Somnath temple.

We have seen Congress supporting Bhim Army in Uttar Pradesh. They fanned the Bhima-Koregaon violence hailing the protests and blaming BJP for ignoring Dalits. While playing these caste-based politics the party has methodically used the Rohit Vemula suicide case, extended support to people like Hardik Patel and Jignesh Mevani in their attempt to appease the Dalits. They have also tried to encash the ‘Lingayat‘ card prior to the Karnataka elections.

In fact, the deep-rooted, horrendous, casteist bias of the Congress Party was boldly out in the open when their loyalist Mani Shankar Aiyer had audaciously passed a casteist remark calling PM Modi a ‘neech’ aadmi. The Congress subsequently revoking Mani Shankar’s suspension, which had come in lieu of his ‘neech’ comment furthered the parties penchant.

Sonia Gandhi, the party supremo, reportedly too had used the same word to describe Modi in 2014, at a rally in Kushinagar (UP).

Recently, the Congress’ effort to come across as a pro-Hindutva party fell flat when Congress veterans were seen taking a u-turn trying to woo the minority community.

While the Congress desperately tries to prove itself to be a secular party, comments coming from party veterans like Ghulam Nabi Azad referring to Modi as a “Gangu Teli” (Modi comes from the Teli caste) itself proves the deep-seated casteist mindset of the party.

Congress’ desperate attempt to ride two horses at the same time laid exposed several times. What is appalling is that one of the oldest party, rather than addressing issues of development has been resorting to such shallow tactics. As the 2019 general elections draw close, the once grand party of India’s politics seems to be fighting a desperate battle.

‘If core issues were of political relevance, BJP would have lost several elections’: Aashish Chandorkar on ‘The Fadnavis Years’

Editor of OpIndia.com, Nupur Sharma, recently interviewed Ashish Chandorkar, author of the newly released book, ‘The Fadnavis Years’. The book, ‘The Fadnavis Years’, focuses on Devendra Fadnavis’ rise to power and his tenure thus far as the Chief Minister of Maharashtra.

Chandorkar says that he was motivated by the urge to describe things as they are happening currently. He says, “We are pretty bad at documenting contemporary history. People who are even politically aware, their knowledge of what has happened in recent years, what drives politics in each state, the idea of politics for them is very abstract.” He goes on to say that a lot of things has changed in recent years and that there was a need for a contemporary perspective. It is that sentiment that emerged in the form of his book, ‘The Fadnavis Years’.

The author also elaborates on the increasing differences between the Shiv Sena and the BJP. Bal Thackeray’s death was a critical moment in the relationship between the two parties as until then, his towering leadership bound both parties together. From Sena’s perspective, he says, they have been traditionally strong in certain pockets of the state. Combined with the personal ambitions of the leadership of the party to grow their base and the credible threat mounted by the BJP to dislodge it from the stature of the senior partner in the alliance, they ended up taking some decisions which have resulted in a fallout.

The 2014 Assembly elections in the state saw 4 parties contesting for power individually. Chandorkar asserts that the reason for this was that every party wanted to figure out where they stand individually with the Modi factor kicking in. Moreover, the BJP was also more confident about their chances than ever after the Lok Sabha elections. He says, “The BJP’s perspective changed, it was they who were in the lead and they were no longer the smaller party. Because of the Lok Sabha success, the BJP thought why should it compromise when the seat-sharing talks were going on.” He also says that multiple rounds of talks were held where the BJP wanted to continue with the alliance but with the added clause of having the upper hand.

Fadnavis was chosen as the Chief Minister of Maharashtra on the basis a combination of factors. Contrary to popular claims, Chandorkar insists that Fadnavis was not ‘airdropped’ into the national scene after the election. He documents that Fadnavis rose to the position he is in today by rising meticulously through the ranks. Fadnavis’ image as a clean politician worked in his favour, claims Chandorkar. “He is someone people could relate to.” The second factor that works in his favour is his focus on infrastructure and the ‘no-nonsense’ manner in which he has gone about his work.

Agricultural marketing is one of the areas where Fadnavis has significantly improved things. His policy reforms in the agricultural sector have improved things for the better significantly. The infrastructure projects initiated by Fadnavis is another great achievement of his, claims Chandorkar. The metro projects and highway projects he has initiated have made an immediate impact. His communication strategy has also helped him convey his message significantly.

Our Editor also asked Chandorkar about Fadnavis’ perceived lack of support for ‘core’ Hindu issues. He says that he made a conscious decision to not focus too much attention on ‘core’ as he was focused on Fadnavis’ work on policies. According to him, ‘core’ voter is someone who votes unconditionally. He says that he does not dismiss the ‘core’ issues but these are not issues that people vote on. “If these issues had great political relevance, BJP would have already lost several elections.” “If people were actually voting on what people on Twitter call ‘core’ issues, then BJP would have already been nonexistent in the state. What has happened is exactly the opposite,” Chandorkar says.

Chandorkar also believes that Fadnavis hasn’t received the credit he deserves. He says that if BJP goes on to perform well in the state in 2019 Lok Sabha elections, a lot of the credit should go to Fadnavis. The book ‘The Fadnavis Years’ focuses greatly on Fadnavis’ policy reforms and how he has strengthened BJP’s position in the state and has navigated through a highly complicated political scene to only emerge stronger than before.

Aashish Chandorkar’s book, ‘The Fadnavis Years’ can be bought here